TheDinarian
News • Business • Investing & Finance
đŸ’„A flip of the coin: the future of digital currenciesđŸ’„
Which digital currency will be the money of the future? Experts at the Sibos 2022 conference weigh up the factors at play.
December 31, 2022
post photo preview

Expanding digital economies, cross-border transactions and rising demand for instant outcomes are creating opportunities for new forms of digital money every day.

They’re innovative and cost-effective, they offer speed, security and privacy but they’re also mired in complexity and regulatory uncertainty.

The three most common varieties are cryptocurrencies, stablecoins and CBDCs - a Central Bank Digital Coin that’s a digital version of their own fiat currency. China is the most advanced of the major economies in developing its own digital money. In Australia, the Digital Finance Cooperative Research Centre has partnered with the Reserve Bank to explore use cases for an Australian CBDC.

Of all the digital currencies jostling to serve a need and solve a problem, which one will be the future currency of choice? This was the question debated by representatives from five leading global institutions at the Sibos 2022 conference in Amsterdam in October, where delegates gathered to learn about ‘Progressive finance for a changing world’.

Instead of a single future currency of choice, panellist Ian De Bode, a Partner with McKinsey & Company in San Francisco, suggested that different digital currencies solve different issues, which means we’re likely to need a range of options in the future. He said, for example, stablecoins are currently the preferred digital currency to make inter-platform or cross-border payments, store value, or provide liquidity for margin loans or swaps in decentralized finance (DeFi). That’s because, as its name suggests, it’s less volatile than cryptocurrencies as its value is pegged to a commodity, currency or a regulating algorithm, and it can engage with smart contracts.

“In terms of global adoption in the next 10 years, I think it’s going to be [a mix of] cryptocurrencies, stablecoin and CBDCs,” De Bode predicted.

Other panellists, such as the Bank of England’s William Lovell, said they expect CBDCs to emerge as the dominant digital currency.

Regulation and limitations key pain points for digital currencies

While they compete for usefulness and the premier position, digital currencies need to navigate some pain points.

Panellist, Sophie Gilder, Managing Director, Blockchain & Digital Assets, at Commonwealth Bank  said regulation will be the key issue for any dominant future digital currency. But as yet, it’s unclear what that regulatory environment will look like.

“Regulatory capital rules have been proposed that might make it unattractive, for example, for regulated financial institutions to hold stablecoins,” Gilder said. “Other regulations could also impact who can issue a stablecoin.”

Gilder also noted that CBDCs may come with limitations, including:

  • how much an individual or a corporation can hold;
  • global interoperability; and
  • whether interest can be paid.

Getting new digital currencies to talk to old tech

Interoperability was a key discussion point for the panellists with SWIFT Board member and Intesa SaoPaolo’s Head of Global Transaction Banking, Stefano Favale admitting interoperability would be a considerable challenge as adoption of digital currencies increases.

“Digital currencies will need to be able to interact with platforms. And we still need intermediaries to provide liquidity – otherwise, you cannot build interoperability and scale,” he said.

Gilder agreed, adding that interoperability is an issue businesses and global financial institutions are accustomed to tackling.

“Every time you use a technology, you need to make it speak to other technologies,” she said. “We need to build interoperability between digital assets and digital currencies living on blockchain as well as legacy technology, which will still exist and definitely has its place.”

The need for privacy versus the need to monitor illicit finance

One of the initial attractions of digital currency was its promise of privacy and anonymity. However that anonymity was often associated with activities such as money laundering. But as De Bode explained, there are legitimate reasons for keeping transactions private. Earlier this year, for example, many individuals the world over used stablecoins to transfer hundreds of millions of dollars to support Ukraine’s military efforts when traditional financing options could not act quickly enough. The digital donors welcomed the anonymity, given the conflict environment.

“A lot of people were willing to donate to the cause but didn’t want that transaction tracked to their individual account” explained De Bode.

Gilder added that digital currencies are more traceable than many would like to believe. To incentivise the adoption of CBDCs, she said, Central Banks and governments would need to factor in the need for privacy as part of the design.

“It’s not acceptable in many countries to have a surveillance architecture through a CBDC,” she said. “That’s something that we'll have to focus on very heavily to engender trust.”

The direction of digital currencies in Australia

The digital currency landscape in Australia differs somewhat from Europe and the United States. Gilder said Australia’s domestic direct payment system is already fast, free for retail use and relatively data rich – meaning there is not the same problem for CBDCs to solve as there might be elsewhere. What they can offer, however, is programmability and efficiency through automation.

“We don’t have a lot of digital assets now – but we will in future. I think that’s what we’ll be using CBDCs for – as a risk-free cash on ledger to efficiently transact on digital assets.”

Forecasts for digital currency over the next decade

Over the next 10 years, the panellists predicted that:

  • Money will be less lumpy – people will be able to be paid by minutes and seconds rather than hours, days or weeks (Ricardo Correia).’
  • Climate change will force us to optimise energy usage in ways we haven’t thought of yet and we will trade value. (William Lovell).
  • Money will take different forms – and be much more user friendly (Sophie Gilder).
  • Digital assets will grow and proliferate (Ian De Bode).
  • If financial institutions can offer a superior experience with different payment options, they can leverage the stickiness of customers, because they can offer both central bank currency and commercial currency (Stefano Favale).

Our digital currency experts

Ricardo Correia is Managing Director and Head of Global Currencies, at R3. He leads strategy and commercialisation for digital currency (DC), namely CBDCs and stablecoins. He and his team have built a global DC working group with more 100 members, including major central banks in the G7 and G20 groups. In 2021 the R3 Digital Currencies team released a world-class Sandbox and Accelerator helping customers design, develop and deploy their solutions more efficiently and effectively. Ricardo served as Head of APAC at R3 for the first 18 months, growing the team and working with member banks across the region. He then spent three years as Global Head of Strategic Alliances & Partnerships, building a network of 300+ global partners who develop solutions and offer services on Corda. Before joining R3, Ricardo held senior leadership positions at Avanade, Accenture and CommBank.

Sophie Gilder is Managing Director, Blockchain & Digital Assets, at Commonwealth Bank. She is responsible for the research, experimentation, policy advocacy and commercialisation of blockchain-driven projects, including CBDCs, crypto and digital finance innovations. Previously, Sophie established the Blockchain and AI centres of excellence and was a founding member of x15ventures, managing a portfolio of fintech ventures.  Sophie has a background in investment banking, working in capital markets across Europe and Australia, and experience as a start-up founder and adviser.

William Lovell is the Head of Future Technology, RTGS Renewal Technology, Bank of England. He is responsible for looking at how new technologies are influencing the financial system and how they can be exploited to meet the Bank’s mission. This involves work on distributed ledger, artificial intelligence as well as conventional technologies with a particular focus on payment and settlement platforms. Much of his time is spent working on the renewal of UK’s RTGS to ensure that the new platform is fit for purpose for the upcoming changes in financial technology.

Ian De Bode is a Partner with McKinsey & Company’s San Francisco office. He leads McKinsey’s digital assets service line in North America. Ian has distinctive experience working with financial institutions and investment funds, including building and bringing new blockchain-based products to market and defining the digital asset strategy. Before joining McKinsey, Ian worked as a product development manager at Umicore, the largest semiconductor manufacturer for specialty substrates (i.e., Germanium). Ian holds a B.Sc from the University of Leuven in Electrical Engineering, a M. Sc. From the University of Leuven in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, and an MBA from the Stanford Graduate School of Business.

Stefano Favale is Head of Global Transaction Banking, Intesa Sanpaolo and SWIFT Board Member. Stefano is responsible for Corporate Digital Channels, Cash Management, Trade Finance, Acquiring, and Securities Services. He manages a team of 400+ sales and product managers across Italy and 40 other countries with the mission to deliver product and innovation to the overall business customer baseline. With more than 20 years in the banking industry, Stefano combines extensive experience in digital and transformational projects, broad managerial responsibilities in commercial banking, and a leadership position in the business payment community. He is also a board member of Banca Intesa Russia, Bancomat SpA, Exetra SpA and SWIFT.

Link

community logo
Join the TheDinarian Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like

Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Denelle Dixon (Stellar CEO) On Bloomburg 🚀

'Everyone, including Mastercard and Visa, is looking at how this technology can make finance easier for their consumers and their business. I don't think there is going to be a loser, but I do think there will be shake-ups. And ultimately, the consumer is going to win.' - SDF CEO @DenelleDixon on @BloombergTV

00:05:29
We are minutes away from passing the GENIUS Act.
00:01:19
Brad Garlinghouse On Banking & The Future Of Money!
00:00:38
👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? 🔜

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

👉 Here’s what you need to know:

💠 'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
💠 Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
💠 Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
💠 Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
💠 Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

👉 What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto 👉txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚹 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading
Nothing to see here.. 👀

Israel's Mossad spy agency was hacked just days before Netanyahu launched strikes on Iranian targets. The files uncovered? Nothing short of apocalyptic.

Among them: 👉 blueprints for cyber warfare, targeted assassinations, blackmail material, and even the unthinkable - the Samson Option - Israel's doomsday doctrine to blow up the entire world with a nuclear holocaust if their own survival is ever threatened.

Op: https://x.com/BarronTNews_/status/1935871791169159188?s=19

🚹 XRP Ledger Welcomes XAO DAO for On-Chain Governance 🚹

The XRP Ledger has integrated XAO DAO, introducing a new era of on-chain governance for the network. This move aims to enhance community-driven decision-making and transparency by allowing stakeholders to participate directly in protocol upgrades and ecosystem proposals through decentralized, blockchain-based voting mechanisms.

Key Highlights:

  • On-Chain Governance:
    XAO DAO brings a decentralized governance framework to the XRP Ledger, enabling holders and ecosystem participants to vote on proposals, upgrades, and other critical decisions in a transparent and secure manner.

  • Community Empowerment:
    The integration is designed to give the XRP community a more active role in shaping the network’s future, fostering greater collaboration and innovation among developers, validators, and users.

  • Ecosystem Growth:
    This development is expected to drive further adoption of the XRP Ledger, attract new projects, and strengthen the network’s position as a leading blockchain for ...

Persisters, Liquid Staking $XPRT is now live on Persistence DEX.

With stkXPRT built into the DEX, you can:

  • Liquid stake XPRT directly on 👉 app.persistence.one/stake

  • Superfluid LP into the stkXPRT/XPRT pool

Best part? It takes less than a minute

Here’s how you can do it 📒👇

https://x.com/PersistenceOne/status/1934954313480065426

post photo preview
🎬Proof the Deep State Planned This War for Years🎬
Nation First outlines how the Israeli attack on Iran was planned by the Deep State and the Military Industrial Complex over 15 years ago.

Prepare to have your mind blown

~NamastĂ© 🙏 Crypto Michael ⚡ The Dinarian

Dear friend,

What just happened in Iran wasn’t a surprise attack. It wasn’t a last-minute decision. It wasn’t even Israel acting alone.

It was a war plan written years ago — by men in suits, sitting in think tanks in Washington and New York. And yesterday, that plan was finally put into action.

Here’s the truth they don’t want you to know: this war was cooked up long before Trump ever became President — and it was designed to happen exactly this way.

Let’s start with what just happened.

Israel launched a massive, unexpected strike on Iran. They hit nuclear facilities. They killed military generals. They struck deep inside Iranian territory — and now the whole region is on edge, ready to explode into full-blown war.

The media is acting shocked. But I’m not. You shouldn’t be either.

Why?

Because we have the documents. They told us this was coming. Years ago.

Exhibit A: The Brookings Institution.

The Brooking Institution is a fancy name for what’s basically a war-planning factory dressed up as a research centre. Back in 2009, Brookings published a report called Which Path to Persia?

It laid out exactly how to get the U.S. into a war with Iran — without looking like the bad guy.

Here’s the sickest part:

“The United States would encourage — and perhaps even assist — the Israelis in conducting the strikes
 in the expectation that both international criticism and Iranian retaliation would be deflected away from the United States and onto Israel.”

Let that sink in.

They literally suggested using Israel to start the war, so America could stand back and say, “Wasn’t us!”

They even titled a chapter of this report: “Leave It to Bibi” — naming Netanyahu as the guy to light the match.

Exhibit B: The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

The Council on Foreign Relations is an another Deep State operation. Also in 2009, CFR published a “contingency memo” that laid out the whole military plan for an Israeli strike on Iran — step by step.

  • What routes the jets would fly (over Jordan and Iraq).

  • What bombs they’d use (the biggest bunker-busters in the U.S. arsenal).

  • Which Iranian sites to hit (Natanz, Arak, Esfahan).

  • And how Iran might respond (missiles, drones, threats to U.S. bases).

It’s like they had a time machine. Because those exact strikes just happened following the routes, likely using the bombs and hitting the sites that the CFR outlined.

Exhibit C: The Plot to Attack Iran by Dan Kovalik.

This one really blows the lid off.

US human rights lawyer and journalist Dan Kovalik, in his book The Plot to Attack Iran: How the CIA and the Deep State Have Conspired to Vilify Iran, shows how the CIA and Israel’s Mossad have been working together for decades — not just watching Iran, but actively sabotaging it. Killing scientists. Running cyberattacks. Feeding lies to the media to make Iran look like it’s always “six months away” from building a nuke.

He even reveals how they discussed false flag attacks — faking an Iranian strike to justify going to war. That’s not a conspiracy theory. That’s documented strategy.

And here’s where President Trump comes in.

Unlike the warmongers who wrote these plans, Trump wasn’t looking to bomb Iran. He wanted to talk. Negotiate. Make a deal — like he did with North Korea.

In fact, peace talks with Iran were just days away.

But someone didn’t want peace. Someone wanted war.

So Israel went in — just like the Brookings script said — and lit the fuse.

Trump didn’t authorise it. He didn’t want it. But they gazumped him. They went around him. And now, the peace he was trying to build has been blown to bits.

This was never about Iran being a threat. It was about keeping the war machine fed.

Think tanks, defence contractors, foreign lobbies — they don’t profit from peace. They thrive on tension. On fear. On war.

And now, thanks to them, the world’s one step closer to the edge.

If you’ve never trusted the mainstream media, you’re right not to.

If you’ve ever suspected there’s a shadowy agenda behind every war, you’re not paranoid.

You’re paying attention.

Because the documents are real. The war was planned. And the bombs are falling — right on schedule.

Pray for Iran’s civilians.

Pray for the Israelis caught in the crossfire.

Pray for a President who still wants peace.

And pray that we wake up before it’s too late.

Because the war has started.

But the truth has just begun to spread.

Until next time, God bless you, your family and nation.

Take care,

George Christensen

Source:

George Christensen is a former Australian politician, a Christian, freedom lover, conservative, blogger, podcaster, journalist and theologian. He has been feted by the Epoch Times as a “champion of human rights” and his writings have been praised by Infowars’ Alex Jones as “excellent and informative”.

George believes Nation First will be an essential part of the ongoing fight for freedom:

“The time is now for every proud patriot to step to the fore and fight for our freedom, sovereignty and way of life. Information is a key tool in any battle and the Nation First newsletter will be a valuable tool in the battle for the future of the West.”

— George Christensen.

Find more about George at his www.georgechristensen.com.au website.

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 PayPal: 
1) Simply scan the QR code below đŸ“Č
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian

🔗 Crypto – Support via Coinbase Wallet to: [email protected]

Or Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

Your generosity keeps this mission alive, for all! NamastĂ© 🙏 The Dinarian

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
The Possible Impact Of USDC On The XRP Ledger And RLUSD
Key Points
  • It seems likely that USDC on the XRP Ledger (XRPL) boosts liquidity, benefiting XRP, though some see it as competition for RLUSD.
  • Research suggests both stablecoins can coexist, enhancing the XRPL ecosystem.
  • The evidence leans toward increased network activity being good for XRP, despite potential competition.

The recent launch of USDC on the XRP Ledger has sparked discussions about its impact on the ecosystem, particularly in relation to RLUSD, Ripple's own stablecoin. This response explores whether this development is more about competition for RLUSD or if it enhances liquidity on the XRPL, ultimately benefiting XRP.
 

Impact on Liquidity and XRP

The introduction of USDC, a major stablecoin with a $61 billion market cap, likely increases liquidity on the XRPL by attracting more users, developers, and institutions. This boost can enhance DeFi applications and enterprise payments, potentially driving demand for XRP, the native token used for transaction fees. While some may view it as competition for RLUSD, the overall effect seems positive for the XRPL's growth.
 

Competition vs. Coexistence with RLUSD

USDC and RLUSD cater to different needs: USDC appeals to those valuing regulatory compliance, while RLUSD, backed by Ripple, may attract users preferring ecosystem integration. Research suggests both can coexist, increasing options and fostering innovation, rather than purely competing.
 

Detailed Analysis of USDC on XRPL and Its Implications

The integration of USDC on the XRP Ledger (XRPL), announced on June 12, 2025, by Circle, has significant implications for the ecosystem, particularly in relation to RLUSD, Ripple's stablecoin launched in 2024. This section provides a comprehensive analysis, exploring whether this development is more about competition for RLUSD or if it enhances liquidity on the XRPL, ultimately benefiting XRP.
 

Understanding RLUSD and Its Role

RLUSD, Ripple's stablecoin, received approval from the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) in 2024 and is designed to be fully backed by cash and cash equivalents, ensuring stability. It is available on both the Ethereum and XRP Ledger blockchains, aiming to enhance liquidity, reduce volatility, and serve cross-border payments. With a current market cap of $413 million, RLUSD is smaller than USDC's $61 billion but has regulatory credibility, particularly appealing to institutions.
 

Impact of USDC on the XRPL

The launch of USDC on the XRPL is a significant development, given its status as the second-largest stablecoin by market cap.
 
Key impacts include:
  • Liquidity Boost: USDC's integration can attract more users, developers, and institutions, increasing overall liquidity. This is crucial for DeFi applications, as Circle's announcement emphasizes its use in liquidity provisioning for token pairs and FX flows.
  • Increased Utility: USDC enhances the XRPL's utility for enterprise payments, financial infrastructure, and DeFi, potentially making it more attractive for global money movement and transparent settlements.
  • Regulatory and Institutional Appeal: As a regulated stablecoin issued by Circle, USDC can bring institutional users to the XRPL, aligning with Ripple's goals for regulated financial activities.
  • Network Growth: Supporting a widely recognized stablecoin like USDC on 22 blockchains, including the XRPL, increases the network's visibility and adoption, potentially driving more activity.

Competition vs. Complementarity with RLUSD

While USDC's launch could be seen as competition for RLUSD, the evidence suggests a more nuanced relationship:
  • Competition: Both are stablecoins on the XRPL, and USDC's larger market presence ($61 billion vs. RLUSD's $413 million) might attract users and developers away from RLUSD. However, competition can drive innovation, such as lower fees or better services, benefiting the ecosystem
  • Complementarity: Different stablecoins cater to different needs. USDC appeals to users valuing regulatory compliance and widespread adoption across multiple blockchains, while RLUSD, backed by Ripple, may attract those preferring ecosystem integration and regulatory approval from NYDFS. The XRPL can benefit from having multiple options, increasing liquidity and fostering a diverse ecosystem.
  • Coexistence Benefits: Research suggests that having multiple stablecoins enhances liquidity and provides users with more choices, potentially leading to higher network activity. For example, institutions might use USDC for global payments and RLUSD for specific XRPL-integrated applications, creating a symbiotic relationships.

Impact on XRP

The introduction of USDC, alongside RLUSD, is likely beneficial for XRP, the native token of the XRPL, for several reasons:
  • Increased Liquidity and Activity: Higher liquidity on the XRPL, driven by both stablecoins, can increase transaction volumes. XRP is used for transaction fees, with some fees burned, potentially reducing supply over time and increasing demand.
  • DeFi and Enterprise Use Cases: Both USDC and RLUSD enhance DeFi and enterprise applications, such as liquidity pools and cross-border payments, which can drive demand for XRP as a settlement token.
  • Network Growth: A more liquid and active XRPL is more attractive to developers and users, potentially leading to long-term growth for XRP, as increased utility can drive its value.
Expert analyses, such as those from u.today and ledgerinsights.com, suggest the launch is a "massive boost" for liquidity and adoption, with RLUSD also playing a significant role.
 

Comparative Analysis: USDC vs. RLUSD

To further illustrate, consider the following table comparing key attributes:
 
Given the evidence, it is more accurate to view the introduction of USDC on the XRPL as beneficial for liquidity, which is ultimately good for XRP, rather than solely as competition for RLUSD. The XRPL benefits from increased options, with both stablecoins enhancing liquidity, utility, and network growth. While some competition exists, the overall impact is positive, fostering a robust ecosystem that can drive demand for XRP. This conclusion aligns with expert analyses and community discussions, acknowledging the complexity of the stablecoin market within the XRPL.
 

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 PayPal: 
1) Simply scan the QR code below đŸ“Č
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian

🔗 Crypto – Support via Coinbase Wallet to: [email protected]

Or Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

Your generosity keeps this mission alive, for all! NamastĂ© 🙏 The Dinarian

Read full Article
post photo preview
Die Glocke: The Nazi Bell That Bent Time, Vanished, and Was Never Seen Again

In the darkest corners of the Third Reich, behind the veil of conventional warfare, Nazi scientists were racing toward something that defied explanation. They weren’t just building rockets or jet planes, they were chasing a technology that pushed the boundaries of physics itself. One of the most mysterious and controversial projects to emerge from this era was called Die Glocke, German for "The Bell." But this wasn’t a bomb. It wasn’t even a weapon in the traditional sense. It was something else entirely.

What Was Die Glocke?

Die Glocke was reportedly a bell-shaped device, approximately 9 feet in diameter and 12 to 15 feet tall, encased in a thick ceramic-like shell. Internally, it housed two counter-rotating cylinders filled with a strange, metallic, violet-colored liquid referred to as Xerum 525, a highly radioactive and unknown compound. According to Polish researcher Igor Witkowski, who first brought the story to global attention in his book "The Truth About the Wunderwaffe," Die Glocke emitted intense electromagnetic radiation and killed many of the scientists who worked on it.

But the real claim that set the world alight? That it had the potential to manipulate gravity, disrupt time, and possibly even pierce dimensional barriers. Some descriptions sound like science fiction. Others sound eerily like technologies rumored in today’s black projects or even UAP propulsion systems.

Where Was It Built?

Most reports place the Bell project deep beneath the Wenceslas Mine in Ludwikowice, Poland. There, nestled in a reinforced underground facility known as Der Riese (The Giant), the Nazis hid many of their advanced weapons programs. Adjacent to the suspected test site is a strange concrete structure referred to today as The Henge, a ring of reinforced pillars that some researchers believe was part of an anti-gravity testing rig or cooling tower for Die Glocke. To this day, its true purpose remains unexplained.

Hans Kammler: The Man Who Vanished SS General Hans Kammler oversaw Nazi Germany’s most advanced technological programs, including the V-2 rocket and rumored exotic weapons like Die Glocke. He was a man with top-tier clearance and deep ties to the Reich’s secret projects. When the war ended, Kammler disappeared. No confirmed death, no trial, or capture. He was never heard from again. Some believe he brokered his safety with U.S. forces during Operation Paperclip, offering knowledge of Die Glocke in exchange for asylum. Others suggest he escaped to South America with the Bell. Whatever the truth, the timing of his disappearance and the vanishing of Die Glocke are hard to ignore.

Did It Actually Work?

That’s the million-dollar question. Accounts claim that when operational, Die Glocke emitted powerful gravitational and temporal anomalies. Test subjects reportedly experienced cellular breakdown, time displacement, and hallucinations. Some witnesses alleged that the device caused freezing of time, or at least a distortion in how time passed in its proximity. Others suggested the Bell may have even "jumped dimensions" or teleported entirely. Skeptics say it was nothing more than a high-energy centrifuge with tragic side effects. Still, CIA documents later referenced Die Glocke, and even modern physicists admit that some of the descriptions line up with theoretical frameworks for gravity manipulation and field-based propulsion.

Connection to Modern Black Projects

If Die Glocke truly existed and worked, it would make sense that it never saw public light. Instead, it would’ve been buried, repurposed, and integrated into deep black programs. Anti-gravity research, electromagnetic propulsion, even certain descriptions of UAPs, all have eerie parallels to the Bell’s characteristics. Was Die Glocke an early testbed for what would later become known as field propulsion or even quantum mirroring? Or was it a dangerous dead-end in the pursuit of Nazi technological superiority?

Last Thoughts To Summarize

Die Glocke remains one of the most tantalizing mysteries of WWII, part weapon, part experiment, part occult machine. A device said to manipulate gravity and time. A Nazi general who vanished without a trace. A concrete ring still standing in the Polish forest. Whether it was a real breakthrough in exotic physics or an elaborate myth built on whispers, Die Glocke has become a symbol, of lost knowledge, buried technology, and the thin line between science and the supernatural. If it was real, it’s likely not lost, just... relocated!

Source

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 PayPal: 
1) Simply scan the QR code below đŸ“Č
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian

🔗 Crypto – Support via Coinbase Wallet to: [email protected]

Or Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

Your generosity keeps this mission alive, for all! NamastĂ© 🙏 The Dinarian

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals