Dinarian888
News • Business • Investing & Finance
Can Distributed Ledger Technology Propel Us Toward Net-Zero Carbon Emissions?
#HBAR
February 07, 2024
post photo preview

Before you read this, keep in mind the use of Problem-Reaction-Solution, by THE POWERS THAT BE, to get people to approve what THEY plan... ~D

The race to reduce carbon emissions and achieve the goals of the 2015 Paris Agreement is intensifying, with many nations moving towards zero-carbon solutions. Despite this, current emission reduction efforts are falling short of international ambitions and it is clear that a different way of operating is needed. Hania Othman, Director of Sustainable Impact Europe/Africa at The HBAR Foundation, says a key to this could be distributed ledger technology.

Context

In 2021, the European Union (EU) embarked on an ambitious journey to reduce its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by at least 55% below the 1990 levels by 2030. This initiative is part of a broader strategy to position Europe as the world’s first climate-neutral continent by 2050, signalling a significant commitment to environmental sustainability. 

Now, two years later, policymakers are eager to apply similar ambitions to the global climate agenda.

The COP28 conference, which took place late last year in Dubai, marked a crucial point in initiating this global dialogue, encouraging countries across the sphere to reduce their carbon emissions and accelerate efforts to achieve carbon neutrality on a global scale. An important outcome of the conference was a collective agreement among nations to “transition away” from fossil fuels. This marked a pivotal shift towards the end of the fossil fuel era and was a key component of the Global Stocktake, a comprehensive assessment under the 2015 Paris Agreement aimed at keeping the global temperature rise below 1.5C. The stocktake highlighted the need for significant reductions in GHG emissions and substantial increases in renewable energy capacity and energy efficiency improvements by 2030.

COP28 President Sultan Al Jaber and other participants onstage during the COP28 Closing Plenary at COP28 in Dubai on December 13, 2023. Photo: UNclimatechange/Flickr

The COP28 deal urges over 200 global economies to increase their efforts in a “just, orderly, and equitable manner,” triple renewable energy, and double the global average of energy efficiency by 2050. The agreement gives significant momentum to the transition away from fossil fuels, including a focus on reducing methane emissions and phasing out inefficient fossil fuel subsidies. The urgency of these targets is underscored by the need to limit global warming to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels, a threshold considered relatively safe by climate experts. However, the proposal is not without its flaws; developing countries have voiced their disappointment over the lack of new financial commitments to assist them in transitioning away from fossil fuels and adapting to climate impacts.

Another key concern that emerged at COP28 was whether we can achieve fair implementation of both the EU and COP28 directives, particularly in a way that does not disproportionately burden developing countries.

In the 27-nation bloc, the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) is instrumental in complementing global efforts. CSRD enhances the transparency of sustainability reporting among companies, aligning corporate practices with broader sustainability goals. Beyond being a mere disclosure regulation, CSRD offers a framework for businesses to adapt to an increasingly urgent low-carbon transition. On the other hand, the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) is designed to prevent carbon leakage by imposing a carbon price on imports of certain goods from outside the EU. This ensures that the EU’s ambitious climate efforts are not undermined by the relocation of carbon-intensive production to countries with less stringent climate policies. To create a fair playing field for both the EU and other global countries to achieve this unified goal, policymakers and other influential figures need to ensure that measures like CBAM do not lead to trade disputes or are perceived as protectionist by non-EU countries.

Upon delving deeper into the outlined goals, further shortcomings emerge. Firstly, the EU self-imposed targets inadvertently highlight its own difficulties in cutting down on carbon emissions. In fact, to reach the 2030 emissions goal, the bloc would need to make further cuts of 132 megatonnes of carbon dioxide a year, the equivalent of the annual output of 332 gas-powered stations.

With regard to the COP28 proposal, the antithetical “incremental” targets proposed have also raised doubts as to whether current carbon reduction strategies are pragmatic enough to achieve a meaningful environmental impact. 

Dire Consequences

One needn’t look very far to identify the impact and the consequences of inaction. The world was repeatedly haunted by the images of abnormal fires ravaging forests, towns, and tourist spots across Greece in 2023. At the same time, last year was the UK’s second-hottest year on record, Ireland experienced its wettest-ever July, while parts of Bulgaria and Turkey were inundated with floods. The message is and has been clear for some time: climate change presents a grave threat to the planet and the consequences are becoming increasingly dire. 

In the face of this, the EU has put mechanisms in place to enforce compliance with its climate goals, including penalties for non-compliance, albeit with lackluster enforcement. However, more action is clearly needed. Now more than ever, there is an impetus for world leaders to embrace emerging technologies such as blockchain and distributed ledger technologies to accelerate progress toward a low-carbon economy.

How Can Web3 Play a Part?

While there isn’t a “one-size fits all” solution that can be adapted to tackle the global climate crisis, the scale of the problem calls for a multifaceted approach. For instance, climate reporting is a complex task, hindered by issues such as the lack of detailed data, inconsistent methodologies often reliant on estimations, exclusive supply chain information, and general non-transparency. 

Distributed ledger technology (DLT) can offer solutions to these challenges. The use of tokenization, in conjunction with integrated data Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (dMRV), offers a promising method to establish a public ledger for emission data. This approach can ensure uniformity in technical frameworks and utilize the inherent features of distributed ledgers – such as auditability, discoverability, and liquidity in emission offsetting and sustainability reporting scenarios. Additionally, the current system struggles with adequately verifying diverse attributes, which ultimately affects the effective accountability of both polluters and governmental entities. 

Using tools such as the Guardian Policy Workflow Engine, an open-source dMRV tool that employs a standards-based approach for token taxonomies, we can trace sustainability outcomes more accurately and effectively. This advanced approach allows for the monitoring of impact down to the individual data attribute associated with the environmental and social impact. Consequently, it facilitates the creation of tailored solutions that are more accurately aligned with the unique characteristics and needs of each organization. This is an example of how, by leveraging DLT, governments, companies, and individuals can record and verify emissions data in an open and immutable manner. This enables stakeholders to have a clear understanding of their environmental, social, and governance impact and take necessary actions to reduce emissions and improve impact outcomes. 

Real-World Impact

DLT can also play a crucial role in verifying carbon credit schemes, a carbon-mitigation process that has been the subject of contention since its initial rollout.

The credibility of these schemes depends on accurate measurement and verification of the emissions reductions, which at present, are not guaranteed. It is generally agreed that the credit schemes have ample room for improvement to deliver on set outcomes – with an investigation by the Guardian stating that over 90% of credits being bought do not represent genuine carbon reductions. As one might expect, this development has sent ripples of disruption throughout the industry. In a market that is still developing, such events significantly strain the fabric of trust and credibility. It is therefore important that we work to enhance the industry’s reputation, as it plays a crucial role in a broader portfolio of solutions essential for effective climate change mitigation. And given the less-than-favourable reputation associated with this industry, it makes sense to adopt fresh measures. 

DLT can provide a tamper-proof and auditable system to ensure the integrity of carbon credit transactions, promoting trust and confidence in the market.

The technology can also be used to address industries that generate significant carbon emissions, such as the supply chain sector. By its nature, getting goods around the world is an energy- and fuel-intensive process, and there are notable inefficiencies within the supply chain industry that can be addressed using DLT. For instance, the technology can be used by supply chain participants to track and trace their products’ entire lifecycle, identifying inefficiencies and areas for improvement. This transparency enables companies to optimize processes, reduce emissions, and promote sustainability across the supply chain.

DLT-based platforms are also enabling the tokenization of carbon offsets, making it more accessible for individuals and organizations to participate in emission reduction projects. 

Setting the Standard

The urgency to meet global carbon emission reduction targets cannot be overstated. It is important to address this issue, as it involves more than just legal and financial aspects; the implications for our planet’s future are dire. While global alliances have made good progress in reducing carbon emissions, we have a long way to go before we can alleviate the crisis that now presents itself. It’s time to find new ways of working. 

By leveraging the innovative power of novel technologies such as DLT and open-source digital, measurement and reporting tools (dMRV), governments, companies, and individuals can enhance the transparency of their climate reporting, verify and trace (often opaque) carbon credit schemes, and reduce supply chain inefficiencies – and this is just the beginning. Web3 technology will be key to allowing global nations to really deliver on their commitments, and contribute to the ‘enhanced transparency framework’ currently being laid out. Perhaps most importantly, Web3 will enable us to shift global proposals from talk to action and embrace the transition to a sustainable future.

Link

community logo
Join the Dinarian888 Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Ripple President Monica Long announced the use of XRP-POOLS 🤯

Ripple President Monica Long announced the use of XRP-POOLS to leverage XRP as collateral for funding customers’ payments from credit card institutions.

We are talking here about TRILLIONS of DOLLARS on the XRP-Ledger!

OP: Jacktherippler

00:00:28
🔥 Interview With Jacob "Const" Steeves, Co-Founder of Bittensor 🔥

Insane Interview Jacob "Const" Steeves (@const_reborn), Co-Founder of Bittensor and CEO of Affine, for an deep dive into what's coming next for Bittensor! 🧠⚡️

From fighting the AI cabal and competing with frontier labs to revenue models and Gamma Tokens—we covered it all. 🔥

⏱️ Timestamps:

0:00 Meet Jacob "Const" Steeves 👋
0:27 Fighting the AI Cabal 🛡️
8:40 Competing With Frontier Labs ⚔️
11:02 Templar's Departure & Teutonic 🏛️
15:44 Research, Revenue & Gamma Tokens
21:31 What's Next for Bittensor? 🔮

Catch the full conversation below! 📺👇

00:23:20
🪙 Is a Gold-Backed Dollar Making a Comeback? 🇺🇸🟡

The global financial landscape could be on the verge of a historic pivot. The U.S. Treasury has reportedly hired economist Judy Shelton—a vocal advocate for a gold-backed currency for three decades—sparking intense speculation about the future of the monetary system. 📈📉

The Core Proposal & Historical Context 📜⏳

🔹 The Shelton Plan: The proposed mechanism involves issuing a Treasury bond that holders can redeem for either U.S. dollars or physical gold.

🔹 A Nod to the Past: This exact promise was standard on U.S. war bonds until 1933, when Congress ultimately suspended convertibility during the Great Depression. 🏦💵

The Global Gold Rush 🌍🏦

🔹 The Biggest Stack: The United States currently holds 8,133 tonnes of gold—the largest reserve on the planet.

🔹 Global Accumulation: Central banks worldwide are stacking gold at an unprecedented rate. For instance, China has aggressively purchased gold for consecutive months, and ...

00:02:45
🚨 Chutes is being framed as a Hyperliquid-style breakout for decentralized AI inference, with live revenue, verified GPU infrastructure, and a direct challenge to centralized cloud AI 🚨

Chutes is gaining attention as a decentralized AI inference platform that claims to combine real usage, cryptographic verification, confidential computing, and open-source infrastructure into a working production system. The thesis is simple: instead of trusting Big Tech clouds with AI workloads, users get a distributed compute layer built around verification and privacy.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Chutes is live in production and reportedly scaled to more than 1,170 active GPU nodes, including large numbers of Nvidia H200s and Blackwell-class hardware.

🔹 The platform says it has processed nearly 38 trillion tokens since launch across 53 deployed applications and more than 700,000 registered users.

🔹 The team reportedly cut unprofitable usage programs, reduced total token volume, and still improved revenue efficiency, with revenue per GPU rising sharply after removing subsidized traffic.

🔹 Chutes is using post-quantum cryptography, trusted execution environments, and Nvidia confidential ...

🚨 Chutes is being framed as a Hyperliquid-style breakout for decentralized AI inference, with live revenue, verified GPU infrastructure, and a direct challenge to centralized cloud AI 🚨
🚨 JPMorgan’s criticism of the CLARITY Act is fueling a fresh power struggle over who gets to write America’s crypto rules 🚨

A new clash is emerging between legacy finance and crypto legislation after JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon reportedly warned that the CLARITY Act could let crypto firms offer bank-like products without bank-level oversight. The dispute is quickly turning into a larger fight over regulation, competitiveness, and who controls the future architecture of digital finance in the United States.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Jamie Dimon reportedly called the CLARITY Act a threat to the financial system, arguing it could allow crypto firms to offer yield-like products while avoiding the capital, reserve, and oversight burdens traditional banks face.

🔹 Senator Cynthia Lummis pushed back publicly, framing the issue as a global strategic race and warning that if the U.S. does not set digital asset standards, other powers will.

🔹 The core tension is whether the bill creates legitimate regulatory clarity or simply opens the door to regulatory arbitrage for crypto platforms operating outside the traditional banking...

🚨 JPMorgan’s criticism of the CLARITY Act is fueling a fresh power struggle over who gets to write America’s crypto rules 🚨
👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? 🔜

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

👉 Here’s what you need to know:

💠 'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
💠 Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
💠 Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
💠 Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
💠 Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

👉 What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto 👉txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚨 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

In 2015, Bitcoin was right there, in front of me.

I ran into it ten times. I never stopped. Like everyone else, I shrugged, and I let it go by.

The hard part was not understanding Bitcoin.
The hard part was stopping for it. Giving it an hour, a page, one real try. The people who got it were not smarter. They had tried.

Eleven years later, I feel the exact same thing about Bittensor. A network where artificial intelligence belongs to no one, where the rules are public, and whose currency is capped like bitcoin. All around me, the same "this is too complicated for me."

This time, I stopped for it. And I wrote the book that lets you do the same in a weekend.

I wrote it for people who know nothing about any of this. Every technical word explained once, in one sentence. A city, its districts, its craftsmen and its jury to understand the machine without a single diagram. And the risks as a whole part of the book, not a footnote.

It will not tell you what to buy. It predicts nothing. It gives you what you ...

post photo preview
Hopefully Before All The Silver Is Gone 🥈

💵 Trump renews $5,000 “dividend” promise if Republicans win the 2026 midterms 💵

President Donald Trump is again promising a $5,000 payment to every adult U.S. citizen if Republicans retain control of both the House and Senate in the November 2026 midterm elections.

🔑 Key points

🔹 The proposal is conditional: Republicans would need to win control of both chambers of Congress.

🔹 It is not currently authorized: Congress would still need to approve the payments and establish eligibility, funding, administration, and timing.

🔹 Estimated cost is approximately $1.2 trillion: The figure is based on roughly 240 million adult citizens receiving $5,000 each.

🔹 Tariff revenue is being presented as a funding source: The administration has suggested that tariff proceeds could help finance the dividend.

🔹 Current tariff revenue may be insufficient: The projected cost would exceed the amount of tariff revenue collected over comparable periods.

🔹 The plan resembles a corporate dividend: Trump has ...

post photo preview

🏛️ CFTC begins developing new crypto rules to combat fraud and protect investors 🏛️

On October 5, 2026, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission opened a public rulemaking process for a comprehensive crypto framework covering retail transactions, trading platforms, and digital-asset markets.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Public comment is opening: The CFTC issued an advance notice of proposed rulemaking to gather feedback before drafting final regulations.

🔹 Regulation Crypto Asset Transactions is proposed: The framework would address retail crypto transactions under the Commodity Exchange Act.

🔹 Regulation Crypto Asset Markets is also being developed: The CFTC intends to establish rules for crypto exchanges and market infrastructure.

🔹 Fraud and manipulation are central concerns: The agency says the framework will target abusive conduct, market manipulation, and misconduct involving customer funds.

🔹 Investor protection is a stated goal: New rules could establish clearer requirements for trading ...

post photo preview
September 13, 2026
post photo preview
Revolut Leak Shows the Cost of Constant ID Collection
Revolut’s mistake is the news, but the bigger problem is the growing number of companies being encouraged or required to keep copies of our most sensitive identity documents.

Online bank Revolut has revealed that it gave out sensitive personal and financial information of an undisclosed number of its customers in response to a fake government request.

The information that was handed over to an “unauthorized third party” reportedly includes names, dates of birth, occupations, addresses, phone numbers, account numbers, transaction histories (including Bitcoin), and even copies of government-issued IDs and onboarding verification selfies.

Revolut claims that derived biometric face data was not.

The company said that the data was handed over in response to an email that came from a real government agency’s domain, but was not actually sent or authorized by that agency.

The email passed several authentication checks (SPF, DKIM, and DMARC) that are designed to establish the authenticity of a message’s origin and integrity, but do not verify the legitimacy of the legal request itself.

Revolut said that it complied with the request “under the reasonable belief that it was an authentic government agency request” – and only later found out that it was not.

Revolut said it later realized its mistake, blocked the email address, and reported the incident to the relevant authorities.

Revolut said that only a “limited” number of its customers were affected by the data leak, and that the company’s systems were not hacked, nor was any money stolen.

The story broke on September 11 when Revolut customers started receiving an email notice about a data leak, and the news was picked up by media outlets the following day.

Revolut notice explaining customer identity and financial data was shared after an unauthorized government email request.

The reason this is a recurring problem is that companies are keeping highly sensitive information about their customers’ identities, and sometimes even financial transactions, for a long time, and this data is then available to be disclosed to third parties – either in response to valid legal requests, or, as in the case of Revolut, fake ones.

One reason for this is know your customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) rules. Revolut’s current UK customer privacy notice spells it out: the company generally keeps personal data of UK customers for no more than seven years after the relationship ends, and sometimes longer – for legal reasons.

This means that even if you close your account, your identity documents don’t disappear.

And while the incident with Revolut happened in the financial sector, it’s by no means the only one that requires customers to hand over sensitive identity information. Discord, a popular chat service, said in an October 9, 2025 security update that government ID photos of approximately 70,000 users may have been exposed after a third-party customer service provider got hacked.

This was not a financial service, nor the same type of attack. But the result was similar – because the underlying business process was the same: requiring and storing sensitive identity documents. In the case of Discord, these were used to review age-related appeals.

It’s hard to do anything about a copy of your old passport, or a photo of your face, or a record of your past transactions. These can be used to identify and profile you, and can be used to carry out targeted fraud. And this can happen even if the initial disclosure didn’t result in financial loss.

The more companies are forced to collect and store such information, and the more of it they have, the more opportunities there are for this data to be leaked, either by the company itself or a third party it works with. That's what makes governments' push for more ID checks just to access ordinary parts of life so reckless.

Source

🙏To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

👉 Cashapp: $thedinarian

👉 Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

👉 PayPal: Scan the QR code below 📲 or Click Here: 

👇 Crypto Donations 👇

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
This Is The Income A Family Needs To Live Comfortably In Every US State

Here’s the short version of what it takes for a family of four to live comfortably in 2026 by state:

In Massachusetts, you’d need nearly $330,000 a year - the highest figure in the entire country. Only three states clear the $300,000 mark: Massachusetts, Hawaii, and California. At the other end of the spectrum, Mississippi is the most affordable at about $188,000. That’s a full $142,000 less than what you’d need in Massachusetts.

So… how much does a family of four need in your state?

This map shows the pre-tax income a household with two working adults and two kids needs to live comfortably in every U.S. state.

The numbers come from SmartAsset (as of February 2026). They’re based on the familiar 50/30/20 budget: 50% for necessities, 30% for discretionary spending, and 20% for savings or other goals. These aren’t bare-minimum survival numbers—they’re what it takes to live pretty well while still putting money aside.

And as Visual Capitalist notes, Massachusetts sits at the very top of that list. Massachusetts tops the ranking, with a family of four needing $329,555 per year to meet the 50/30/20 benchmark.

Hawaii follows at $313,165, while California ranks third at $302,682.

Rank State Income needed for family of four (2026)

  • 1 - Massachusetts - $329,555
  • 2 - Hawaii - $313,165
  • 3 - California - $302,682
  • 4 - Connecticut - $298,189
  • 5 - New Jersey - $295,110
  • 6 - New York - $291,533
  • 7 - Colorado - $283,213
  • 8 - Washington - $281,798
  • 9 - Oregon - $280,966
  • 10 - Vermont - $280,384
  • 11 - Alaska - $272,064
  • 12 - New Hampshire - $267,904
  • 13 - Rhode Island - $264,659
  • 14 - Minnesota - $263,078
  • 15 - Maryland - $257,837
  • 16 - Maine - $250,931
  • 17 - Montana - $249,434
  • 18 - Pennsylvania - $247,936
  • 19 - Illinois - $244,109
  • 20 - Virginia - $242,944
  • 21 - Nevada - $242,278
  • 22 - Indiana - $241,696
  • 23 - Wisconsin - $238,451
  • 24 - Arizona - $236,870
  • 25 - Utah - $235,789
  • 26 - Delaware - $228,134
  • 27 - Ohio - $226,221
  • 28 - Idaho - $226,054
  • 29 - Florida - $223,392
  • 30 - New Mexico - $223,142
  • 31 - Nebraska - $223,059
  • 32 - Missouri - $217,734
  • 33 - Georgia - $214,573
  • 34 - Michigan - $214,323
  • 35 - South Carolina - $212,909
  • 36 - North Carolina - $212,410
  • 37 - Wyoming - $212,410
  • 38 - Oklahoma - $211,910
  • 39 - North Dakota - $210,496
  • 40 - Kansas - $207,917
  • 41 - Iowa - $204,422
  • 42 - Texas - $203,424
  • 43 - West Virginia - $202,592
  • 44 - South Dakota - $201,760
  • 45 - Alabama - $198,931
  • 46 - Louisiana - $197,933
  • 47 - Tennessee - $197,267
  • 48 - Arkansas - $195,437
  • 49 - Kentucky - $194,854
  • 50 - Mississippi - $187,533

Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York aren't far behind, bringing the number of states with comfortable-income thresholds above $290,000 to six.

Colorado and Vermont Make the Top 10

As expected, many of the highest income thresholds are concentrated in the Northeast and along the West Coast.

However, Colorado has the seventh-highest threshold in the country at $283,213, ranking above Washington and Oregon.

Vermont rounds out the top 10 at $280,384, despite having the second-smallest population of any U.S. state. Meanwhile, nearby states like New Hampshire, Maine, and Rhode Island all fall outside the top 10.

Just Six States Come in Below $200,000

Despite the wide range in living costs across the country, only six states have a comfortable-income threshold below $200,000 for a family of four.

Mississippi ranks lowest at $187,533, followed by Kentucky. The states of Arkansas, Tennessee, Louisiana, and Alabama also fall below the $200,000 mark.

The gap between Massachusetts and Mississippi exceeds $142,000 per year, meaning the Massachusetts benchmark is about 76% higher.

Source

🙏To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

👉 Cashapp: $thedinarian

👉 Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

👉 PayPal: Scan the QR code below 📲 or Click Here: 

👇 Crypto Donations Always Welcome 👇

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
🤖Can Decentralized AI Stop Big Tech from Owning the Future of Robotics?🤖
The race to build the future of robotics is no longer just about robots. It's about who controls the intelligence behind them.
 
Over the last three years, a small group of companies has emerged as the backbone of the AI revolution. Microsoft provides cloud infrastructure. NVIDIA supplies the chips. Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and others develop the models. Together, they control much of the compute, data, and software stack powering modern AI.
 
Now that AI is moving into the physical world, many are asking a bigger question:
 
Will these same companies end up controlling robotics too?
 
It's a valid concern.
 
The latest generation of robots relies on enormous amounts of compute, simulation, training data, and foundation models. Many robotics startups today are built on infrastructure provided by large technology companies. NVIDIA's Omniverse is becoming a key simulation environment for robot training. Microsoft Azure is powering the training of robotics foundation models. Physical AI startups increasingly depend on hyperscale cloud infrastructure to train and deploy intelligent systems. Recent partnerships across the industry show just how central Big Tech has become to robotics development.
But while Big Tech is building the highways, another movement is trying to ensure it doesn't own every destination.
 
That movement is decentralized AI.
 
Why Decentralized AI Exists
 
The idea behind decentralized AI is simple. Instead of a handful of companies owning the models, compute infrastructure, data pipelines, and intelligence networks, these resources are distributed across thousands of participants.
 
This means anyone can contribute compute, contribute models, validate outputs and can participate.
The most visible example today is the decentralized AI network known as Bittensor (@bittensor). The network has evolved into a large ecosystem of specialized AI markets called subnets, where participants compete to provide useful machine intelligence and are rewarded based on performance. Rather than relying on a single company, intelligence is generated and validated by a distributed network of miners and validators.
 
Think of it as an attempt to build an open marketplace for AI instead of a world where intelligence is rented from a few centralized providers.
 
Why This Matters for Robotics
 
Robotics has a unique problem. Unlike chatbots, robots operate in the physical world. They need to perceive environments, make decisions, move safely and they need to learn continuously.
 
The challenge is that collecting and training on real-world robotic data is incredibly expensive. That's one reason large companies have such an advantage. They can afford the compute, simulation environments, and data infrastructure needed to train robotics models at scale.
 
This is where decentralized systems become interesting.
 
Instead of one company collecting all the data and training all the models, decentralized networks could allow thousands of contributors to participate in building robotic intelligence.
 
Imagine a future where:
  • Warehouse robots contribute operational data.
  • Delivery robots contribute navigation data.
  • Factory robots contribute manipulation data.
  • Developers contribute models.
  • Validators evaluate performance.
The resulting intelligence becomes a shared network rather than a proprietary asset.
 
That vision is beginning to emerge.
 
Bittensor's Move Toward Physical AI
 
While many people associate Bittensor (@bittensor) with language models and AI services, parts of the ecosystem are increasingly exploring embodied intelligence and robotics.
 
One example is Kinitro, a subnet focused on incentivizing the training and evaluation of embodied AI systems. The goal is to create competitive environments where developers build robotic intelligence and are rewarded based on performance.
 
The broader Bittensor ecosystem has also expanded into compute marketplaces, distributed inference systems, bandwidth infrastructure, and AI coordination layers that could eventually support robotics workloads. Several subnets now focus on decentralized compute, confidential inference, data transfer, and model training, critical components for future robotic systems.
 
In other words, the pieces are starting to appear.
 
Not a decentralized robot network yet.
 
But the infrastructure that could support one.
 
Beyond Bittensor: The Rise of Physical AI Networks
 
Bittensor isn't alone.
 
Across the industry, researchers and builders are experimenting with decentralized approaches to physical AI.
 
New research published in 2026 introduced the concept of DAO-enabled decentralized physical AI, or DePAI. The idea combines robotics, decentralized infrastructure, AI models, governance systems, and human oversight into a single framework. Instead of centralized control, robots and physical infrastructure could be coordinated through transparent rules and distributed ownership models.
 
At the same time, developers are exploring decentralized operating systems for robots that allow machines to communicate directly with each other and with distributed compute resources. These architectures are designed to make robotic systems more resilient and less dependent on a single cloud provider.
 
The goal is not simply decentralization for its own sake.
 
The goal is resilience.
 
If one server fails, the system continues.
 
If one company disappears, the network survives.
 
If one participant leaves, innovation continues.
 
But Here's the Reality
 
Decentralized AI faces the same challenge every decentralized technology faces.
 
Big Tech has resources. A lot of resources.
 
Training advanced robotics models requires enormous compute budgets, sophisticated simulation environments, access to specialized hardware, and vast amounts of real-world data.
 
That's why many robotics startups still partner with major cloud providers and AI companies. It's often the fastest path to deployment.
 
And there are legitimate concerns about whether decentralized networks can maintain quality, reliability, and security at the scale required for industrial robotics. Even researchers studying decentralized AI systems have highlighted risks around concentration, incentives, governance, and network security.
 
The challenge isn't just decentralizing intelligence.
 
It's decentralizing intelligence while maintaining performance.
 
That's much harder.
 
The Most Likely Outcome
 
The future probably won't be fully centralized. And it probably won't be fully decentralized either. Instead, we're likely heading toward a hybrid model.
 
Large technology companies will continue providing chips, cloud infrastructure, simulation platforms, and foundational research.
 
At the same time, decentralized AI networks will emerge as alternative coordination layers where intelligence, data, and economic value can be shared more openly.
 
The companies building robots may use NVIDIA hardware.
 
Train on Azure.
 
Run foundation models from OpenAI.
 
But they may also participate in decentralized data networks, decentralized compute markets, and decentralized intelligence protocols.
 
The future of robotics could end up looking less like a monopoly and more like an ecosystem.
 
The Bigger Question
 
The real question isn't whether decentralized AI can eliminate Big Tech.
 
It can't.
 
At least not anytime soon.
 
The real question is whether decentralized AI can prevent a future where a handful of companies control every robot, every model, every dataset, and every decision made by the machines operating around us.
 
As robots become workers, assistants, delivery drivers, factory operators, and even economic agents, that question becomes increasingly important.
 
Because the battle for the future of robotics is no longer about hardware.
 
It's about who owns the intelligence.
 
And that battle is just getting started.
 
 

🙏To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

👉 Cashapp: $thedinarian

👉 Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

👉 PayPal: Scan the QR code below 📲 or Click Here: 

👇 Crypto Donations 👇

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals