Vechain’s ‘Web3 For Better’ Whitepaper

Summarising Our Approach to Global Sustainability Challenges

March 27, 2023

The launch of our new whitepaper, co-developed with Boston Consulting Group (BCG), marks a seismic shift in the utilisation of blockchain technology in the pursuit of Environmental, Social, and corporate Governance (ESG), Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) and achieving global sustainability targets.

Titled ‘Web3 For Better’, the new whitepaper details a comprehensive approach to tackling sustainability challenges using ‘blockchain biospheres’ — ecosystems that leverage the core strengths of blockchain technology to create highly transparent, efficient and modular networks of companies and individuals to address sustainability challenges. These ecosystems deploy the approach of ‘gamification’, a concept where active engagement and participation by users is rewarded, creating powerful positive feedback loops to further incentivise sustainable actions.

Vechain has already demonstrated the efficacy and value of its technologies at scale with some of the largest global enterprises. By combining these experiences with BCG’s expertise and vast client network, we’re embarking on the next steps in our journey and globalising our successes, launching a new web3-powered era of green global development.

Below — we summarise the contents of the whitepaper to explain the core ethos and path forward in this new chapter in the mainstreaming of blockchain technology.

Redefining The Role of Web3 and Concepts of Value

‘Web3’ is a term to describe the evolution of data ownership and the internet itself. In the current iteration — Web2 — users create or view information, submitted to, and stored by, tech providers who ultimately control information flows, leveraging these data to create value for themselves.

In Web3, we extend beyond the simple ‘read and write’ paradigm and instead, enable an environment where users can immutably create, own and fully control their data, generating value from it for the first time. Web3 also allows users to exchange value with others directly, removing the need for intermediaries. Web3 is often referred to as the ‘Internet of Value’ for this reason.

In this new epoch, the notion of value itself is shifting. Purchasing decisions such as ethics or sustainability create opportunities for consumers to drive social change through the brands and companies they engage with. These ‘positive externalities’ are overlooked in legacy valuation models and represent new opportunities to apply blockchain and create value for brands based on consumer activity.

A recent Boston Consulting Group survey of approximately 19,000 consumers found that 16% cited sustainability as one of the top-three drivers in their most recent purchase. A significantly larger share said they could be persuaded to make sustainable choices if the products or services deliver other related needs.

Put simply, social and environmental factors, or essentially, choices, create new kinds of market value that legacy models fail to take into account. It is with this framework that vechain and Boston Consulting Group are upending the traditional valuation model of goods and services by leveraging the power of blockchain to generate new economically valuable insights.

Going Green With Gamification

Humans are motivated by rewards and incentives. In our vision for a greener future, people are at the centre of game design — their motivations and needs shape how incentives are constructed.

For ecosystem enablers/developers, gamification enhances community engagement, generates deeper insights into consumer behaviours, increases retention and more. For participants, gamification creates community, promotes feelings of belonging, accomplishment, and ownership as well as creating tangible direct benefits such as providing discounts and services.

For example, a user journey can be created to increase second-hand fashion buyer engagement, leveraging NFTs and token-gated access. A digital product passport (tokenomics built using NFTs) can facilitate ownership transfer of a product from seller to buyer in a secure and immutable way, earning some kind of tokenized reward upon doing so.

As the buyer collects more product digital passports, their status grows and are motivated to earn extra tokens awarded in pursuit of certain milestones (e.g., their tenth purchase). Upon doing so — they gain special access to features, perhaps discounts, or certain desirable capabilities within the ecosystem (a process called ‘tokengating’).

In turn, this can be applied to create more nuanced perks across ecosystems and industries with the Blockchain Biosphere, creating new webs of engagement and multiplying the effect of individual actions..

Vechain’s ‘Blockchain Biospheres’

Vechain’s blockchain biospheres are a revolutionary approach to enabling sustainability using ecosystems of incentives and direct engagement. Blockchain biospheres are industry-spanning ecosystems dedicated to solving specific sustainability/industry needs, whether tackling sustainable approaches to global logistics trails or quantifying carbon capture and tokenizing emissions reductions of the energy sector. Early precursors of these biospheres included our Carbon Credit DApp built in 2018 with DNV and BYD, and later, becoming the tech provider for San Marino as it builds towards carbon neutrality.

For blockchain biospheres to thrive, an ecosystem’s business model must make economic sense and provide the right incentives for each actor, whether business or individual. For new ecosystems to take hold, we must also incorporate new, broader concepts of value, create a new kind of economic approach and reward/promote pro-societal and eco-friendly behaviours.

We can imagine a scenario where a reseller from a second-hand sustainable fashion ecosystem receives tokens for their efforts in promoting reuse of clothing. They can then spend those tokens for reduced fees at a charging station in the electric vehicle (EV) ecosystem. In close collaboration with Boston Consulting Group, we are in the process of expanding our enterprise partnerships and developing additional technical capabilities to support these kinds of inter-connected Biospheres.

Token holders and service providers are more motivated to contribute to and build on the ecosystems they participate in, thus growing the value of their impact, holdings and ecosystems at large. Blockchain biospheres directly incentivise participation by all kinds of users and recognise individuals, through rewards, for their activities. With these solutions, vechain is creating technical solutions to radically enhance the impact of individual actions.

Second-Hand Fashion Marketplace

One of our first examples is a second-hand marketplace ecosystem dedicated to promoting sustainable fashion. The objective is to promote the reuse and trusted after sale of clothing, reducing the environmental impact of the fashion industry while giving ecosystem participants more control over the authentication process of sales and purchases.

With on-chain fungible tokens, NFTs, smart contracts, and DAOs, vechain and BCG are creating greater customer engagement and stickiness. Beyond deploying digital assets, elements of Web3 can be used to roll out features that incentivise greater participation and promote loyalty, such as:

• Fungible and non-fungible tokens (e.g., spendable loyalty currencies, NFTs) to gamify interactions, track engagements with sellers and reward loyalty with real-world perks and benefits

• Utility or “Phygital” NFTs issued to reward activity in the ecosystem by unlocking early access, discounts, and unique experiences

• Deploying blockchain-based tokens to plug-in external partners and merchants. The immediate transaction settlement and interoperability rules programmed in Smart Contracts automates the manual overhead associated with such collaborations

• Token gating — aka a certain level of engagement as a requisite for access — to enable smoother collaboration between parties, and more engaging, rewarding experiences for users

• DAO-like structures to enable voting on brand decisions, such as products to launch or partnerships to bring onboard. Governance can be configured to give certain token holders’ votes more weight depending on loyalty status, history of engagement, participation in key challenges etc

The Current Strategy

In traditional resale markets, sellers list goods on a marketplace. Higher value goods such as luxury items require authentication at physical locations, in exchange for a commission. Once purchased, goods are shipped to the buyer, who relies on the credibility of the marketplace for authentication. Payment flows from the buyer, through the marketplace, to the seller.

The Web3 Approach

In the web3 second-hand market for fashion, sellers list goods on the marketplace. Instead of the seller shipping the goods to an authentication site, the goods are sent straight to the buyer, having already been implanted with vechain’s NFC + blockchain technologies. The buyer scans the tag to verify the authenticity of the goods themselves. Payments are executed by smart contracts and sent directly to the seller, without intermediary or commission taking.

Electric Vehicle Battery Recycling

Another key target for our blockchain biospheres are electric vehicle (EV) batteries. The objective of this ecosystem is to use blockchain technology to create battery passports, based on NFT technology, that enable full lifecycle traceability of batteries, easing the recycling process and promoting the reuse of critical materials.

EVs are estimated to make up half of US automobile sales by 2030, according to Bloomberg. That rapid growth makes it an imperative to explore the challenges facing the sector as it continues to evolve and scale. We have identified three significant pain points for EVs and batteries:

1. High initial carbon footprint for manufacturing EVs

2. Low recycling and second life usage of EV batteries

3. Lack of engagement after initial EV sale

The European Union’s battery mandate requires that a certain percentage of a lithium-ion battery’s content come from recycled sources. A predicted shortage of the precious metals used to construct new EV batteries creates an imperative to build technical solutions to mitigate issues before they arise.

Governments are providing significant monetary incentives to build-out EV battery supply chains and recycling systems. These trends create a wealth of opportunity for vechain’s technologies.

The Current Strategy

In the traditional EV battery lifecycle, there is low credibility with supply chain sustainability due to a lack of transparency. Consumers have minimal insight into the manufacturing of EVs, including their batteries. Additionally, there is a lack of traceability of batteries after the initial EV sale, either heading to landfill or recycling sites with no oversight or ability to verify.

The Web3 Approach

In vechain’s EV Battery Ecosystem, a phygital battery passport, powered by NFTs, becomes the enabler of sustainable behaviour. The passport collects information throughout the manufacturing process, sale process, second-hand customers, and eventually, recycling facilities, who can access the EV battery passports and retrieve battery information to complete the cycle, creating visibility across the entire lifecycle.

3D Printing and Supply Chain at the Edge (SC@E)

Our third ecosystem deploys novel technologies to tackle entrenched problems with modern supply chains. 3D printing in combination with blockchain technology is providing a powerful answer to address the sustainability challenges of the logistics industry.

Global supply chains account for 8% of annual carbon emissions, according to the International Energy Agency. The magnitude of these emissions is only projected to grow in coming decades. While this is a well-established industry, there are three significant pain points:

1. Supply chains are significant producers of carbon emissions

2. Expensive and lengthy transportation routes for spare parts from original equipment manufacturers (OEMs)

3. Unused inventory leading to waste and working capital losses

SC@E replaces traditional manufacturing with blockchain-enhanced 3D printing in a process that looks like the following:

A customer initiates the process by placing a request for a spare part
The request is sent to the owner of the spare part’s intellectual property who relays a digital blueprint to a 3D printing facility close to the customer
Automobile Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) send blueprint files to 3D printing facilities, securely facilitated by VechainThor

The Current Strategy

In the current supply chain and logistics industry, OEMs manufacture a spare part far away from the end user. The part may be transported hundreds or thousands of miles to the end user through a variety of transportation methods, generating significant emissions. The whole process can take days or weeks, leading to long lead times in the case of supply chain shocks.

The Web3 Approach

Supply Chain at the Edge is a more versatile and streamlined process in which the OEM is only responsible for designing the parts. When an end user has a request for a part, that part will be printed close to them after the digital file has been sent to a 3D printer via blockchain. The lead time for parts shrinks drastically, as does the emissions related to the product’s manufacturing and delivery.

The SC@E ecosystem generates three sources of value:

1) Carbon emissions savings from on-location 3D printing of physical goods, eliminating long-distance shipping

2) Time saved — 3D printing locally takes 12–24 hours and can be delivered quickly. Overseas manufacture and transportation can take weeks to reach final customers

3) Additional economic opportunities — faster supply chains allows OEMs to reduce inventory stockpiles since they can rely on on-demand 3D printing. This reduces capital costs and lets OEMs scale down inventory warehouses, increasing economic opportunity elsewhere

Vechain’s Mass Adoption: Next Gen Tooling, Integrating The System Integrators

Naturally, vechain’s technologies play a core role in the development of Blockchain Biospheres. We are building many new powerful features to enable wider scale adoption of vechain and to create technical parity with the world’s largest blockchain, Ethereum.

In the current enterprise landscape, many have opted to use private blockchains based on Ethereum technologies. With this parity, vechain will allow the seamless porting of projects to our public blockchain VechainThor.

Powerful Tools

One of the core components of this mission is our upcoming web3-as -a-service platform, VORJ.

VORJ is our most advanced toolset yet — a Web2-based portal to cater for the most demanding Web3 needs. Featuring a familiar UI, it allows users to mint, and manage fungible and non-fungible tokens, access a wide-array of smart contract templates built to Ethereum standards and a smart contract wizard for quick deployment. With this approach, we ensure seamless interoperability with other EVM networks.

We recently launched VeWorld, a powerful Web wallet, soon to be launched in mobile and desktop versions. One of the upcoming features — integration of URL-based fee delegation — means users can easily configure transaction cost payments with third parties such as vechain.energy, removing a key hurdle to mass adoption.

The wallet will feature innovative functions such as a fiat on/off ramp, token bridges, a native DEX, a native NFT viewer and more.

Other key technical features include the deployment of a carbon footprint explorer via VechainStats, an official sustainability-focused NFT marketplace, oracle integration to bridge data from the real world and other blockchains, greatly enhancing cross-chain operability and a DAO development framework.

We have been dedicating significant resources to improving developer tooling, including contract development framework integration, a contract development IDE, the OpenZeppelin smart contract library, Ethereum’s Hard Hat and Truffle toolsets and more.

Integrating The System Integrators

A key adoption vector for vechain is through the various global system integrators — a dedicated team is now focused on working with various global ERPs to offer vechain-as-a-service, leveraging our powerful VORJ platform.

Through this approach, the VechainThor blockchain is obtaining global accessibility at a far greater scale than before. This approach, in tandem with the extensive networks of our strategic partners is placing vechain at the core of enterprise blockchain development, and promises to see our blockchain thrive as a core player in the web3 era.

Next Steps

Launching and establishing the first ecosystems is now our core priority. With our tool sets almost live, we are coordinating something grander in collaboration with our strategic partners.

We are identifying players who fit the roles needed for each sustainability ecosystem to operate and who understand the necessary incentives for stakeholders to participate. Our differentiated underlying technologies and portfolio of real-world applications (co-developed through enterprise partnerships) are providing a springboard for vechain to become the enabler of Web3 at scale, and empower people to drive positive change.

Closing Remarks

The Blockchain Biosphere approach represents the foundational layer of the next decade of blockchain development. These interconnected ecosystems finally offer individuals the platform to drive meaningful outcomes, at scale.

Web3 technologies distribute power among the many instead of concentrating it among the few. Through our promotion of continuous research and innovation, in partnership with academic institutions, developers, and strategic partners, vechain is advancing Web3 in its entirety, powering practical and efficient solutions to address real-world challenges.

With new governance and economic models that will cater for smooth and scalable adoption of vechain’s blockchain, our Biosphere represents a significant moment in the history of this emerging industry.

Join us, and let’s build the future of sustainability, together.

About vechain

Vechain, headquartered in San Marino, Europe, is the curator of VechainThor, a world leading smart contract platform spearheading the real world adoption of blockchain technology.

Through leveraging the capabilities of ‘trustless’ data (information without intermediaries), smart contracts and IoT technologies, VechainThor has enabled solutions across a wide array of fields. Vechain now turns its attention to the greatest challenge of all — building digital ecosystems to drive sustainability and digital transformation at global scale.

Visit https://www.vechain.org to learn more.

Join the TheDinarian Community

To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today

thedinarian@thedinarian

February 17, 2025

The Dawn of DeFi: The Hidden War for a Decentralized Future

👉 DON'T FADE THIS ARTICLE~ Crypto Michael AKA "The Dinarian"

The below article is NOT financial advice, it is being broadcast for entertainment purposes only. You should DO YOUR OWN RESEARCH and NEVER invest any more than you are willing to lose. On that note, THIS ARTICLE AND THE UNDERLYING ASSET DISCUSSED COULD CHANGE YOUR LIFE FOR THE BETTER FOREVER! You SHOULD pay close attention as this MAY BE THE MOST IMPORTANT article you could ever have read, unless you were fortunate enough to read the Bitcoin whitepaper and had invested in it back in 2008. The asset I am about to present to you, COULD EASILY FLIP BITCOIN! ESPECIALLY WITH TODAYS ADMINISTRATION IN PLACE!
~ Namasté 🙏 Crypto Michael AKA "The Dinarian"

Attempted Theft of the World's Most Valuable Property, SEC Lawfare & The ETHgate Scandal

It is widely accepted that the media often spreads misinformation and hides any truth that challenge the establishments narratives. Well, this is one of those hidden truths...

Loans without Banks, Trades without Exchanges, Contracts without Lawyers. Peer to Peer Capital Markets disrupts traditional finance by removing middlemen and counter-party risk, enabling you to become your own bank by holding the keys to it all in your own privately held digital wallet.

To what lengths do you think the establishment would go to defend their control of the financial system? A system seemingly ripe with market manipulation, naked shorts, money laundering and regulatory capture.

The Myth of Open Source

For context, in the realm of open source, major corporations can engage in Intellectual Property theft by using open source projects to gain insights, technology, or legal protections without fully reciprocating to the community. Companies might contribute code to an open source project, only to later use that same code in commercial products, extending it with enhancements, essentially using open source as a low-cost R&D resource. Patents are crucial here, serving as a defense mechanism. Although open-source licenses cover copyrights, they don't extend to patents, meaning that companies holding patents can enforce legal protections against unauthorized commercial use, ensuring that any commercial application of their patented technology within open-source software requires proper licensing or recognition. This protection has historically led to the hyper-growth of industries like mobile phones and the internet, where patented technologies could be safely shared and built upon, promoting innovation and market expansion.

Validating Inventorship

In fields such as technology, pharmaceuticals, and manufacturing, patents are vital for safeguarding new inventions, with Nikola Tesla's extensive patent portfolio serving as a testament to his contributions to science.

However, Tesla's revolutionary inventions, like the Wardenclyffe Tower which aimed at providing free wireless energy, faced fierce opposition due to their potential to disrupt established control over energy markets. Financially sabotaged by investors like J.P. Morgan, legally challenged through "the war of currents" by Thomas Edison's promotion of the less efficient Direct Current system, and undermined by media smear campaigns, Tesla's work was systematically suppressed. After his death, the FBI's seizure of his documents further suggests efforts to control or conceal his ideas that could disrupt centralized energy distribution, illustrating how innovation can be stifled to maintain existing power structures.

Could this type of suppression still be happening today?

The Genesis of Decentralized Finance

Reggie Middleton first introduced Distributed Finance what would later become known as Decentralized Finance (DeFi), in 2013 when he invented and patented technologies under the title "Devices, systems, and methods for facilitating low trust and zero trust value transfers." This included groundbreaking concepts like programmable Smart Contracts, Swaps, Tokenized Assets, NFTs, Stable Coins, Digital Wallets, and even underpin Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs).

https://patents.google.com/patent/US11196566B2/en?oq=US11196566+

Called by many as "The Most Valuable Property in the World", his patents US11196566B2, US11895246B2, JP6813477B2, JP7204231B2, JP7533974B2, & JP7533983B2 have been cited over 138 times by major financial institutions, underscoring their foundational role in the blockchain industry.

His patents cover:

Trustless Peer-to-Peer Value Transfers: Systems for enabling decentralized and secure value transfers between parties without the need for intermediaries. Applicable to cryptocurrency transactions, DeFi platforms, and digital payment systems.
Decentralized Financial Systems (DeFi): Methods and devices that facilitate decentralized trading, lending, borrowing, and yield generation. Impacting decentralized exchanges (DEXs) like Uniswap, SushiSwap, and similar platforms.
Smart Contracts: Implementation of self-executing contracts on blockchain networks, used to automate agreements and enforce conditions without intermediaries. Essential for platforms such as Ethereum, Cardano, and other Layer-1 and Layer-2 blockchain protocols.
Tokenized Asset Trading: Methods for creating, transferring, and trading tokenized assets, including cryptocurrencies, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and digital securities. Platforms like OpenSea, Rarible, and asset tokenization platforms may fall within the scope.
Cryptographic Security and Wallet Systems: Systems for securing digital assets using cryptographic methods, including cold storage, multi-signature wallets, and multi-party computation (MPC). Potential overlaps with services offered by companies like Coinbase, Kraken, Gemini, and institutional custody providers.
Decentralized Identity and Verification Systems: Technologies for managing and verifying digital identities on decentralized networks, including for KYC (Know Your Customer) purposes. Likely touching on identity solutions like Civic, BrightID, and Blockstack.
Blockchain-Based Voting and Governance: Systems for implementing decentralized voting, governance, and consensus mechanisms, foundational to DAO (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations). Relevant to governance platforms like Aragon, Snapshot, and MakerDAO.
AI Economic Agentic Computing: First introduced by the VeADIR Platform refers to the application of autonomous agents in economic systems, where software entities can make decisions, negotiate, and execute transactions independently. These agents use artificial intelligence to analyze market data, predict trends, and optimize economic activities like trading, resource allocation, and supply chain management. Used by OpenAi, Claude Sonnet, Meta and xAI.

The societal value of these patents to disrupt traditional financial models and fintech business practises, by essentially removing the banks as middlemen, create significant economic incentives to suppress his work.

True Decentralization

Current Decentralized Exchanges (DEXs) often fall short of being truly decentralized due to various practical and structural limitations. Although DEXs leverage blockchain technology and smart contracts to enable trading without a central authority, aspects like governance, liquidity, and user interface can introduce centralization. Governance tokens might be concentrated in the hands of a few, influencing decision-making unevenly. The frontend, controlled by developers, represents a centralized point of control or potential failure. Liquidity pools can be dominated by a handful of large providers, leading to centralized liquidity dynamics. Some DEXs implement regulatory compliance like KYC/AML, which inherently involves centralized oversight. The use of layer-2 solutions for scalability might also undermine decentralization if not fully autonomous.

However, patents like US11196566B2 and US11895246B2 could pave the way for true decentralization by introducing innovations in blockchain interoperability and decentralized governance mechanisms. These patents potentially offer solutions for more evenly distributed control over exchange operations, enhancing the autonomy and distribution of decision-making, thus moving closer to genuine decentralization in the DEX ecosystem, which can be expanded to other industries like Healthcare, Supply Chain, or any other industry that trades value.

Who is Reggie Middleton?

Reggie Middleton, through his BoomBustBlog, became a notable figure in financial analysis, particularly for his early and accurate predictions regarding the collapses of Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns during the 2008 financial crisis. His blog was renowned for providing in-depth, contrarian insights into economic trends, investment opportunities, and corporate vulnerabilities. Reggie won the CNBC's stock draft consecutively for two years, and appeared on major financial news networks like CNBC, BBC and Bloomberg where he discussed market trends, his forecasts, and the implications of financial strategies adopted by major firms. His track record has undeniably positioned him as a significant voice in the financial commentary space.

Reggie's work gained public attention when he appeared on the Keiser Report and CNBC in 2014, premiering his innovations built on the Bitcoin blockchain called "Ultracoin", two years before Ethereum captured the crypto limelight.

His vision was to create sound markets for a financial ecosystem where loans could be issued without banks, trades executed without exchanges, and contracts enforced without lawyers, aiming to disintermediate traditional finance by removing the middleman that doesn't add value.

In 2014, Reggie pioneered a simple Apple trade using a Pure Bitcoin Wallet: The Ultracoin Client.

Ultracoin later renamed VERI short for “Veritaseum” meaning "of truth", was the

first to market in tokenizing precious metals, offering VeGold, VeSilver and even tokenized fiat currencies or so called "Stablecoins". Veritaseum also introduced VeRent creating yield through P2P lending, and the revolutionary VeADIR platform, an autonomous, blockchain-powered research platform that independently evaluates and acts on dynamic research in real-time, communicates in machine language, and operates by purchasing, analyzing, and distributing insights on various assets while allowing VERI token holders to access and trade this research.

In 2018 he created the worlds first Gold Denominated Blockchain Mortgage

with traditional written note, mortgage as well as a smart contract on a public blockchain, both of whom incorporate each other by reference. The transaction had traditional title insurance and the note was recorded with the county clerk. The mortgage was denominated in Veritaseum's VeGold product, a digital form of gold in bearer form, fully transferable and redeemable upon demand.

Merely a few examples of groundbreaking products offered by Veritaseum.

Coinbase's Challenge: The Patent Infringement Suit

Coinbase, a dominant force in the cryptocurrency exchange market, enlisted the services of Perkins Coie, one of the largest patent law firms, to contest the validity of Reggie Middleton's patents.

They launched an Inter Partes Review (IPR) at the Patent Trials and Appeals Board (PTAB), arguing that Middleton's patents lacked novelty. An overwhelming 85% of patents are invalidated through this process. However, Coinbase's challenge was denied along with the appeal, thereby upholding and strengthening the validity of Reggie's patents.

This IPR challenge came after Veritaseum sued both Coinbase and Circle USDC for $350 million each over patent infringement. Unfortunately, Reggie's patent attorney and close friend passed away during this suit, so the cases has been dismissed without prejudice, meaning they can be negotiated or the cases reopened at any time. This leaves Coinbase in a precarious position, especially if shareholders have not been properly informed of this risk.

This lawsuit details how Coinbase's infrastructure, specifically its Ethereum and Solana validator nodes, engage with client devices to facilitate transactions. Exhibit #3 meticulously outlines the patent's claims, detailing the roles of computing devices, the use of memory for key pair storage, network interfaces for transaction terms, and the generation and dissemination of transaction data records. It provides concrete examples such as the processing of NFT transactions on Ethereum and the management of transaction fees on Solana, supported by in-depth references to code and API interactions. Furthermore, the exhibit explains the verification of transactions through an external state, illustrating how Coinbase's technology aligns with the patent's principles for decentralized transaction processing without a central authority.

SEC's Intervention: A Turning Point

In 2019, with promising negotiations on the horizon with both the Jamaican and the Nigerian Stock Exchanges for digital asset platforms, Reggie's world was turned upside down.

The SEC accused Reggie of fraud, alleging he misled investors about the functionality of Veritaseum's VeADIR platform, which the SEC ordered to be shut down following a live demonstration. The SEC also made claims on the validity of Reggie's patent applications, which have since been approved by both the USPTO and the Japan Patent Office. Oddly enough, the SEC may actually infringe on these very patents through the disgorgement and storage of seized crypto tokens.

Despite Veritaseum's cooperation with the SEC over a two-year period, along with a detailed response addressing the SEC's allegations, and not one token holder claiming to be defrauded, these allegations still led to a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) that froze millions in assets, destroying the company's operations, and forcing a consent judgment "neither confirming or denying the allegations". The SEC would top it all off with a gag order that barred Reggie from publicly discussing the matter.

Keep in mind, the SEC is claiming jurisdiction by calling Utility Tokens "Digital Asset Securities" but recently SEC Commissioner @HesterPeirce stated:

"...by using imprecise language we've been able to suggest the token itself is a security, apart from that investment contract, which has implications for Secondary Sales, it has implications for who can list it...

We've fallen down on our duty as a regulator not to be precise. So, tucking into a footnote that yes we admit that now that the TOKEN ITSELF IS NOT A SECURITY, that is something we should have admitted long ago and then started wrestling with the difficult questions."

This calls into question if the SEC even had jurisdiction to bring forth this case to begin with. The Veri Community would later challenge the SEC's unproven allegations against Reggie with

a Dossier supporting the Vacating or Setting Aside of this case, and suggesting possible misconduct by the SEC.

Allegations of SEC Misconduct:

Misrepresentation of Facts: Assertions that the SEC deliberately mischaracterized the
functionality of the VeADIR platform, along with the patents and their value, by labeling them as lacking novelty and part of fraudulent activities.
Misleading Evidence: The SEC's use of declarations from Patrick Doody and Roseann Daniello, which contained misleading information about the personal ownership of a Kraken account used to misappropriate funds. Doody would later correct his statement, but the SEC did not update the court with this new information, potentially misleading the judicial process.
Conflict of Interest: Doody's undisclosed financial interests in the digital asset space through Lily Pad Capital LLC could suggest a bias in his testimony, which was pivotal in obtaining the TRO.
Coercion and Intimidation: Witnesses like Lloyd Cupp and John Doe provided affidavits claiming coercion by SEC attorneys to alter their testimonies, pointing towards witness tampering and intimidation.

FOIA Responses: The SEC's FOIA department initially denied any communications with Kraken, only later admitting to subpoena issuance, suggesting an attempt to obscure facts.
RICO Allegations: A 95 page RICO Dossier, supported by extensive evidence, alleges that the SEC's actions could resemble an organized crime syndicate, with systemic coercion, misrepresentation, and procedural misconduct aimed at Reggie Middleton.
Bar Complaint: The Veri community lodged a Bar Complaint against the SEC's Lead Attorney
over the use of misleading evidence, coercion and intimidation of witnesses.

Summary Articles of the B ar Complaint and RICO Dossier

Comparisons with the SEC Misconduct in the DEBT Box Case

The DEBT Box case shares a troubling parallel with the Veritaseum case. In both cases a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) freezing funds was issued using dubious evidence which suppressed the ability to defend themselves. This behavior was already admonished by five US Senators

in a letter to Commissioner Gary Gensler in which the SEC presented misleading claims in this now high-profile cryptocurrency case.

"Regardless of whether Commission staff deliberately misrepresented evidence or unknowingly presented false information, this case suggests other enforcement cases brought by the Commission may be deserving of scrutiny. It is difficult to maintain confidence that other cases are not predicated upon dubious evidence, obfuscations, or outright misrepresentations."

Given the similarities in alleged procedural misconduct between the cases, it raises systemic questions about the SEC’s litigation approach in cryptocurrency matters.

This parallel underscores a potential agency-wide issue that could involve either implicit biases against crypto companies or an explicit strategy to pursue aggressive, potentially misleading tactics in court.

Is The Fox Guarding the Hen House?

In a significant development, the Attorney Grievance Committee (AGC) has decided to forward a complaint against SEC attorney Jorge Tenreiro to the SEC's Office of General Counsel (OGC) for investigation. This controversial move suggests a potential conflict of interest, given that the OGC is part of the SEC, the very agency where Tenreiro was recently promoted to Chief Litigation Counsel. The complaint, filed by the Veri community, accuses Tenreiro of misconduct including alleged coercion, witness tampering, and misrepresentation during SEC investigations. The Veri Community argues that this decision undermines the integrity of the legal process, as the OGC's role is to provide legal advice and defend the SEC, not to independently investigate its own employees. This raises questions about the impartiality and transparency of the disciplinary process for attorneys, especially when it involves high-profile figures like Tenreiro.

"As noted in re Rowe, 80 N.Y.2d 336 (1992), the public’s confidence in the legal profession depends on transparent and impartial disciplinary processes. Delegating oversight to the SEC, where Mr. Tenreiro remains a senior official and where the OGC has a clear institutional stake, jeopardizes this confidence and risks the appearance of protectionism.”

The VeriDAO has submitted a response letter to the AGC along with creating a PDF generator
to help the estimated 100 complainants and anyone else interested in requesting the AGC to reconsider this action.

Legal and Judicial Trials

The legal battles would only continue for Reggie. The case of Hall v. Middleton, in which Hall, a 1% shareholder sued Reggie, raises concerns of judicial bias and procedural mishandling. In this case, Reggie was denied Due Process and barred from presenting crucial evidence or calling witnesses due to his former attorneys' "Office Failures" that missed deadlines to submit evidence without the knowledge of Reggie or the firm Brundidge & Stanger that outsourced his counsel as detailed in their affirmations.

"In my many years of practice it is a rare instance where I have witnessed an attorney intentionally not file critical documents as required by Court Order without the permission or knowledge of his client, who had an established and fully developed attorney client-relationship with said attorney, and then misrepresent that the requirements of the Court Order were being satisfied. This is one of those instances and I hope not to see another."
~ Carl Brundidge

The judge ruled that Reggie must:

Pay a $1M fine to his company Veritaseum Inc., in which he owns 99%
The plaintiff was awarded costs of $495k against Veritaseum Inc.
The Judge ordered Patents (filed before the creation of Veritaseum Inc.) to be assigned to the company without compensation.

Attorney's "Office Failures":

Sheridan England missed critical deadlines, resulting in the striking of exculpatory evidence. England’s inaction or inadequate defense exacerbated Middleton’s legal vulnerability, directly leading to adverse outcomes.

Judge Schecter’s Conduct:

Ignoring Exculpatory Evidence: Despite knowledge of its existence, Schecter struck Middleton’s post-trial memorandum.
Procedural Bias: The judge’s decisions systematically favored Hall, including allowing him to collect attorney fees from Middleton personally, contrary to the principles of derivative law.
Forced Patent Transfers: Schecter’s order to transfer patents to an underfunded entity (Veritaseum) which were court restrained by the same judge, rendering them defenseless against attacks and IP theft.

This ordeal was compounded when Reggie was held in Contempt for using personal funds (while Veritaseum’s funds were court-restrained) to successfully defend his patents against an IPR challenge by Coinbase in the PTAB of the USPTO in an attempt to invalidate these patents. The Forced Patent Expropriation to Veritaseum without compensation or the ability to defend them could be seen as coordinated as it benefited very large competitors seeking to avoid licensing fees or infringement claims, or possibly even IP Theft.

Judicial Complaint: A formal complaint has been filed with the NYS Commission on Judicial Conduct by the Veri Community.

ETHgate: The Broader Conspiracy Allegations

Parallel to Middleton's struggles, "ETHgate" emerged, involving allegations by Ethereum co-creator @StevenNerayoff. Nerayoff claimed a government conspiracy aimed at controlling or monopolizing cryptocurrency development by targeting key figures. This narrative suggested that by attacking innovators (like Reggie Middleton as the Veri Community contends), the SEC might have indirectly cleared a path for Ethereum, which, despite its decentralized claim, benefited from a regulatory environment less scrutinized than its competition.

The term "ETHgate" encapsulates the belief that Ethereum's "Free Pass" from regulatory scrutiny might not just be due to its technological merits but also due to strategic regulatory maneuvers, where attacking smaller or less established DeFi projects could safeguard larger, more influential platforms like Ethereum.

Back in 2021, @JohnEDeaton1 from @CryptoLawUS explained XRP's side of Ethereum's "Free Pass". More recently, further SEC RICO Claims are insinuated in "RIGGED from the start" a documentary by @Fruition_News , along with posts by @KuwlShow and the XRParmy involving the SEC, Ethereum, a16z, and Consensys surrounding the Bill Hinman speech. Active FOIA requests by @EleanorTerrett seek to shed light on meetings between Hinman and Ethereum members.

Given the SEC protection of ETH and the high probability of Ethereum infringing on Reggie Middleton's patents as meticulously detailed in Exhibit #3 of the Coinbase case, is it ridiculous to believe Reggie Middleton could have been targeted?

Community Support: The Backbone of Resilience

Despite the SEC's narrative labeling them as "The Defrauded," the Veritaseum community rallied around Reggie.

SmartMetal with embedded NFT avalaible through VeriDAO.io

Financially devastated and with his funds frozen, Reggie faced foreclosure and was threatened with jail time after contempt charges for defending his patents using personal funds. In a remarkable show of support, the Veri Community rallied, raising an impressive $149,000 in less than two weeks to cover the fine while the case is under appeal.

They funded legal battles largely through donations and more recently with innovative means like NFT silver rounds called SmartMetal using Reggie's patented technologies, underscoring their belief in his vision. The first minted round was auctioned off for an astonishing $14,000 won by "M S"

"There is no better witness to the veracity of any defense than the alleged defrauded defending the alleged fraud at their own expense"
~ The Veri Community

This community support was not just financial but also moral, with efforts such as an Amicus Brief in the case against XRP, a No Action Letter (NAL) seeking clarity on secondary market sales of tokens, a Bar Complaint against the SEC's newly promoted Chief Litigation Counsel, and the @dao_veri's

#ProjectSunlight The SEC RICO Revelation.

A Call for a New Regulatory Paradigm

Reggie Middleton's saga is emblematic of the challenges faced by pioneers in the blockchain and DeFi arenas. His patents, now granted, underscore their foundational nature, yet the path to their recognition was marred by legal battles, suggesting a systemic issue where the regulatory framework might not fully comprehend or support emerging tech. His resilience, supported by an unwavering community and the validation of his intellectual property, underscores the need for a regulatory environment that fosters rather than stifles innovation. As blockchain technology continues to evolve, Reggie's story serves as a critical reference for balancing innovation with legal and ethical governance, ensuring that the future of finance remains open to all, not just those with the resources to navigate the legal maze.

For more information visit https://veridao.io/

I know what everyones question is, "HOW CAN I GET MY HANDS ON THE $VERI TOKEN BEFORE EVERYTHING GETS REVERSED AND RELEASED BACK TO THE COMMUNITY?"

Your in luck: Mark is a trusted source, longtime Veri Vet that beta tested the VeADIR platform. Simply follow the thread below. I highly advise picking up a few, and tuck them away! This is the token that could literally FLIP BITCOIN $100k and beyond!

The information provided in this video, including but not limited to documents regarding legal matters, is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal (or any other) advice, and no warranties or representations are made regarding the accuracy, completeness, or fitness of the information for any specific purpose. VeriDAO and its operators do not act as attorneys or legal, financial or technical professionals or advisors and are not responsible for any actions taken or decisions made based on the content provided. Users should seek independent legal counsel for any legal advice or guidance. By watching this video, you agree that VeriDAO and its operators shall not be held liable for any damages or legal consequences arising from the use or misuse of the information contained herein.

Link

Disclaimer:

The content provided in this document is intended strictly for informational and educational purposes only. This document constitutes a research opinion and should be regarded as such. All claims, statements, allegations, and opinions contained within are based on publicly available information and are allegations unless and until proven in a court of law. The authors expressly disclaim any representation or warranty regarding the truthfulness, accuracy, completeness, fitness for a particular purpose, or durability of the information contained herein.

The authors of this document are not licensed attorneys or legal professionals and do not claim to provide legal, financial, or professional advisory services. Nothing in this document should be construed as legal advice, legal opinion, or any form of licensed advisory counsel. If you require legal assistance or professional advice, you are strongly encouraged to consult a licensed attorney or qualified expert in the relevant field. The authors are laypersons presenting research-based opinions, and as such, this document should not be relied upon to make any decisions of legal, financial, or professional significance.

The authors make no guarantees, express or implied, regarding the completeness or reliability of the information presented. No warranties of any kind are offered regarding the accuracy, validity, timeliness, or completeness of any information within this document. The information may contain errors or inaccuracies, and any use of it is entirely at your own risk.

Furthermore, this document may contain statements of belief, criticism, or commentary, and all such statements are offered solely as opinions protected under the principles of free speech. The authors disclaim liability for any interpretation that may be construed as libel, slander, or defamation, as the document aims to present alleged facts and subjective opinions for educational research purposes only. All statements about individuals, organizations, or entities should be understood as unproven allegations, and readers are urged not to interpret them as established facts.

The authors will not be liable for any damages, losses, or legal consequences that arise from the use, misuse, or reliance on the information provided herein. No responsibility is assumed for any actions or decisions that any party may make based on this document. The reader assumes full responsibility for any and all consequences that may arise from using the information contained in this document.

By accessing and using this document, you agree that neither the authors nor any affiliated parties shall be held liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or punitive damages resulting from your use of this information. The authors reserve the right to update or revise the information in this document at any time without notice, but they are under no obligation to do so.

Finally, any statements regarding individuals, entities, or organizations are not intended to malign, defame, or harm the reputation of those mentioned. Any resemblance to real individuals or incidents is purely coincidental, unless otherwise explicitly stated, and the authors urge readers to exercise caution and discernment when interpreting the information presented.

This document is a work-in-progress, part of an ongoing investigative process, and should not be treated as definitive or final. Readers are encouraged to independently verify the information and seek professional advice before acting on any information herein.

Read full Article