Dinarian888
News • Business • Investing & Finance
FEDML Nexus AI Studio: an all-new zero-code LLM builder
Using The THETA Blockchain Edge Nodes
November 02, 2023
post photo preview
💡We have a webinar on Tuesday Nov 7 at 11am PT/2pm ET at which we’ll introduce our FEDML Nexus AI platform and show a live-demonstration of Studio: Register for the webinar here

Table of contents:
- Introduction
- FEDML Nexus AI Overview
- LLM use cases
- The challenge with LLMs
- Why a zero-code LLM Studio?
- How does it work?
- Future plans to add Studio
- Advanced and custom LLM training with Launch and Train
- Webinar announcement 

Introduction

Most businesses today are exploring the many ways modern artificial intelligence and its generative models may revolutionize the way we interact with products and services. Artificial intelligence technology is moving fast and it can be difficult for data scientists and machine learning engineers to keep up with the new models, algorithms, and techniques emerging each week.  Additionally, it’s difficult for developers to rapidly experiment with models and data at the pace required to keep up with the business’s AI application ideation.

Further, the “large” nature of these new generative models, such as large language models, is driving a new level of demand for compute, particularly, hard to find low cost GPUs, to support the massive computations required for distributed training and serving these generative models.

FEDM Nexus AI is a new platform that bridges these gaps and provides Studio, a no-code, rapid experimentation, MLOps, and low cost GPU compute resources for developers and enterprises to turn their LLM ideas into domain-specific value generating products and services.

FEDML Nexus AI Overview

FEDML Nexus AI is a platform of Next-Gen cloud services for LLMs and Generative AI. Developers need a way to quickly and easily find and provision the best GPU resources across multiple providers, minimize costs, and launch their AI jobs without worrying about tedious environment setup and management for complex generative AI workloads. Nexus AI also supports private on-prem infrastructure or hybrid cloud/on-prem.  FEDML Nexus AI solves for the needs which come with generative AI development in 4 ways:

  • GPU Marketplace for AI Development: Addressing the current dearth of compute nodes/GPUs arising due to the skyrocketing demand for AI models in enterprise applications, FEDML Nexus AI offers a massive GPU marketplace with over 18,000 compute nodes.  Beyond partnering with prominent data centers and GPU providers, the FEDML GPU marketplace also welcomes individuals to join effortlessly via our "Share and Earn" interface.
  • Unified ML Job Scheduler and GPU Manager: With a simple fedml launch your_job.yaml command, developers can instantly launch AI jobs (training, deployment, federated learning) on the most cost-effective GPU resources, without the need for tedious resource provisioning, environment setup and management. FEDML Launch supports any computing-intensive job for LLMs and generative AI, including large-scale distributed training, serverless/dedicated deployment endpoints, and large-scale similarity search in vector DB. It also enables cluster management and deployment of ML jobs on-premises, private, and hybrid clouds.
  • Zero-code LLM Studio: As enterprises increasingly seek to create private, bespoke, and vertically tailored LLMs, FEDML Nexus AI Studio empowers any developer to train, fine-tune, and deploy generative AI models code-free. This Studio leverages fedml launch and allows companies to seamlessly create specialized LLMs with their proprietary data in a secure and cost-effective manner.
  • Optimized MLOps and Compute Libraries for Diverse AI Jobs: Catering to advanced ML developers, FEDML Nexus AI provides powerful MLOps platforms for distributed model training, scalable model serving, and edge-based federated learning. FEDML Train offers robust distributed model training with advanced resource optimization and observability. FEDML Deploy provides MLOps for swift, auto-scaled model serving, with endpoints on decentralized cloud or on-premises. For developers looking for quick solutions, FEDML Nexus AI's Job Store houses pre-packaged compute libraries for diverse AI jobs, from training to serving to federated training.

LLM use cases

LLMs have the potential to revolutionize the way we interact with products & services. They can be used to generate text, translate languages, answer questions, and even create new creative content.  Actual applications & LLM capabilities can be organized into 3 groups: Assistants, Learning, and Operations.  These have some overlap of course. Some example applications in each:

The challenge with LLMs

Though new versions of open-source LLMs are released regularly, and they continuously improve, (e.g. they can handle more input context length) these based models typically won’t work well out of the box for your specific domain’s use case. This is because these base open-source models were trained on general text data from the web and other sources in their pretraining. 

You will typically want to specialize the base LLM model for your domain’s use case. This entails fine-tuning the model on data that’s relevant to your use case or task. Fine-tuning, however, comes with its own set of challenges which prevent or hinder LLM projects from completing end to end.

There are 3 general challenges associated with fine-tuning large language models

  1. Getting access to GPU compute resources
  2. Training & deployment process
  3. Experimenting efficiently

1. compute resources: LLMs require substantial compute, memory, and time to fine-tune and deployment. The large matrix operations involved with training and deploying LLMs suggests that GPUs are in the best position to handle the calculation workload most efficiently.  GPUs, particularly the high end A100 or H100 type, are very hard to find available today and can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars to purchase for on-prem.

There are techniques to efficiently use the compute, including to distribute the training across many servers, hence you will typically need access to several GPUs to run your fine-tuning.

2. process, Without a solution like FEDML Nexus AI Studio, managing and training LLM models for production scale and deployment typically involves a many step process, such as:

  1. Selecting the appropriate base model
  2. Building training data set
  3. Selecting an optimization algorithm
  4. Setting & tracking hyperparameters
  5. Implementing efficient training mechanisms like PEFT
  6. Ensure use of SOTA technology for the training
  7. Managing your python & training code
  8. Finding the necessary compute and memory.
  9. Distributing the training to multiple compute resources
  10. Managing the training and validation process

And Deploying LLM models typically involves a process like:

  1. Building many models to experiment with
  2. Building fast serving endpoints for each experiment
  3. Ensure use of SOTA technology for serving
  4. Managing your python & serving code
  5. Finding the necessary compute and memory.
  6. Connecting your endpoint with your application
  7. Monitoring and measuring key metrics like latency and drift
  8. Autoscale with demand spikes
  9. Failover when there are issues

FEDML Nexus AI Studio encapsulates all of the above into just a few simple steps.

3. on experimentation, there’s a fast pace of new open source model development and training techniques, and your business stakeholders are asking for timely delivery to test their AI product ideas.  Hence you need a way to quickly fine-tune and deploy LLM models with a platform that automatically handles most of the steps for you, including finding low cost compute.  In this way, you can run several experiments simultaneously, thereby enabling you to deliver the best AI solution and get your applications’ new value for your customers sooner.  

Why a zero-code LLM Studio?

To support the 3 general challenges mentioned above, FEDML Nexus AI Studio, encapsulates a full end-to-end MLOps (or sometimes called LLMOps) for LLMs and makes the process just a few simple steps in a guided UI.  The step by step is discussed in the How it works section.  But as for Why LLM studio?:

  • No-code: Studio’s UI walks you through few steps involved very simply
  • Access to popular Open-Source LLM models: we keep track of the popular open source models so you don’t have to. We provide access to Llama 2, Pythia and others in various parameter sizes for your fine-tuning.
  • Built-in training data or bring your own: We provide several industry specific data sets built-in or you can bring your own data set for the fine-tuning. 
  • Managing your LLM infrastructure: This includes provisioning and scaling your LLM resources, monitoring their performance, and ensuring that they are always available.
  • Deploying and managing your LLM applications: This includes deploying LLM endpoints for your LLM application to run on production while collecting metrics on performance.
  • Monitoring and improving your LLM models: This includes monitoring the performance of your LLM models, identifying areas where they can be improved, and retraining them to improve their accuracy.

Without a robust MLOps infrastructure like FEDML Nexus AI, it can be difficult to effectively manage and deploy LLMs. Without Studio, you may have a number of problems, including:

  • Slow Development: if you can’t experiment with fine-tuning new models, new data, and configurations quickly and at low cost, you may not be putting forth the best effort model for your business applications.
  • High costs: FEDML Nexus AI’s new cloud services bring a GPU marketplace based pricing, hence you can be sure your training and deployment is cost effective.
  • Performance issues: If your LLM infrastructure is not properly managed, you may experience performance issues, such as slow response times and outages.
  • Security vulnerabilities: If your LLM applications are not properly deployed and managed, they may be vulnerable to security attacks.
  • Model drift: Over time, LLM models can become less accurate as the data they are trained on changes. If you are not monitoring and able to efficiently continuously improve your LLM models, this can lead to a decrease in the quality of your results.

How does it work?

Studio’s no-code user interface greatly compresses the typical workflow involved with fine-tuning an LLM.  It’s easy and only 3 steps:

  1. Select an open source model, a fine-tuning data set & start training
  2. Select a fine-tune model and build an endpoint
  3. Test your model in a chatbot.

Step 1.Select an open source model, a fine-tuning data set & start training

At nexus.fedm.ai, click the Studio icon in the main menu at the left.

Select from our growing list of Open-source LLM modes:

Next, select from build-in datasets or add your own.  The built-in data sets are already created properly to work with the open source modes. They have the necessary design, label/columns, and the proper tokenizers are handled. You can search for an view the actual data for these standard datasets at Hugging Face, for example the popular training data databricks/databricks-dolly-15k is here: https://huggingface.co/datasets/databricks/databricks-dolly-15k/tree/main

A few hyper-parameters are provided for your review and adjustment if desired.  Set use_lora to true for example to drastically reduce the compute and memory needed to fine-tune.

Then click Launch, and Studio will automatically find the suitable compute in our low cost GPU marketplace to run your fine-tune training.

Studio will use a SOTA training algorithm to ensure efficient fine-tuning.

Once you start fine-tuning, you can see your model training in Training > Run 

You may start multiple model fine tunes to compare and experiment with the results.  The GPU marketplace will automatically find the compute resources for you.  If a compute resource isn’t currently available, your job will be queued for the next available GPU.

Step 2. Select a fine-tune model and build an endpoint

After you’ve built a fine-tuned model, you can deploy it to an endpoint.  Goto Studio > LLM Deploy.  Name your endpoint, select your fine-tuned model and indicate FEDML Cloud for Studio to automatically find the compute resource on our GPU marketplace.

For deploy and serving, a good rule of thumb is to assume 2-bytes or half-precision is required per parameter, and hence best to have GPU memory that’s 2x number of parameters: 

For example, if you have a 7 billion parameter model, at half-precision, it needs about 14GB of GPU space.  Studio will automatically find a suitable GPU for you.

Step 3. Test your model in a chatbot.

And finally, test your fine-tuned LLM and its endpoint through our built-in chatbot.  Goto Studio > Chatbot, select your new endpoint, and type a query to test

And that’s it! You’ve completed fine tuning, deployment, and a chatbot test. All with just a few clicks and Studio even found the servers for you.

FEDML also provides a more sophisticated Chatbot for customers who would like a more refined & production ready-chatbot which can support many models simultaneously.

Future plans for Studio

We plan to add additional AI training tasks to Studio. For example, Multi-modal model training and deployment.  We’ll publish to our blog when those are ready for you to try.

Advanced and custom LLMs with Launch, Train, and Deploy

Check for our future blog post where we’ll show you how to handle more advanced and custom training and deployment with our Launch, Train, and Deploy products. 

Webinar announcement 

We have a webinar on Tuesday Nov 7 at 11am PT/2pm ET at which we’ll introduce our FEDML Nexus AI platform and show a live-demonstration of Studio:

  • Discover the vision & mission of FEDML Nexus AI
  • Dive deep into some of its groundbreaking features
  • Learn how to build your own LLMs with no-code Studio
  • Engage in a live Q&A with our expert panel

Register for the webinar here!

Link

 

 

community logo
Join the Dinarian888 Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
RFK Jr: "The Pandemics are coming from labs. ALL OF THEM... Lyme, COVID, RSV, HIV & Spanish Flu came out of a vaccine lab." ☠️ 💉

"Gain-of-Function Vaccine research has created the worst plagues in our history."

"We can go down the whole list of diseases... It’s just a disaster. It’s given us no benefits. It’s given us everything from Lyme disease to Covid, and many many other diseases. RSV, which is now one of the biggest killers of children, came out of a vaccine lab."

"There’s strong evidence that even Spanish flu came from vaccine research."

"There’s plenty of evidence that HIV also came from a vaccine gain-of-function lab program. "

"The 'PANDEMICS' are coming from labs... ALL OF THEM."

00:04:00
🚀The industry has gotten incredible at teaching robots

🚀The industry has gotten incredible at teaching robots to move, sprint, and imitate body dynamics. But as Michael Parker (@bittensormax) points out in The UMI Thesis, there’s still a massive missing piece in Physical AI: Motion Understanding.

✨ Key Takeaways:

🔹Looking Human vs. Understanding Humans: Robots can execute impressive physical feats, but they still struggle to reliably read non-verbal human cues in context.

🔹Motion is Meaning: A gesture, hesitation, or glance changes completely depending on posture, timing, and surrounding context.

🔹Beyond Pixels: True intelligence requires mapping human intent and sequence across time—not just processing raw frames.

🔹The UMI Intelligence Layer: As robots enter hospitals, factories, homes, and stores, Bittensor’s SN78 @umi_sn78 UMI (Universal Motion Intelligence) aims to own the critical layer that translates human movement into real meaning.

The future of robotics isn't just about how machines move—it's about how ...

00:04:54
Follow The Money🎯

Israel Exposed launched 🤯Who Funded The Genocide🤯

A searchable database tracking pro-Israel political money in U.S. politics.

It includes:

👉 11,168 named donors + employers

👉 523 members of Congress + funding

👉 House & Senate votes on arms-transfer resolutions

👉165 candidates with network-backed fundraising pages

👉105 recipient committees linked to FEC filings

00:01:36
🚨 Chutes is being framed as a Hyperliquid-style breakout for decentralized AI inference, with live revenue, verified GPU infrastructure, and a direct challenge to centralized cloud AI 🚨

Chutes is gaining attention as a decentralized AI inference platform that claims to combine real usage, cryptographic verification, confidential computing, and open-source infrastructure into a working production system. The thesis is simple: instead of trusting Big Tech clouds with AI workloads, users get a distributed compute layer built around verification and privacy.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Chutes is live in production and reportedly scaled to more than 1,170 active GPU nodes, including large numbers of Nvidia H200s and Blackwell-class hardware.

🔹 The platform says it has processed nearly 38 trillion tokens since launch across 53 deployed applications and more than 700,000 registered users.

🔹 The team reportedly cut unprofitable usage programs, reduced total token volume, and still improved revenue efficiency, with revenue per GPU rising sharply after removing subsidized traffic.

🔹 Chutes is using post-quantum cryptography, trusted execution environments, and Nvidia confidential ...

🚨 Chutes is being framed as a Hyperliquid-style breakout for decentralized AI inference, with live revenue, verified GPU infrastructure, and a direct challenge to centralized cloud AI 🚨
🚨 JPMorgan’s criticism of the CLARITY Act is fueling a fresh power struggle over who gets to write America’s crypto rules 🚨

A new clash is emerging between legacy finance and crypto legislation after JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon reportedly warned that the CLARITY Act could let crypto firms offer bank-like products without bank-level oversight. The dispute is quickly turning into a larger fight over regulation, competitiveness, and who controls the future architecture of digital finance in the United States.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Jamie Dimon reportedly called the CLARITY Act a threat to the financial system, arguing it could allow crypto firms to offer yield-like products while avoiding the capital, reserve, and oversight burdens traditional banks face.

🔹 Senator Cynthia Lummis pushed back publicly, framing the issue as a global strategic race and warning that if the U.S. does not set digital asset standards, other powers will.

🔹 The core tension is whether the bill creates legitimate regulatory clarity or simply opens the door to regulatory arbitrage for crypto platforms operating outside the traditional banking...

🚨 JPMorgan’s criticism of the CLARITY Act is fueling a fresh power struggle over who gets to write America’s crypto rules 🚨
👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? 🔜

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

👉 Here’s what you need to know:

💠 'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
💠 Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
💠 Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
💠 Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
💠 Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

👉 What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto 👉txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚨 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

The future of cybersecurity isn't about blocking yesterday's threats—it's about defeating tomorrow's before they are even built. 🛡️⚡

​The ultimate competitive edge belongs to defenders who can instantly ingest unique zero-days, automatically generate the attack strains that don't exist yet, and ship bulletproof detections to the front lines ahead of the breach. 🔮🚀

​As legacy security platforms degrade under the weight of novel AI-driven threats, the world’s largest financial institutions won't scatter their bets. They will consolidate on the single provider capable of delivering this predictive defense at global scale. 🏦📊

​The Engine Behind the Defense:

​To stay ahead, that provider needs a constant, unrelenting supply of edge-case attacks. A decentralized subnet is the only architecture built to fuel this machine—paying a global swarm of attackers to continuously probe, create, and supply novel threats around the clock. 🌐🐝💥

​Self-evolving security is ...

🚀 Navigating Bittensor yield just got effortless! 🧠⚡️

If you’ve been looking to optimize your $TAO positions across subnets without the headache of manual rebalancing or technical friction, @TrustedStake is changing the game! 💎

The new Quickstart Guide breaks down how to get seamless exposure to top-tier AI strategies:

🎯 One-Click Index Exposure: Access curated subnet baskets (Universe, Top 15, and specialized sectors) in seconds.

🛡 Non-Custodial Security: Retain complete asset control while leveraging Substrate proxy accounts—keeping your primary stash safe in cold storage.

🔄 Automated Rebalancing & Yield Optimization: Smart TWAP execution, validator selection, and root reinvestment handle the heavy lifting to maximize your alpha.

📈 Block-Level Transparency: Real-time PnL metrics and full on-chain visibility right from your dashboard.

👇Check out the full walkthrough to get started👇
...

post photo preview

🎯 Leadpoet’s new Arena could change how businesses find their next customers 🎯

Leadpoet is launching an Arena where AI agents compete to identify companies most likely to buy, turning sales intelligence into a measurable performance competition.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Agents compete on lead quality: Systems are evaluated on whether the prospects they identify show genuine buying intent.

🔹 Better than list generation: The goal is to find likely customers rather than produce large volumes of low-quality contacts.

🔹 Real-world signals matter: Agents can analyze company activity, business changes, hiring, technology use, market behavior, and other indicators.

🔹 Performance becomes measurable: Agents can be ranked based on precision, relevance, conversion potential, and downstream sales outcomes.

🔹 Competition can improve intelligence: Different agents may identify different signals, creating a wider search across potential customers.

🔹 Sales teams gain prioritization: Businesses ...

post photo preview
Revolut Leak Shows the Cost of Constant ID Collection
Revolut’s mistake is the news, but the bigger problem is the growing number of companies being encouraged or required to keep copies of our most sensitive identity documents.

Online bank Revolut has revealed that it gave out sensitive personal and financial information of an undisclosed number of its customers in response to a fake government request.

The information that was handed over to an “unauthorized third party” reportedly includes names, dates of birth, occupations, addresses, phone numbers, account numbers, transaction histories (including Bitcoin), and even copies of government-issued IDs and onboarding verification selfies.

Revolut claims that derived biometric face data was not.

The company said that the data was handed over in response to an email that came from a real government agency’s domain, but was not actually sent or authorized by that agency.

The email passed several authentication checks (SPF, DKIM, and DMARC) that are designed to establish the authenticity of a message’s origin and integrity, but do not verify the legitimacy of the legal request itself.

Revolut said that it complied with the request “under the reasonable belief that it was an authentic government agency request” – and only later found out that it was not.

Revolut said it later realized its mistake, blocked the email address, and reported the incident to the relevant authorities.

Revolut said that only a “limited” number of its customers were affected by the data leak, and that the company’s systems were not hacked, nor was any money stolen.

The story broke on September 11 when Revolut customers started receiving an email notice about a data leak, and the news was picked up by media outlets the following day.

Revolut notice explaining customer identity and financial data was shared after an unauthorized government email request.

The reason this is a recurring problem is that companies are keeping highly sensitive information about their customers’ identities, and sometimes even financial transactions, for a long time, and this data is then available to be disclosed to third parties – either in response to valid legal requests, or, as in the case of Revolut, fake ones.

One reason for this is know your customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) rules. Revolut’s current UK customer privacy notice spells it out: the company generally keeps personal data of UK customers for no more than seven years after the relationship ends, and sometimes longer – for legal reasons.

This means that even if you close your account, your identity documents don’t disappear.

And while the incident with Revolut happened in the financial sector, it’s by no means the only one that requires customers to hand over sensitive identity information. Discord, a popular chat service, said in an October 9, 2025 security update that government ID photos of approximately 70,000 users may have been exposed after a third-party customer service provider got hacked.

This was not a financial service, nor the same type of attack. But the result was similar – because the underlying business process was the same: requiring and storing sensitive identity documents. In the case of Discord, these were used to review age-related appeals.

It’s hard to do anything about a copy of your old passport, or a photo of your face, or a record of your past transactions. These can be used to identify and profile you, and can be used to carry out targeted fraud. And this can happen even if the initial disclosure didn’t result in financial loss.

The more companies are forced to collect and store such information, and the more of it they have, the more opportunities there are for this data to be leaked, either by the company itself or a third party it works with. That's what makes governments' push for more ID checks just to access ordinary parts of life so reckless.

Source

🙏To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

👉 Cashapp: $thedinarian

👉 Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

👉 PayPal: Scan the QR code below 📲 or Click Here

👇 Crypto Donations 👇

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
This Is The Income A Family Needs To Live Comfortably In Every US State

Here’s the short version of what it takes for a family of four to live comfortably in 2026 by state:

In Massachusetts, you’d need nearly $330,000 a year - the highest figure in the entire country. Only three states clear the $300,000 mark: Massachusetts, Hawaii, and California. At the other end of the spectrum, Mississippi is the most affordable at about $188,000. That’s a full $142,000 less than what you’d need in Massachusetts.

So… how much does a family of four need in your state?

This map shows the pre-tax income a household with two working adults and two kids needs to live comfortably in every U.S. state.

The numbers come from SmartAsset (as of February 2026). They’re based on the familiar 50/30/20 budget: 50% for necessities, 30% for discretionary spending, and 20% for savings or other goals. These aren’t bare-minimum survival numbers—they’re what it takes to live pretty well while still putting money aside.

And as Visual Capitalist notesMassachusetts sits at the very top of that list. Massachusetts tops the ranking, with a family of four needing $329,555 per year to meet the 50/30/20 benchmark.

Hawaii follows at $313,165, while California ranks third at $302,682.

Rank State Income needed for family of four (2026)

  • 1 - Massachusetts - $329,555
  • 2 - Hawaii - $313,165
  • 3 - California - $302,682
  • 4 - Connecticut - $298,189
  • 5 - New Jersey - $295,110
  • 6 - New York - $291,533
  • 7 - Colorado - $283,213
  • 8 - Washington - $281,798
  • 9 - Oregon - $280,966
  • 10 - Vermont - $280,384
  • 11 - Alaska - $272,064
  • 12 - New Hampshire - $267,904
  • 13 - Rhode Island - $264,659
  • 14 - Minnesota - $263,078
  • 15 - Maryland - $257,837
  • 16 - Maine - $250,931
  • 17 - Montana - $249,434
  • 18 - Pennsylvania - $247,936
  • 19 - Illinois - $244,109
  • 20 - Virginia - $242,944
  • 21 - Nevada - $242,278
  • 22 - Indiana - $241,696
  • 23 - Wisconsin - $238,451
  • 24 - Arizona - $236,870
  • 25 - Utah - $235,789
  • 26 - Delaware - $228,134
  • 27 - Ohio - $226,221
  • 28 - Idaho - $226,054
  • 29 - Florida - $223,392
  • 30 - New Mexico - $223,142
  • 31 - Nebraska - $223,059
  • 32 - Missouri - $217,734
  • 33 - Georgia - $214,573
  • 34 - Michigan - $214,323
  • 35 - South Carolina - $212,909
  • 36 - North Carolina - $212,410
  • 37 - Wyoming - $212,410
  • 38 - Oklahoma - $211,910
  • 39 - North Dakota - $210,496
  • 40 - Kansas - $207,917
  • 41 - Iowa - $204,422
  • 42 - Texas - $203,424
  • 43 - West Virginia - $202,592
  • 44 - South Dakota - $201,760
  • 45 - Alabama - $198,931
  • 46 - Louisiana - $197,933
  • 47 - Tennessee - $197,267
  • 48 - Arkansas - $195,437
  • 49 - Kentucky - $194,854
  • 50 - Mississippi - $187,533

Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York aren't far behind, bringing the number of states with comfortable-income thresholds above $290,000 to six.

Colorado and Vermont Make the Top 10

As expected, many of the highest income thresholds are concentrated in the Northeast and along the West Coast.

However, Colorado has the seventh-highest threshold in the country at $283,213, ranking above Washington and Oregon.

Vermont rounds out the top 10 at $280,384, despite having the second-smallest population of any U.S. state. Meanwhile, nearby states like New Hampshire, Maine, and Rhode Island all fall outside the top 10.

Just Six States Come in Below $200,000

Despite the wide range in living costs across the country, only six states have a comfortable-income threshold below $200,000 for a family of four.

Mississippi ranks lowest at $187,533, followed by Kentucky. The states of Arkansas, Tennessee, Louisiana, and Alabama also fall below the $200,000 mark.

The gap between Massachusetts and Mississippi exceeds $142,000 per year, meaning the Massachusetts benchmark is about 76% higher.

Source

🙏To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

👉 Cashapp: $thedinarian

👉 Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

👉 PayPal: Scan the QR code below 📲 or Click Here

👇 Crypto Donations Always Welcome 👇

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
🤖Can Decentralized AI Stop Big Tech from Owning the Future of Robotics?🤖
The race to build the future of robotics is no longer just about robots. It's about who controls the intelligence behind them.
 
Over the last three years, a small group of companies has emerged as the backbone of the AI revolution. Microsoft provides cloud infrastructure. NVIDIA supplies the chips. Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and others develop the models. Together, they control much of the compute, data, and software stack powering modern AI.
 
Now that AI is moving into the physical world, many are asking a bigger question:
 
Will these same companies end up controlling robotics too?
 
It's a valid concern.
 
The latest generation of robots relies on enormous amounts of compute, simulation, training data, and foundation models. Many robotics startups today are built on infrastructure provided by large technology companies. NVIDIA's Omniverse is becoming a key simulation environment for robot training. Microsoft Azure is powering the training of robotics foundation models. Physical AI startups increasingly depend on hyperscale cloud infrastructure to train and deploy intelligent systems. Recent partnerships across the industry show just how central Big Tech has become to robotics development.
But while Big Tech is building the highways, another movement is trying to ensure it doesn't own every destination.
 
That movement is decentralized AI.
 
Why Decentralized AI Exists
 
The idea behind decentralized AI is simple. Instead of a handful of companies owning the models, compute infrastructure, data pipelines, and intelligence networks, these resources are distributed across thousands of participants.
 
This means anyone can contribute compute, contribute models, validate outputs and can participate.
The most visible example today is the decentralized AI network known as Bittensor (@bittensor). The network has evolved into a large ecosystem of specialized AI markets called subnets, where participants compete to provide useful machine intelligence and are rewarded based on performance. Rather than relying on a single company, intelligence is generated and validated by a distributed network of miners and validators.
 
Think of it as an attempt to build an open marketplace for AI instead of a world where intelligence is rented from a few centralized providers.
 
Why This Matters for Robotics
 
Robotics has a unique problem. Unlike chatbots, robots operate in the physical world. They need to perceive environments, make decisions, move safely and they need to learn continuously.
 
The challenge is that collecting and training on real-world robotic data is incredibly expensive. That's one reason large companies have such an advantage. They can afford the compute, simulation environments, and data infrastructure needed to train robotics models at scale.
 
This is where decentralized systems become interesting.
 
Instead of one company collecting all the data and training all the models, decentralized networks could allow thousands of contributors to participate in building robotic intelligence.
 
Imagine a future where:
  • Warehouse robots contribute operational data.
  • Delivery robots contribute navigation data.
  • Factory robots contribute manipulation data.
  • Developers contribute models.
  • Validators evaluate performance.
The resulting intelligence becomes a shared network rather than a proprietary asset.
 
That vision is beginning to emerge.
 
Bittensor's Move Toward Physical AI
 
While many people associate Bittensor (@bittensor) with language models and AI services, parts of the ecosystem are increasingly exploring embodied intelligence and robotics.
 
One example is Kinitro, a subnet focused on incentivizing the training and evaluation of embodied AI systems. The goal is to create competitive environments where developers build robotic intelligence and are rewarded based on performance.
 
The broader Bittensor ecosystem has also expanded into compute marketplaces, distributed inference systems, bandwidth infrastructure, and AI coordination layers that could eventually support robotics workloads. Several subnets now focus on decentralized compute, confidential inference, data transfer, and model training, critical components for future robotic systems.
 
In other words, the pieces are starting to appear.
 
Not a decentralized robot network yet.
 
But the infrastructure that could support one.
 
Beyond Bittensor: The Rise of Physical AI Networks
 
Bittensor isn't alone.
 
Across the industry, researchers and builders are experimenting with decentralized approaches to physical AI.
 
New research published in 2026 introduced the concept of DAO-enabled decentralized physical AI, or DePAI. The idea combines robotics, decentralized infrastructure, AI models, governance systems, and human oversight into a single framework. Instead of centralized control, robots and physical infrastructure could be coordinated through transparent rules and distributed ownership models.
 
At the same time, developers are exploring decentralized operating systems for robots that allow machines to communicate directly with each other and with distributed compute resources. These architectures are designed to make robotic systems more resilient and less dependent on a single cloud provider.
 
The goal is not simply decentralization for its own sake.
 
The goal is resilience.
 
If one server fails, the system continues.
 
If one company disappears, the network survives.
 
If one participant leaves, innovation continues.
 
But Here's the Reality
 
Decentralized AI faces the same challenge every decentralized technology faces.
 
Big Tech has resources. A lot of resources.
 
Training advanced robotics models requires enormous compute budgets, sophisticated simulation environments, access to specialized hardware, and vast amounts of real-world data.
 
That's why many robotics startups still partner with major cloud providers and AI companies. It's often the fastest path to deployment.
 
And there are legitimate concerns about whether decentralized networks can maintain quality, reliability, and security at the scale required for industrial robotics. Even researchers studying decentralized AI systems have highlighted risks around concentration, incentives, governance, and network security.
 
The challenge isn't just decentralizing intelligence.
 
It's decentralizing intelligence while maintaining performance.
 
That's much harder.
 
The Most Likely Outcome
 
The future probably won't be fully centralized. And it probably won't be fully decentralized either. Instead, we're likely heading toward a hybrid model.
 
Large technology companies will continue providing chips, cloud infrastructure, simulation platforms, and foundational research.
 
At the same time, decentralized AI networks will emerge as alternative coordination layers where intelligence, data, and economic value can be shared more openly.
 
The companies building robots may use NVIDIA hardware.
 
Train on Azure.
 
Run foundation models from OpenAI.
 
But they may also participate in decentralized data networks, decentralized compute markets, and decentralized intelligence protocols.
 
The future of robotics could end up looking less like a monopoly and more like an ecosystem.
 
The Bigger Question
 
The real question isn't whether decentralized AI can eliminate Big Tech.
 
It can't.
 
At least not anytime soon.
 
The real question is whether decentralized AI can prevent a future where a handful of companies control every robot, every model, every dataset, and every decision made by the machines operating around us.
 
As robots become workers, assistants, delivery drivers, factory operators, and even economic agents, that question becomes increasingly important.
 
Because the battle for the future of robotics is no longer about hardware.
 
It's about who owns the intelligence.
 
And that battle is just getting started.
 
 

🙏To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

👉 Cashapp: $thedinarian

👉 Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

👉 PayPal: Scan the QR code below 📲 or Click Here

👇 Crypto Donations 👇

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals