TheDinarian
News • Business • Investing & Finance
đŸ’„Wall Street Veteran Is the Face of Crypto in Ripple-SEC FightđŸ’„
December 07, 2022
post photo preview
  • SEC lawsuit against Ripple nears two-year mark
  • Company says it spent $100 million on law firms

Stuart Alderoty is giving the US Securities and Exchange Commission its toughest fight against crypto regulation in one of the industry’s most important tests, even as the FTX debacle grips the world of digital assets.

Alderoty, a 63-year-old lawyer, has spent most of his career working for traditional financial players. As chief legal officer for the payments company Ripple Labs Inc., he’s now at the center of a scorched-earth litigation and public relations battle against the SEC and its chairman, Gary Gensler.

“They want to exert power that the law doesn’t otherwise give them,” Alderoty said in an interview in Washington prior to FTX’s bankruptcy.

The Ripple case is a keystone in the growing debate over regulating an industry that’s sometimes compared to the Wild West. It could soon enter a new phase: A federal judge is reviewing dueling motions from Ripple and the SEC, each asking the suit to be resolved in its favor.

?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbloomberg-bna-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F68%2F71%2Fe1c87a024c148dfe1cd9ac6f2e9a%2Fstuart-headshot-horizontal-6.jpg
Stuart Alderoty
Photo: Ripple Labs, Inc.

Ripple claims it has already spent roughly $100 million to defend the case and, effectively, shield the entire crypto industry from what it calls overregulation by the SEC. Alderoty has turned to a roster of well-known outside lawyers, including the Obama administration’s SEC Chair Mary Jo White and her former deputy, Andrew Ceresney.

Meanwhile, the “crypto winter” descending on digital asset markets this year, and the high-profile meltdown of FTX, has the SEC touting its efforts to protect investors.

Crypto Cools

The closely watched SEC lawsuit against Ripple should provide the first “conclusive decision on whether a crypto asset is or is not a security,” said Tibor Nagy, a New York litigator who has represented crypto industry clients.

The SEC accuses Ripple, its CEO Bradley Garlinghouse, and the San Francisco-based company’s co-founder Christian Larsen of misleading investors by failing to register Ripple’s XRP—one of the world’s 10 largest crypto tokens—as a security.

Ripple raised more than $1.3 billion through an unregistered token offering, the agency said in its lawsuit, filed in December 2020.

The company argues that XRP isn’t an “investment contract,” and thus isn’t subject to the regulator’s authority. Allowing the SEC to regulate the token as a security would open the door to treating other assets—like cars, diamonds, and soybeans—as securities, Ripple said in court papers.

The SEC is feeling vindicated by its approach to crypto regulation. The agency announced Nov. 15, four days after FTX filed for bankruptcy, that it initiated 760 enforcement actions this year that led to a record $6.4 billion in fines and monetary recoveries for investors, up 64% from 2021.

?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbloomberg-bna-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F0b%2F7e%2F5026ae0946bdb82615b125737e95%2Fgettyimages-1234425306.jpg
Gary Gensler, chair of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Photo: Melissa Lyttle/Bloomberg

Regulators often look to show the public that they’re being tough on alleged bad actors after a financial disaster, said Gary DeWaal, a former chair of Katten Muchin Rosenman’s financial markets and regulation practice. Other crypto-related legal issues besides the demise of FTX have emboldened the SEC, he said.

DeWaal cited a November win by the SEC in a federal case in New Hampshire against blockchain payments network LBRY Inc. He said the ruling could expand the agency’s bid to classify digital tokens as securities under its purview.

A victory by the SEC against Ripple “would have a real chilling effect on the crypto space,” DeWaal said.

The SEC and Gensler, which have made no secret of their desire to be the top US crypto cop, declined to discuss the Ripple case. Gensler told Bloomberg News in an interview published Dec. 1 that crypto investors should embrace SEC regulation.

Allies and Adversaries

Alderoty, who grew up in Brooklyn and now lives on the Jersey Shore, joined Ripple as its top lawyer in 2019. He said he “gave up 30 years of networking” in more traditional Wall Street legal roles to try something new.

He put himself through college and law school—both at New Jersey’s Rutgers University—by taking a variety of jobs. He fought brush fires in California, drove a forklift in a light bulb factory, and memorized every US zipcode in the pre-digital era while working for United Parcel Service Inc.

Alderoty went on to serve as general counsel for CIT Group Inc.—a financial services outfit sold to First Citizens BancShares Inc.—and North American legal chief at HSBC Holdings PLC. He also was a litigator for American Express Co. and LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, a precursor to a Manhattan law firm that famously flamed out.

In 2010, Alderoty was part of an advisory committee convened by the US Chamber of Commerce to vet future Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan’s views on business issues after she was nominated for a seat on the high court.

Alderoty gave $10,000 to groups supporting Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) in the last election cycle as the veteran lawmaker faced an onslaught from her own party over Cheney’s role on the Jan. 6 Committee. He also contributed $4,800 to a campaign for Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D.-NY), federal election records show.

Alderoty said he favors reasonable regulation of the crypto industry, but the SEC is playing politics instead of pursuing sound policy. He and Garlinghouse argue that Congress, not unelected agency leaders, should set the standards.

The two Ripple executives said the company has spent big money to make that happen. Garlinghouse said the $100 million figure includes legal bills, as well as discovery and expert witness costs incurred during the SEC litigation and year-long period before its enforcement action. Lobbying costs are separate, the CEO said.

?url=http%3A%2F%2Fbloomberg-bna-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F11%2F45%2F9d84590a40b28a5244187e18824b%2F228267394-1.jpg
Mary Jo White appears at a 2014 hearing of the House Financial Services Committee.
Photo: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg

White and Ceresney, a pair of Debevoise & Plimpton partners, are part of the legal team defending Ripple. So is Michael Kellogg, a founding partner of Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, whose notable clients have included Saudi Arabia’s crown prince.

Alderoty declined to itemize hourly billables for Ripple’s prominent litigators.

Debevoise and King & Spalding have collectively handled more than 50% of Ripple’s litigation caseload in US federal courts in the last five years, according to Bloomberg Law data. More than 20 other firms have also represented Ripple during that time, including Boies Schiller Flexner; Cooley; K&L Gates; Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan; and Skadden, Arps, Slate, and Meagher & Flom.

Ripple has spent $810,000 through the first three-quarters of this year on lobbyists, including those from Michael Best & Friedrich and Williams & Jensen, per Senate disclosures.

Garlinghouse, acknowledging the difficulty in forecasting legal proceedings, said he hopes for a resolution in Ripple’s dispute with the SEC by early 2023.

In the meantime, he said, the company is operating as though it has already lost the case by focusing on international markets. About 95% of Ripple’s business is abroad, said Garlinghouse, in places like Brazil, Dubai, Japan, Singapore, Switzerland, and the UK. Ripple recently sought to expand to the European Union by filing for a business license in Ireland.

“People thinking of starting a crypto or blockchain company shouldn’t do it in the US,” Garlinghouse said.

Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton partner Matthew Solomon and senior attorney Alexander Janghorbani—another pair of former SEC litigators—are representing Garlinghouse in the SEC case, while Larsen has retained a legal team led by Michael Gertzman and Martin Flumembaum of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison.

Flumenbaum has advised numerous high-profile clients, such as former junk bond trader Michael Milken and a late son of disgraced financier Bernard Madoff. Flumenbaum initially agreed to represent FTX founder Samuel Bankman-Fried, but last month backed out over what Paul Weiss called a “conflict.”

An ‘Already Confused Space’

The cross-border collapse of FTX and related implosion of BlockFi have created unwelcome waves for Ripple, which faces off against the SEC in a far different environment than that in which the lawsuit was filed two years ago.

Ripple said in a statement it has no “significant exposure” to the FTX and BlockFi bankruptcies. The company said it doesn’t foresee its business-to-business operations being affected.

Despite industry hopes for a decision that finally ends the uncertainty, the eventual court ruling in the Ripple-SEC case could add more “ambiguity to an already confused and ambiguous space,” said DeWaal, citing the conflicting ways regulators have approached crypto.

Nagy noted that while a “win for the SEC would be a harbinger of more regulatory action,” Ripple “appears to be playing the long game” and is likely to fight the case through appellate courts, if needed.

Ripple is working with legislators and regulators around the world to identify areas of common interest, Alderoty said. He also pledged that the company would remain aggressive in the SEC litigation.

Ripple recently prevailed in a months-long discovery fight over internal SEC communications related to a June 2018 speech by William Hinman, the SEC’s former head of corporation finance. Alderoty has called Hinman’s talk a seminal event that muddied the waters as to how the US classifies digital assets.

The “Hinman documents” remain confidential, but Alderoty has said that he feels more confident about Ripple’s legal arguments after receiving them.

Hinman, who returned last year to Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, declined a request for comment.

Alderoty in recent weeks has used the insolvencies of FTX and BlockFi to routinely take the SEC to task on Twitter. Ripple’s top lawyer intends to keep up the pressure on Gensler.

“His insistence on elevating the SEC’s quest for power over effective regulation in this country is doing deep financial damage,” Alderoty wrote last month.

The case is SEC v Ripple Labs Inc., S.D.N.Y., No. 1:20-cv-10832, 12/22/2020.

Link

community logo
Join the TheDinarian Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like

Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
🚹 THE WEF’S ENDGAME: TOTAL CONTROL OF YOUR LIFE

They’ve stopped pretending.

In their own words:

‱ “If a billion people stop eating meat
”
‱ “We’re developing the ability to track consumers’ carbon footprint.”
‱ “What are they eating? How are they traveling?”
‱ “Meat and dairy producers should pay for the damage they cause.”
‱ “Every cup of coffee you drink harms the planet.”
‱ “Your future protein won’t come from meat.”

This isn’t “climate policy.”

It’s a blueprint for monitoring, pricing, and punishing every part of your daily life — food, travel, purchases, movement, even what you drink in the morning.

The WEF wants a world where your lifestyle is regulated like a bank account — and where dissent is impossible because everything is tracked, scored, and controlled.

They call it “sustainability.”
But we all know what it really is:

Compliance. Surveillance. Obedience.

And the pushback starts now.

00:00:52
Ever wonder why the supposed traffic cameras are still up, even though THEY claim they were for traffic tickets but are no longer used? đŸ€”

🚹 THE CHINA MODEL IS HERE — AND THIS IS WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE

A chilling look inside Shanghai’s AI-powered surveillance “Urban Brain” system — the blueprint for the social credit grid spreading across China
 and soon, the West.

In Pudong, a single control room can monitor every resident in real time:

‱ Every building mapped
‱ Every vacancy tracked
‱ Every elderly person living alone logged
‱ Every movement recorded
‱ Every behaviour scored
And it gets worse.

Trash not sorted correctly?
Cameras catch you from three angles.

Park in the wrong place?
Your violation is uploaded instantly.

Residents themselves are enlisted as watchers — snapping photos, reporting one another, feeding the central AI.

The system then auto-assigns punishments and sends enforcement teams out via mobile app.

This isn’t policing.
This isn’t governance.
This is algorithmic control of human life.

Chinese state media brags that police can now identify every person on the street within one second.

This is the model global...

00:02:20
🔑Blockchain lowers barriers so that everyone wins🔑

With BENJI, Franklin Templeton used the Stellar network to bring its money market fund onchain, reducing the minimum investment from $2,500 to just $25.

Denelle Dixon breaks down what this means for access and inclusion on Thinking Crypto Podcast with Tony Edward.

00:00:39
👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? 🔜

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

👉 Here’s what you need to know:

💠 'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
💠 Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
💠 Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
💠 Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
💠 Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

👉 What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto 👉txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚹 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

.@Grok and everyone else, read this ENTIRE post! If you know SmartMetals, skip 2 paragraphs- you won't know the rest!

https://x.com/ReggieMiddleton/status/1990407690753859856

🚹 BITCOIN ERASED 2025 GAINS, PICTURE REMAINS FRAGILE: ANALYST 🚹

Bitcoin has given back its entire 2025 advance and now trades in the red for the year, according to a Decrypt analysis. Strategists warn the technical set-up is deteriorating, macro liquidity is tightening again, and downside targets 👉 as low as 70k are back on the table.

🔑 Key Points

  • Year-to-Date Flip:

    • BTC peaked near 125k in early October but has since shed 25 %.

    • Friday’s close below 93k puts the largest crypto –2.4 % YTD, erasing the last of the January–March rally.

  • Liquidity Drain 2.0:

    • The U.S. Treasury General Account (TGA) has rebuilt to 820bn as the reopened government spends slower than expected, pulling dollar liquidity out of risk assets.

    • 30-day net TGA additions now –7.3 %, a level that historically coincides with BTC draw-downs of 15-20 %.

  • Technical Breakdown:

    • 200-day moving average (91.2k) is being retested; a weekly close beneath it opens 78k (June low) then 71k (2024 high retest)....

🚹 UBS PARTNERS WITH ANT INTERNATIONAL FOR TOKENIZED DEPOSITS 🚹

Swiss banking giant UBS has entered a strategic partnership with Ant International (the fintech arm of Ant Group) to explore tokenized deposits, aiming to streamline cross-border treasury and liquidity management for multinational corporates using blockchain technology.

🔑 Key Points

  • Partnership Scope:

    • UBS and Ant International will jointly pilot tokenized deposits on a permissioned blockchain.

    • Initial use-case: real-time, programmable treasury sweeps and liquidity transfers between Ant’s subsidiaries and partner banks in multiple jurisdictions.

  • Technology Stack:

    • Ant’s Ant Chain permissioned network will host the tokenized deposit smart contracts.

    • UBS will provide the banking rails, KYC/AML compliance layer, and fiat settlement via its UBS Tokenize platform.

  • Programmability Features:

    • Deposits can be programmed to auto-sweep when balance thresholds are hit, trigger FX conversions, or enforce corporate ...
post photo preview
3I/ATLAS — Secret Laws Of Gravity
Unlocking the future of space travel through the precise calculation of time and orbital trajectories.

"My preliminary analysis suggests two principal hypotheses regarding the reported phenomenon known as '3I/Atlas':

  1. A Coordinated Psychological Operation (PsyOp): The phenomenon may constitute a calculated effort to manipulate public sentiment or induce fear, potentially preceding a planned, large-scale deception (referred to informally as 'Project Bluebeam').

  2. A Highly Anomalous Object: Alternatively, the phenomenon represents an authentic, significant anomaly warranting serious scientific or intelligence scrutiny.

Regardless of its origin, '3I/Atlas' represents an historically noteworthy development that necessitates close, informed observation."

 

~Crypto Michael | The Dinarian 🙏

Abstract Introduction:

New data is now showing something that arrived early and its changing colors as we previously predicted.

In orbital mechanics where trajectories are calculated centuries in advance with accurate precision measured in seconds.

A 11-minute deviation is not a rounding error.

It’s not a typo in the database.

It’s not close enough.

"It’s Physically impossible.”

Now The longest government shutdown in U.S. history still blocking NASA releases while the object executed its closest Fly-by approaches to Mars, The Sun and Venus at the moment of maximum observational blackout.

But orbital mechanics don’t care about “government shutdowns.”

Our observations Don’t Stop.

And the math doesn’t wait for “Press releases.”

The math says this:

“If 3I/ATLAS is natural, it should have lost about 5.5 billion tons of mass.”

It didn't.

1. The 5.5 Billion Ton Problem:

Let’s start with what everyone agrees on: 3I/ATLAS “now” arrived earlier than pure gravitational predictions would allow. Even though we have been mentioning this trajectory change over 2 Weeks ago (October 21st Article HERE) TRACKING 3I/ATLAS .

The scientific consensus explanation? “Natural outgassing” the "rocket effect." As water ice sublimates near the Sun, it creates thrust, like a slow-motion rocket engine powered by evaporating ice. Comets do this all the time. It’s normal. It’s natural. It’s explainable.

Except for ONE problem.

“The Physics Don’t Add Up!”

To generate enough thrust to arrive approximately “11 minutes early” would require shedding a staggering amount of mass.

Our calculations show “over 5.5 billion tons” of gas ejected over the perihelion passage.

Think about that for a moment.

That’s not a little puff of vapor.

That’s not some gas leaking from surface cracks.

That’s 15% of the object’s total estimated mass.

If 3I/ATLAS lost that much material naturally, it would create a debris cloud larger than Jupiter’s magnetosphere—visible to amateur telescopes from Earth. Absolutely impossible to miss in professional observations, and bright enough to be catalogued by every sky survey on the planet.

1.1 ~ The Plume Paradox:

Here’s where it gets interesting:

No such cloud has yet to be observed.

Not by Hubble. Not by JWST. Not by ground-based observatories. Not by the Mars orbiters that watched it pass at 30 million kilometers.

The brightness remained within “expected limits.” The coma showed stable & geometric shifting features. The tail structure now disappeared (but that’s another story). The main one is that: “The debris cloud that should exist — simply doesn’t.”

This isn't a minor discrepancy.

This is complete, mathematical failure of the natural comet hypothesis.

Part 2: The Industrial Signature:

So if natural sublimation didn't create the thrust, what did?

The answer is hidden in the chemistry—specifically, in what shouldn’t be there. “The Nickel Anomaly.” When multiple astronomers analyzed 3I/ATLAS’s spectral signature, they found something extraordinary: “nickel vapor” (Ni) at extreme distances from the Sun, where temperatures should be far too cold for metals to vaporize naturally.

Nickel doesn't just evaporate on its own at those temperatures.

It needs HELP.

And there’s only one known process—natural or industrial—that produces a volatile nickel-carbon compound at cold temperatures which we have said several times previously;

Nickel Tetracarbonyl: Ni(CO)₄

This is not a natural cosmic process.

This is an “industrial chemical pathway” used on EARTH for metal refinement!!!

It forms at 120°C and decomposes at 180°C allowing nickel to vaporize at temperatures where water ice would remain frozen solid.

It is LITERALLY, an industrial refrigerant for metal processing.

The presence of Ni(CO)₄ in the plume tells us two things:

  • The core is not ice — It’s a nickel-rich, engineered structure.
  • The process is not passive sublimation — it’s an active, controlled system.

The nickel vapor isn’t contamination.

It’s not a coincidence.

It’s Exhaust.

3. Secret Gravity (SOEG) Model:

This is where our research team proposes something NEW.

We call it The “Self-Optimizing Ejection Guidance (SOEG) Model”

A Brand New Scientifically defensible framework that explains the acceleration not as chaotic outgassing, but as “controlled propulsion.”

The SOEG Model (Project EE / 3IE)

The System:
‱ Volatile Reservoir — CO₂ ice + Nickel-rich metallic core.
‱ Solar Heating — Perihelion triggers sublimation at optimal moment.
‱ Magnetic Ionization — Internal magnetic field ionizes nickel vapor into plasma.
‱ Anisotropic Jets — Plasma channeled through focused nozzles. (not random cracks)
‱ Thrust Optimization — Maximum momentum transfer with minimal mass loss.

Unlike natural cometary outgassing—which is chaotic, omnidirectional, and wildly inefficient. The SOEG Model Fully Represents: (CONTROLLED, DIRECTIONAL, OPTIMIZED PROPULSION.)

It’s the engineering solution to interstellar navigation: Using a “magnetofluidic drive” that uses the Sun’s + Nearby Planets & Star energy to activate a propulsion system that was BUILT.

The secret is in the magnetic field. By ionizing the nickel-carbon vapor into a high-velocity plasma jet, the system achieves thrust efficiencies that natural sublimation could never match.

This isn’t science fiction. This is “magnetohydrodynamics” the same physics that powers experimental plasma thrusters being developed by NASA and ESA for deep-space missions.

The difference?

We’re building prototypes


Someone else already perfected it.

4. The Scientific Statistical Test:

Here’s what makes it undeniable.

Natural comets exhibit HIGH temporal variance in their acceleration parameters.

Technical terms like (A₁) and (A₂) that describe how thrust changes over time. Natural outgassing is messy, chaotic & unpredictable.

Our Prediction:

We formally predict that when sufficient post-perihelion data is published — expected from JUICE observations (data release February 2026) and ground-based telescopes through December 2025— 3I/ATLAS WILL show:

  • (A₂ parameter near zero) — phase-locked rotational coherence.
  • Temporal drift < 0.5σ — stability far beyond natural variance.
  • “Thrust vector alignment” with rotational axis — body-fixed engine signature.

If ALL 3 conditions are met.

The probability that 3I/ATLAS is a natural comet drops below 0.01% (a >4σ statistical rejection).

This is not speculation. This is a time-stamped, falsifiable prediction.

By February — March 2026, we will either be proven right or wrong.

The data doesn’t care about our theories. It only cares about what actually happens.

5. The Blue Hue đŸ””:

Now there’s one more piece of evidence—and it’s visible to the naked eye (well, through a telescope). “The Color Anomaly.”

Natural comets scatter sunlight off dust particles, producing a yellowish-red glow. At 1.36 AU from the Sun, 3I/ATLAS should have appeared reddish-orange from thermal emission.

Instead, observers noted something strange: “A distinct blue fluorescence” in the coma.

What Blue Light Means?

Blue emission in a comet’s coma comes from highly ionized species—primarily “CO” (carbon monoxide ions) and certain excited metallic vapors. This requires enormous, “FOCUSED” energy to achieve.

You don’t get this level of ionization from passive solar heating. You get it from ~ Active Plasma Generation. The blue hue is the visible proof of the SOEG engine operating at perihelion. It’s the "engine glow" of a magnetofluidic drive generating high-energy plasma to achieve maximum thrust efficiency.

Compare:
- Natural comets (Hale-Bopp, NEOWISE, 67P, Etc.): Usual Yellowish-red dust scattering.
- Expected for 3I/ATLAS at 1.36 AU: Reddish-orange thermal glow.
- Observed in 3I/ATLAS: Distinct “Blue” plasma fluorescence.

This isn't subtle.

This is the difference between reflected sunlight and an active thruster firing.

5.5 ~ Convergence of Evidence:

Let's put it all together.

The Self-Optimizing Ejection Guidance (SOEG) Model is not speculation. It’s not wild theorizing. It’s one of the only frameworks that coherently explains:

✅ The early arrival— non-gravitational acceleration without natural explanation.

✅ The missing 5.5-billion-ton debris cloud — controlled thrust with minimal mass loss.

✅ The Ni(CO)₄ industrial signature — engineered propulsion chemistry.

✅ The blue plasma glow — active ionization system visible during perihelion.

✅ The statistical impossibility — phase-locked stability beyond natural variance. (pending verification)

However each piece of evidence, standing alone, is anomalous but potentially explainable.

Together, they form an interlocking pattern that demands a technological origin.

But then there’s the Silence.

Venus conjunction: Still offline.

This is not incompetence.

This is recognition.

THEY know something we’re still calculating.

December 19, 2025: 3I/ATLAS reaches closest approach to Earth at 167 million miles.

“If the calculations are correct, the 5.5-billion-ton debris cloud should be impossible to miss. Every telescope on the planet will be watching.”

All of this new information scheduled to be released should definitely include the following: High-resolution spectroscopy, morphological analysis, particle environment data and MOST CRITICALLY the astrometric parameters that will confirm or refute our SOEG model’s predictions.

“If the A₂ parameter shows phase-locked stability, the SOEG model is confirmed.”

Conclusion:

The Numbers Don’t Lie. The orbital path was not set by gravity alone. The acceleration was not powered by ice. The chemistry was not natural. And the timing is not “coincidental.”

3I/ATLAS is a message written in orbital mechanics, plasma physics, and industrial chemistry—a message we have “74 days” left to fully decode.

The mathematics are clear.

The predictions are calculated.

We don't have to speculate about what it is.

“We just have to (wait) for the complete data packet to arrive.”

And when it does, one of two things will happen:

Either the natural hypothesis survives (unlikely, given the evidence). Or we confirm what the numbers have been screaming to us since October are TRUE.

“Something pushed it. Something controlled it. Something arrived exactly when it needed to.”

Or The A-parameters will lock.

The plasma signature will confirm.

The debris cloud will be absent.

And the institutional silence will make perfect sense.

Because you don’t announce a discovery like this through a press release.

You announce it through a “Calculated Strategy.”

Analogy Conclusion:

The orbital path was set by laws that were not known,
For where the starlight failed, a force was subtly sown.

No dust and ice, but Nickel in the plume’s blue gleam,
A pulse of hidden power, of controlled, forgotten dreams.

The A-Parameter locks, The true secret of the sphere,
The Simultaneous Truth arrives, When all the numbers are near.

— Earth Exists

Additional Reference & Data Source Links đŸ–‡ïž:

EARTH EXISTS Documentation:
- [Previous article. 35 Days of Silence — 3I/ATLAS]

Source

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 PayPal: 
1) Simply scan the QR code below đŸ“Č
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian


🔗 Crypto Donations👇
XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
BlackRock Is Manipulating The Price Of Bitcoin👀

Blackrock possess a strategic depth that goes far beyond initial appearances. When the general market perceives selling and traders respond with emotion, these major players are often operating on a much more profound level. They adeptly identify and leverage every available mechanism to influence market dynamics. Their power isn't in direct control of the asset, but in understanding how to move the market without ever taking direct ownership.

What entity has become the most prominent corporate champion of Bitcoin ($BTC)?

It's the one with the massive treasury holdings, known as Microstrategy.

 

However, the major strategic challenge lies here: the size of their Bitcoin position is fundamentally linked to their external financing, typically in the form of debt.

This reliance on significant debt creates an inherent vulnerability—a dependence on creditors and shareholders. When an entity's position is highly leveraged, that dependence makes them susceptible to market manipulation or strategic pressure from external financial forces.

When a highly leveraged corporate holder of a significant asset (like $BTC) faces external financial stress, that pressure inevitably transfers to the asset itself.

Blackrock's goal isn't to induce a market crash, but rather to establish a dominant position and control.

Any substantial sale of major cryptocurrencies like $BTC or $ETH initiated by Blackrock, can be interpreted not as routine trading, but as a deliberate effort to manipulate market sentiment and pricing.

Blackrock is deploying a sophisticated combination of tactics: they simultaneously generate market volatility through strategic sales of the asset ($BTC) while accumulating shares in key corporate holders (the stock symbolized by $MSTR).

The deeper intent is to leverage this equity stake to direct the corporate strategy of the highly leveraged Bitcoin champion.

With a sufficiently large ownership percentage, this influence becomes highly effective. The resulting market power is therefore a function of both manipulating price movement and controlling corporate policy.

Is Microstrategy (the company represented by the $MSTR stock) vulnerable to this kind of pressure? The evidence suggests yes.

A substantial stake held by Blackrock grants them effective leverage to influence and manipulate the company itself.

When the company's shares experience a significant decline, the leadership is often compelled to take action, potentially buying back their own stock. This action is driven by the fact that falling share prices directly intensify financial and market pressure on the entire organization.

If the stock of Microstrategy continues a sustained decline, lenders will inevitably begin to re-evaluate and revise the terms of existing loans. This is a critical point of failure for the entire strategy.

The fundamental operational model of this corporate champion works like a closed loop:

  • It secures debt financing (taking loans) to acquire $BTC.

  • Alternatively, it issues new equity (selling shares) to acquire $BTC.

Crucially, the ongoing interest payments on this substantial debt are often managed by the mechanism of issuing even more shares, creating a continuous cycle of dilution and reliance on a high stock price.

A major consequence of rising leverage is the escalating cost of borrowing, requiring Microstrategy to source even larger amounts of capital.

The most straightforward solution—to issue and sell more stock—proved to be insufficient.

In fact, the situation worsened: the company’s recent attempt to raise funds through a stock offering did not fully sell out. This failure directly resulted in a significant liquidity shortfall, hamstringing Microstrategy’s ability to meet its financial obligations and continue its asset acquisition strategy.

And the ultimate shock came when Microstrategy—the very entity that vowed it would never liquidate its holdings—began to sell.

These weren't insignificant trades; the sales were valued at billions of dollars.

The key question now becomes: Does this sudden, massive reversal signal the imminent collapse of Microstrategy, or is it simply a necessary, albeit drastic, maneuver of 'business as usual' under extreme duress?

There appear to be two primary strategic objectives behind Blackrock's calculated moves:

  • Scenario A (Direct Dominance): Blackrock aims to neutralize its most prominent competitor (the corporate Bitcoin accumulator) in order to seize the title as the largest holder of $BTC.

  • Scenario B (Indirect Control): The institution’s goal is to establish absolute market control and influence, preferring to leverage Microstrategy to execute the most aggressive or politically difficult actions.

The outright financial destruction of Microstrategy is highly improbable. Such an action would trigger a severe market crash that could take years to fully repair.

The far more intelligent strategy is integration and control.

Under this model, Microstrategy remains operational, while Blackrock secretly dictates strategy. This allows Microstrategy to absorb the market blame for any necessary but controversial manipulation, a classic and often dirty tactic used by high-powered financial entities.

In the immediate future, the market will continue to exhibit strong reactions to the strategic maneuvers of Blackrock.

When they execute sales, it instantly captures headlines, is aggressively amplified by the media, and causes fearful retail traders ('weak hands') to panic and exit their positions.

Every decrease in price that results from this panic directly translates into a superior entry point for Blackrock. This clearly illustrates that the current market environment is driven purely by emotion, making it a survival game reserved only for those with the strongest resolve.

In the long run, the nature of $BTC will likely shift, moving away from its original ideals of being completely free and decentralized.

The vast majority of the available supply is projected to become highly concentrated within a small number of major corporations and investment funds.

Consequently, the price cycles will no longer be reliably tied to events like halvings or popular narratives. Instead, they will be driven primarily by government and central bank policy decisions, overarching macroeconomic conditions, and the internal political maneuverings of the world's most dominant funds and corporations.

Blackrock's goal is not to eliminate $BTC; instead, they are focused on constructing an elaborate system of control around the asset.

Microstrategy (the stock symbolized by $MSTR) remains a powerful tool, but it now operates under terms and directives that the company's leadership no longer fully dictates.

Since direct command over the decentralized asset is impossible, control is established through strategic influence over the largest corporate and fund custodians. Moving forward, Blackrock will be the primary entity determining the market's trajectory.

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 PayPal: 
1) Simply scan the QR code below đŸ“Č
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian

🔗 Crypto Donations👇


XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
A Request for NASA to Release Scientific Data on 3I/ATLAS

During my recent podcast interview with Joe Rogan (accessible here), I had mentioned the unfortunate circumstances, under which NASA had not released for four weeks the images collected by the HiRISE camera onboard the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. These images were taken on October 2–3, 2025, when the interstellar object 3I/ATLAS passed within 30 million kilometers from Mars. The images are extremely valuable scientifically because they possess a spatial resolution of 30 kilometers per pixel, about 3 times better than the spatial resolution achieved in the best publicly available image from the Hubble Space Telescope, taken on July 21, 2025 (accessible here and analyzed here). Whereas the Hubble image was taken from an edge-on perspective since Earth and the Sun were separated by only ~10 degrees relative to distant 3I/ATLAS, the HiRISE image offers a sideways perspective, valuable in decoding the mass loss geometry and glow around as it approached the Sun.

The delay in the data release was argued to be the result of the government shutdown on October 1, 2025. Nevertheless, conspiracy theorists suggested that it may have to do with evidence for extraterrestrial intelligence in the HiRISE images. When asked about it, I suggested that the delay is probably not a sign of extraterrestrial intelligence but rather of terrestrial stupidity. We should not hold science hostage to the shutdown politics of the day. The scientific community would have greatly benefited from the dissemination of this time-sensitive data as astronomers plan follow-up observations in the coming months.

Joe Rogan suggested that I contact the interim NASA administrator, Sean Duffy. The following day, I corresponded with congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna regarding a related formal request from NASA. Following our exchange, Representative Luna wrote a brilliant letter to NASA’s acting administrator Duffy.

We all owe a debt of deep gratitude for the visionary support displayed by Representative Luna to frontier science through her letter, attached below.

Avi Loeb is the head of the Galileo Project, founding director of Harvard University’s — Black Hole Initiative, director of the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the former chair of the astronomy department at Harvard University (2011–2020). He is a former member of the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology and a former chair of the Board on Physics and Astronomy of the National Academies. He is the bestselling author of “Extraterrestrial: The First Sign of Intelligent Life Beyond Earth” and a co-author of the textbook “Life in the Cosmos”, both published in 2021. The paperback edition of his new book, titled “Interstellar”, was published in August 2024.

Source

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 PayPal: 
1) Simply scan the QR code below đŸ“Č
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian

🔗 Crypto Donations👇
XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals