TheDinarian
News • Business • Investing & Finance
FedNow’s Future and What the Triple Clock Theory Says About It
July 17, 2023
post photo preview

Four days from today, the Federal Reserve’s instant account-to-account payments rail will go live. FedNow’s launch on July 20 will bring the number of real-time rails in the U.S. to two. The first real-time rail to go live was RTP®, operated by The Clearing House, in 2017.

Judging by the barrage of press releases and PR pitches received by PYMNTS over the last several weeks, the launch of FedNow is to payments what the Red Sox winning the World Series in 2004 after an 86 year drought was to baseball: an historic milestone that was a long time in coming.

So, it seems, the race for instant payments in the U.S. is on.

In many ways, July 20 begins the countdown to ubiquitous instant account-to-account payments in the U.S. TCH with RTP® has been live for six years and counts 274 financial institutions and 65% of U.S. deposits connected to its rail as important milestones of its own. But as even TCH and its member banks will admit, traction around use cases has been scattered, the number of transactions low. TCH with RTP® hasn’t yet achieved the critical mass needed to ignite its payments platform. The introduction of FedNow creates competition for RTP® volume and potentially the real-time payments infrastructure for new use cases like merchant payments.

In addition to the U.S. Treasury, FedNow says that 56 “Early Adopters” are certified and ready to move money over its rails at launch. The profile of those early adopters leans heavily to small FIs — 41 of the 56 are FIs, many with profiles like 1st National Bank of Yuma, Buffalo Federal Bank and Consumers Cooperative Credit Union with assets of $550M, $174M and $2.8B respectively — even though four TCH founding members, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo, US Bank and BNY Mellon, are also ready to roll on Thursday. There are fifteen technology providers like AdyenFiservFISJack HenryFinastra and ACI that banks and FinTechs can use to connect to the FedNow rails.

So, it seems, the race for instant payments in the U.S. is on.

Like any good competitive rivalry stimulated by a new entrant, the watercooler talk now is about how long it will take for either or both networks to reach the point where they support a large volume of transactions and use cases to drive those transactions and ignite real-time account-to-account payments in the U.S.

Knowing that answer — or even how to guess — will depend on the clock you’re using to time the race.

The Triple Clock Theory

Humans have been measuring time for more than five thousand years. It was 1500 BC when the Egyptians invented sundials and water clocks to, among other things, track the blocks of time between sunrise and sunset to better schedule the arrivals and departures of ships bringing goods into the country.

It was the Sumerians who created the base 60 numerical system in the 3rd millennium BC which would become the basis for timekeeping today: Hours were comprised of 60-minute intervals and minutes of 60 second intervals.  Mechanical clocks that followed in the mid-to-late 1200s were perfected over the subsequent three hundred years, making it possible for time to be measured systemically and consistently with precision everywhere in the world.

We measure time because there is a finite amount of it — in a day, in a week and over a lifetime. People use time as an organizing construct to manage their daily lives. Athletes count time because they want to beat their personal records. The amount of time that it takes for big things to happen makes news: whether it is how long it takes to capture escaped convicts or how long it might take for inflation to hit the Fed’s 2% target. People want to make the most of their time because it is the most precious asset they have. Wasting it is low on everyone’s list.

Counting time in the business world is how economists and business leaders measure productivity: the minutes, hours and days needed to complete a task, and the number of people required to deliver the expected outcome. Like people, businesses want to optimize how their workforce’s time is spent and are loathe to waste it, even though by some accounts we all waste 24 billion hours a year in unproductive meetings. At least we did until people could multitask under the table with mobile phones or when their cameras are off during Zoom calls.

But it turns out that businesses, themselves, have their own internal clocks — a measure of keeping time often set by how long they’ve been in the market, the maturity of the markets in which they operate, the number of competitors vying for market share and the tech they use to power, manage and measure their business performance. These internal clocks set the pace for how decisions are made and how effective businesses are in creating a market advantage by continually innovating the products and services that their customers value and want to use.

The Triple Clock Theory analysis helps companies anticipate relevant market dynamics to reset their internal clocks.

 

The Triple Clock Theory (TCT) is an original framework that my consulting colleagues and I have devised to help businesses understand the pace of their internal clocks so that they can better assess whether their clocks could be cleaned by rivals seen and unseen — pardon the pun. But more importantly, the TCT analysis uses data-driven analysis to help companies anticipate relevant market dynamics to reset their internal clocks to prevent that from happening.

TCT posits that an incumbent business clock operates at a slower speed than a new entrant clock when introducing a product or service into the same competitive market. The rationale is as obvious as it is simple: Incumbents have created the market, acquired customers, created barriers to entry and have the assets — and a running head start — to sustain and grow their lead. Once a big incumbent machine gets its gears in motion, its momentum carries it forward, at least in theory. Incumbents assume that their clocks don’t have to move as fast because they have a big lead — until, of course, they see faster-paced competitors nipping at their heels.

As newbies, challengers’ clocks must move rapidly because they face a different reality: They lack clients, market position and the deep pockets to lollygag around. New entrants typically use different tools to help their clocks operate at a faster speed and shape their competitive advantage. Those tools could be anything from a new business model, pricing framework, data or payments capabilities, or user experience. Sometimes powerful new entrants bring all of that wrapped around better and more agile tech that makes switching easy and eliminates friction that still exists in how business is done in that market. They are also leaner so they can move fast.

Then there is the third clock, the technology clock, which is one of the sources of market disruption or competitive opportunity for both incumbents and new entrants. The technology clock can either speed up or slow down their respective internal clocks. New, breakthrough tech can create a better, faster and cheaper way to deliver the same product or service — or spawn new challengers that use it to leapfrog existing players. Predicting who will gain the most from the influence of the technology clock on their business is not always obvious since the technology clock does not always advantage new entrants.

Generative AI and LLMs are the most recent example of this third technology clock, but there have been others over the years. Most interesting about the Gen AI clock is its ability to not only change the pace of business, but the fundamental ways in which business is done.

In a matter of a few short months, the intellectual value of its potential has been internalized by every business worldwide. Open-source models are eliminating the barriers to entry that often come along with accessing and integrating powerful tech into business.

Both are fast-tracking Gen AI’s own path to critical mass and ubiquity.

Watching the Real-Time Payments Clock

In 2017, it was the real-time payments technology clock that set out to disrupt how money moved between bank accounts in the U.S. and the rails that, until then, cleared and settled those transactions.

Fundamentally changing the speed for clearing and settling payments was the promise of the first new U.S. payments rail in 40 years, RTP®. The press release announcing the launch described the participation of its then twenty-five owner banks, the biggest of the big in the U.S., along with their expectations of introducing a host of new scenarios using real-time payments and new markets that would see it as a differentiating value proposition for their own products and services.

The stated goal then was to reach ubiquity by 2020 — meaning that every financial institution in the U.S. would be connected to RTP® rails and use it to innovate client-facing payments in those three years post-launch.

The internal clocks at both the Fed and TCH will run a lot faster now that there’s competition for real-time payments transactions.

Six years later, the U.S. remains a long way from ubiquity and adoption of account-to-account real-time payments even though 11 times more banks are members of the RTP® network today than at launch and nearly two-thirds of U.S. bank deposits are connected to it. Being connected means that those banks can move transactions over it — if they develop use cases around it and promote them.

Of course, adoption and use go together to a degree. It is hard to get substantial transaction use without widespread network adoption. But ubiquitous adoption doesn’t guarantee widespread transaction use, which requires use cases that banks market and customers buy.

Now, most people in and around the payments ecosystem say that the introduction of FedNow will move the U.S. more quickly to that real-time payments ubiquity. The CFPB’s desire to accelerate open banking in the U.S. will create more demand for real-time account-to-account payments and move more banks to connect to a real-time network. Merchants, who for decades have tried to find alternatives to card rails for accepting payments, may view FedNow as that alternative.

All of those dynamics will likely quicken the pace of the internal clocks at both the Fed and TCH now that there’s competition for real-time payments transactions. I don’t think its market entry necessarily gives FedNow an edge.

The FedNow Real-Time Payments Clock

In many ways, it makes the march of both rails to ignition — which requires ubiquitous adoptions and widespread use for transactions — more challenging.

For FedNow to scale, early adopters will have to see success — and see it quickly.

Igniting a new payments network requires volume and scale — and how quickly that happens is vital. Having early adopters connect is one thing, but having them transact is another, as the TCH experience shows. If that takes too long for whatever the reason, early adopters will lose interest — and the traction necessary to create the network effects that drive scale will slow. They will likely shift to other real-time payments alternatives.

The less obvious part of the FedNow challenge is the current lack of interoperability between FedNow and RTP®. Unlike the two ACH networks that are also operated by TCH and the Fed, there is currently no ability for a bank to originate a real-time payment on one rail and a bank not connected to that same rail to receive it. Also notable at the FedNow launch are the number of big banks that aren’t connected, at least not yet, but are part of the TCH RTP® scheme — including Bank of America, Citi, and PNC.

In the absence of interoperability, achieving real-time payments ubiquity in the U.S. will require that every bank in the U.S. — all 10,000 of them — be connected to both TCH and FedNow rails. Persuading banks to do that will require the availability of use cases that are compelling enough for consumers and corporates to integrate and support. That seems ambitious and even improbable, particularly since most banks haven’t adopted either network.

Achieving real-time payments ubiquity in the U.S. will require that every bank in the U.S. — all 10,000 of them — be connected to both TCH and FedNow rails.

More likely is that the big banks and technology partners connected to both will create that missing ubiquity by becoming the real-time payments orchestration layer for banks and other third parties. The decision they then face is how to route transactions.

Since pricing over the network is identical, those decisions will hinge on transaction limits, fraud and security protections, acceptance and the preference of their partners, whose real-time payments use cases today may already be satisfied by existing RTP® rails.

It will also rest with which rail can support important future use cases like Request for Payment, given its potential to ignite mainstream real-time payments use by consumers for bill pay — and in a timeframe that is relevant for end users. The consumer protections required of that use case remain a work in progress for FedNow.

That’s not to say that TCH and RTP® have a cake walk to critical mass and ubiquity, either.

The RTP® Real-Time Payments Clock

The lack of an effective RTP® ignition strategy at launch is why connectivity to two-thirds of bank deposits hasn’t turned into 100% connectivity, more transaction volume, and a more powerful set of use cases at scale. RTP®’s biggest competitor today isn’t FedNow, but Same-Day ACH and wires, both of which have ubiquity and deliver a faster payments outcome that banks know how to monetize. Push to debit transactions over card rails support instant payouts for B2C use cases like insurance claims and gaming payouts and check the instant payments box for those use cases using money mobility rails — and on a global scale.

TCH with RTP® and the Fed with FedNow may both think they can operate on a slow clock.

There’s also inertia on the part of corporates who haven’t yet invested in real-time payments integration because they aren’t sure that every bank account they want to send money can receive a real-time payment. Until they move their ERPs to the cloud, their batch-based ERP systems don’t allow them to post payments in real time either, muting their sense of urgency.

Larger corporates see its potential in solving for the nuisance “edge case payments” that are today mostly sent the old-fashioned way with checks but need the ubiquity problem solved first.  Banks, corporates and FinTechs could decide that the workaround for the instant ubiquity challenge is to offer choice — RTP® or FedNow will become one of several options, but not the only way to clear and settle good funds instantly.

Watching the Clock and Getting to Critical Mass

The FedNow launch on Thursday makes the U.S. unique in the world to have both a central bank and private sector instant account-to-account payments rails. The rationale for the introduction of FedNow was to create a redundant set of rails so FIs have a choice, much as they do when processing ACH transactions today.

In some ways, TCH with RTP® and the Fed with FedNow may both think they can operate on a slower clock –and for different reasons. They are owned and run by large incumbents with staying power and money. They have important relationships that they can leverage to drive volume and scale. But unless one of them can get to ubiquity quickly and banks develop and market use cases to move large volumes of transactions over these rails, both could stall.

That’s where the technology clock comes in — as well as the fast clock for smaller and more nimble rivals who may use technology to create something better, faster and cheaper.

As they say, only time will tell.

Link

community logo
Join the TheDinarian Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
👀 Something Historic Just Happened In Colombia

Something historic just happened in Colombia.
An object was recovered, a metallic sphere that defies explanation.

Now it’s the center of an international investigation involving U.S. congressmen, physicists, and Dr. Steven Greer.

The object, called the Buga Sphere, was discovered by a local metal detectorist, Don José.

👉 At first, it weighed 2kg, then 6kg and then 10kg.

The same object, no external changes and weight fluctuations recorded live.

What kind of material behaves like this?

The sphere doesn’t emit radiation, but it does mess with electronics.

People near it reported metallic taste, nausea, and phones going haywire. David Vélez wore an anti-static suit just to touch it.

Not exactly your average scrap metal.

A second sphere showed up in Jumbo, caught on camera by a separate witness.

Same shape, movement, and equatorial line.
Italy’s top UAP analysts reviewed the footage.
The metadata was untouched, it wasn't CGI, it’s real.

Inside the Buga Sphere scientists discovered:

🔹Fused polymers
🔹Optical ...

00:03:33
"The World Order That We Are Coming Into"

If XRP is the neutral bridge for all sovereign currencies, stablecoins, and tokenized assets, then it’s not just facilitating payments, it’s capturing all that value at every level. From smart contracts to tokenized treasuries and digitized assets, XRP forms the foundation and backbone for everything in between.

With cross-border payments representing a multi-trillion-dollar corridor, that’s where the largest capital will flow and the greatest returns will come from.

At this point, you’re the gatekeeper to the digital economy. Everything else follows or fades away once regulations take effect.

You either see it or you won’t until it’s too late.

~The Black Swan Capitalist

00:01:50
Denelle Dixon (Stellar CEO) On Bloomburg 🚀

'Everyone, including Mastercard and Visa, is looking at how this technology can make finance easier for their consumers and their business. I don't think there is going to be a loser, but I do think there will be shake-ups. And ultimately, the consumer is going to win.' - SDF CEO @DenelleDixon on @BloombergTV

00:05:29
👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? 🔜

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

👉 Here’s what you need to know:

💠 'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
💠 Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
💠 Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
💠 Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
💠 Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

👉 What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto 👉txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚨 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading
Bloomberg Analysts Increase XRP ETF Approval Odds to 95%

Key Takeaways:

🔹️Spot XRP ETF approval odds increased by Bloomberg analysts.

🔹️The SEC's positive engagement boosts confidence.

🔹️Ripple market could see significant liquidity influx.

https://aicryptocore.com/bloomberg-xrp-etf-approval-95-percent-odds/

🤔 What Happened To Jed McCaleb, The Co-founder and Chief Architect of the Stellar Development Foundation?

Jed McCaleb, the co-founder and Chief Architect of the Stellar Development Foundation (SDF), remains actively involved with Stellar as of 2025. He continues to serve on the SDF’s board and is recognized as the Chief Architect, helping to guide the technical vision and development of the Stellar network. The SDF, under his and other leaders' guidance, is focused on expanding real-world asset tokenization and aims to power $3 billion in real-world asset value on-chain by the end of 2025.

Beyond Stellar, McCaleb is also known for founding the aerospace company Vast, which is developing artificial gravity space stations; he currently serves as Vast’s chairman and sole funder. According to Forbes, McCaleb’s net worth is estimated at $2.9 billion as of April 2025.

In summary, Jed McCaleb is still deeply engaged with Stellar’s ongoing mission of financial inclusion and blockchain innovation, while also pursuing ambitious projects in the space industry.

https://www.vastspace.com/
...

What Is Stronghold? 🤔

👀 Current Price: $0.01183 👀
👉All Time High: $0.05931

Website: https://stronghold.co/
Whitepaper: https://docsend.com/view/dftxunt
Coin: SHX
Coinmarketcap: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/stronghold-token/
Max Supply: 100B SHX
Circulating Supply: 5.79B SHX
Stellar Contract Address: GDSTRSHXHGJ7ZIVRBXEYE5Q74XUVCUSEKEBR7UCHEUUEK72N7I7KJ6JH

👇 How to buy: Swap XLM --> SHX via the StellarX Dex 👇
https://www.stellarx.com/swap/native/SHX:GDSTRSHXHGJ7ZIVRBXEYE5Q74XUVCUSEKEBR7UCHEUUEK72N7I7KJ6JH

post photo preview
Musk Turns On Starlink to Save Iranians from Regime’s Internet Crackdown

Elon Musk, the world’s richest man and a visionary behind SpaceX, has flipped the switch on Starlink, delivering internet to Iranians amid a brutal regime crackdown.

This move comes on the heels of Israeli strikes targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities, as the Islamic Republic cuts off online access.

The former Department of Government Efficiency chief activated Starlink satellite internet service for Iranians on Saturday following the Islamic Republic's decision to impose nationwide internet restrictions.

As the Jerusalem Post reports, that the Islamic Republic’s Communications Ministry announced the move, stating, "In view of the special conditions of the country, temporary restrictions have been imposed on the country’s internet."

This action followed a series of Israeli attacks on Iranian targets.

Starlink, a SpaceX-developed satellite constellation, provides high-speed internet to regions with limited connectivity, such as remote areas or conflict zones.

Elizabeth MacDonald, a Fox News contributor, highlighted its impact, noting, "Elon Musk turning on Starlink for Iran in 2022 was a game changer. Starlink connects directly to SpaceX satellites, bypassing Iran’s ground infrastructure. That means even during government-imposed shutdowns or censorship, users can still get online, and reportedly more than 100,000 inside Iran are doing that."

During the 2022 "Woman, Life, Freedom" protests, Starlink enabled Iranians to communicate and share footage globally despite network blackouts," she added.

MacDonald also mentioned ongoing tests of "direct-to-cell" capabilities, which could allow smartphone connections without a dish, potentially expanding access and supporting free expression and protest coordination.

Musk confirmed the activation, noting on Saturday, "The beams are on."

This follows the regime’s internet shutdowns, which were triggered by Israeli military actions.

Adding to the tension, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the Iranian people on Friday, urging resistance against the regime.

"Israel's fight is not against the Iranian people. Our fight is against the murderous Islamic regime that oppresses and impoverishes you,” he said.

Meanwhile, Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of Iran’s last monarch, called on military and security forces to abandon the regime, accusing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a Persian-language social media post of forcing Iranians into an unwanted war.

Starlink has been a beacon in other crises. Beyond Iran, Musk has leveraged Starlink to assist people during natural disasters and conflicts.

In the wake of hurricanes and earthquakes, Starlink has provided critical internet access to affected communities, enabling emergency communications and coordination.

Similarly, during the Ukraine-Russia conflict, Musk activated Starlink to support Ukrainian forces and civilians, ensuring they could maintain contact and access vital information under dire circumstances.

The genius entrepreneur, is throwing a lifeline to the oppressed in Iran, and the libs can’t stand it.

Conservative talk show host Mark Levin praised Musk’s action, reposting a message stating that Starlink would "reconnect the Iranian people with the internet and put the final nail in the coffin of the Iranian regime."

"God bless you, Elon. The Starlink beams are on in Iran!" Levin wrote.

Musk, who recently stepped down from leading the DOGE in the Trump administration, has apologized to President Trump for past criticisms, including his stance on the One Big Beautiful Bill.

Source

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 PayPal: 
1) Simply scan the QR code below 📲
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian

🔗 Crypto – Support via Coinbase Wallet to: [email protected]

Or Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

Your generosity keeps this mission alive, for all! Namasté 🙏 Crypto Michael ⚡  The Dinarian

Read full Article
post photo preview
GENIUS Act lets State banks conduct some business nationwide. Regulators object

The Senate passed the GENIUS Act for stablecoins last week, but significant work remains before it becomes law. The House has a different bill, the STABLE Act, with notable differences that must be reconciled. State banking regulators have raised strong objections to a provision in the GENIUS Act that would allow state banks to operate nationwide without authorization from host states or a federal regulator.

The controversial clause permits a state bank with a regulated stablecoin subsidiary to provide money transmitter and custodial services in any other state. While host states can impose consumer protection laws, they cannot require the usual authorization and oversight typically needed for out-of-state banking operations.

The Conference of State Bank Supervisors welcomed some changes in the GENIUS Act but remains adamantly opposed to this particular provision. In a statement, CSBS said:

“Critical changes must be made during House consideration of the legislation to prevent unintended consequences and further mitigate financial stability risks. CSBS remains concerned with the dramatic and unsupported expansion of the authority of uninsured banks to conduct money transmission or custody activities nationwide without the approval or oversight of host state supervisors (Sec. 16(d)).”

The National Conference of State Legislatures expressed similar concerns in early June, stating:

“We urge you to oppose Section 16(d) and support state authority to regulate financial services in a manner that reflects local conditions, priorities and risk tolerances. Preserving the dual banking system and respecting state autonomy is essential to the safety, soundness and diversity of our nation’s financial sector.”

Evolution of nationwide authorization

Section 16 addresses several issues beyond stablecoins, including preventing a recurrence of the SEC’s SAB 121, which forced crypto assets held in custody onto balance sheets. However, the nationwide authorization subsection was added after the legislation cleared the Senate Banking Committee, with two significant modifications since then.

Originally, the provision applied only to special bank charters like Wyoming’s Special Purpose Depository Institutions or Connecticut’s Innovation Banks. Examples include crypto-focused Custodia Bank and crypto exchange Kraken in Wyoming, plus traditional finance player Fnality US in Connecticut. Recently the scope was expanded to cover most state chartered banks with stablecoin subsidiaries, possibly due to concerns about competitive advantages.

Simultaneously, the clause was substantially tightened. The initial version allowed state chartered banks to provide money transmission and custody services nationwide for any type of asset, which would include cryptocurrencies. Now these activities can only be conducted by the stablecoin subsidiary, and while Section 16(d) doesn’t explicitly limit services to stablecoins, the GENIUS Act currently restricts issuers to stablecoin related activities.

However, the House STABLE Act takes a more permissive approach, allowing regulators to decide which non-stablecoin activities are permitted. If the House version prevails in reconciliation, it could result in a significant expansion of allowed nationwide banking activities beyond stablecoins.

Is it that bad?

As originally drafted, the clause seemed overly permissive.

The amended clause makes sense for stablecoin issuers. They want to have a single regulator and be able to provide the stablecoin services throughout the United States. But it also leans into the perception outside of crypto that this is just another form of regulatory arbitrage.

The controversy over Section 16(d) reflects concerns about creating a regulatory gap that allows banks to operate interstate without the oversight typically required from either federal or state authorities. As the two Congressional chambers work toward reconciliation, lawmakers must decide whether stablecoin legislation should include provisions that effectively reduce traditional banking oversight requirements.

Source

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 PayPal: 
1) Simply scan the QR code below 📲
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian

🔗 Crypto – Support via Coinbase Wallet to: [email protected]

Or Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

Your generosity keeps this mission alive, for all! Namasté 🙏 Crypto Michael ⚡  The Dinarian

Read full Article
post photo preview
Dubai regulator VARA classifies RWA issuance as licensed activity
Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA) leads global regulatory framework - makes RWA issuance licensed activity in Dubai.

Real-world assets (RWAs) issuance is now licensed activity in Dubai.

~ Actual law.
~ Not a legal gray zone.
~ Not a whitepaper fantasy.

RWA issuance and listing on secondary markets is defined under binding crypto regulation.

It’s execution by Dubai.

Irina Heaver explained:

“RWA issuance is no longer theoretical. It’s now a regulatory reality.”

VARA defined:

- RWAs are classified as Asset-Referenced Virtual Assets (ARVAs)

- Secondary market trading is permitted under VARA license

- Issuers need capital, audits, and legal disclosures

- Regulated broker-dealers and exchanges can now onboard and trade them

This closes the gap that killed STOs in 2018.

No more tokenization without venues.
No more assets without liquidity.

UAE is doing what Switzerland, Singapore, and Europe still haven’t:

Creating enforceable frameworks for RWA tokenization that actually work.

Matthew White, CEO of VARA, said it perfectly:

“Tokenization will redefine global finance in 2025.”

He’s not exaggerating.

$500B+ market predicted next year.

And the UAE just gave it legal rails.

~Real estate.
~Private credit.
~Shariah-compliant products.

Everything is in play.

This is how you turn hype into infrastructure.

What Dubai is doing now is 3 years ahead of everyone else.

Founders, investors, ecosystem builders:

You want to build real-world assets onchain.

Don’t waste another year waiting for clarity.

Come to Dubai.

It’s already here.

 

Source

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 PayPal: 
1) Simply scan the QR code below 📲
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian

🔗 Crypto – Support via Coinbase Wallet to: [email protected]

Or Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

Your generosity keeps this mission alive, for all! Namasté 🙏 Crypto Michael ⚡  The Dinarian

 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals