TheDinarian
News • Business • Investing & Finance
Staking Regulation Best Practices: An Overview by Alison Mangiero, Executive Director of POSA
March 18, 2023
post photo preview

Key Takeaways

  • Alison Mangiero of POSA provides an overview of staking and its importance for the security and maintenance of blockchain networks, emphasizing that staking should not be considered an investment scheme or subject to securities regulations.
  • The regulatory landscape for staking is complex, needing a clear differentiation between staking, lending, and other financial products to facilitate appropriate regulatory treatment.
  • POSA established the Staking as a Service Industry Principles in 2019, providing guidelines for industry participants to maintain focus on network security and avoid regulatory scrutiny. The principles include using non-financial terminology, focusing on security and network participation, and not providing guarantees on rewards earned.
  • Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) should be accurately described and differentiated from derivatives (LSDs) to ensure clarity and avoid regulatory confusion. LSTs should not be considered investment contracts, notes, or securities under U.S. federal securities laws, nor should they be considered swaps under commodity law.
  • Accurate terminology and clear communication are crucial when discussing staking and related services, making it easier for regulators and lawmakers to understand the technology and its importance in blockchain networks.
  • Ongoing regulatory developments may include potential banking packages addressing stablecoin and custody regulations and additional enforcement actions targeting custodial staking arrangements.

  • The industry should prioritize educating regulators and lawmakers on the differences between staking, lending, and other financial products to facilitate appropriate regulatory treatment and promote a healthy regulatory environment.

In a recent panel discussion during the Staking Rewards Institutional Ethereum Staking Forum, Alison Mangiero, Executive Director of the Proof of Stake Alliance (POSA), delivered a comprehensive presentation on staking regulation in the blockchain industry. In her talk, Alison discusses the legal and regulatory landscape surrounding staking, various staking models, and how these regulations can impact the industry.

 

           

 

Understanding the Four Staking Models

Alison outlines four distinct staking models that exist within the blockchain space:

  1. Protocol staking: Users deposit ETH into a smart contract, run Ethereum software, and receive rewards directly from the protocol.
  2. Custodial staking: Users enter an agreement with a service provider to stake ETH using the provider’s infrastructure. The provider takes custody of the ETH.
  3. Delegated self-custodial Software as a Service (SaaS) staking: Users maintain control and ownership of their ETH while using professional software to stake. Custody of tokens is never relinquished.
  4. Smart contract-facilitated liquid staking: Users deposit ETH into a smart contract, which spins up a validator when it receives 32 ETH in total.

Staking is not an Investment Scheme

Alison emphasizes that staking should not be considered an investment scheme, as it is crucial for maintaining and securing blockchain networks. Validators provide technical services, not financial services. Thus, staking should not be viewed as an investment contract or security.

Staking as a Service Industry Principles

In 2019, POSA developed a set of Staking as a Service Industry Principles, which still hold relevance today:

  1. Use non-financial terminology when discussing staking.
  2. Focus on security and network participation.
  3. Do not provide guarantees on the amount of rewards earned.

Alison explains that these principles aim to help the industry provide a clear understanding of staking and its importance in blockchain networks.

Liquid Staking Tokens vs. Derivatives

A working group was formed to analyze liquid staking tokens (LSTs) under US law, concluding that LSTs for digital commodities should not be considered investment contracts, notes, or securities. They should also not be treated as swaps under commodity law. Alison stresses the importance of accurate terminology, advocating for using “liquid staking tokens” instead of the commonly misused term “liquid staking derivatives.”

Liquid Staking Principles

The working group also developed a set of liquid staking principles, which include:

  1. Using appropriate terminology to describe tokens (LSTs vs. LSDs).
  2. Focusing on increasing liquidity without sacrificing the importance of staking for security and network participation.
  3. Developing tools that enable direct staking with access to liquidity.
  4. Refraining from providing investment advice.

These principles aim to guide the industry in developing and offering liquid staking products without crossing regulatory boundaries.

Possible Regulatory Developments

Alison shares her thoughts on possible regulatory developments in the near future, such as a potential banking package that could include stablecoin and custody regulations. She also anticipates additional enforcement actions, although the specifics remain uncertain.

“I think there will be bills introduced in Congress. I think the likelihood of them passing is not likely in the coming months. But there will be some action from people trying to introduce sensible regulations.”

Alison Mangiero

Importance of Accurate Descriptions and Terminology

Alison concludes her talk with a call to the industry to use accurate descriptions and terminology when discussing staking and related activities. She believes that doing so will make engaging with regulators and lawmakers easier while explaining the importance of staking in blockchain networks.

“We should be cautious about the words that we use, the way that we’re describing the activities that we engage in, and also explain why it’s essential for the functioning of these networks.”

Alison Mangiero

Final Thoughts

Alison Mangiero of POSA highlights the importance of staking in the blockchain ecosystem and the need for a clear and accurate understanding of its role in maintaining network security. By following established industry principles and promoting accurate terminology, stakeholders can work together to create a favorable regulatory environment that fosters innovation and growth in the blockchain and staking sectors. As the industry evolves and regulatory landscapes change, education and open communication with regulators and lawmakers will be essential in ensuring that staking and related services are treated fairly and appropriately under existing and future regulations. For future conversations like this, check out our Staking Summit 2023.

Link

community logo
Join the TheDinarian Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
“We built the tools of our own destruction” Andre Cronje

“We built the tools of our own destruction”

Andre Cronje from @SonicLabs breaks down how DEFI is being absorbed by TradFi, why decentralisation is fading, and what the future really looks like

Love him or hate him, he's brutally honest and deeply insightful 🧠

00:09:29
⚠ As A Navy Veteran, This Tells Me Something BIG IS COMING!

🚨 This is a VERY big deal.

👉 U.S. Space Force Major General John Olson-just said, “There absolutely is life out there.”

👉 He said it during a press conference. Not in a podcast. Not off the record.

👉 Someone at that level, in that uniform, making a statement like this publicly? That’s not nothing. That’s a shift. A MAJOR SHIFT!

00:02:04
⚠ History Doesn't Always Repeat But History Sometimes Rhymes ⚠

Alex Jones says bad actors inside the United States are preparing to release a biological weapon on the American people on July 4th.

He claims they plan to blame Russia and China, then ultimately point the finger at Trump for pulling out of the World Health Organization.

👉He says a table-top exercise held last year simulated a bio-attack tied to Russia and China set for July 4th 2025.


The National Blueprint for Biodefense is a comprehensive report released by the Bipartisan Commission on Biodefense, aimed at addressing various biological threats such as naturally occurring diseases, accidental laboratory releases, and biological attacks. The 2024 edition of the Blueprint contains 36 recommendations and 185 action items to enhance the nation's biodefense capabilities.

This report was released in the context of rising threats from offensive biological weapons programs, lab accidents, and outbreaks, highlighting the need for significant reforms and improvements in the U.S. ...

00:02:42
👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? 🔜

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

👉 Here’s what you need to know:

💠 'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
💠 Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
💠 Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
💠 Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
💠 Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

👉 What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto 👉txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚨 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading
🪐🔗 XRPL EVM Sidechain Goes Live: Ethereum-Compatible Smart Contracts Arrive on XRP Ledger 🪐

The XRP Ledger has officially launched its Ethereum-compatible EVM sidechain on mainnet, unlocking a new era of cross-chain development and interoperability for the XRP ecosystem.

🔷 This EVM sidechain, built in partnership with Ripple, Peersyst, and Axelar, allows developers to build, port, and deploy Ethereum-style decentralized apps—such as DeFi, lending, tokenization, and payments—while leveraging the XRP Ledger’s hallmark low fees and high speed.

🔷 The sidechain operates in parallel to the main XRP Ledger, maintaining a secure connection via Axelar, which also bridges assets like wrapped XRP and links to dozens of other blockchain networks for seamless asset transfers.

🔷 Developers can now deploy EVM-based applications within the XRPL ecosystem, expanding programmability and utility without altering the core reliability of the XRP Ledger.

🔷 The launch has already attracted DeFi projects such as Band Protocol, Grove, and Squid, with more integrations—including ...

🌟🤖 Sonic & Kaito: Social Engagement Now Earns You S Token Airdrop Rewards! 🌟

🔷 Sonic has integrated with Kaito, a leading Web3 information dashboard, to launch a unique rewards system where your social contributions can boost your S token airdrop eligibility.

🔷 With the new Yapper Leaderboard, users earn Yap points for quality tweets and content that promote Sonic—covering topics like fee monetization, technology, DeFi apps, and ecosystem growth.

🔷 Points are retroactively tracked from the start of the current season, so all impactful posts count—even those made before the announcement.

🔷 To qualify, simply share insightful, positive, and educational content about Sonic on Twitter; misleading or malicious content may reduce your airdrop allocation.

🔷 This initiative shifts rewards from just DeFi activity to community-driven engagement, giving real value to those who shape the conversation and educate others.

🔷 The program aims to filter out bots and ensure only genuine contributors receive rewards, strengthening Sonic’s DeFi ecosystem and...

"DEFI won’t replace banks. It’ll power them"

Here are the 9 most interesting takeaways from Andre's @Permissionless roundtable:

1️⃣ Stablecoins will dominate DEFI
↳ The market will hit $1.5T+ in 5 years

2️⃣ TradFi is quietly adopting DEFI rails
↳ Regulated neobanks are already embedding DEFI yields straight into banking apps

3️⃣ Maximum decentralization peaked
↳ Most users don’t want to manage private keys or deal with bugs. They want safety, support, and some kind of “undo” button

4️⃣ DAOs mostly failed
↳ Years of DAO governance experiments led to inefficiency, waste, and misallocated funds. Builders now admit: real products need real teams

5️⃣ DEFI's killer feature: no gatekeepers
↳ In TradFi, you need permission to build. In DEFI, anyone can ship...even a 16-year-old dev with no funding

6️⃣ New regulation is bullish for DEFI
↳ Stablecoin issuers may be banned from offering native yield. That yield-hungry capital? It’ll flow straight into on-chain DEFI protocols

7️⃣ UX is DEFI ...

post photo preview
post photo preview
Musk Turns On Starlink to Save Iranians from Regime’s Internet Crackdown

Elon Musk, the world’s richest man and a visionary behind SpaceX, has flipped the switch on Starlink, delivering internet to Iranians amid a brutal regime crackdown.

This move comes on the heels of Israeli strikes targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities, as the Islamic Republic cuts off online access.

The former Department of Government Efficiency chief activated Starlink satellite internet service for Iranians on Saturday following the Islamic Republic's decision to impose nationwide internet restrictions.

As the Jerusalem Post reports, that the Islamic Republic’s Communications Ministry announced the move, stating, "In view of the special conditions of the country, temporary restrictions have been imposed on the country’s internet."

This action followed a series of Israeli attacks on Iranian targets.

Starlink, a SpaceX-developed satellite constellation, provides high-speed internet to regions with limited connectivity, such as remote areas or conflict zones.

Elizabeth MacDonald, a Fox News contributor, highlighted its impact, noting, "Elon Musk turning on Starlink for Iran in 2022 was a game changer. Starlink connects directly to SpaceX satellites, bypassing Iran’s ground infrastructure. That means even during government-imposed shutdowns or censorship, users can still get online, and reportedly more than 100,000 inside Iran are doing that."

During the 2022 "Woman, Life, Freedom" protests, Starlink enabled Iranians to communicate and share footage globally despite network blackouts," she added.

MacDonald also mentioned ongoing tests of "direct-to-cell" capabilities, which could allow smartphone connections without a dish, potentially expanding access and supporting free expression and protest coordination.

Musk confirmed the activation, noting on Saturday, "The beams are on."

This follows the regime’s internet shutdowns, which were triggered by Israeli military actions.

Adding to the tension, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the Iranian people on Friday, urging resistance against the regime.

"Israel's fight is not against the Iranian people. Our fight is against the murderous Islamic regime that oppresses and impoverishes you,” he said.

Meanwhile, Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of Iran’s last monarch, called on military and security forces to abandon the regime, accusing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a Persian-language social media post of forcing Iranians into an unwanted war.

Starlink has been a beacon in other crises. Beyond Iran, Musk has leveraged Starlink to assist people during natural disasters and conflicts.

In the wake of hurricanes and earthquakes, Starlink has provided critical internet access to affected communities, enabling emergency communications and coordination.

Similarly, during the Ukraine-Russia conflict, Musk activated Starlink to support Ukrainian forces and civilians, ensuring they could maintain contact and access vital information under dire circumstances.

The genius entrepreneur, is throwing a lifeline to the oppressed in Iran, and the libs can’t stand it.

Conservative talk show host Mark Levin praised Musk’s action, reposting a message stating that Starlink would "reconnect the Iranian people with the internet and put the final nail in the coffin of the Iranian regime."

"God bless you, Elon. The Starlink beams are on in Iran!" Levin wrote.

Musk, who recently stepped down from leading the DOGE in the Trump administration, has apologized to President Trump for past criticisms, including his stance on the One Big Beautiful Bill.

Source

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 PayPal: 
1) Simply scan the QR code below 📲
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian

🔗 Crypto – Support via Coinbase Wallet to: [email protected]

Or Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

Your generosity keeps this mission alive, for all! Namasté 🙏 Crypto Michael ⚡  The Dinarian

Read full Article
post photo preview
GENIUS Act lets State banks conduct some business nationwide. Regulators object

The Senate passed the GENIUS Act for stablecoins last week, but significant work remains before it becomes law. The House has a different bill, the STABLE Act, with notable differences that must be reconciled. State banking regulators have raised strong objections to a provision in the GENIUS Act that would allow state banks to operate nationwide without authorization from host states or a federal regulator.

The controversial clause permits a state bank with a regulated stablecoin subsidiary to provide money transmitter and custodial services in any other state. While host states can impose consumer protection laws, they cannot require the usual authorization and oversight typically needed for out-of-state banking operations.

The Conference of State Bank Supervisors welcomed some changes in the GENIUS Act but remains adamantly opposed to this particular provision. In a statement, CSBS said:

“Critical changes must be made during House consideration of the legislation to prevent unintended consequences and further mitigate financial stability risks. CSBS remains concerned with the dramatic and unsupported expansion of the authority of uninsured banks to conduct money transmission or custody activities nationwide without the approval or oversight of host state supervisors (Sec. 16(d)).”

The National Conference of State Legislatures expressed similar concerns in early June, stating:

“We urge you to oppose Section 16(d) and support state authority to regulate financial services in a manner that reflects local conditions, priorities and risk tolerances. Preserving the dual banking system and respecting state autonomy is essential to the safety, soundness and diversity of our nation’s financial sector.”

Evolution of nationwide authorization

Section 16 addresses several issues beyond stablecoins, including preventing a recurrence of the SEC’s SAB 121, which forced crypto assets held in custody onto balance sheets. However, the nationwide authorization subsection was added after the legislation cleared the Senate Banking Committee, with two significant modifications since then.

Originally, the provision applied only to special bank charters like Wyoming’s Special Purpose Depository Institutions or Connecticut’s Innovation Banks. Examples include crypto-focused Custodia Bank and crypto exchange Kraken in Wyoming, plus traditional finance player Fnality US in Connecticut. Recently the scope was expanded to cover most state chartered banks with stablecoin subsidiaries, possibly due to concerns about competitive advantages.

Simultaneously, the clause was substantially tightened. The initial version allowed state chartered banks to provide money transmission and custody services nationwide for any type of asset, which would include cryptocurrencies. Now these activities can only be conducted by the stablecoin subsidiary, and while Section 16(d) doesn’t explicitly limit services to stablecoins, the GENIUS Act currently restricts issuers to stablecoin related activities.

However, the House STABLE Act takes a more permissive approach, allowing regulators to decide which non-stablecoin activities are permitted. If the House version prevails in reconciliation, it could result in a significant expansion of allowed nationwide banking activities beyond stablecoins.

Is it that bad?

As originally drafted, the clause seemed overly permissive.

The amended clause makes sense for stablecoin issuers. They want to have a single regulator and be able to provide the stablecoin services throughout the United States. But it also leans into the perception outside of crypto that this is just another form of regulatory arbitrage.

The controversy over Section 16(d) reflects concerns about creating a regulatory gap that allows banks to operate interstate without the oversight typically required from either federal or state authorities. As the two Congressional chambers work toward reconciliation, lawmakers must decide whether stablecoin legislation should include provisions that effectively reduce traditional banking oversight requirements.

Source

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 PayPal: 
1) Simply scan the QR code below 📲
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian

🔗 Crypto – Support via Coinbase Wallet to: [email protected]

Or Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

Your generosity keeps this mission alive, for all! Namasté 🙏 Crypto Michael ⚡  The Dinarian

Read full Article
post photo preview
Dubai regulator VARA classifies RWA issuance as licensed activity
Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA) leads global regulatory framework - makes RWA issuance licensed activity in Dubai.

Real-world assets (RWAs) issuance is now licensed activity in Dubai.

~ Actual law.
~ Not a legal gray zone.
~ Not a whitepaper fantasy.

RWA issuance and listing on secondary markets is defined under binding crypto regulation.

It’s execution by Dubai.

Irina Heaver explained:

“RWA issuance is no longer theoretical. It’s now a regulatory reality.”

VARA defined:

- RWAs are classified as Asset-Referenced Virtual Assets (ARVAs)

- Secondary market trading is permitted under VARA license

- Issuers need capital, audits, and legal disclosures

- Regulated broker-dealers and exchanges can now onboard and trade them

This closes the gap that killed STOs in 2018.

No more tokenization without venues.
No more assets without liquidity.

UAE is doing what Switzerland, Singapore, and Europe still haven’t:

Creating enforceable frameworks for RWA tokenization that actually work.

Matthew White, CEO of VARA, said it perfectly:

“Tokenization will redefine global finance in 2025.”

He’s not exaggerating.

$500B+ market predicted next year.

And the UAE just gave it legal rails.

~Real estate.
~Private credit.
~Shariah-compliant products.

Everything is in play.

This is how you turn hype into infrastructure.

What Dubai is doing now is 3 years ahead of everyone else.

Founders, investors, ecosystem builders:

You want to build real-world assets onchain.

Don’t waste another year waiting for clarity.

Come to Dubai.

It’s already here.

 

Source

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 PayPal: 
1) Simply scan the QR code below 📲
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian

🔗 Crypto – Support via Coinbase Wallet to: [email protected]

Or Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

Your generosity keeps this mission alive, for all! Namasté 🙏 Crypto Michael ⚡  The Dinarian

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals