TheDinarian
News • Business • Investing & Finance
XRPL’s New AMM
April 24, 2023
post photo preview

In early 2022, Ripple proposed a novel automated market maker (AMM) design for the XRP Ledger. It has subsequently been implemented on a devnet, with a mainnet launch being contingent upon governance approval of a proposal that will be shared at a later date.

Unlike traditional blockchain-based AMMs (such as Ethereum-based AMMs), it integrates directly into the XRPL itself as a core primitive. This makes it a fundamental building block of the XRP Ledger and supports Ripple’s goal of providing XRPL developers with the resources and tools needed to grow the ecosystem.

It’s worth noting that the XRPL is an open-source blockchain that is independent of Ripple, with Ripple managing approximately 4% of validators.

In this article, I will provide a high-level overview of this new AMM. In particular, I will explain five key features that distinguish it:

  1. Protocol-Native AMM: protocol-wide liquidity pools mean that liquidity is shared at a blockchain level. This makes it easy for developers to integrate AMM functionality into their projects, removing pain points such as liquidity bootstrapping.
  2. No MEV or Front-Running: federated consensus and canonical transaction ordering eliminate MEV and front-running. Both terms will be explained in detail below.
  3. Single-Sided Liquidity Provisioning: most liquidity pools require 2 tokens to be deposited at a 1:1 ratio. The XRPL’s AMM requires only a single asset, with the protocol automatically swapping the token in order to maintain a 1:1 ratio.
  4. Central Limit Order Book Integration: both AMM pricing and order book pricing are enabled on the XRPL, with the best price being automatically executed for users.
  5. Continuous Auction: arbitrageurs may bid for 24-hour trading slots for the AMM with near-zero fees, allowing them to immediately bring prices back to equilibrium with external markets and resulting in greater profitability. Liquidity providers are also compensated through the distribution of winning bid amounts for each AMM pool, mitigating impermanent loss exposure.

Below I’ll explain each in-depth, and do my best to provide an opinion on the validity of each idea.

A Protocol-Native AMM

One of the biggest challenges faced by decentralized exchanges (DEXs) is attracting liquidity. Therefore, it’s common for DEXs (who typically rely upon AMMs for pricing) to offer liquidity incentives in the form of high APRs in order to bootstrap liquidity for their liquidity pools. While effective at attracting liquidity, it also frequently results in mercenary capital that’s quick to leave as soon as the rewards drop, harming long-term sustainability. Liquidity is a project’s lifeline in DeFi and attracting it is a top priority, but attracting it requires high capital investments for initial bootstrapping and fragmentation between projects.

The XRPL’s new AMM is protocol-native, meaning that it’s built at the blockchain level itself with protocol-wide liquidity, despite varying front-facing interfaces. There may only be one pool per asset pair, and anyone may create a new XRPL liquidity pool. 

The result is that those building on the XRPL can integrate their own DEX/AMM interfaces in order to add swap functionality, without requiring liquidity to be bootstrapped nor being at risk of mercenary capital or high slippage. 

A drawback to this is that it appears AMMs may no longer be able to differentiate themselves based on factors such as having low slippage or a wide selection of assets. However, this could also be seen as an improvement as it lets developers focus on more important innovations without needing to commit resources to attracting AMM liquidity. For example, XRPL developers could now focus on vertical integration with the XRPL by adding other products such as their own stablecoin and borrowing/lending markets.

No MEV or Front-Running

Front-running is one form of miner extractable value (MEV) whereby a profitable transaction is seen in the mempool and the same trade is made, albeit with a higher gas fee so that it is executed first. Given the speed at which blocks are created, this is most commonly performed by bots. For example, if I were to discover a profitable trade for $10 and look to execute it, a bot could execute it before me by paying more in gas fees, and take off with the profit. 

Various groups such as FlashBots are actively studying MEV and it is estimated that the gross extracted value on Ethereum alone has exceeded $700M. While not all MEV is bad, it’s become clear that substantial value has been taken away from users.

The XRPL eliminates MEV and front-running through the following: 

Federated Consensus

With federated consensus, only a subset of validator nodes must come to consensus which significantly increases throughput. Stellar also uses this design with their subsets of nodes being referred to as quorum slices, whereas with the XRPL the subsets are referred to as Unique Node Lists (UNLs). 

Certain default UNLs are available for new node operators, with these default lists being formed based on successful past performance, having proven identities, and having stringent IT standards. Despite this, other UNLs may be proposed and/or chosen as desired. In general, underperforming nodes are removed as the UNLs are updated, meaning that over time the top nodes are rewarded. The result is that a group of validators come to a consensus about a given block’s transactions, so there is no single validator prioritizing transactions based on gas fees. 

Canonical Transaction Ordering

Validators in PoS blockchains are incentivized by profit and as such they prioritize transactions with the highest associated gas fees, opening up the potential for MEV. 

Instead, canonical transaction ordering means that transactions are ordered in a deterministic way that is hard to predict, while all network nodes still agree on the order of transactions. The inability to predict transaction ordering means that front-running potential is either severely mitigated or outright eliminated.

Are the above effective?

Some argue that federated consensus is not truly decentralized as validators are assigned by default. I agree as this appears to be default bias, but I’m also not a maxi that everything needs to be fully decentralized at all times. However, the number of validators managed by any single entity is limited, such as Ripple having only 2 of 35 validators. While not as decentralized as Ethereum per say, I appreciate the benefits conferred by this methodology and note the stringent UNL requirement. I’m of the opinion that the validators are worthy of their positioning despite the default bias, but also appreciate concerns over this.

Single-Sided Liquidity Provision

Liquidity pools most commonly contain a given pair of assets, such as XRP and USDC. In order to help maintain an equal composition between the two, new liquidity providers must typically provide both assets in equal proportions, such as $50 in value for each. This causes friction for liquidity providers, as they must first swap assets to have equal proportions of each, or otherwise be limited to depositing the lesser amount of either asset held.

The XRPL’s AMM enables liquidity providers to deposit only a single asset into a given pool, with half of the asset’s value being automatically converted into the paired asset. For example, if one wished to deposit $100 of XRP into a USDC/XRP pool, 50% of the XRP would be automatically converted to USD and both would then be deposited in equal amounts.

I’m very supportive of this idea and see it as the next step in the evolution of not only DEXs, but DeFi itself. I first saw this idea while working on the Venus Protocol V4 whitepaper, where it was detailed how back-end integration with Pancake Swap would enable anyone to borrow/lend the assets of their choice. If I were to only have USDC but wanted to lend another asset, Venus would automatically swap it while taking 25% of the swap fee.

This idea significantly improves user experience and I see DeFi moving heavily toward this in the future. It’s great to see the XRPL already integrating it.

One question that comes to mind, however, is in regards to new liquidity pools comprised of long-tail assets. I imagine that as liquidity providers deposit these assets which may then be swapped automatically, they could be subject to moderate slippage. That being said, this is only theoretical and likely has been thought through already. 

Central Limit Order Book (CLOB) Functionality

To date, the XRPL has solely used a CLOB design, which is common in traditional finance and has orders executed based on matching buy/sell orders. On the XRPL, the limit orders are referred to as offers and these offers may be either partially or fully filled. Additional functionalities such as auto-bridging exist, where trades automatically use XRP as an intermediary token should it be cheaper than trading directly token-to-token. 

While this is well-suited to the XRPL, most decentralized exchanges rely upon AMM pricing and each approach has its unique strengths and weaknesses. For example, order books tend to require greater liquidity (and therefore market makers with ample funds). The XRPL’s new AMM on devnet now incorporates both models and extracts liquidity from both, thus providing the best pricing with the least slippage. 

I imagine that optimal pricing would typically be via an AMM but that order book functionality would at times be beneficial (e.g. limit order trade functionality). It may be especially helpful for providing liquidity within certain trade bandwidths, in a similar fashion to Uniswap’s concentrated liquidity. Rather than relying upon AMM pricing, a heavy build-up of order book trades may help cushion any slippage impact.

Continuous Auctions

Arbitrageurs wish to profit from price discrepancies between decentralized exchanges, meaning that they’ll compete with others to execute trades where profits outweigh any potential transaction costs incurred. These transaction costs can be high on certain blockchain networks and subject to inefficiencies caused by slow block speeds.

On the XRPL, transaction costs are low and block speeds are fast, meaning that arbitrageurs can immediately bring prices back to equilibrium with external markets. This is especially relevant during highly volatile periods, as fast trade execution enables greater profitability.

However, arbitrageurs aren’t the only party to benefit from the XRPL’s architecture. One common challenge for liquidity providers is that asset price discrepancies lead to impermanent loss, a form of opportunity cost due to price divergence. For example, if XRP and USDC were to diverge in price, liquidity providers may have benefitted more by simply holding XRP instead of providing it as liquidity.

The XRPL mitigates the above through a continuous auction process where arbitrageurs bid for 24-hour windows during which they’re subject to near-zero trading fees. As XRPL transaction fees are already minimal, this is especially relevant to any arbitrageur executing a high number of trades. If another party were then to outbid them, they would be refunded pro rata. Therefore, we can expect that bids are based on historical data and any personal analysis + bias. Bid amounts that are processed are distributed amongst each AMM pool, in turn compensating liquidity providers and mitigating impermanent loss.

In summary, each liquidity pool has a 24-hour window during which arbitrageurs may bid for the right to near-zero trading fees. The bids reward liquidity providers, while arbitrageurs can efficiently capture any price discrepancies which in turn mitigates impermanent loss further.

It’s hard for me to comment on how this would work in practice as I’m missing some detailed quantitative information, and it’s such a novel idea I haven’t dug into before. For example, as more users arrive at the XRPL and arbitrage competitiveness increases substantially…will bids become very large? Will this meaningfully compensate liquidity providers? Will impermanent loss be materially mitigated? It seems like yes in theory but it’s hard to tell.

Concluding Thoughts

The XRPL has an advanced technical front but network effects are huge in DeFi. While Ethereum/BSC/Tron currently have ~80% of TVL, the XRPL is adding new capabilities that will drive further adoption and grow its developer community. For example, it recently added NFT capabilities, and additional features such as interoperable sidechains, portable digital identities, and smart contracts are expected later this year.

On the technical front, the new XRPL AMM is very low-cost, fast, and sustainable which are all great characteristics of a blockchain ecosystem. If they are able to build out a strong developer community, attract TVL, and address real-world challenges, they will be well poised. In fact, former colleagues of mine shared great things after attending the XRPL’s Apex Summit last year in Las Vegas, and an upcoming one in Amsterdam this September. Meeting the projects in-person tends to be very effective in evaluating an ecosystem.

In the meantime, I hope that the above piece was able to shed light on key architectural differences that distinguish the XRPL from others. The AMM is currently in the devnet stage but will be available in the coming months, and it should be an exciting time.

Link

community logo
Join the TheDinarian Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
🚨NEW: Watch @BoHines sit down with @CryptoAmerica_

Watch @BoHines sit down with @CryptoAmerica_ to discuss key details of the White House crypto report including anticipated new DOJ guidance, as well as fresh commentary on the @rstormsf trial, and the nomination of @BrianQuintenz to lead the @CFTC.

00:28:43
Why Invest In XRP?

Because Ripple Is EVERYWHERE!

This is on Wall Street... NY

00:00:06
👉"You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth.

"That 100 fxxxing percent is the lie you are going to be told."

Jeremy Corbell in January 2025

00:02:38
👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? 🔜

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

👉 Here’s what you need to know:

💠 'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
💠 Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
💠 Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
💠 Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
💠 Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

👉 What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto 👉txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚨 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

On avantis, there's something for everyone

fuelled by instinct and flash-level speed

powered by @PythNetwork

🔮 🐆

https://x.com/avantisfi/status/1951129700056871240?s=19

In the latest episode of the XDC MENA Podcast, host Rebecah Dausen is joined by Amir Neghabian, founder of Vital Veda, to explore how blockchain is modernizing the way we approach Fitness.

Why you should tune in:
-Learn how decentralized systems can verify the authenticity of Fitness
-Discover how Web3 opens access to Fitness knowledge
-Understand XDC’s role in enabling trusted, wellness-driven ecosystems

🎥 Watch now:

Still the best infographic about total #XRP circulation, updated. (SBI Holdings fiscal year end report)

~36b left in escrow..

post photo preview
post photo preview
PYTH: We'll Always Have Coldplay

Welcome back to The Epicenter, where crypto chaos meets corporate cringe.

But surprisingly, crypto has not been the most chaotic corner of the internet as of late.

That honor goes to the startup Astronomer, whose CEO’s cheating scandal broke the web in a glorious meme-fueled media frenzy. The company’s damage control? Hiring Gwyneth Paltrow as a “temporary spokesperson.” Do we think they’re grasping at straws or setting a new standard for PR?

Meanwhile, the markets didn’t blink. BTC is still flexing near its all-time highs. Michael Saylor’s bringing a bitcoin-adjacent money-market product to Wall Street. A pharma company just earmarked $700M to stack BNB, and analysts are calling time of death on the four-year crypto cycle. It’s a steady boom now, kittens.

A few things that are also worth noting: Winklevoss vs. JPMorgan, Visa’s take on stablecoins, and Robinhood’s Euro drama that defies the chillness of eurosummer.

Let’s get into it 👇

⛓️ The On-Chain Pulse: What’s Happening on the Front Lines of Finance

This week’s biggest news in crypto and all things digital assets

🗣️ Word on the Street: What the Experts are Saying

Stuff you should repost (or maybe even cough reword and take credit for)

Meme of the Week

🏦 Kiss my SaaS: What’s Changing the Game for Fintech

Things you should care about if you want to impress your coworkers

Closing Thoughts

From meme-fueled PR stunts to Bitcoin-backed money-market funds, this week reminded us that markets move fast—and headlines move faster. With Wall Street automating itself, fintechs beefing with banks, and even your smartphone becoming a miner, anything is possible. Stay curious, stay cynical, and as always—stay sharp and stay liquid. We’ll see you back here in two weeks.

— The Epicenter, powered by Pyth Network

 

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 PayPal: 
1) Simply scan the QR code below 📲
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian

🔗 Crypto – Support via Coinbase Wallet to: [email protected]

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
4 Fintech Companies 💸& Things To Know About 🤔

The fintech revolution is reshaping the way we manage, invest, and move money, breaking down traditional barriers and empowering individuals worldwide. As financial technology continues to evolve at a rapid pace, a select group of innovative companies are leading the charge by offering groundbreaking solutions that redefine banking, payments, and digital assets. Whether you’re a savvy investor, an industry professional, or simply curious about the future of finance, discovering these trailblazing fintech companies is essential to understanding today’s dynamic financial landscape.

 

  1.  Alina Invest - The AI Wealth Manager for GenZ Women

Alina is aimed at women under 25 who identify as beginner investors. They're an SEC-registered investment advisor that charges $120/year for membership. The service "buys and sells for you" and gives up notification updates of recent transactions like a wealth manager would.

👉 Getting people to invest early is crucial to building long-term wealth. One thing that holds them back is a lack of confidence and experience. Being targetted "for beginners" and people who live on TikTok should appeal. I love the sense of "we're buying and selling for you." Funds always do that, but making it an engagement mechanic is very smart. The risk here is that building a wealth business will take decades for the AUM to compound. But the next generations, Wealthfront or Betterment, will look something like Alina.

2. Blue layer - The Carbon project funding platform

Bluelayer allows Carbon project developers to take from feasibility studies to issuing credits, tracking inventory, and managing orders. Developers of reforestation, conservation, direct air capture, and other projects can also directly report to industry registries. 

👉 Carbon investing and tax credits are heavily incentivized but need transparent data. By focusing on the developers, Bluelayer can ensure the data, reporting, and credits lifecycle is all managed at the source. This is smart.

3. Akirolabs - Modern Procurement for enterprise

Akiro is a "strategic" procurement platform aiming to help enterprise customers identify risks, value drivers, and strategic levers before issuing an RFP. It aims to bring in multiple stakeholders for complex purchasing decisions at multinationals. 

👉 Procurement is a great wedge for multinational corporate transformation. Buying anything in an enterprise that uses large-scale ERPs is a nightmare of committees and spreadsheets. Turning an oil tanker-sized organization around is difficult, but the right suppliers can have a meaningful impact in the short term. That only works if you can buy from them. Getting people on the same page with a single platform is a great start.

4. NeoTax - Automated Tax R&D Credits

NeoTax allows companies to connect their engineering tools to calculate available tax advantages automatically. Once calculated, the tax fillings are clearly labeled with supporting evidence for the IRS.

👉 AWS and GCP log files and data are a goldmine. Last week, I covered Bilanc, which uses log files to figure out per-account unit economics. Now, we calculate R&D tax credits. The unlock here is LLM's ability to understand unstructured data. The hard part is understanding the moat, but time will tell.

In an era where technology and finance are increasingly intertwined, these four fintech companies stand out as catalysts for positive change. By driving progress in digital payments, asset management, lending, and decentralized finance, they are not only making financial services more accessible and efficient—they are also paving the way for a more inclusive and empowered global economy. Staying informed about their innovations can help you seize new opportunities and take part in the future of finance.

 

👀Things to know 👀

 

PayPal issued low guidance and warned of a “transition year.” The stock is down 8% in extended trading despite PayPal reporting a 9% growth in revenue and 23% EBITDA. Gross profit is down 4% YoY. PayPal's total revenues were $29Bn for the year

Adyen reported 22% revenue growth and an EBITDA margin of 46% for the full year. Adyen's total revenues were $1.75bn for the full year. The margin was down from 55% the previous year, impacted by hiring ahead of growth.

🤔 PayPal’s Braintree (unbranded) is losing market share in the US, while Adyen is winning it. eCommerce is growing ~9 to 10% YoY, and PayPal’s transaction revenue grew by 6.7%. The higher interest rate environment meant interest on balances dragged up the total revenue figure. Their core business is losing market share. Adyen is outgrowing the market by ~12%.

🤔 The PayPal button (branded) is losing to SHOP Pay and Apple Pay. The branded experience from Apple and Shopify is delightful for users; it’s fast and helps with small details like delivery tracking. That experience translates to higher conversion (and more revenue) for merchants.

🤔 The lack of a single global platform hurts PayPal, but it helps Adyen. In the earnings call, the new CEO admitted their mix of platforms like Venmo, PayPal, and Braintree are holding them back. They aim to combine and simplify, but that’s easier said than done.

🤔 Making a single platform from PayPal, Venmo, and Braintree won’t be easy. There’s a graveyard of payment company CEOs who tried to make “one platform” from things they acquired years ago. It’s crucial if they’re going to grow that they get their innovation edge back. Adyen has one platform in every market.

🤔 PayPal’s UK and European acquiring business is a bright spot. The UK and EU delivered 20% of overall revenue, growing 11% YoY. Square and Toast don’t have market share here, while iZettle, which PayPal acquired in 2018, is a strong market player. Overall though, it’s yet another tech stack and business that’s not part of a single global platform.

The two banks provided accounts to UK front companies secretly owned by an Iranian petrochemicals company. PCC has used these entities to receive funds from Iranian entities in China, concealed with trustee agreements and nominee directors. 

🤔 This is the headline every bank CEO fears. Oof. Shares of both banks have been down since the news broke, but this will no doubt involve crisis calls, committees, appearing in front of the regulator, and, finally, some sort of fine.

🤔 The "risk-based approach" has been arbitraged. A UK company with relatively low annual revenue would look "low risk" at onboarding. One business the FT covered looked like a small company at a residential address to compliance staff. They'd likely apply branch-level controls instead of the enterprise-grade controls you'd see for a large corporation. 

🤔 Hiring more staff won't fix this problem; it's a mindset and technology challenge. In theory, all of the skill and technology that exists to manage risks with large corporate customers (in the transaction banking divisions) are available to the other parts of a bank. In practice, they're not. Most banks lack a single data set and the ability for compliance officers in one team to see data from another part of the org. Getting the basics right with data and tooling is incredibly hard and will involve a multi-year effort. 

🤔 These things are rarely the failure of an individual or department; the issue is systemic. While two banks are named in this headline, the issue is everywhere. Banks need more data and better data to train better AI and machine learning. That all needs to happen in real-time as a compliment to the human staff. Throwing bodies at this won't solve the visibility issue teams have.

 🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 PayPal: 

1) Simply scan the QR code below 📲
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian

🔗 Crypto – Support via Coinbase Wallet to: [email protected]

Or Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

Your generosity keeps this mission alive, for all! Namasté 🙏 Crypto Michael ⚡  The Dinarian

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
What is XAH and Xahau?

If you're new to XRP, you may have noticed some of us discussing another network named 'Xahau'.

It's Like XRP ... But Different

The Xahau network was created in 2023, and its starting point was the open-source code for the XRP Ledger. A small team of researchers and entrepreneurs decided to add smart contracts to the network code.


The XRP Ledger has no smart contract capabilities, by default.

To integrate smart contracts, the team decided to use an architecture that includes 'WASM' or 'web assembly' code. Each account can have up to 10 'hooks' installed that are triggered for transactions that match specific criteria. They can run before or after a transaction is processed. This enables a variety of use cases that do not involve the need to change the network's core code.

Hooks

A 'hook' is what is known as a smart contract that can be triggered in relation to a specific account and its transactions.

The term arises from the programming world, where it generally means "code that runs based on triggering conditions." In Xahau's case, it indicates code that is run before, or after, a transaction is processed.
 
Each hook must be installed on a specific account by the party that controls the account - i.e., the secret key holder.
 
What Can XAH Do That XRP Cannot?
 
The primary benefit from the use of hooks, is that the core network code does not need to be changed every time a new use case is identified. This means that additional use cases can be addressed immediately, with no requirement for intervening steps, such as:
  • Community review
  • Community approval
  • Amendment voting
All of those steps are eliminated with the use of hooks; new use cases can be addressed as fast as the code can be developed.
 
To read more about how hooks enables Xahau to handle more use cases than even the XRPL, you can read this article:
 
Key Differences From XRP
 
Other unique differences from the XRP Ledger include:
  • Much smaller supply ~612 million coins vs. 100 billion coins
  • XAH hodlers are rewarded at 4% of their account balance. There are no rewards for XRP.
  • Governance participants are incentivized
  • Payment channels available for user-created tokens (IOUs)
  • URI tokens instead of NFT tokens
Who's Who of Xahau?
 
The list of those that are either founders, or closely associated with the founding organizations, is extensive. Here are the names of three organizations mentioned in the whitepaper, or their current moniker:
  • Xaman (a.k.a. XRPL Labs)
  • Gatehub
  • InFTF (Inclusive Financial Technology Foundation)
There exists a long list of impressive developers, architects, and technologists among the Xahau inner circle. But the three names that people associate most prominently with the leadership of the Xahau network are Wietse Wind, Richard Holland, and Denis Angell. The links to their 'X' accounts are:
 
Friend Or Foe?
 
This topic is one of the most contentious.
 
While Ripple, the company with the largest stake of XRP, showed interest in hooks early on, they ultimately decided to advocate for a different approach; the use of an EVM-based solution (Ethereum Virtual Machine) to handle smart contracts on the XRP Ledger. This decision was met with consternation by the Xaman team that had worked with them for several years to advocate for the use of hooks.
 
You can read more about the 'business politics' part of this topic here:
 
So how do Xahau fans view the relationship between XRP and XAH?
 
The Xahau team - and many of its community members - advocate for the use of a 'dual-chain' solution to implement smart contracts. This can be accomplished by the use of 'listener' software, along with native Xahau hooks.
 
A proof of concept, developed by Denis Angell, has demonstrated that bi-lateral communication can work with a simple approach.
 
From an economic standpoint, every chain that has its own digital asset is a competitor; but the simple way to think about Xahau, is that a 'bunch of XRP geeks' decided to implement smart contracts on their own version of the XRP Ledger.
 
The team emphasized transparency along the way, and initially received support from the primary XRP stakeholder, Ripple. They published Xahau as open-source code that could, in theory, be back-engineered and integrated with the XRP Ledger. You can clearly observe the team's idealistic mindset in early marketing mistakes, where they named their digital asset 'XRP Plus' in an effort to emphasize the way that they viewed their creation. While this resulted in confusion - and even suspicion - in its early days, the team quickly pivoted, and named their digital asset 'XAH', which became its ticker symbol.
 
Synergy effects between the two camps speak to a genuine camaraderie, with many Xahau developers being open and willing to help with changes to the core XRP Ledger protocol. You can find many examples of this open dialogue on the 'X' platform.
 
How To Purchase XAH
 
If you wish to speculate by buying XAH directly, it is available in a variety of convenient locations, depending on where you are located. If you're in a country that is supported by Bitrue, you can directly purchase or trade XAH by using that exchange.
 
On January 20th, 2025, Bitmart announced that it supports trading of XAH for customers in their list of supported countries; And in late March, another major exchange announced that they would be supporting XAH trading pairs: Coinex.
 
If you're located in the United States, you can purchase XAH directly from a vendor known as 'C14'. The xApp for C14 is located in the Xaman wallet.
 
XRP Ledger geeks can also purchase XAH IOUs on the XRPL Dex and then convert them to 'real' XAH using a Gatehub bridge. This is available in countries that Gatehub supports.
 
Which XAH Accounts Should I Follow?
 
On the 'X' platform, there exists two major community groups for XAH fans:
In addition to the Xahau notables I've already mentioned in this article, my advice is to take a look at who is posting in the above two communities. There are many impressive leaders and entrepreneurs included. You should be able to find multiple 'X' accounts that reflect your interests.
 
Xahau Development Roadmap
 
Xahau leaders have published a roadmap for 2025 that lists their various goals for the ecosystem:
 
To read a detailed explanation for each item, refer to this: Xahau Roadmap Super Thread
 
One of the most incredible waypoints listed is 'JavaScript Hooks Implementation.' 🤯
JavaScript!
 
With the 'JavaScript Hooks Implementation', Xahau is making history; it will enable anybody that knows JavaScript to easily create and install a smart contract. While networks like Ethereum are impressive early movers, they require developers to learn a new language and syntax.
 
Xahau will soon open 'crypto smart contracts' to a group of developers that number in the tens of millions.
 
Project L-10K
 
Project L-10K is one of the most important items in the pipeline. L-10K refers to the effort to boost the throughput of Xahau consensus to over 10,000 transactions per ledger! This will benefit hosted projects such as Evernode, and future issued assets. Heading up the effort is Richard Holland, who provided a progress update to the community in late May of 2025:
 
To learn more about this ambitious effort, you can watch his full presentation here:
The Future Of Defi And Payments
 
Once you've seen the extensive list of use cases that XAH easily handles, it's truly inspiring. Xahau is everything that you love about XRP, plus a long list of more things to love. ❤️
 
Be an early adopter of XAH and the Xahau network! Join the community groups listed and follow the accounts that seem to reflect your own interest - speculator, developer, or crypto fan. You have a place in our community, no matter what your background or interests are. Welcome to the future of crypto Defi and Payments
 
Sources:
 
 
NOTE: Payment channels for IOUs is currently in amendment status for the XRP Ledger, authored by Denis Angel here:
 
 

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 PayPal: 

1) Simply scan the QR code below 📲
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian

🔗 Crypto – Support via Coinbase Wallet to: [email protected]

Or Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

Your generosity keeps this mission alive, for all! Namasté 🙏 Crypto Michael ⚡ The Dinarian

 
 
Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals