TheDinarian
News • Business • Investing & Finance
Will MiCA stifle stablecoins?
April 20, 2023
post photo preview

Highlights

  • MiCA bans interest/benefit payments for stablecoins
  • This likely applies only to interest paid by the issuer
  • DeFi protocols often provide regulated activities
  • National regulators could decide someone controls the DeFi protocol (is a CASP)
  • Every transaction other than P2P self custody is caught by AML travel rule (no €1,000 minimum)
  • Do stablecoin issuers have to KYC every holder?

With the EU’s Markets in Crypto Assets Regulations (MiCAR) receiving a final vote tomorrow, some have wondered about the impact on stablecoins. Specifically, if a ban on stablecoin interest could inhibit decentralized finance (DeFi) and how additional anti-money laundering (AML) crypto-asset regulations could impact transactions. Stablecoins should do just fine despite the interest ban and vastly expanded AML, but the conclusion comes with caveats. 

There was no intention for the first iteration of MiCAR to address DeFi explicitly. However, as we’ll show, it would be a mistake to assume that all DeFi protocols get a free pass.

MiCA bans stablecoin interest and benefits

Starting with the MiCAR interest clause, stablecoins are either e-money tokens or asset-referenced tokens, but there’s a ban on interest on both

The big picture vision for stablecoins is to create a low cost programmable form of payments for everyday use. Today adoption for these purposes is limited, and DeFi has been one of the growth engines of stablecoins. A big part of that has been the use of stablecoins on DeFi lending and borrowing protocols such as Compound and Aave. And they pay interest.

Article 45 Prohibition of interests
By derogation to Article 12 of Directive 2009/110/EC, no issuer of e-money tokens or crypto-asset service providers shall grant interest or any other benefit related to the length of time during which a holder of e-money tokens holds such e-money tokens.

So the question is whether these interest clauses mean that regulators will pursue Aave and Compound for paying interest. The answer boils down to two factors: is the protocol interest the same type of interest or benefit that the prohibition refers to? And do Aave and Compound get a free pass because this iteration of MiCAR doesn’t directly target DeFi? The answers are broadly positive for stablecoins but not clear cut.

Does the MiCA interest ban apply to lending protocols?

The interest ban clause derives from e-money laws which also ban interest to differentiate e-money from banking. Hence the real intent of the ban is to prevent the stablecoin issuer from behaving like a bank.

Clifford Chance’s Diego Ballon Ossio highlighted to Ledger Insights that the clause is positioned in the section regarding stablecoin issuance, reinforcing the view that it’s targeting stablecoin issuers. However, it also mentions crypto asset service providers (CASPs). The lawyer noted that the mention of CASPs prevents a service provider from becoming a deposit taker of electronic money. 

Ledger Insights believes that the centralized crypto lender Nexo does something similar. Currently, someone can send euros to Nexo, which converts it into its own euro stablecoin EURx on which it pays interest. You won’t find EURx on crypto trading platforms because it’s an internal stablecoin which is currently allowed as an exception under current e-money regulations. But probably not with this new MiCAR clause.

Regarding whether MiCA impacts lending protocols, the Clifford Chance view is that lending protocols enable secondary value added services that are not inherently part of the stablecoin. In contrast, the interest and benefits clause intends to prevent stablecoin issuers from behaving like banks. There are analogies with other financial transactions, such as securities lending, where the compensation would not be considered a relevant interest or benefit because the issuer does not provide the service.

“If you have secondary transactions, repos (repurchase agreements), securities lending or collateral and I make my assets available, that is not inherent to the asset as such, that is an extra service,” said Clifford Chance partner Marc Benzler. But he added that it depends on the specific circumstances. 

There was also the question of whether a return earned on money deposited in a liquidity pool for automated market makers (AMM) would be a benefit tied to the stablecoin. However, that would even more obviously be a secondary type of transaction. But there could be unexpected legal risks involved in liquidity pool participation, as we’ll explore later.

Do DeFi protocols get a free pass?

Despite MiCAR not explicitly targeting DeFi, some DeFi protocols could be targeted for enforcement by national regulators.

“DeFi is the elephant in the room with MiCA,” said Ballon Ossio. “It’s been kicked down the road. And it creates circumstances where the rules either don’t work or can be circumvented by using the technology. The person who’s doing that carries a degree of legal risk.”

While MiCA is a uniform regulation across the EU, it will be enforced by national regulators, which means the treatment won’t be the same everywhere.

MiCAR particularly targets the activities of crypto asset service providers (CASPs), meaning centralized finance (CeFi) providers are the main players impacted. However, if a national regulator deems that someone involved in a DeFi protocol controls the processes and is involved in a regulated activity, they will consider them a CASP.

The draft regulation covers a list of a dozen CASP activities which include functions that DeFi protocols often perform, such as: 

  • operating a trading platform
  • the exchange of crypto-assets for other crypto-assets
  • the reception and transmission of orders for crypto-assets on behalf of third parties.

Ballon Ossio says a regulator isn’t going to target a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) just because it’s a DAO. “They couldn’t get them because they’re a DeFi protocol. They’d have to get them because they’re doing one of the CASP activities and somebody is responsible for it, and they haven’t gotten a license for it,” he said.

A decision on whether someone is carrying on a particular activity is a question of local law and the particular facts. For example, in some jurisdictions, it could be a matter of whether someone controls the code or has significant influence even if they are not the sole controller.

“The question is can you prove it, make a case, bring an enforcement action?” he added. “You have layers of regulatory decision-making that might prevent anything happening to the protocol. But the fundamental principle of whether it is out of scope because it’s a protocol is something I think that regulators will push back on.”

Hence, DeFi protocols won’t necessarily get a free pass. But they also are less likely to be the first targets of enforcement.

Stablecoins, AML and the travel rule

A raft of new EU laws around anti money laundering are being finalized that include crypto but are not specific to it. Additionally, specific AML crypto-asset legislation for the so-called travel rule had its final debate alongside MiCAR today. 

Dealing first with the travel rule, one surprise is the EU has dropped the de minimis threshold of €1,000, meaning every single transaction involving a CASP will require the AML travel rule data to be passed along.

The one plus of the travel rule is it doesn’t apply to self custody transactions that don’t involve a CASP. The draft law has a clause that excludes transactions where “the transfers constitute person-to-person transfers of crypto-assets carried out without the involvement of a crypto-asset service provider.” And it adds that e-money tokens are considered as crypto-assets for this clause.

Will AML mean every stablecoin holder must be KYC’d?

The broader AML legislation raises some thorny questions for stablecoins.

The legislation considers an e-money issuer as a financial institution with an AML responsibility when establishing a business relationship or if token holders plan “occasional” transactions. 

Some argue that a holder of a stablecoin has a relationship with the issuer and hence the stablecoin issuer needs to perform AML on every holder, which would be bad news for stablecoins

A contrasting view is to consider an analogy, such as whether a bond issuer has to perform KYC or AML relating to secondary market transactions in which it has no direct involvement. A different example is insurers only need to perform AML on beneficiaries at the point of payout. So a stablecoin issuer could execute KYC and AML at redemption.

However, this is a topic where we have yet to come to a definitive conclusion.

The many MiCA questions

After the detour on the separate AML legislation, one final point regarding MiCA is the considerable uncertainty around many aspects of the bill. But that is the norm for financial market regulations. The industry will lobby and the regulators will respond with answers to frequently asked questions.

Talking generally about financial services regulations, Ballon Ossio observed, “It’s surprising how sophisticated players are used to dealing with uncertainty in the context of financial services regulation.” He added, “If you come at it cold, there are lots of gaps in there that the market has dealt with through custom and now has become settled. That needs to happen with MiCA.”

Link

community logo
Join the TheDinarian Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
👉 BlackRock CEO Larry Fink admits he was wrong about crypto.
00:00:45
🇺🇸 President Trump says there will be no income tax "at some point in the not-too-distant future."

As I have been telling you for a few years now, ALL Tax has ALWAYS been voluntary, since WWII donations started.

He has to do it this way so there isn't a revolution on the government's hands. If THEY just came out and told you it has always been voluntary, the people would rise up and take to the streets. There would be mass chaos. -Crypto Michael ⚡️The Dinarian

00:00:12
🚨 “WHAT HAPPENED IN CRYPTO TODAY” – COINTELEGRAPH’S DAILY WRAP 🚨

Cointelegraph’s live-blog snapshot (edition: 27 Nov 2025) packs the market-moving headlines, on-chain sparks and policy sound-bites that ricocheted through crypto in 24 hrs – from a surprise Basel stablecoin concession to a record open-interest print on BTC futures.

🔑 Key Headlines

🔹️ Basel Boost: BCBS officially dropped the punitive 1 250 % risk-weight for bank-held stablecoins (Tether, USDC) and replaced it with a tiered 20 %–100 % framework – unleashing a 2.4 B intraday rally in stablecoin issuer tokens and bank-centric DeFi plays.

🔹️ BTC Open Interest Record: Aggregate perpetual & futures OI hit 53.8 B (Deribit + CME + Binance) – 7 % above April peak – as whales added 1.1 B long exposure ahead of Friday’s 0-DTE expiry; funding flipped +18 % annualised.

🔹️ Nasdaq Tokenized Equities Live: Nasdaq’s ATS-Clearing hybrid went live with 3 private-company tokens; first trade executed 4.3 M face value in T+0 settlement, marking the first regulated U.S. exchange to custody & ...

00:00:06
👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? 🔜

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

👉 Here’s what you need to know:

💠 'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
💠 Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
💠 Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
💠 Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
💠 Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

👉 What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto 👉txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚨 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

If you're using a Ledger Nano X, Flex, or Stax device, the most recent update has also introduced a Bluetooth pairing issue....

Not to worry, you just need to delete the existing device pairing and re-pair it to get it working again.

https://support.ledger.com/article/15158192560157-zd

post photo preview

LATEST: 🚨 The official Pepe memecoin site has reportedly been compromised to redirect users to malicious links containing Inferno Drainer code, with Blockaid warning users to stay clear until the issue is resolved.
https://x.com/CoinMarketCap/status/1996648256357408978

🚨 UPDATE: CFTC NOW PERMITS SPOT CRYPTO TRADING ON REGISTERED EXCHANGES 🚨

In a landmark first for U.S. digital-asset regulation, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has officially green-lighted spot crypto trading on federally registered exchanges, starting with Chicago-based Bitnomial this week. The move brings Bitcoin, Ether and other commodity-tokens under the same century-old regulatory umbrella that governs U.S. futures, options and swaps—complete with leverage, unified margin and clearing-house protection.

🔑 Key Breakthroughs

🔹️ Historic First: Bitnomial’s Designated Contract Market (DCM) and Derivatives Clearing Organization (DCO) will list spot BTC, ETH, XRP, SOL side-by-side with futures & perps—single portfolio margin, net settlement, T+0 delivery.

🔹️ Federal Umbrella: All orders—retail or institutional—clear through a CFTC-supervised clearing house, eliminating the patch-work of state money-transmitter licences that has kept U.S. leverage platforms ...

post photo preview
XDC Network's acquisition of Contour Network

XDC Network's acquisition of Contour Network marks a silent shift to connect the digital trade infrastructure to real-time, tokenized settlement rails.

In a world where cross-border payments still take days and trap trillions in idle liquidity, integrating Contour’s trade workflows with XDC Network Blockchains' ISO 20022 financial messaging standard to bridge TradFi and Web3 in Trade Finance.

The Current State of Cross-Border Trade Settlements

Cross-border payments remain one of the most inefficient parts of global finance. For decades, companies have inter-dependency with banks and their correspondent banks across the world, forcing them to maintain trillions of dollars in pre-funded nostro and vostro balances — the capital that sits idle while transactions crawl across borders.

Traditional settlement is slow, often 1–5 days, and often with ~2-3% in FX and conversion fees. For every hour a corporation can’t access its own cash increases the cost of financing, tightens liquidity that could be used for other purposes, which in turn slows economic activity.

Before SWIFT, payments were fully manual. Intermediary banks maintained ledgers, and reconciliation across multiple institutions limited speed and volume.

SWIFT reshaped global payments by introducing a secure, standardized messaging infrastructure through ISO 20022 - which quickly became the language of money for 11,000+ institutions in 200 countries.

But SWIFT only fixed the messaging — not the movement. Actual value still moves through slow, capital-intensive correspondent chains.

Regulated and Compliant Stablecoin such as USDC (Circle) solves the part SWIFT never could: instant, on-chain settlement.

Stablecoin Settlement revamping Trade and Tokenization

Stablecoin such as USDC is a digital token pegged to the US Dollar, still the most widely used currency for trade, enabling the movement of funds instantly 24*7 globally - transparently, instantly, and without the need for any intermediaries and the need to lock in trillions of dollars of idle cash.

Tokenized settlement replaces multi-day reconciliation with on-chain finality, reducing:

  • Dependency on intermediaries
  • Operational friction
  • Trillions locked in idle liquidity

For corporates trapped in long working capital cycles, this is transformative.

Digital dollars like USDC make the process simple:

Fiat → Stablecoin → On-Chain Transfer → Fiat

This hybrid model is already widely used across remittances, payouts, and treasury flows.

But one critical piece of global commerce is still lagging:

👉 Trade finance.

The Missing link is still Trade Finance Infrastructure.

While payments innovation has raced ahead, trade finance infrastructure hasn’t kept up. Document flows, letters of credit, and supply-chain financing remain siloed, paper-heavy, and operationally outdated.

This is exactly where the next breakthrough will happen - and why the recent XDC Network acquisition of Contour is a silent revolution.

It transforms to a new era of trade-driven liquidity through an end-to-end digital trade from shipping docs to payment confirmation – one infrastructure that powers all.

The breakthrough won’t come from payments alone — it will come from connecting trade finance to real-time settlement rails.

The XDC + Contour Shift: A Silent Revolution

  • Contour already connects global banks and corporates through digital LCs and digitized trade workflows.
  • XDC Blockchain brings a settlement layer built for speed, tokenization, and institutional-grade interoperability and ISO 20022 messaging compatibility

Contour’s digital letter of credit workflows will be integrated with XDC’s blockchain network to streamline trade documentation and settlement.

Together, they form the first end-to-end digital trade finance network linking:

Documentation → Validation → Settlement all under a single infrastructure.

XDC Ventures (XVC.TECH) is launching a Stable-Coin Lab to work with financial institutions on regulated stablecoin pilots for trade to deepen institutional trade-finance integration through launch of pilots with banks and corporates for regulated stable-coin issuance and settlement.

The Bottom Line

Payments alone won’t transform Global Trade Finance — Trade finance + Tokenized Settlement will.

This is the shift happening underway XDC Network's acquisition of Contour is the quiet catalyst.

Learn how trade finance is being revolutionised:

https://www.reuters.com/press-releases/xdc-ventures-acquires-contour-network-launches-stablecoin-lab-trade-finance-2025-10-22/

Source

🙏 Donations Accepted, Thank You For Your Support 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 Stripe:
1) or visit http://thedinarian.locals.com/donate

💳 PayPal
2) Simply scan the QR code below 📲 or Click Here

🔗 Crypto Donations Graciously Accepted👇
XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
Inside The Deal That Made Polymarket’s Founder One Of The Youngest Billionaires On Earth🌍

One year ago, the FBI raided Polymarket founder Shayne Coplan’s apartment. Now, the college dropout is a billionaire at age 27.

In July, Jeffrey Sprecher, the 70-year-old billionaire CEO of Intercontinental Exchange, the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, sat at Manhatta, an upscale restaurant in the financial district overlooking the sprawling New York City skyline from the 60th floor. As a sommelier weaved through tables pouring wine, in walked Shayne Coplan—in a T-shirt and jeans, clutching a plastic water bottle and a paper bag with a bagel he’d picked up en route. Sprecher chuckles as he recalls his first impression of the boyish, eccentric entrepreneur: “An old bald guy that works at the New York Stock Exchange, where we require that you wear a suit and tie, next to a mop-headed guy in a T-shirt that's 27.” But Sprecher was fascinated by Polymarket, Coplan’s blockchain-based prediction market, and after dinner, he made his move: “I asked Shayne if he would consider selling us his company.”

Prediction markets like Polymarket let thousands of ordinary people bet on future events—the unemployment rate, say, or when BitCoin will hit an all-time high. In aggregate, prediction market bets have proven to be something of a crystal ball with the wisdom of the crowd often proving itself more prescient than expert opinion. For instance, Polymarket punters predicted that Trump would prevail in the 2024 presidential election, when many national pundits were sure that Kamala Harris would win.

Coplan initially turned down Sprecher’s buyout offer. But discussions led to negotiations and eventually a deal. In October, Intercontinental announced it had invested $2 billion for an up to 25% stake in the company, bringing the young solo founder the balance he was looking for. “We're consumer, we’re viral, we're culture. They’re finance, they’re headless and they’re infrastructure,” Coplan tells Forbes in a recent interview.

At the same time, Coplan announced investments from other billionaires including Figma’s Dylan Field, Zynga’s Mark Pincus, Uber’s Travis Kalanick and hedge fund manager Glenn Dubin. A longtime Red Hot Chili Peppers fan, Coplan even convinced lead singer Anthony Kiedis to invest after a mutual acquaintance brought the musician to Coplan’s apartment one day. “He's buzzing my door, and I’m like, ‘holy shit,'” Coplan recalls, his bright blue eyes widening. “I love their music. A lot of the inspiration [for my work] comes from the music that I listen to.”

Thanks to the deals, Polymarket’s valuation quickly shot to $9 billion, making the 2025 Under 30 alum the world’s youngest self-made billionaire, with an estimated 11% stake worth $1 billion. His reign was short: twenty days later, he was overtaken as the youngest by the three 22-year-old founders of AI startup Mercor.

Young entrepreneurs are minting ten-figure fortunes faster than ever. In addition to the Mercor trio and Coplan, 15 other Under 30 alumni—including ScaleAI cofounder Lucy Guo, Reddit’s Steve Huffman and Cursor’s cofounders—became billionaires this year, while Guo’s cofounder Alexandr Wang and Robinhood’s Vlad Tenev (both former Under 30 honorees) regained their billionaire status after having fallen out of the ranks.

The budding billionaire has long been fascinated by markets and tech. When he was just 14, Coplan emailed the regional Securities and Exchange Commission office to ask how to create new marketplaces. “I did not get a response, but it’s a really funny email,” he says, grinning playfully as he thinks of his younger self. “It just shows that this stuff takes over a decade of percolating in your mind.”

Two years later, Coplan showed up at the offices of internet startup Genius uninvited after multiple emails of his asking for an internship went ignored. At age 16—at least a decade younger than anyone in that office—he secured his first job after making a memorable impression with his “wild curls” and “encyclopedic knowledge of billionaire tech entrepreneurs.” “If he chooses to become a tech entrepreneur, which seems likely, I have no doubt that we’ll be seeing his name again in the press before long,” Chris Glazek, his manager at the time, wrote in Coplan’s college recommendation letter.

Coplan went on to study computer science at NYU, but dropped out in 2017 to work on various crypto projects that never took off. In 2020, he founded Polymarket to create a solution to the “rampant misinformation” he saw in the world: The company’s first market allowed users to bet on when New York City would reopen amid the pandemic. He soon expanded into elections and pop culture happenings, among other events.

But it didn’t take long for the company to butt heads with regulators. In January 2022, Polymarket paid a $1.4 million fine to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission for offering unregistered markets. It was also ordered to block all U.S. users, but activity on Polymarket skyrocketed particularly during the 2024 U.S. presidential election, with bets totaling $3.6 billion. A week after the election, the FBI raided Coplan's apartment and seized his devices as part of an investigation into a possible violation of this agreement. Shortly after, Coplan posted on his X account that he saw the raid as “a last-ditch effort” from the Biden administration “to go after companies they deem to be associated with political opponents.”

In July, the Department of Justice and CFTC dropped the investigations—after which Sprecher reached out to Coplan for dinner—and less than a week later, Polymarket announced it had acquired CFTC-licensed derivatives exchange QCX to prepare for a compliant U.S. launch. QCX applied to be a federally-registered exchange in 2022—an application that was left dormant for three years before receiving approval less than two weeks before the acquisition was announced. When asked about the timing of the deal, Coplan points to CFTC acting chairwoman Caroline Pham, who President Trump tapped to lead the agency in January. “Caroline deserves a lot of credit for getting every single license that had been paused for no reason approved, as acting chairwoman in less than a year,” he says. Coplan had realized an acquisition might be the only way for Polymarket to legally operate in the U.S. as early as 2021 due to the lengthy federal approval process, a source familiar with the deal told Forbes.

Just two months after the acquisition and days after Donald Trump Jr. joined Polymarket’s advisory board, the company received federal approval to launch in the U.S. (Trump Jr. has also served as a strategic advisor to Polymarket’s main competitor Kalshi since January.)

Polymarket’s rapid rise has drawn critics. Dennis Kelleher, co-founder and CEO of Washington-based financial advocacy group Better Markets, told Forbes in an email that the current administration’s deregulation around prediction markets has unlocked a regulatory “loophole” to enable “unregulated gambling” under the CFTC, “which has zero expertise, capacity or resources to regulate and police these markets.” Kelleher added that with backing from the Trump family “who are directly trying to profit on this new gambling den… the massive deregulation and crypto hysteria will almost certainly end badly for the American people.”

Investors and businesses are scrambling to seize the moment of deregulation. “We had opportunities to invest in events markets earlier, but there was a lot of risk,” Sprecher says, listing the regulatory changes in favor of crypto and prediction markets under the current administration. “This was the moment to invest if we wanted to still be early in the space.”

In the last few months, Trump’s Truth Social and sportsbook FanDuel, as well as cryptocurrency exchanges Crypto.com, Coinbase and Gemini all announced their own plans to offer prediction markets. Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev said prediction markets, which were integrated into its platform in March, were helping drive record activity for the retail brokerage in its third quarter earnings call.

“People are starting to realize right now that the opportunities are endless,” says Dubin, the billionaire hedge fund veteran who invested in Polymarket earlier this year. He points to sports betting companies, which have been regulated by states as gambling activity and taxed accordingly. States like New York can tax up to 51% of sportsbooks’ revenue, but federally-regulated prediction markets can bypass state laws, avoiding taxes and operating in all 50 states. With the realization that prediction markets could upend the sports betting industry—which brought in $13.7 billion in revenue in 2024—businesses are quickly jumping on board despite pushback from state gambling regulators. In October, both Polymarket and Kalshi secured partnerships with sportsbook PrizePicks and the National Hockey League, and Polymarket announced exclusive partnerships with sportsbook DraftKings and the Ultimate Fighting Championship.

The disruption won’t be limited to sports betting. Alongside its investment, Intercontinental’s tens of thousands of institutional clients including large hedge funds and over 750 third-party providers of data will soon have access to Polymarket data, as it gets integrated into Intercontinental’s products such as indices to better inform investment decisions. It also hopes to work with Polymarket to work on initiatives around tokenization—or converting financial assets into digital tokens on blockchain technology—to allow traders on Intercontinental’s exchanges to trade more flexibly at all hours of the day, Sprecher says. What’s more, in November, Google Finance announced it would integrate Polymarket and Kalshi data into its search results, while Yahoo Finance also announced an exclusive partnership with Polymarket.

Despite flashy investors, partnerships and a record $2.4 billion of trading volume in November, Polymarket has yet to launch in the U.S. or turn a profit. Coplan and his investors have hinted at ways the company could make money one day—selling its data, charging fees to users, launching a cryptocurrency token (similar to Ethereum or Bitcoin)—but decline to confirm any specifics. For now, the only thing that’s certain is the bet Coplan is making on himself. “Going for it and having it not pan out is an infinitely better outcome than living your life as a what if,” he says.

Standing across from the New York Stock Exchange building, Coplan tilts his head up as he watches a massive banner with Polymarket’s logo get hoisted onto the exterior of the building. It’s been five years since founding. One year since the FBI raid. He’s taking it all in. “Against all odds,” the bright blue banner reads, rippling in the wind alongside three American flags protruding from the building.

Source

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 Stripe:
1) or visit http://thedinarian.locals.com/donate

💳 PayPal
2) Simply scan the QR code below 📲 or Click Here

🔗 Crypto Donations Graciously👇
XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
Epstein-Linked Emails Expose Funding Ties to Bitcoin Core Development — Here Is What the Documents Reveal
  • Newly released emails show Jeffrey Epstein helped fund MIT’s Digital Currency Initiative, which supported Bitcoin Core development.
  • The documents also confirm that Leon Black donated to MIT’s Media Lab through Epstein-directed channels.
  • The revelations reshape part of Bitcoin’s early institutional funding history and highlight long-hidden influence from controversial donors.

Newly unsealed emails from the House Oversight Committee have shed fresh light on Jeffrey Epstein’s hidden financial influence inside MIT’s Media Lab — and more importantly, how some of that money flowed into Bitcoin Core development. The correspondence reveals that Joichi Ito, then-director of the MIT Media Lab, relied on Epstein-connected “gift funds” to rapidly launch the Digital Currency Initiative (DCI) in 2015, the research hub that became one of the primary sources of funding for Bitcoin’s core developers.

Emails Show Epstein-Connected Money Helped Launch MIT’s Digital Currency Initiative

In the newly surfaced emails, Ito directly thanked Epstein for the financial help that allowed MIT to “move quickly and win this round,” referring to the formation of DCI — a program explicitly designed to provide long-term support for Bitcoin Core contributors after the collapse of the Bitcoin Foundation. Ito’s forwarded message to Epstein described how the foundation’s implosion left core developers without stable funding, creating an opening for MIT to bring them under its umbrella.

He explained that three major developers — including Wladimir van der Laan and Cory Fields — agreed to join MIT, calling it “a big win for us.” The email also highlighted early support from prominent academics, including cryptographer Ron Rivest and IMF economist Simon Johnson. Epstein simply replied: “gavin is clever.”

Funding Numbers Reveal a Much Larger Financial Trail

MIT publicly claimed that Epstein donated $850,000 to the institution, with $525,000 flowing to the Media Lab. But journalist Ronan Farrow later reported the true figure was closer to $7.5 million — including a $5 million anonymous donation connected to Epstein associate Leon Black. The new emails appear to confirm that Black not only donated, but did so through Epstein’s direction.

One email from Ito to Epstein reads: “We were able to keep the Leon Black money, but the $25K from your foundation is getting bounced by MIT back to ASU.”

 

Epstein responded: “No problem — trying to get more black for you.”

The documents reveal Epstein’s influence reached deeper into Bitcoin circles than previously acknowledged, even including early conversations with Brock Pierce — another figure with documented ties to both Epstein and controversy surrounding early crypto foundations.

MIT’s Internal Concerns and the Fallout

The emails also expose MIT’s internal unease around anonymous or reputationally risky donations. After the scandal broke, Ito resigned in 2019. MIT later tightened donation policies, warning that “everything becomes public” eventually — a statement that now seems prophetic given this week’s disclosures.

Developers like Wladimir van der Laan say they were unaware of the extent of Epstein’s involvement and noted that DCI’s funding transparency “was not great back in the day.” The Media Lab and DCI declined to comment.

Source

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 Stripe:
1) or visit http://thedinarian.locals.com/donate

💳 PayPal
2) Simply scan the QR code below 📲 or visit HERE

🔗 Crypto Donations👇
XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals