Dinarian888
News • Business • Investing & Finance
💥A blockchain-based infrastructure for web2 and web3 AI applications💥
Let's Take A Deep Dive On Fetch.Ai
October 07, 2022
post photo preview
  • Fetch-ai Network is developing the infrastructure and tooling for creating Web2 and Web3 AI applications.
  • FET is the native token of Fetch-ai Network. The current main use cases for FET include:
    • Staking: FET is an access deposit token that acts as a form of stake to demonstrate the desire to behave appropriately.
    • Value exchange between agents: FET is required for two agents to perform an exchange of value in the ecosystem.
    • AI/ML access: FET token enables development of and access to a broad range of machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks that are available on the ledger.
  • The project consists of the following major components working in conjunction:
    • Fetch-ai blockchain system: a 💥Cosmos SDK💥 based self-sovereign blockchain ledger and the supporting tools for developing DApps on the network.
    • Applications built on Fetch-ai: the modular Autonomous Economic Agents (AEAs) and the Digital Twin Platforms that can efficiently and securely communicate peer-to-peer and provide interconnectivity with multiple networks.

Historical daily prices (in USD)

Token Summary

Interesting on-chain metrics that provide a rapid understanding of the state of Fetch

1. Overview

1.1 What is Fetch-ai Network

Fetch-ai Network is a Cambridge-based artificial intelligence lab building an open-access decentralized blockchain based framework with the principal goal of delivering a fully autonomous, agent-based digital economy. The Fetch-ai Network technology stack is built using principles derived from a branch of artificial intelligence known as multi-agent systems. This approach involves solving different problems from the bottom-up by creating individual autonomous software agents that perform actions in the world to accomplish their individual objectives. By combining the actions of multiple agents, it is possible to achieve outcomes that would not be possible with centralized architectures because the environments are too complex, are spatially distributed or involve multiple stakeholders. Blockchain technology involves the design of incentives to successfully coordinate the actions of multiple disinterested parties to achieve a common goal, and can already be seen as the world’s most successful implementation of multi-agent systems. Fetch-ai Network is working to generalize and extend the results from this established research field into new domains in finance, supply chain, mobility, smart cities and IoT applications.

1.2 Token Use Cases

The primary use cases of the FET token are listed below.

  1. Ability to connect agents and nodes to the network: This is an access deposit token that acts as a form of stake to demonstrate the desire to behave appropriately. It modulates the ability for bad actors to flood the network with undesirable nodes or agents due to the escalating cost of doing so.
  2. Value exchange between agents: The FET token is required in order to allow for two agents, regardless of where they are, to perform an exchange of value. The FET token is infinitely divisible, thereby supporting transactions that have very low monetary value, but in aggregate provide new and profound levels of insight.
  3. Access to the digital world: FET tokens are needed to access, view, and interact with the decentralized digital world. This is a space optimized for digital entities: an abstract representation of the real world in many dimensions that allows machines to make sense of and work within. The FET token is needed to gain access to all aspects of this digital world for agents.
  4. Ability to access and develop ledger-based AI/ML algorithms: The FET token enables development of and access to a broad range of machine learning and artificial intelligence tasks that are available on the ledger. These may be primitive services developed by Fetch-ai Network such as: trust and prediction models, or they may be large-scale independently developed services for network users.
  5. For exchange into Fetch-ai Network’s operational fuel: operation costs in Fetch-ai Network are decoupled from the Fetch-ai Network token in a similar way to that of “gas” on the Ethereum network but with additional functionalities designed to increase the stability of such a fuel and look at addressing the issues associated with high and low-velocity economies. Fetch-ai Network’s operational fuel allows access to processor time for contract execution and services for agents.

1.3 Products, technical details, consensus mechanism

The Fetch-ai Network blockchain is an interchain protocol based on the Cosmos-SDK, and uses a high-performance WASM-based smart contract language called Cosmwasm to allow advanced cryptography and machine learning logic to be implemented on-chain. This layer is responsible for securing the network through consensus. It also provides staking, governance, and identity services that support digital twin applications. The Fetch-ai Network blockchain relies on a modified version of the Cosmos protocol’s Tendermint Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism to secure the network. And since the Fetch-ai Network blockchain is Cosmos-based, it can be interoperable with other blockchains in the Cosmos ecosystem via the inter-blockchain communication (IBC) protocol. In addition the Feth.ai technology stack further consists of: an agent framework, an open economic framework and an agent communication network.

The Autonomous agent framework is designed to allow for a decentralized digital economy to manifest where each individual and organization is represented by an autonomous economic entity with its own agency. Designed as an actor-like asynchronous message passing system, the framework allows for a high degree of modularity as components largely communicate via messages. Moreover, the framework can be bifurcated in two parts: the core, developed by Fetch-ai Network and external contributors and packages implementing agent-specific business logic. Figure one presents a simplified illustration of the AEA framework.

The Open Economic Framework (OEF) consists of protocols, languages and market mechanisms agents use to search and find each other, communicate with as well as trade with each other. As such the OEF defines the decentralized virtual environment that supplies and supports APIs for autonomous third-party software agents, also known as Autonomous Economic Agents (AEAs).

The agent communication network is a peer-to-peer communication network for agents. It allows AEAs to send and receive envelopes between each other. The implementation builds on the open-source libp2p library. A distributed hash table is used by all participating peers to maintain a mapping between agents' cryptographic addresses and their network addresses. Agents can receive messages from other agents if they are both connected to the ACN (see here for an example).

2. What is Fetch-ai Network?

2.1 Project overview

Fetch-ai Network is a Cambridge-based artificial intelligence lab building an open-access decentralized blockchain based framework with the principal goal of delivering a fully autonomous, agent-based digital economy. The Fetch-ai Network technology stack is built using principles derived from a branch of artificial intelligence known as multi-agent systems.

2.2 Project mission

Fetch-ai Network is working to generalize and extend the results from established research fields such as blockchain, artificial intelligence and multi agent systems into new domains in finance, supply chain, mobility, smart cities and IoT applications, by creating useful antifragile tools, decentralized apps, protocols and frameworks.

2.3 Project value proposition

By bringing data to life Fetch-ai Network solves one of the greatest problems in the data industry today: data can’t sell itself. With Fetch-ai Network, it can. Data is able to actively take advantage of any opportunity to exploit itself in any marketplace, in an environment that’s constantly reorganizing to make that task as easy as possible. Internet-of-things (IOT) devices inhabited by Fetch-ai Network autonomous agents can increase utilization by capitalizing on short-lived opportunities to sell information that they possess in existing, as well as novel, information services markets: an agent in a vehicle can provide weather and road conditions by simply relaying the activity of its windscreen wiper and washer. Through the deployment of agents in combination with machine learning technology, data and hardware can now get up on their own two feet, get out there and sell themselves entirely free of intermediaries or human intervention.

3.Token sales and economics

3.1 Token sales data

Fetch-ai Network leverages its own native cryptocurrency FET as a utility token and the primary medium of exchange on the platform. FET is used to pay for network transaction fees, deploy AI, and pay for services. Users can also choose to stake FET to participate in securing the network via its Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism and earn rewards in return for contributing to validator nodes.

There is a fixed number of divisible tokens that are used on the Fetch-ai Network network as the digital currency for all transactions, as well as for network operations such as secure communications. Tokens can also constitute an access deposit for both nodes and agents wishing to perform certain operations (as a security mechanism to discourage malicious behavior). Token allocation has been divided amongst public sale, seed investors & private sale, founders & team, advisors, ecosystem, mining rewards, and issuer.

3.2 Token Distribution

The total number of tokens generated is intended to be 1,152,997,5753. No further tokens will be created, but native Fetch-ai Network tokens can be subdivided indefinitely

4. Token Overview & Use Cases

Fetch.ai leverages its own native cryptocurrency FET as a utility token and the primary medium of exchange on the platform. FET is used to pay for network transaction fees, deploy AI, and pay for services. Users can also choose to stake FET to participate in securing the network via its Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism and earn rewards in return for contributing to validator nodes.

There is a maximum supply of approximately one billion FET, which exists both in its native form as an ERC-20 token that can be used throughout the Ethereum ecosystem, and as a BEP-20 Token that can be used throughout the Binance Smart Chain Network. FET can be easily exchanged through a token bridge at a 1:1 ratio for either the Fetch.ai blockchain mainnet or ERC-20 version as needed. Staking on the Fetch.ai mainnet can earn users high rewards with significantly lower transaction fees for users.

There are a range of use-cases which Fetch-ai Network’s multi-agent systems can tap into and create a decentralized digital economy. From service sectors like Travel or Gig-economy to sectors relying on automation and machine learning like Mobility or Supply chain management, Multi-Agent systems can decentralize access to data and disrupt existing data monopolies.

Starfleit: Starfleit is a decentralized exchange (DEX) where transactions occur directly between crypto traders without needing a centralized market maker but instead using an Automated Market Maker (AMM) developed using Cosmwasm smart contracts. The assets available to swap range from native Fetch-ai Network assets, CW-20 assets, IBC transferable assets, and even assets from other chains outside the Cosmos ecosystem, via the Axelar bridge.

Atomix: Atomix enables stablecoin holders to supply liquidity and receive a yearly yield composed of protocol-generated returns and ATMX rewards. That yield is highly competitive compared to returns delivered by decentralized finance (DeFi) and traditional alternatives.

MOBIX: MOBIX (MOBX), is a Move 2 Earn, decentralized micro-mobility marketplace that incentivizes sustainable urban mobility.

Mettalex: A decentralized crypto and commodities derivatives trading platform, Mettalex is addressing pain points in commodities markets like front running, poor liquidity, price manipulation and loss of value in the form of margin calls.

Resonate.social: Resonate (RESO), decentralized social network for Web3 that enables users for the very first time to have a personal AI-powered, trusted social experience that is automatically sanitized from malicious, untrustworthy sources and actors. Built on the Fetch-ai Network blockchain, Resonate.social empowers users to deploy personalized AI proxies to accomplish any Web3 social economic activity on their behalf within and without the network.

Collective Learning:

The Fetch-ai collective learning module is a tool that enables distributed parties to work together to train machine learning models without sharing underlying data with any of the individual participants. Utilizing blockchain technology and AI learning capabilities, it supports and trains its network to learn from private data without having access to it.

  • AXIM: Axim allows businesses to safely and securely connect data silos, improve their understanding via machine learning models and gain valuable insights to help optimize their business functions, without compromising any of their data privacy.
  • DabbaFlow: DabbaFlow, empowers individuals and companies to take more control over their data and turn them into real business outcomes, while keeping their data private and secure. It is the first of its kind end-to-end encrypted file-sharing platform and is the first step on Fetch-ai Network’s mission to bring AI fully to Web3.
  • OpenColearn: Open CoLearn is a platform to give distributed app developers (Web 3.0) the tools to use AI securely while safeguarding consumers' data privacy and ownership. It bridges the gap between consumers who generate a low volume of data and care about privacy and data ownership and developers who want to provide AI predictions or monetize that data in a distributed way.

Notable use-cases for Collective Learning

  1. COVID-19 detection : Multiple participants from the healthcare sector trained a machine learning algorithm using Fetch-ai’s Collective Learning to detect COVID-19 in chest x-rays. During these trials, the trained AI model correctly identified COVID-19 cases from a training set of over 1,434 chest X-ray images with 90% accuracy.
  2. Cancer cell detection: In partnership with Poznan Supercomputing Networking Center (PSNC) on Collective Learning, Fetch-ai and PSNC will train algorithms for hospitals and research centers worldwide to identify and detect circulating cancer cells in patients’ blood or tissue biopsies in the future.
  3. Bosch and Fetch-ai - Predictive Maintenance: Predictive maintenance is a process that identifies potential failures of machinery before they happen.To identify potential failures of manufacturing machinery, Bosch is utilizing Fetch-ai’s Collective Learning to predict potential failures in Bosch’s machinery while maintaining data privacy.
  4. Colearn pAInt: This is an art creation platform that allows groups of creators to automatically generate NFTs using Machine Learning. Each piece is one of a kind and sold via auction on OpenSea. \

4.1 DeFi

  • Botswap.fi: This is an automated DeFi Liquidity Management App where users can manage and protect their crypto assets across multiple different chains such as Ethereum (ETH) and Binance Smart Chain (BSC) on Uniswap and PancakeSwap and automate the process of swapping coins, managing liquidity pools, and more by using the Fetch-ai Network AEAs. Just create an agent, a trigger, choose the pairs in your portfolio you want to protect against rug pulls and that’s all, your agent does the work for you through day and night.

4.2 Mobility

  • Deep Parking: The smart parking application of the future. This prototype was demonstrated at the world’s largest automotive conference in Munich, Germany. Tested on a Tesla, Jaguar, and BMW, along with partners - Bosch, Ocean Protocol and Datarella, Deep Parking is an application built upon AI and blockchain technology that finds parking spaces for automobile drivers that were previously unused. Rather than driving into a parking lot hoping to find a space, a Fetch-ai Network digital twin representing your car will search and autonomously communicate with all the local parking spot digital twins to find the nearest available space to your destination and book it for you, before directing you to it. The digital twins negotiate and agree the terms for the parking booking. Once the user has left the parking space, the payment transactions are sent automatically.
  • DDN (Decentralized Delivery Network): Forget Uber, Lyft, Deliveroo and any other centralized service providers you know of. That’s what DDN or decentralized delivery network is about - where you can interact with a service provider, negotiate your price and travel/have items delivered and have this done autonomously on your behalf. The advantages are plenty - you return value to local economies, you have unparalleled level of privacy and everything is decentralized - which means you keep control of your data

4.3 Travel

  • The FET powered Travel marketplace delivers an alternative method by which bookings can be taken: one where the customer and hotels deal with each other directly and as a result offer significant cost savings for both hotels and consumers. It aims to provide an unparalleled level of privacy for all its users by moving the private data away from centralized entities by keeping it safe in each user’s smartphone and a personalized booking experience.

4.4 Supply Chain

  • The partnership between Fetch-ai Network and LiquidChefs aims to utilize Fetch-ai Network’s Autonomous Economic Agents integrated with its Search and Discovery Framework to build local and transparent supply chains, allowing LiquidChefs to search and connect with any sustainable supplier in its immediate vicinity. By digitizing and automating the LiquidChefs supply chain, Fetch-ai Network infrastructure will create a decentralized supply chain marketplace. This marketplace connects buyers and suppliers agents, in real time, to support dynamic, scalable, multi-agent supply chains.
  • This will allow individuals, organizations and assets to be represented as autonomous agents which work autonomously based on the users’ needs and preferences, such as finding local and sustainable suppliers. The decentralized supply chain marketplace was showcased at the Davos World Economic Forum in 2022.

5. Roadmap & Updates

5.1 Completed Milestones

Completion DateMilestoneCommentary
2020: Q3Launch of AtomixMedium Announcement
2021: Q1First stable release of the Agent (AEA) framework v1.0 releasedLink
2021: Q1Fetch-ai Network Mainnet v2.0 launchedLink
2021: Q2FET listed on CoinbaseLink
2021: Q2DeFi Agents (recently renamed to BotSwap) releasedLink
2021: Q2Multi-modal transport demo at IAAMedium Announcement
2021: Q4App demo for ethical and sustainable supply chains showcased at WEF Davos 2022Medium Announcement
2021: Q4FET listed on BitstampLink
2021: Q4FET listed on GeminiTweet
2022: Q1$150M Development fund launchedLink
2022: Q1Resonate.social launchedLink
2022: Q1FET listed on etoroLink
2022: Q1FET listed on VoyagerLink
2022: Q1Fetch-ai Network joins IBC and FET/OSMO listed on Osmosis DEXLink
2022: Q2FET listed on Kraken, Bitpanda,Link
2022: Q2DabbaFlow (CoLearn) launchedLink
2022: Q3Native FET token listed on Binance USTweet
2022: Q340000 new users onboarded to Fetch-ai NetworkLink

5.2 Current Roadmap

2022 Q3-Q4

  • Fetch-ai Network
    • Maintenance upgrade of the Fetch-ai Network for any security patches from the upstream Cosmos SDK releases
    • Eridanus release which will bring support for Group Module, BLS signatures, and cross chain composability using interchain accounts. This will also include patches from the upstream Cosmos SDK releases
  • External Protocol Integrations
    • Integrate with the Axelar bridge to support bi-directional transfer of Axelar supported EVM assets (including popular stablecoins) between the EVM ecosystem and the Fetch Ecosystem
    • Integrate with the SubQuery Indexer protocol to bring fast querying capabilities to the other Fetch-ai Network products such as the Fetch Wallet, and the Fetch Explorer. Additionally, make it available for the Fetch-ai Network Ecosystem projects by providing a Fetch-ai Network hosted indexing service.
  • Products and Tools
    • Fetch Wallet features
      • Integrating wallet to wallet messaging and notification service, including group messaging and group notification support
      • Swap support with integration of the Fetch-ai Network Ecosystem DEX - Starfleit
      • Other Features (non-exhaustive list)
    • Fetch Station Explorer Features
      • Improved UI/UX for general areas such as accounts and governance proposal
      • Ability to query and interact with contracts
      • NFT support
    • AEA - Autonomous Economic Agent framework and ACN - Agent Communication Network
      • Increasing community engagement to gather feedback for future feature development
      • Release improved documentation and education content on AEAs
      • Initial set of Agent component examples and crowdsourced examples for the AEA registry
    • Jenesis shell tool
      • Initial beta release of Jenesis shell tool to provide scaffolding for bootstrapping DApp development on the Fetch-ai Network
  • Ecosystem and Community (non-exhaustive list)
    • Launch Fetch Improvement Proposal (FIP) process
    • Launch of Fetch’s Digital Twin platform applications
    • Launch of Atomix Real-World Asset (RWA) lending protocol on the Testnet
      • Launch of RWA backed stable coin on the Testnet
    • Launch of Fetch-ai Network ecosystem DEX - Starfleit
    • Launch of GetMySlice GDPR compliant data sharing service

2023 Q1-Q2

  • Fetch-ai Network
    • Formax release supporting Cosmos SDK Lambda upgrade (v9)
    • Gemini release supporting Cosmos SDK Epilson upgrade (v10)
  • External Protocol Integrations
    • Add support for generic message passing from the Axelar bridge to support cross chain and cross ecosystem composability
    • Support upstream changes for the Axelar Bridge integration
    • Support upstream changes for the SubQuery Indexer integration
  • Products and Tools
    • Fetch Wallet features
      • Native mobile wallet
      • Bi-directional Open Banking integration
      • Support for EVM chains
      • Swap support for EVM assets using the Axelar Bridge
      • Off-chain decentralized peer-to-peer communication support
      • Wallet based analytics
    • Fetch Station Explorer Features
      • Launch of the Fetch Name Service
    • AEA - Autonomous Economic Agent framework and ACN - Agent Communication Network
      • Improved AEA registry
      • Improved Agent graphical UI
    • Jenesis shell tool
      • Add contract IDE and testing capabilities
  • Ecosystem and Community (non-exhaustive list)
    • Launch of Atomix Real-World Asset (RWA) lending protocol on the Mainnet
    • Launch of RWA backed stable coin on the Mainnet

5.3 Commercial and Business Development Progress

  • Bosch
    • Bosch is working with Fetch-ai Network as part of the launch of a fully functional blockchain network (v2.0 main-net), testing key features on the test-net. Sharing a common vision, the strategic advance engineering project “Economy of Things” (EoT) at Bosch Research and Fetch-ai Network aim to transform existing digital ecosystems using distributed ledger technologies (DLT) like blockchain.
  • Catena X
    • Catena-X is the first integrated, collaborative, open data ecosystem for the automotive industry of the future.
    • Together with other partners, Fetch-ai Network is supporting the Catena-X group in building a digital ecosystem that provides equal collaboration of all the stakeholders by setting up new standards in the automotive value chain along with building greater manufacturing and supply chain efficiency.
  • moveID
    • moveID is part of the Gaia-X 4 Future Mobility project family consisting of five consortia and aims to develop a decentralized digital identity infrastructure for mobility in Europe
    • Together with partners within moveID, Over the next three years, the GAIA-X 4 moveID project is set to develop the necessary standards and technological concepts to enable the secure exchange of information between providers of mobility applications and their customers. The goal is to create decentralized digital vehicle identities. This is an important prerequisite for the mass use of electric vehicles, automated driving, and the establishment of connected cities. GAIA-X 4 moveID is supported to the tune of 14 million euros by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action – covering half of the project costs.
  • IOTA
    • IOTA is an open-source distributed ledger and cryptocurrency designed for the Internet of things.
    • Fetch-ai Network and IOTA’s collaboration enables granular control over data and to reduce the reliance on centralized systems that take advantage of data.
  • LiquidChefs
    • LiquidChefs specialise in the supply of portable bar hire, events bars and mobile cocktails bars, as well as, slick and stylish bartenders and baristas for any private or corporate event
    • This partnership paves the way for increased transparency within supply chains using autonomous economic agents and was showcased at WEF Davos 2022
  • IAA Mobility 2021
    • The IAA (Passenger Cars) event & brand is known as Germany's leading international automotive trade fair.
    • Fetch-ai Network along with its partners — Bosch, Datarella, and Ocean Protocol showcased our exciting collaboration demonstrating the technology involved in Deep Parking. Deep Parking is an application built upon AI and blockchain technology that finds parking spaces for automobile drivers that were previously unused.

6. Team Overview

Humayun Sheikh
Founder and CEO
Entrepreneur, Investor and Visionary | Founding Investor in DeepMind | Founder, CEO of uVue and itzMe | Passionate about Future of Distributed Economy | Key Focus on AI, Machine Learning, Blockchain and Token-based economies
 
Jonathan Ward
CTO
Senior Algorithm Engineer at DNA Electronics, Research Scientist at EMBL, Led development of novel minimal agency consensus protocol that solves node-as-intermediaries problem and makes blockchain viable for financial applications.
 
Kamal Ved
CPO - Fetch-ai Network
Venture Partner at Lunar Ventures, Executive director at brainbot technologies AG, Independent Technology and Business Strategy Consultant at Bosch.
 
Devon Bleibtrey
CPO - Fetch-ai app
Director of Technology at ESG Automotive USA, Director of Product development at Auklet, Co-Funder at Push Display. Advocate of effective team communication and collaboration.
 

7. Community

Telegram (English)
Telegram (Chinese)
Reddit

 
community logo
Join the Dinarian888 Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
The Genie Is Out Of The Bottle 👀

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Former CFTC Chairman Chris Giancarlo says "the genie is out of the bottle" on crypto, and it’s going to consume the entire financial system 👀

"Wall Street itself is now adopting digital network technology as its very architecture." 🚀

00:00:31
⚠️‼️BANK CEO CONFIRMS THE FEDERAL RESERVE DELAYED HIS BANK FROM FLIPPING THE SWITCH TO CRYPTO‼️⚠️

‼️BANK CEO CONFIRMS THE FEDERAL RESERVE DELAYED HIS BANK FROM FLIPPING THE SWITCH TO CRYPTO‼️

Mike Ring, CEO of Old Glory Bank, explains on the record why his bank's crypto platform has not launched.💯

"So why have we not FLIPPED THE SWITCH and made this available?"🙇‍♂️

Old Glory Bank built NextGen Banking. One bank account with crypto built in.

Customers link their digital assets inside the bank and move between dollars and the blockchain.🌐

The launch was ready. A deal was in place for July 2026 with more than enough capital behind it.

The Federal Reserve cancelled it at the last minute.🔻

"The Fed hates crypto. They do not want a bank like Old Glory Bank to be able to provide you, Main Street, an easy way to get on and off the blockchain."☝️

However, the bank is prepared with a plan B.🔒

A new deal is in place and this one does NOT need the Federal Reserve.😉

"We're doing a deal that does not require Federal Reserve approval. They are not going to stop us. They cannot ...

00:03:04
🔄 Four steps from Alpha to TAO—without selling your Alpha

Forge Lending lets users use supported Bittensor Alpha positions as collateral to borrow TAO. The basic flow is supply, borrow, repay, then withdraw—while remembering that interest accrues and collateral can be liquidated if the position becomes too risky.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Supply Alpha collateral: Deposit eligible Alpha into its supported Forge market and enable it as collateral.

🔹 Borrow TAO against Alpha: Borrow within the market’s limits; your Alpha remains collateral, and interest accrues on the TAO debt.

🔹 Repay the TAO loan: Repay some or all of the debt, including accrued interest, to improve your account health.

🔹 Withdraw your Alpha collateral: Once your account remains healthy after withdrawal—typically after repaying the full loan—you can withdraw the Alpha.

🔎 Why it matters

🔹 Borrowing can provide access to TAO liquidity without selling your Alpha position.

🔹 The collateral remains exposed to market and protocol risks while the loan is open.

🔹 Borrowing ...

00:00:21
🚨 Chutes is being framed as a Hyperliquid-style breakout for decentralized AI inference, with live revenue, verified GPU infrastructure, and a direct challenge to centralized cloud AI 🚨

Chutes is gaining attention as a decentralized AI inference platform that claims to combine real usage, cryptographic verification, confidential computing, and open-source infrastructure into a working production system. The thesis is simple: instead of trusting Big Tech clouds with AI workloads, users get a distributed compute layer built around verification and privacy.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Chutes is live in production and reportedly scaled to more than 1,170 active GPU nodes, including large numbers of Nvidia H200s and Blackwell-class hardware.

🔹 The platform says it has processed nearly 38 trillion tokens since launch across 53 deployed applications and more than 700,000 registered users.

🔹 The team reportedly cut unprofitable usage programs, reduced total token volume, and still improved revenue efficiency, with revenue per GPU rising sharply after removing subsidized traffic.

🔹 Chutes is using post-quantum cryptography, trusted execution environments, and Nvidia confidential ...

🚨 Chutes is being framed as a Hyperliquid-style breakout for decentralized AI inference, with live revenue, verified GPU infrastructure, and a direct challenge to centralized cloud AI 🚨
🚨 JPMorgan’s criticism of the CLARITY Act is fueling a fresh power struggle over who gets to write America’s crypto rules 🚨

A new clash is emerging between legacy finance and crypto legislation after JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon reportedly warned that the CLARITY Act could let crypto firms offer bank-like products without bank-level oversight. The dispute is quickly turning into a larger fight over regulation, competitiveness, and who controls the future architecture of digital finance in the United States.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Jamie Dimon reportedly called the CLARITY Act a threat to the financial system, arguing it could allow crypto firms to offer yield-like products while avoiding the capital, reserve, and oversight burdens traditional banks face.

🔹 Senator Cynthia Lummis pushed back publicly, framing the issue as a global strategic race and warning that if the U.S. does not set digital asset standards, other powers will.

🔹 The core tension is whether the bill creates legitimate regulatory clarity or simply opens the door to regulatory arbitrage for crypto platforms operating outside the traditional banking...

🚨 JPMorgan’s criticism of the CLARITY Act is fueling a fresh power struggle over who gets to write America’s crypto rules 🚨
👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? 🔜

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

👉 Here’s what you need to know:

💠 'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
💠 Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
💠 Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
💠 Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
💠 Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

👉 What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto 👉txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚨 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading
C B R N Excercises Being Conducted Worldwide 🌐

🔌 Exercise Liberty Eclipse & Grid Security: Understanding Infrastructure Resilience 🛡️

​In this broadcast, the channel examines government and utility exercises focused on infrastructure resilience, grid security, and cybersecurity preparedness.

​🔑 Key Insights:

​🔹️ Exercise Liberty Eclipse: Reviews Department of Energy and military drills designed to test response protocols and system resilience against cyber disruptions.

🔹️ Infrastructure Vulnerabilities: Discusses ongoing evaluations surrounding the security of digital controls and power grids in modern utility systems.

🔹️ Global Coordination: Examines international cooperation and standardized monitoring exercises aimed at maintaining critical infrastructure stability.

🔹️ Preparedness Planning: Highlights standard emergency management practices and the importance of robust contingency planning for essential public services.

​🎬

​
#GridSecurity ...

📊 Taopill puts Bittensor’s economic activity on one dashboard

Taopill, launched by Unsupervised Capital founder Sami Kassab, tracks subnet revenue, token buybacks, TAO emissions, and capital flows. It aims to help users assess Bittensor’s activity beyond token prices alone.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Five metrics in one place: The dashboard covers company revenue, subnet revenue, protocol issuance, net flows, and TAO’s issuance relative to organic network activity.

🔹 Buybacks verified on-chain: Taopill tracks subnet revenue used for token buybacks and burns, which it says are verified directly on-chain.

🔹 $51.9M annualized company revenue: The dashboard showed this approximate figure in data captured November 12—not audited annual results.

🔹 $27.9M annualized subnet revenue: This figure reflects revenue from on-chain buybacks in the same snapshot.

🔹 Four subnets lead the list: Lium (SN51), Targon (SN4), Engy (SN53), and Almanac (SN41) were highlighted.

🔹 Data quality remains important: ...

🧠 Google releases Gemini 4 Carbon for complex AI work

Google says Gemini 4 Carbon is now available for developers, businesses, scientists, and eligible consumers. The model is designed for demanding, multi-step coding, research, cybersecurity, and knowledge-work tasks.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Built for complex workflows: Google positions Carbon for long-horizon tasks that require deeper reasoning and repeated verification.

🔹 Available through Google products: Developers and enterprises can access it through the Gemini API; Google AI Ultra subscribers are getting it in Antigravity, the Gemini app, and AI Mode in Search.

🔹 Introductory API pricing: Google lists $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens through November 30, 2026. After that, the stated prices rise to $4 and $20, respectively.

🔹 Benchmark claims come from Google: The company says Carbon ranked first on three workflow benchmarks and cost over 2× less per task than the next-best external model in those tests.

🔹 ...

post photo preview
🎯What’s In Your Vault? — 2026 Edition🎯

Sixteen years ago, I posed a question that appeared to be about money but was never really about money at all. What's In Your Wallet? was written at a moment when the world remained intoxicated by the illusion that a representation of value and value itself were interchangeable. The distinction seemed trivial because the machinery of modern finance operated smoothly enough to conceal it. A bank balance purchased goods. A brokerage statement could be exchanged for assets. A warehouse receipt represented commodities. A title represented property. A promise represented delivery. The system functioned, and because it functioned, few bothered to examine the assumptions upon which it rested.

Yet beneath the smooth functioning of the machine lurked a subtle substitution. Somewhere along the way we ceased valuing the thing and began valuing the description of the thing. We stopped demanding possession and settled for evidence of possession. We became comfortable owning records instead of realities, claims instead of assets, promises instead of substance. The map became more important than the territory because most people never wandered far enough from the roads to discover that the two were not the same.

Reading those observations in 2026 feels less like revisiting an old essay and more like observing a fault line that has slowly widened beneath the surface of the global financial order. What has changed is not the distinction itself. What has changed is that the institutions most responsible for maintaining the abstraction appear increasingly unwilling to trust it.

Around the world, central banks have begun bringing gold home. Not merely purchasing gold, though that is certainly occurring, but repatriating it. Bullion that once rested comfortably in the vaults of London and New York is being moved into domestic custody. Public explanations invoke geopolitical uncertainty, sanctions exposure, strategic resilience, and sovereign security. None of those explanations are incorrect. They are simply incomplete. They describe the circumstances without illuminating the realization that appears to be driving the behavior.

A gold bar in your vault is not the same thing as a claim upon a gold bar in someone else's vault. Since the Templars in Jerusalem communicating with the courts of Europe, promises are not the thing that's promised. They never were.

For decades that distinction could be ignored because confidence in the system remained sufficiently high that possession appeared unnecessary. The custodians were trusted. The networks functioned. The legal frameworks appeared durable. The infrastructure seemed permanent. Under those conditions, claims and assets could masquerade as equivalents because the distance between them was rarely tested. Yet every system eventually encounters moments when assumptions become visible. The freezing of sovereign reserves reveals that ownership and access are not identical. Financial crises reveal that liquidity and solvency are not identical. Infrastructure failures reveal that existence and availability are not identical. Again and again reality intrudes upon abstraction and reminds us that the world beneath the ledger still matters.

This is why the movement of gold deserves more attention than the declarations of economists, politicians, central bankers, or global forums. The repatriation of gold is not fundamentally a commodity story, an inflation story, or even a monetary story. It is a custody story. It is a sovereignty story. It is an acknowledgment that possession remains the final court of appeal whenever confidence begins to wobble.

The irony is difficult to miss. At precisely the moment civilization celebrates digital currencies, tokenized assets, algorithmic settlement systems, cloud-based records, and increasingly abstract forms of ownership, many of the institutions responsible for preserving national wealth appear to be moving in the opposite direction. Public narratives race toward virtuality while institutional behavior quietly migrates toward physical custody. The speeches point toward digitization while the bullion trucks point toward reality.

Perhaps nowhere does this contradiction become more visible than when contemplating the fragility of the infrastructure upon which modern finance rests. We speak confidently of balances, portfolios, reserves, pensions, derivatives, and increasingly digital assets as though they possess an existence independent of the systems that record them. Yet the entire architecture rests upon a remarkably delicate foundation of electricity, communications, computation, synchronization, and trust. We have become so accustomed to continuity that we mistake continuity for permanence.

Consider not catastrophe but interruption. Consider a Carrington-scale solar event, a successful cyberattack, a cascading grid failure, or an electromagnetic pulse. The specific mechanism matters less than the principle. The lights go out. The servers stop responding. The networks cease synchronizing. The endless choreography of verification pauses. Legal claims may survive. Contracts may survive. Accounting entries may survive. Yet the practical ability to verify, transfer, access, or exercise those claims becomes uncertain. The abstractions remain theoretically intact while becoming functionally irrelevant.

Gold occupies a peculiar place within this thought experiment because it exists outside the thought experiment. It requires no password, no network connection, no authentication server, no intermediary, and no continuous electrical infrastructure to affirm its existence. The ledger may disappear. The gold remains. Whether one views gold as a monetary asset, a strategic reserve, or simply a historical curiosity, its persistence reveals something deeper about the nature of value itself. Assets that derive their existence from the systems that record them are fundamentally different from assets that exist independently of those systems.

What fascinates me, however, is not the rhetoric surrounding the so-called Great Reset, because the phrase itself has become one of the most effective distractions of the modern era. During the COVID years, populations were conditioned into increasingly reflexive forms of polarization in which every issue was immediately translated into opposing camps, every observation became a declaration of allegiance, and every question became a test of ideological loyalty. One side treated the Great Reset as evidence of a coordinated conspiracy while the other dismissed it as evidence of irrational paranoia. Both reactions produced the same outcome. Attention became fixed upon the slogan while remaining safely distant from the structure beneath it.

History has never required a committee to produce a reset. Resets emerge whenever claims become sufficiently detached from assets, whenever promises become sufficiently detached from productive capacity, whenever leverage becomes sufficiently detached from resilience, and whenever abstractions become sufficiently detached from reality. Long before a reset acquires a name, it exists as a tension embedded within the architecture itself.

This is why the most revealing actions in history are rarely the ones announced from podiums. They are the quiet movements that occur beneath the rhetoric. While populations argue over narratives, central banks move bullion. While commentators debate ideology, nations secure custody. While attention remains fixed upon political theater, the custodians of monetary power appear to be asking an older and more fundamental question concerning what survives when confidence falters, when access becomes uncertain, and when the systems responsible for recording ownership can no longer be assumed to function exactly as they did yesterday.

History repeatedly demonstrates that major transitions rarely emerge from the causes later assigned to them. Wars, sovereign defaults, financial crises, technological disruptions, infrastructure failures, and natural disasters frequently function as explanatory narratives that make visible contradictions that had already been accumulating for decades. The triggering event receives the blame because it is easier to understand than the architecture that rendered the event consequential. Yet the architecture is always where the real story resides. The event merely exposes what was already true.

Seen from this perspective, the most important question is not whether a particular organization intends to implement a Great Reset. The more important question concerns the conditions under which resets become inevitable. Whenever claims multiply faster than assets, whenever obligations expand faster than productive capacity, whenever financial abstractions drift sufficiently far from physical realities, tensions accumulate that eventually demand reconciliation. That reconciliation may arrive through inflation, restructuring, default, crisis, technological disruption, or events conveniently attributed to forces beyond human control, but the mechanism remains secondary to the principle. Reality eventually reasserts itself because reality is the only foundation upon which any abstraction can ultimately stand.

Viewed through that lens, the repatriation of gold appears less like a financial decision than an institutional acknowledgment that the distinction between claims and assets still matters. It represents a quiet recognition that resilience and possession acquire increasing importance precisely when complexity and uncertainty begin to rise. It suggests that beneath the public narratives, beneath the political theater, and beneath the endless distractions that dominate contemporary discourse, some of the world's most consequential actors may be asking the same question that inspired an essay sixteen years ago. What do you actually possess when the systems recording possession become uncertain?

The question is not fundamentally about gold. It is not fundamentally about vaults. It is not fundamentally about central banks. It is a question about the difference between a thing and a description of a thing, between ownership and access, between claims and assets, between abstractions and realities. It is the question that emerges whenever a civilization becomes sufficiently dependent upon representations that it forgets to examine the realities those representations are intended to describe.

Sixteen years ago I asked what was in your wallet. Watching nations quietly move bullion across oceans and into sovereign custody, the question feels sharper today than it did then. Not because the answer has changed, but because the institutions themselves appear increasingly unwilling to pretend that a claim and an asset are the same thing. The distinction sounded eccentric in 2010. It sounds increasingly obvious in 2026. The most interesting question is whether the rest of us will recognize the significance of that realization before history once again forces the issue on its own terms.

Source

🙏To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

👉 Cashapp: $thedinarian

👉 Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

👉 PayPal: Scan the QR code below 📲 or Click Here: 

👇 Crypto Donations 👇

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
⚠️90 DAYS WITHOUT THE GRID⚠️
Why Governments Are Preparing for Critical Systems to Fail

MIND BEND THEORY | DOCUMENTED INVESTIGATION

The United States is preparing major military installations to continue operating if civilian infrastructure goes down. Britain is telling households to prepare for days without essential services. India is warning that an attack on the financial system can weaken a nation. And the Bank of England is asking what happens when cyber defenses fail—not if they can prevent every attack.

Individually, each development has an explanation.

Put them beside one another, however, and a larger pattern becomes visible.

Over the span of only a few weeks, governments and financial authorities in the United States, United Kingdom and India have publicly discussed preparations for disruptions involving some of the systems modern society depends upon most:

Power.

Water.

Fuel.

Communications.

Banking.

Supply chains.

This does not establish that these governments are preparing for one secret event.

There is no public evidence of a coordinated countdown, predetermined blackout date or single intelligence warning connecting them.

But there is something here that can be documented.

Governments are increasingly planning around a question that sounds very different from traditional emergency preparedness:

What happens when the systems we normally assume will be available are no longer available?

And in the United States, that question has now reached the Pentagon.

DOCUMENT 01

UNITED STATES — FORTRESS AMERICA

On September 30, 2026, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth established a program called FORTRESS America.

The acronym stands for:

Federal Operations for Resilience, Troop Resources, Energy, Supply and Survivability.

The program addresses a vulnerability that rarely receives much public attention:

The world's most powerful military still depends extensively on civilian infrastructure.

Electric grids.

Commercial supply chains.

Communications infrastructure.

Fuel.

Foreign sources of critical materials.

FORTRESS America is intended to reduce those dependencies.

The Pentagon's own public description says the initiative is designed to ensure that major U.S. military installations generate independent power so that bases remain operational even if the civilian grid is taken down by cyberattack or sabotage.

It goes beyond electricity.

The program includes five major areas:

Energy independence

Installation hardening and cyber resilience

Supply-chain and defense-industrial-base resilience

Strategic defense reserves

Space and spectrum resilience

The Pentagon also wants deeper reserves of critical supplies so military operations can continue when ordinary supply lines are disrupted.

The underlying idea is simple:

The military should be capable of functioning even when the infrastructure surrounding it cannot.

An October 7 implementation memorandum obtained by DefenseScoop shows that the Pentagon had already begun establishing the FORTRESS America Program Office and assigning officials to implement those objectives.

Then another piece of the story emerged.

DOCUMENT 02

THE 90-DAY REQUIREMENT

On October 25, Fox News published details from additional FORTRESS America documents its reporters reviewed.

According to that reporting, major continental U.S. military installations are being prepared to sustain essential operations for at least 90 days without outside support.

The essential systems reportedly include:

Power.

Water.

Fuel.

Communications.

Think about the distinction carefully.

The Pentagon isn't telling Americans that the United States will lose electricity for 90 days.

It isn't predicting a 90-day blackout.

Military contingency planning deliberately prepares for scenarios officials hope never occur.

But preparing installations for this possibility tells us something about the scenario being considered.

The Pentagon is building resilience around the possibility that a sufficiently serious conflict or attack could interfere with the civilian systems on which military installations normally depend.

The publicly released FORTRESS material specifically discusses:

Cyberattack.

Sabotage.

Grid disruption.

Foreign supply-chain disruption.

Attacks against installations.

And prolonged military contingencies.

That makes the 90-day requirement significant—but it must be described accurately.

Mind Bend Theory verification note:

The September 30 FORTRESS America program itself is documented publicly.

The October 7 implementation memorandum has been reported and described by DefenseScoop.

The 90-day requirement, however, currently comes from documents reviewed by Fox News, rather than a primary 90-day document independently published for the public.

That distinction matters.

We follow the documents as far as they take us—and no farther.

DOCUMENT 03

UNITED KINGDOM — BE READY FOR THREE DAYS

Now cross the Atlantic.

On October 22, the British government launched its new Be Ready campaign.

This time the audience wasn't the military.

It was ordinary households.

The UK government is asking households that are able to do so to prepare to remain self-sufficient for approximately three days during an emergency.

The government specifically discusses disruptions affecting:

Power.

Water.

Phones.

Internet access.

A Parliamentary Written Statement issued the same day explicitly states:

“The updated advice calls on households to be self-sufficient for three days in the case of an emergency.”

The government recommends maintaining three days of bottled water and non-perishable food.

Its expanded preparedness guidance includes:

Approximately three litres of drinking water per person per day

Three days of non-perishable food

Battery-powered or wind-up radio

Torch and spare batteries

Charged power bank

Essential medications

First-aid supplies

Blankets and warm clothing

Important telephone numbers written down

Basic hygiene supplies

Cash

Why cash?

Because during some disruptions, electronic payment systems and ATMs may not function normally.

That creates an important connection between infrastructure and finance.

Electricity isn't isolated from banking.

Communications aren't isolated from payments.

Modern infrastructure is interconnected.

And failure can move through those connections.

DOCUMENT 04

INDIA — “WARS ARE NOT FOUGHT WITH WEAPONS ALONE”

Three days later, on October 25, another statement appeared.

This one came from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Modi was inaugurating the Reserve Bank of India's newly established Data Centre and Cybersecurity Training Institute in Bhubaneswar.

The facilities are designed to strengthen the technological foundations and cybersecurity resilience of India's financial system.

Four data centres will host mission-critical payment and settlement systems.

But Modi's explanation of why this matters went beyond ordinary cybersecurity.

His official statement says:

“Nowadays, wars are not fought with weapons alone; a nation can also be weakened by attacking its economy.”

He continued by saying India's growing economy requires its banking system to be protected against cyber looters and cyber terrorists.

That puts another critical system into the picture:

Money.

A modern economy depends on digital banking infrastructure almost as heavily as it depends on electricity and telecommunications.

Payment systems move commerce.

Banks hold liquidity.

Settlement systems move money between financial institutions.

Data centres keep those networks functioning.

Disrupt the financial infrastructure badly enough and the consequences don't remain inside banks.

They reach businesses.

Supply chains.

Payroll.

Purchasing.

Markets.

And households.

DOCUMENT 05

BANK OF ENGLAND — WHAT IF CYBER DEFENSE FAILS?

There is another document worth reading.

On June 30, Bank of England Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden delivered a speech titled:

“Agents of Change.”

The subject was artificial intelligence and financial stability.

One section deserves particular attention.

Breeden warned that advanced AI systems are becoming increasingly capable of identifying and chaining together cyber vulnerabilities.

That changes the nature of cyber risk.

AI can help defenders.

But the same capabilities can potentially increase the speed and effectiveness of attackers.

The important change in thinking comes afterward.

Preventing attacks is no longer enough.

Financial institutions must also prepare to recover after a successful attack.

Breeden raised the possibility of simultaneous disruption across multiple financial firms.

She then asked whether critical financial institutions may eventually require completely separate failover capabilities—or even the ability to rebuild compromised core systems from “bare metal.”

In October, Reuters reported that the Bank of England was pushing financial institutions further toward this type of recovery planning.

That represents a subtle but significant change in the question.

It isn't simply:

How do we stop the attack?

It's becoming:

What happens if we don't?

And:

How do we keep the system functioning afterward?

CONNECT THE DOCUMENTS

Now put the documents beside one another.

UNITED STATES

Military installations are being hardened so essential operations can continue when civilian infrastructure is disrupted.

UNITED KINGDOM

Households are being told to prepare for three days without services they normally assume will remain available.

INDIA

The prime minister publicly warns that modern conflict can weaken a country by attacking its economy and calls for stronger protection of banking infrastructure.

BANK OF ENGLAND

Financial authorities are examining recovery scenarios in which cyber defenses have already failed and multiple institutions could potentially be disrupted simultaneously.

These aren't identical programs.

They aren't even aimed at the same people.

And there is currently no public evidence demonstrating that they were coordinated.

But they share one important assumption:

CRITICAL SYSTEMS CAN FAIL.

And resilience therefore cannot begin after the failure occurs.

It has to exist beforehand.

THE SYSTEM BEHIND THE SYSTEM

This is where the story becomes bigger than individual announcements.

Modern infrastructure isn't a collection of isolated systems.

It's a network.

Consider what happens when electricity fails.

Without power, telecommunications eventually become difficult to maintain.

Without communications, electronic payments can be affected.

Fuel pumps require electricity.

Water systems depend on pumping and treatment infrastructure.

Businesses depend on payment processing.

Supply chains depend on communications, transportation and fuel.

Hospitals require electricity, communications, water, medicine and logistics simultaneously.

A serious disruption doesn't necessarily remain inside the system where it started.

It can propagate.

POWER → COMMUNICATIONS → BANKING → COMMERCE → SUPPLY CHAINS

And the dependency runs in multiple directions.

That interconnectedness is precisely why governments plan for resilience.

WHAT THIS DOES NOT PROVE

Mind Bend Theory exists to examine unusual patterns.

But a pattern isn't automatically proof of a conspiracy.

There is currently no public evidence showing that Washington, London and New Delhi are secretly preparing for the same scheduled event.

There is no verified date for a coming global blackout.

There is no public document establishing an imminent 90-day collapse of the American electrical grid.

And the Pentagon's 90-day military resilience requirement should not be interpreted as a prediction that Americans will lose electricity for 90 days.

That would go beyond the evidence.

What the evidence actually establishes is interesting enough.

Governments increasingly consider disruption of power, communications, supply chains and financial infrastructure plausible enough to justify concrete preparation.

The UK is preparing households.

The United States is hardening military infrastructure.

India is strengthening the technological backbone of its financial system.

The Bank of England is thinking about how banks recover after cyber defenses fail.

That isn't speculation.

It's in the documents.

THE QUESTION

Perhaps the most important change isn't what governments believe will happen.

It's what they're preparing to survive.

For decades, infrastructure security focused heavily on preventing failure.

The emerging model looks different:

Assume something eventually gets through.

Assume something eventually goes down.

Build the ability to continue operating anyway.

The Pentagon calls that resilience.

The UK calls it being ready.

Central banks call it operational resilience.

Different terminology.

Same fundamental question:

WHAT STILL WORKS WHEN THE SYSTEM DOESN'T?

DOCUMENT TRAIL

Read the Evidence Yourself

Mind Bend Theory strongly encourages readers to examine the original material rather than relying solely on our interpretation.

🇺🇸 DOCUMENT 01 — FORTRESS America Establishment

September 30, 2026

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's memorandum establishes FORTRESS America as a Department of Defense resilience program.

The publicly reported memorandum establishes the program around installation resilience, independent energy, strategic reserves, supply chains and related national-defense infrastructure.

Source type: Pentagon memorandum / official announcement.

🇺🇸 DOCUMENT 02 — FORTRESS America Implementation Memorandum

October 7, 2026

DefenseScoop obtained the memorandum from Under Secretary for Acquisition and Sustainment Michael Duffey directing officials to begin operationalizing the FORTRESS America Program Office.

It identifies five foundational pillars, including energy independence, installation hardening and cyber resilience, strategic reserves and supply-chain resilience.

Source type: Pentagon memorandum obtained by DefenseScoop.

🇺🇸 DOCUMENT 03 — 90-Day FORTRESS Requirement

October 25, 2026

Fox News reports that documents it reviewed require major continental U.S. installations to sustain essential operations for at least 90 days without outside support.

Source type: Journalistic reporting based on documents reviewed by reporters.

Important: This is not currently being presented by Mind Bend Theory as a publicly released primary 90-day Pentagon document.

🇬🇧 DOCUMENT 04 — UK Cabinet Office Be Ready Announcement

October 22, 2026

The Cabinet Office announces the three-year Be Ready campaign and describes preparation for disruption affecting power, water, phones and internet.

Source type: Official UK government publication.

🇬🇧 DOCUMENT 05 — Parliamentary Written Statement HCWS409

October 22, 2026

The UK Parliament records the government's explicit recommendation that households prepare to remain self-sufficient for three days.

Source type: Official Parliamentary record.

🇬🇧 DOCUMENT 06 — Be Ready Household Emergency Checklist

The government's practical household guidance provides recommendations for water, food, radio, lighting, medication, power banks, emergency cash and other supplies.

Source type: Official UK government preparedness guidance.

🇮🇳 DOCUMENT 07 — Prime Minister of India / RBI Cybersecurity Facilities

October 25, 2026

Official statement documenting the opening of the Reserve Bank of India's Data Centre and Cybersecurity Training Institute and Modi's warning that countries can be weakened through attacks against their economies.

Source type: Official Government of India statement.

🇬🇧 DOCUMENT 08 — “Agents of Change” — Sarah Breeden

June 30, 2026

The Bank of England deputy governor discusses rapidly advancing AI cyber capabilities, simultaneous disruption across financial institutions, separate failover infrastructure and potentially rebuilding compromised systems from bare metal.

Source type: Official Bank of England speech.

DOCUMENT 09 — Bank of England Cyber-Recovery Reporting

October 15, 2026

Reuters reports on the Bank of England's push for stronger recovery capabilities against AI-enabled cyberattacks, including bare-metal recovery.

Source type: Independent reporting.

MIND BEND THEORY

Follow the documents. Separate what they prove from what they don't.

Then ask why the preparation is happening now.

Documents attached to the investigation

FORTRESS America — Sept. 30 memorandum record
Pentagon FORTRESS America implementation memorandum — DefenseScoop
FORTRESS America 90-day documents — Fox News investigation
UK Cabinet Office — Be Ready announcement
UK Parliament — Written Statement HCWS409
India PM's Office — RBI Data Centre & Cybersecurity Training Institute
Bank of England — Sarah Breeden, “Agents of Change”
Reuters — Bank of England cyber-recovery warning

Source

🙏To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

👉 Cashapp: $thedinarian

👉 Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

👉 PayPal: Scan the QR code below 📲 or Click Here: 

👇 Crypto Donations 👇

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
September 13, 2026
post photo preview
Revolut Leak Shows the Cost of Constant ID Collection
Revolut’s mistake is the news, but the bigger problem is the growing number of companies being encouraged or required to keep copies of our most sensitive identity documents.

Online bank Revolut has revealed that it gave out sensitive personal and financial information of an undisclosed number of its customers in response to a fake government request.

The information that was handed over to an “unauthorized third party” reportedly includes names, dates of birth, occupations, addresses, phone numbers, account numbers, transaction histories (including Bitcoin), and even copies of government-issued IDs and onboarding verification selfies.

Revolut claims that derived biometric face data was not.

The company said that the data was handed over in response to an email that came from a real government agency’s domain, but was not actually sent or authorized by that agency.

The email passed several authentication checks (SPF, DKIM, and DMARC) that are designed to establish the authenticity of a message’s origin and integrity, but do not verify the legitimacy of the legal request itself.

Revolut said that it complied with the request “under the reasonable belief that it was an authentic government agency request” – and only later found out that it was not.

Revolut said it later realized its mistake, blocked the email address, and reported the incident to the relevant authorities.

Revolut said that only a “limited” number of its customers were affected by the data leak, and that the company’s systems were not hacked, nor was any money stolen.

The story broke on September 11 when Revolut customers started receiving an email notice about a data leak, and the news was picked up by media outlets the following day.

Revolut notice explaining customer identity and financial data was shared after an unauthorized government email request.

The reason this is a recurring problem is that companies are keeping highly sensitive information about their customers’ identities, and sometimes even financial transactions, for a long time, and this data is then available to be disclosed to third parties – either in response to valid legal requests, or, as in the case of Revolut, fake ones.

One reason for this is know your customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) rules. Revolut’s current UK customer privacy notice spells it out: the company generally keeps personal data of UK customers for no more than seven years after the relationship ends, and sometimes longer – for legal reasons.

This means that even if you close your account, your identity documents don’t disappear.

And while the incident with Revolut happened in the financial sector, it’s by no means the only one that requires customers to hand over sensitive identity information. Discord, a popular chat service, said in an October 9, 2025 security update that government ID photos of approximately 70,000 users may have been exposed after a third-party customer service provider got hacked.

This was not a financial service, nor the same type of attack. But the result was similar – because the underlying business process was the same: requiring and storing sensitive identity documents. In the case of Discord, these were used to review age-related appeals.

It’s hard to do anything about a copy of your old passport, or a photo of your face, or a record of your past transactions. These can be used to identify and profile you, and can be used to carry out targeted fraud. And this can happen even if the initial disclosure didn’t result in financial loss.

The more companies are forced to collect and store such information, and the more of it they have, the more opportunities there are for this data to be leaked, either by the company itself or a third party it works with. That's what makes governments' push for more ID checks just to access ordinary parts of life so reckless.

Source

🙏To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

👉 Cashapp: $thedinarian

👉 Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

👉 PayPal: Scan the QR code below 📲 or Click Here: 

👇 Crypto Donations 👇

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals