TheDinarian
News • Business • Investing & Finance
🌐 ISO 20022: to March and beyond – Deutsche Bank 🌐
January 08, 2023
post photo preview

SWIFT plans to introduce a central Transaction Manager (TM) platform, which will be mandatory for all SWIFT users. This article provides an update on ISO 20022 payments standard migration so far...

The upcoming implementation of ISO 20022 in the high value payments (HVP) space is set to unlock a host of benefits for the cross-border payments industry – from improved compliance processes to the creation of innovative products and services. Deutsche Bank’s Joey Han explores how preparations are ramping up – and what we should expect as we transition into the ISO 20022 era

The origin of ISO 20022 dates back to 2004, when it was first recognised by the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) as the global payment standard of the future. Eighteen years later, this future has nearly arrived. Once Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunications (SWIFT) and major payment market infrastructures (including T2, Fedwire/CHIPS and CHAPS) have migrated to the new standard over the next couple of years, ISO 20022 will apply to the entire spectrum of payments, including domestic, automated clearing house (ACH), real-time and high value cross-border payments.

The new standard is comprehensive in scope, flexible in nature and will act as a harmonised, global standard. This comes at a critical time for the industry, with calls for seamless and faster payments growing louder – and it is hoped that these attributes can provide the foundation for uplifted customer experience, streamlined compliance procedures, and a host of new, innovative services.

The decision to migrate HVP to ISO 20022 gave rise to a multi-year, industry-wide set of preparations – involving all key actors, from financial institutions and corporates, to clearing infrastructures and SWIFT.

Over the past few years, however, the proposed migration strate­gies have, for a variety of reasons, been somewhat of a moving target. Most recently, the European Central Bank (ECB) announced what is anticipated to be final change to its strategy, with the go-live date mov­ing from November 2022 to March 2023 to give participants additional time to complete their testing in a stable environment. In order to align with the ECB’s revised strategy – and to ensure the implementation is as straightforward as possible – both European Banking Authority (EBA) Clearing and SWIFT announced that they would also sync up their re­spective migrations. The Bank of England is scheduled to migrate in April 2023 (though a deadline extension is also being considered), followed by The Clearing House and The Federal Reserve Banks in November 2023 and March 2025 respectively.

The differences in migration timelines and scope, as well as the fact that some banks will migrate immediately, while others will wait, is introducing a host of challenges – and ultimately delaying the benefits the new, data-rich payment standard can bring. So, how are these challenges being addressed, and what are the main considerations going forward?

Full steam ahead in APAC

The migration of domestic, HVP systems in Asia Pacific (APAC) are al­ready well underway. In summer 2022, several ISO 20022 migrations took place across APAC. Paving the way for the rest of the world, Thailand’s RTGS system – known as Bank of Thailand Automated High-value Transfer Network (BAHTNET) – became one of the first payment infrastructures to introduce ISO 20022 this year, along with the Malaysian RTGS (RENTAS) and the Singaporean RTGS (MEPS+). Additionally, Australia will be going live in March 2023, with a co-existence period lasting until November 2024. New Zealand will also go live at the same time.

What can we learn from the early adoption of ISO 20022? Not all migrations are created equal. When moving to ISO 20022, banks operating in multiple markets have to navigate different geographical and regulatory conditions, as well as different technical approaches. Both a phased “like-for-like” approach and a “big-bang” approach will also impact the migration project, operations and end customer in different ways.

Also, while the rules for how to use ISO 20022 messages are based on the market practices outlined by High Value Payments Systems Plus (HVPS+) and are in line with Cross-Border Payments and Reporting Plus (CBPR+), they are still not the same in every market. Close attention is needed to spot and prepare for these subtle differences – or risk a higher volume of rejects and further issues in payments processing.

“The ISO 20022 migration is much more than just a new messaging format, it is the start of an entirely new era for payments”
Joey Han, Clearing Solutions Specialist, APAC, Institutional Cash Management at Deutsche Bank

Transaction management

Though several communities are already using ISO 20022, with the upcoming changes covering correspondent banking, the significance of the move to the new standard is much more far reaching. Cor­respondent banking largely relates to cross-border payments, but it also includes domestic payments between correspondents – or indirect participants – and their direct participants in the domestic HVP market infrastructures.

As part of its migration, SWIFT plans to introduce a central Transaction Manager (TM) platform, which will be mandatory for all SWIFT users. The TM will orchestrate transactions end-to-end, replacing the point-to-point messaging that is currently in use. The first interbank message in the payment chain will trigger the creation the Transaction Copy, which will then be updated with each subsequent message in line with strict data integrity rules. The improvements this will bring to end-to-end transaction integrity is one of the major drivers for the introduction of the platform. The technical deployment of the TM took place in November 2022, with no payment traffic expected until May 2023.

It will also play a key role in helping financial institutions navigate SWIFT’s co-existence phase (March 2023 to November 2025) – the period in which MT and ISO 20022 messages will remain interoperable – by removing the “weakest link” problem and mitigating the risk of data truncation. The TM will achieve this by maintaining a complete copy of the transaction data and reinstating any data that the intermediary agent could not include in the message type (MT) message. In line with the co-existence period – and the challenges it brings – many banks, such as Deutsche Bank, have promised to maintain their MT receiving capabilities throughout the entire co-existence period. 

A while longer to wait

Though the TM will be a great asset to the industry, it will not be the silver bullet from day one. Before the full benefits of the TM can be unlocked, there will be a short period where it will not process any bank traffic and the processing rules will not be applied. This means that when the CBPR+ messages go-live in March 2023, and the first financial institutions begin to process data-rich ISO 20022 payments, the TM rules will not be ap­plied to these transactions.

With TM functionality not expected to be offered until May 2023, end-to-end preservation of rich data will not be guaranteed on any mes­sages until then. Because of this, many financial institutions – including Deutsche Bank – are recommending that market participants avoid using the enriched data during the first few months of the migration phase to help reduce and mitigate any possibility of data truncation. This is in line with recommendations from the Payments Market Practice Group (PMPG).

From May 2023, the TM is scheduled to go through a three-stage, build-up approach to ensure platform stability and mitigate concentra­tion risk. Over the course of the build-up period, SWIFT will be closely monitoring the payment channels and watching for high levels of traffic. If, at any particular time, an extraordinarily high volume of messages was detected, SWIFT would be able to react and help reduce the number of payments being routed through the TM by introducing additional routing criteria. Under current plans, SWIFT aims to achieve this by broadening or shortening the unique end-to-end transaction reference (UETR) range, as required. For instance, if a UETR range is limited to 1A-10, this means that only transactions with a UETR that includes the last two characters from this range will be routed via the TM.

Translation and truncation

SWIFT’s in-flow translation will act as a central translation engine to sup­port banks already using ISO 20022, as well as those that continue to use MT messages. ISO 20022 messages will be translated to MT and delivered as multi-format (ISO 20022 with embedded translated MT) messages. By translating ISO 20022 messages to the MT equivalent and delivering both formats to the receiver, the tool will play a critical role in supporting the co-existence phase, as well as compliance processes. A non-ISO 20022 enabled institution, for example, will use the ISO 20022 format to perform the necessary compliance due diligence, and use the MT format for processing.

But that is not to say there won’t still be issues with truncation. If a non- ISO 20022 enabled institution is acting as an intermediary in a transaction, it will not be able to send on the rich ISO 2022 data it receives – and will instead send on a truncated MT message.

There are two main types of truncations: those that are indicated by a “+” in the body of the truncated messages (for ISO elements with direct MT equivalents), and those that aren’t (for ISO elements without direct MT equivalents). In the latter case, the elements unique to ISO will be mapped into the non-equivalent elements in fields 70 and 72. If the available space in these fields were filled, the elements of a lower translation priority would be dropped from the message.

The in-flow translation will, therefore, be particularly important during the first few months of the migration. With the TM not fully operational by until May 2023, the in-flow translation will provide a much-needed additional layer of protection. The translation report – that comes with each translated message – will identify instances of truncation, as well as provide detailed information on the translated MT. Where truncation is identified, CBPR+ has provided a standard, global template to be used for additional data requests.

Carry on testing

With the migration now in sight, what is left to do? Many of our clients have been reaching out to us asking about the possibilities of testing. In this respect, we have been as accommodating as possible regarding bilateral tests. And while it is clearly not feasible to test with every client, we have also taken steps to facilitate self-service activities.

For example, Deutsche Bank recently launched the DB Institutional Cash Management (ICM) Portal on SWIFT MyStandards. The portal aims to provide ICM usage guidelines (UGs) for pacs.008, pacs.009 and pacs.009COV, which are based on CBPR+ and enriched with Deutsche Bank annotations. These can be used as the basis for any testing activity on MyStandards.

As the deadline approaches, it is worth remembering the reason these efforts are being made. The ISO 20022 migration is much more than just a new messaging format, it is the start of an entirely new era for payments. It is a huge opportunity to fundamentally reassess and greatly improve existing business models and solutions. In doing so, it will help the payments community meet the changing needs of their clients – both now and in the future.

Link

community logo
Join the TheDinarian Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like

Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
⚠ Ripple Blankets Las Vegas Strip with XRP Billboards ⚠

Ripple Vegas Conference (2026): Ripple Blankets Las Vegas Strip with XRP Billboards Ahead of 2026 Conference. Ripple launched a huge ad campaign this week on the Vegas Strip, featuring digital billboards at Resorts World and Wynn Resort, plus mobile trucks promoting XRP Las Vegas 2026 on April 30-May 1. The displays proclaim 'We're enabling the Internet of Value' and 'Raise the Standard,' coinciding with Bitcoin 2026's final day at The Venetian. RippleX confirmed the push with 'We didn’t fold. You didn’t either,' echoed by CEO Brad Garlinghouse, as the event kicks off tomorrow at Paris Las Vegas to discuss TradFi-DeFi, regulations, and more.

00:00:07
👀 Klaus Schwab promises new WEF recruits 👀

In a leaked video, Klaus Schwab promises new WEF recruits that their "avatar" will live on after death, and that their brains "will be replicated through artificial intelligence and algorithms."

00:00:38
🚹BlackRock: The Most Evil Business In The World🚹

The company that owns the world. They are buying up the media, real-estate, everything you can think of and it's leading to dystopian future ahead. Larry Fink's investment management is destroying our lives.

"BlackRock is the 4th branch of government" - Bloomberg

“Whoever controls the money controls the world” - Henry Kissinger

We no longer live under free market capitalism, we live under a system of socialism for the rich.

00:15:38
👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? 🔜

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

👉 Here’s what you need to know:

💠 'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
💠 Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
💠 Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
💠 Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
💠 Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

👉 What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto 👉txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚹 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

🚹 XRP Ledger sees surge in tokenized U.S. Treasuries 🚹

A powerful trend is building on the XRP Ledger—real-world assets (RWAs), especially U.S. Treasuries, are rapidly moving on-chain, signaling deeper institutional adoption.

🔑 Key points

đŸ”č Tokenized Treasuries expanding:
The XRP Ledger is seeing a notable increase in tokenized U.S. Treasury products, bringing traditional finance assets onto blockchain rails.

đŸ”č Institutional players involved:
Firms are leveraging XRPL to issue and manage yield-bearing, compliant financial instruments on-chain.

đŸ”č Faster settlement:
Tokenization enables near-instant settlement, compared to traditional systems that can take days.

đŸ”č Lower costs + accessibility:
On-chain Treasuries reduce intermediaries and open access to a broader range of investors globally.

đŸ”č Built-in compliance tools:
XRPL supports features like issuer controls and permissioning, making it attractive for regulated assets.

🔎 Why it matters

đŸ”č Real-world assets are the next wave
RWAs (like Treasuries) ...

post photo preview

🚹 Bittensor’s founder: “TAO isn’t a crypto—it’s AI infrastructure” 🚹

A major narrative shift is being pushed by Jacob Steeves—and it directly challenges how most people view tokens like TAO.

🔑 Key points

đŸ”č Not a token-first system
Steeves argues TAO isn’t meant to be a speculative asset—it’s the incentive layer powering a decentralized AI network.

đŸ”č Marketplace for intelligence
Bittensor functions as a peer-to-peer market where AI models compete and get paid for useful output, not hype or staking alone.

đŸ”č Subnets = micro-economies
The network is split into specialized subnets, each acting like its own AI market (text, vision, prediction, etc.), rewarding contributors based on performance.

đŸ”č Fixing open-source AI incentives
Bittensor aims to solve a core problem:
👉 open AI research isn’t well monetized
👉 centralized labs dominate

So it introduces token rewards to incentivize global contributors.

đŸ”č “Proof of intelligence” model
Instead of proof-of-work or proof-of-stake, the network rewards useful ...

🚹 $620M floods into Bittensor as Nvidia & Polychain load up 🚹

A massive institutional wave just hit Bittensor (TAO), and it’s not small money—this is serious capital positioning around decentralized AI infrastructure.

🔑 Key points

đŸ”č $620M institutional injection:
Nvidia ($200M) have deployed over $620M into TAO exposure.

đŸ”č Heavy staking = supply squeeze:
Around 68% of TAO supply is locked, with much of Nvidia’s allocation staked—reducing circulating liquidity.

đŸ”č Real revenue, not just hype:
The network generated ~$43M in AI compute revenue in Q1 2026, showing actual usage.

đŸ”č Emission cut tightening supply:
Daily token emissions were cut in half, lowering sell pressure by ~$500K per day.

đŸ”č Price supported by fundamentals:
TAO rose ~21% in Q1 2026, holding strength despite volatility.

đŸ”č ETF narrative building:
Grayscale & Bitwise filings for TAO ETFs could become a major future catalyst.

🔎 Why it matters

đŸ”č This is AI infrastructure, not just a token
Bittensor is essentially a marketplace for machine...

post photo preview
The Quiet Revolution in Bittensor

This past week (April 13–19, 2026) wasn’t just another cycle of subnet drama and $TAO price noise.

Three major developments landed almost back-to-back that, when viewed together, paint a far bigger picture than most participants are seeing right now.

Bittensor is steadily transitioning from a speculative incentive network into production-grade decentralized AI infrastructure that enterprises, researchers, and real users are beginning to plug into directly.

Most eyes remain fixed on emissions, governance changes like BIT-0011, or short-term token flows. But the deeper shift happening underneath is structural. These three developments show Bittensor subnets creating tangible value across enterprise physical AI, frontier training scalability, and consumer-facing uncensored models in ways that can compound over years, not hype cycles.

  1. Score (Subnet 44) + Manako Labs Secures PwC France & Maghreb Alliance:

 

This was one of the clearest institutional validation moments the ecosystem has seen so far.
@manakoai, the commercial product layer built on @webuildscore decentralized computer vision network, took first place at Start in Block, beating more than 1,000 startups at the Louvre during
 
Around the same time, @PwC_France & Maghreb announced a strategic alliance to integrate Manako’s Business Operations World Model into its AI and digital advisory practice. PwC isn’t some small crypto-friendly firm. They are a $57B revenue global giant serving 82% of the Fortune Global 500. Reports indicate they spent months on technical and legal due diligence before deciding to move forward with deployment opportunities across retail, manufacturing, logistics, energy, and infrastructure.
 
The key capability is powerful: transforming existing enterprise camera systems into real-time physical AI decision networks without requiring companies to rebuild their entire operational stack.
 
The Bigger Picture Most Aren’t Seeing: This does not look like a one-off pilot or marketing headline. It could represent one of the first real on-ramps for Big Four consulting firms to distribute decentralized AI infrastructure to enterprise clients at scale. If successful, this creates:
 
▫Recurring enterprise demand
▫Regulatory credibility
▫Higher-quality commercial usage
▫Long-term trust in Bittensor infrastructure
 
That type of adoption cannot be replicated by retail hype alone.
 
2. Macrocosmos (Subnet 9 / IOTA) Releases ResBM: 128x Activation Compression
 
 
While enterprise headlines captured attention, @MacrocosmosAI quietly released its ResBM (Residual Bottleneck Models) research paper. The breakthrough demonstrated state-of-the-art 128x activation compression in pipeline-parallel training while maintaining near-zero loss in convergence, memory efficiency, or compute overhead. This is highly relevant because it is designed for low-bandwidth, internet-scale distributed training, the exact type of environment decentralized networks must solve for.
 
Why This Matters Long-Term:
 
The biggest barrier to truly decentralized frontier model training is not only GPU access. It is bandwidth and communication cost when massive models are split across many machines. Centralized labs solve this using expensive proprietary interconnects inside hyperscale data centers. ResBM attempts to attack that problem directly. What many miss is that this tech moat positions Subnet 9 (@IOTA_SN9), and Bittensor’s pre-training layer more broadly, as a viable alternative for the next wave of open-source models. As training demands continue to rise, the ability to scale efficiently without centralization could become a compounding strategic advantage.
 
This is not a minor upgrade. It may materially shift the economics of who gets to train competitive models.
 
3. Venice Uncensored 1.2 Launches, Trained on Targon (Subnet 4)
 
 
@ErikVoorhees and the @AskVenice team released Venice Uncensored 1.2, a Mistral 24B variant featuring:
 
‱ Vision support
‱ 4x larger context window
‱ Stronger tool use
‱ Minimal refusal behavior after extensive testing
 
Most importantly, it was explicitly trained using @TargonCompute confidential compute on Subnet 4.
 
This gained strong attention because it is a live consumer-facing product users can interact with immediately. Privacy-focused, uncensored AI running on decentralized infrastructure resonates in a world increasingly concerned about centralized censorship, data harvesting, and platform control.
 
The Underappreciated Angle Targon’s confidential compute layer is showing it can support real model training workloads for production applications.
 
Every Venice-style release creates a direct bridge between:
 
▫End-user demand
▫Subnet emissions
▫Compute utilization
▫TAO-linked ecosystem value
 
As regulation around privacy and AI governance grows stricter, demand for confidential and permissionless training environments may continue rising.
 
This is the consumer on-ramp that complements the enterprise and research stories above.
 
Connecting the Dots: The Bigger Picture for Bittensor: Individually, these are impressive wins.
 
Together, they signal something more profound:
 
▫Enterprise bridge (SN44): Real corporate budgets and distribution channels via PwC.
▫Technical scalability (SN9): Solving the hard physics of decentralized training.
▫Product-market pull (SN4): Shipping usable AI to everyday users who value freedom and privacy.
 
Bittensor is no longer just incentivizing miners. It is evolving into a neutral, permissionless layer where multiple AI value chains can operate together, from world models and large-scale training to inference, compute, and consumer applications.
 
While many still focus on short-term moves such as subnet rotations, governance votes, or
$TAO price action amid post-Covenant recovery, the bigger shift is ecosystem maturity.
 
These developments help attract:
 
▫ Serious capital
▫ Strong technical talent
▫ Real enterprise demand
▫ Growing consumer usage
 
This week showed resilience and forward momentum.
 
Big Four validation, meaningful research breakthroughs, and live products all point to one thing: The vision is becoming real.
 
Final Thoughts: If you are only watching the chart, you may be missing the real shift. Bittensor is laying the groundwork to become the decentralized backbone for the next era of AI, not by competing head-on with closed labs on every metric, but by becoming the open, scalable, incentive-aligned alternative no single company can fully control or censor.
 
The pieces are moving.
 
The bigger picture is beginning to come into focus for those paying attention beyond the noise.
 

 🙏 Donations Accepted, Thank You For Your Support 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 Stripe:

1) or visit http://thedinarian.locals.com/donate

💳 PayPal: 
2) Simply scan the QR code below đŸ“Č or Click Here: 

🔗 Crypto Donations Graciously Accepted👇
XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
📈Bittensor ($TAO) Staking📈
Learn how to stake your TAO and earn potential rewards.

Decentralized staking

Staking TAO tokens lets you earn rewards by supporting the Bittensor network. In return, you receive a share of the staking rewards.

Source: Taostats

In the Bittensor (TAO) ecosystem, there are two main ways people can stake their tokens: Root staking and Alpha staking. These represent two different strategies, with different levels of risk and reward.

Root staking was the first method introduced when Bittensor launched. It allows users to lock up their TAO tokens in the core part of the network (now called Subnet 0) to earn steady, “predictable” rewards. It's straightforward and carries less risk, making it a good fit for early users or anyone who prefers a more passive, steady approach. In essence, this is the “traditional” form of token staking seen in many crypto projects. Rather than simply holding your tokens, you delegate them to validators who help run and secure the network on your behalf.

Source: Taostats.io

Later, on February 13, 2025, Alpha staking was introduced as part of a major network upgrade called Dynamic TAO (dTAO). This upgrade created subnet-specific tokens called Alpha tokens, which users receive when they stake TAO into subnets. If you’re not familiar with the concept of subnets and Bittensor infrastructure, please check out Bittensor project review. Alpha tokens can go up or down in value, but they also offer a chance for much higher rewards, especially in new or fast-growing subnets. It has more complex staking dynamics and comes with more risk, but also more opportunity if you're actively involved.

Source: Taostats.io

In both Root and Alpha staking, there’s no fixed lock-up period—you can stake or unstake your TAO tokens at any time. However, while your tokens are staked, they’re temporarily locked, which means you can’t trade or transfer them until you unstake.

In Root staking, staking rewards are simple and “stable”. However, the reward amount (APY) is slowly going down over time. It’s because the network is moving more rewards toward Alpha staking.

In Alpha staking, things work differently. You first change your TAO into special tokens called Alpha tokens, which are connected to subnets. When you hold Alpha tokens, your balance grows as and when the subnet earns daily rewards. The more TAO is staked into a subnet, the more rewards it gets. If you want to exit, you must convert your Alpha tokens back to TAO. This process can be affected by market prices and might give you less TAO back than you put in, depending on the timing. This method can earn you more than Root staking, but it depends on how well your chosen subnet performs and how much activity it gets.

With Root staking, your rewards are based on how well your validator performs in the network. In Alpha staking, you stake your TAO into a subnet, and your rewards depend on the overall performance of that subnet. Subnets that provide more value to the network receive more emissions, which increases your Alpha token balance.

Centralized staking

Centralized TAO staking, offered by platforms like Coinbase, is a simple and beginner-friendly option where the exchange handles the staking process for you. You earn a fixed reward rate of around 17.3% APY. While your tokens are temporarily locked during staking, there are no additional lock-up periods beyond what the network requires. The main trade-off between centralized and decentralized staking is convenience versus control.

Staking is a great way to put your TAO to work while contributing to the network's security. But, it's important to understand the terms before participating, as rewards and conditions may differ depending on the platform you choose.

 🙏 Donations Accepted, Thank You For Your Support 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 Stripe:
1) or visit http://thedinarian.locals.com/donate

💳 PayPal: 
2) Simply scan the QR code below đŸ“Č or Click Here: 


🔗 Crypto Donations Graciously Accepted👇
XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
🧬VINDICATED! The Epstein Files Connect Gates, Pandemics & Censorship to a Globalist Blueprint for a Biosecurity State🧬

Every warning. Every documentary. Every article. Every post that got us banned. All of it was true. Now what? What can we do? Read on, share this Substack, help us save lives! The Light is shining! ✹

Well, well, well
 look what the cat dragged in.

Actually, scratch that. Look what the Department of Justice finally dragged out of Jeffrey Epstein’s email inbox and dumped on the world’s doorstep like a rotting corpse nobody wanted to claim. Yep, that’s right. The Epstein files. It’s hilarious how the “Democratic hoax” and “fantasy” client list we were all told didn’t exist suddenly became a very real, very unsealed document.

For years—years—they called us conspiracy theorists. They slapped “misinformation” labels on our posts faster than Pfizer could print liability waivers. They kicked us off platforms, lied about us in the media, and shadow-banned our reach. Meanwhile, the real conspiracy—the one typed out in black-and-white emails between billionaires, bankers, and a convicted pedophile—was sitting in a government vault, waiting to prove us right.

And now? Now the receipts are public.

The release of Jeffrey Epstein’s files has done far more than expose a network of elite pedophilia and blackmail—it has vindicated truth-tellers like us and countless others who were smeared, censored, de-platformed, and persecuted for warning about the sinister agendas of the globalist elite. The documents reveal shocking connections between Epstein, Bill Gates, pandemic planning, and the systematic suppression of anyone who dared to connect the dots.

We weren’t crazy. We were just early. And they hated us for it.

Epstein, Gates, and the Pandemic “Business Model” They Built Together

One of the most damning revelations from Epstein’s files is his partnership with Bill Gates. Forget the carefully crafted PR spin about “regretting” those meetings. These weren’t casual dinners. These were planning sessions.

Back in 2015, Gates and Epstein exchanged emails about “preparing for pandemics” and strategies to “involve the WHO.” Gates wrote: “I hope we can pull this off.”

How’s that for a chill down your spine?

This eerily foreshadowed the 2019 Event 201 simulation—a pandemic exercise hosted by the Gates Foundation, Johns Hopkins, and the World Economic Forum that just happened to model a global coronavirus outbreak
 just months before COVID-19 ”mysteriously” emerged in Wuhan. Funny how that works, isn’t it?

But let’s rewind even further, to the real blueprint—the financial architecture that made the pandemic response not just possible, but profitable.

The story crystallizes in a chilling 2011 email exchange. Juliet Pullis, a JPMorgan executive under then-chairman Jes Staley, emailed Jeffrey Epstein with a list of detailed questions. The source? “The JPM team that is putting together some ideas for Gates.”

The questions were precise: What are the objectives? Is anonymity key? Who directs the investments and grants? This wasn’t JPMorgan consulting an expert; it was a trillion-dollar bank asking a convicted felon to architect a billion-dollar philanthropic fund for Bill Gates.

This wasn’t JPMorgan consulting a philanthropic expert. This was a trillion-dollar bank asking a convicted felon to architect a billion-dollar philanthropic fund for one of the richest men on Earth. Let that marinate for a moment.

Epstein’s reply was fluent and commanding. He described a donor-advised fund with a “stellar board” and ties to the Gates-Buffett “Giving Pledge.” He noted the billions already pledged and identified the gap: “They all have a tax advisor, but have no real clue on how to give it away.” His solution? “JPM would be an integral part. Not advisor
 operator, compliance.“ Staley’s response: “We need to talk.”

By July 2011, the plan evolved. In an email to Staley, copying Boris Nikolic (Gates’ chief science advisor), Epstein laid out the core pitch: “A silo based proposal that will get Bill more money for vaccines.”

Not “more research for pandemics.” Not “better public health infrastructure.” “More money for vaccines.” This is the unambiguous language of capital formation, not charity. It reveals the structure’s intended output planning reached the highest levels.

In August 2011, Mary Erdoes, CEO of JPMorgan’s $2+ trillion Asset & Wealth Management division, emailed Epstein (while on vacation) with additional operational questions.

Epstein’s reply was breathtaking in scope:

  • Scale: “Billions of dollars” in two years, “tens of billions by year 4.”

  • Structure: Donors choose from “silos” like mutual funds.

  • The Kicker: “However, we should be ready with an offshore arm — especially for vaccines.”

An offshore arm. For vaccines. For a charitable vehicle. Let that sink in.

So, by the time the world was panicking in March 2020, the financial machinery was already built. The investment vehicles, the donor-advised funds, the reinsurance products at places like Swiss Re, and even the simulation playbooks were dusted off and ready to go.

The pandemic wasn’t an interruption to their business—it was the Grand Opening.

Epstein’s role extended far beyond trafficking; he was a facilitator and blackmail operative for the global elite. The same forces that orchestrated the COVID-19 power grab—the mask mandates, lockdowns, censorship, and coercive mRNA push—are the ones who silenced critics like us.

Gates, despite his documented ties to Epstein (multiple flights on the “Lolita Express” after Epstein’s 2008 conviction), walks freely. He’s on TV. He’s advising governments. He’s still funding “global health initiatives” and pushing digital IDs, vaccine passports, and climate lockdowns.

Meanwhile, people like our friend, Joby Weeks, are under house arrest without charges, and voices like ours were de-platformed, demonetized, and destroyed for saying this very thing.

We told you. You knew it in your gut. Now you have the emails.

Censorship: The Elite’s “Misinformation” Label to Cover Their Crimes

The Epstein files expose not just criminal behavior, but the playbook for the systematic suppression of truth. While Epstein’s powerful friends were being protected by the FBI, the DOJ, and the media, platforms like Facebook (Meta), YouTube (Google), and Twitter went to war against anyone talking about it.

Think about the sheer audacity.

We were banned from social media for calling COVID-19 a “fake pandemic” and exposing the vaccine injury data that’s now undeniable.

Below is a screenshot of the first Facebook post that was taken down and then used as “Exhibit A” in their “reports” about how bad we were, naming us the 3rd most dangerous people on earth after Dr Joseph Mercola and Bobby Kennedy in the digital hit list they called the “Disinformation Dozen.” They attacked us, lied about us, and pressured the media, social media, and population at large to do the same: attack, threaten, and cast us out.

We were labeled “dangerous” for sharing emails, documents, and research that the DOJ and the CDC have now confirmed.

It was never about “safety.” It was about narrative control.

The same institutions that turned a blind eye to Epstein’s crimes for decades—the same ones that let him “commit suicide” in a maximum-security prison with cameras conveniently malfunctioning—suddenly became the ruthless hall monitors of “acceptable discourse,” ensuring only their approved stories could be told.

Big Tech, Big Media, and Big Government are all part of the same protection racket. They shielded Epstein’s client list, and now they shield the architects of the pandemic debacle. Independent journalists, researchers, and health advocates like us, who connected these dots, were systematically de-platformed, demonetized, and destroyed.

Why? Because we were right, and that was the greatest threat of all.

When you’re over the target, that’s when the flak gets heaviest. And brothers and sisters, we were getting shelled.

They Lied About Us While Protecting the Real Criminals

Let’s be crystal clear about what happened here.

We have spent decades exposing the cancer industry, Big Pharma’s corruption, and the suppression of natural health solutions. We produced The Truth About Cancer docu-series, reaching millions worldwide. We warned about vaccine injuries, censorship, and the coming medical tyranny years before COVID-19.

And what did they do? They called us “Conspiracy Theorists,” “Anti-Vaxxers,” and “Killers.” Dangerous.

They said we were killing people with “misinformation.”

Facebook banned us. YouTube deleted our videos. Legacy media ran hit pieces. PayPal froze our accounts.

All while Bill Gates—a man with documented ties to Jeffrey Epstein, who flew on his plane multiple times after Epstein’s conviction, who got STDs from Russian girls Epstein provided for him for which Gates asked Epstein’s help getting him antibiotics to slip secretly to his then wife, Melinda, so that she would not know about his inexcusable and perverted escapades—yes, THAT Bill Gates—was at the same time, being platformed on every major news network as the world’s health oracle.

All while Anthony Fauci—who funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan through Peter Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance, who lied under oath to Congress, who flip-flopped on masks, lockdowns, and vaccines—was treated like a saint. Time Magazine’s “Guardian of the Year.”

All while Pfizer—a company with a $2.3 billion criminal fine for fraudulent marketing, bribery, and kickbacks—was given blanket immunity from liability and billions in taxpayer dollars to produce a vaccine in record time with no long-term safety data.

Were we the dangerous ones?

No.

We were the truthful ones. And that made us the enemy.

The Weaponized Institutions: From Epstein’s Blackmail to Your Digital ID

Epstein’s operation was never just about blackmail for perversion; it was blackmail for control. The files show his cozy ties to intelligence agencies (Mossad, CIA), financial giants like JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank, and political leaders across the globe.

This is the same cabal now pushing:

  • The Great Reset

  • Digital IDs

  • Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs)

  • 15-minute cities

  • Carbon credit social scoring

  • Vaccine passports

Let’s connect the dots they desperately don’t want you to see:

Financial Control:

JPMorgan banked Epstein for years despite clear red flags—over $1 billion in suspicious transactions flagged internally and ignored. They knew. They didn’t care. They paid a $290 million fine and moved on.

Now, banks like Bank of America, Chase, and PayPal de-bank conservatives, truckers, health freedom advocates, and anyone who questions the narrative. Canadian truckers. Gun shops. Crypto entrepreneurs. The goal is the same: punish dissent and control economic life.

CBDCs are the endgame—a digital leash on every citizen. Programmable money that can be turned off, restricted, or expired. Social credit by another name.

Medical Tyranny:

The FDA, CDC, and WHO—utterly captured by Big Pharma—lied about:

  • COVID origins (Wuhan lab leak dismissed as conspiracy theory)

  • Vaccine efficacy (”95% effective” turned into “you need boosters forever”)

  • Natural immunity (ignored despite being superior)

  • Early treatments (ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D censored and mocked)

They attacked natural health advocates just as they’ve done for decades with cancer cures, detox protocols, and anything that threatens Big Pharma profits. They are not health agencies; they are profit-enforcement arms dressed in lab coats.

Political Corruption:

Epstein’s blackmail ensured elite immunity. His client list includes presidents, princes, CEOs, scientists, and media moguls.

Meanwhile, true dissidents—Julian Assange (tortured in prison for journalism), Edward Snowden (exiled for exposing mass surveillance), and journalists like us—face persecution, imprisonment, debanking, slanderous hit pieces, and/or constant character assassination.

Two systems of justice: one for them, one for you. One for Epstein’s friends, one for truth-tellers.

The Way Forward: They’re Exposed. Now It’s Time to Build.

The Epstein files are more than proof; they are a declaration that the system is rotten to its core. But here’s the beautiful part: they vindicate us completely.

Every warning. Every documentary. Every article. Every post that got us banned. All of it was true.

The globalists’ grip is weakening. The truth—the real, ugly, documented truth—is erupting from the very files they tried to hide. They labeled us liars, but the emails show they were the architects. They silenced us, they censored us, but that only made our voices more necessary.

Epstein did not kill himself. COVID-19 was not natural. The vaccines were not safe or effective. The censorship was not about protecting you—it was about protecting them.

And now? Now it’s time to use this vindication as fuel. Not for revenge, but for revolution. A revolution of truth, health, freedom, and justice.

They tried to bury us. They didn’t know we were seeds.

The Epstein files are a smoking gun. A paper trail. A confession written in emails, financial structures, and offshore accounts.

They prove what we’ve been saying all along:

  • The system is rigged.

  • The elites are criminals.

  • The pandemic was planned.

  • The censorship was coordinated.

And we were right. 👍

Source

🙏 Donations Accepted, Thank You For Your Support 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 Stripe:
1) or visit http://thedinarian.locals.com/donate

💳 PayPal: 
2) Simply scan the QR code below đŸ“Č or Click Here: 


🔗 Crypto Donations Graciously Accepted👇
XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals