TheDinarian
News • Business • Investing & Finance
Instacart Product Chief Says Grocery’s Future Is All About the AI-Powered ‘Personal Planogram’
August 26, 2024
post photo preview

One hundred years ago, the grocery shopper was just trying out the new concept of chain stores like Piggly Wiggly, A&P and King Kullen. She would visit one of these chains with sawdust on the floor and handwritten price tags for items like sirloin steak (.39 pound), flour (.04) and butter (.45). Even back then in the 1920s, the industry had its own trade periodical — and it picked out a prescient issue that would come to dominate the economics of the category.

“During the [1917-18] war, and in the period of reconstruction, we have heard and read much of eliminating the so-called ‘Middleman,’” the editors of Progressive Grocer wrote in its inaugural issue in 1922. “We are convinced, however, that no method has yet been developed that can more economically serve the consumer than the present triumvirate of manufacturer, wholesaler and retailer.”

Outside of the obvious price differences, in some ways, the issues in the grocery business have remained the same, as highlighted in the Progressive Grocer editorial. It’s still about economically serving the consumer. Shoppers will still want to handle their produce, even though digital delivery options abound. Some will still want the experience of seeing the Wheaties box with Simone Biles on the shelf. But in other ways, absolutely everything has changed.

According to the PYMNTS Global Digital Shopping Index, grocery merchants now need to prioritize features that are different from retail merchants for maximum impact. For merchants that provide groceries, “Click and Mortar consumers most want to use their preferred payment method. The next most valued features are rewards — as grocery shoppers want to earn discounts for their loyalty — and digitally available product details. Consumers also want digitally available coupons that are usable both in-store and online.

Looking back can point the way forward. It’s no coincidence, Instacart Chief Product Officer Daniel Danker told Karen Webster, that the company kicked off a recent all-hands meeting with a look at 1924 trends. These days, grocery is all about the Click and Mortar shopper navigating the connected economy. If Instacart is any indicator, the grocery experience is about to get more “shoppable. Looking to become more than just a food delivery service, Instacart is preparing new AI tools for an upgraded digital grocery experience that will move affordability up the priority list in a shift that it believes will strengthen the overall grocery ecosystem.

“It always has to come back to the customer,” Danker told Webster. “It has to solve a problem. We can’t just have technology for the sake of technology.”

Ch-Ch-Changes And AI’s Beginner Phase

Today, Instacart sees the future of grocery shopping as a hybrid model that combines the best of digital convenience with the sensory experience of in-store shopping. Danker told Webster that in the very near future, the back of the store is going to be oriented much more around enabling fulfillment, either for online orders that are delivered or online orders that are picked up. The front of the store will be oriented much more around the set of products that consumers want to browse and touch — tailored, time-efficient and tuned to the changing profile of the grocery store shopper.

Instacart’s AI strategy revolves around convenience and personalization, with features like the “Buy it again function, which typically contains over 200 items for the average user.

“We want to make it effortless, and it’s beginner AI,” he told Webster, explaining that phase one is all about making food decisions effortless for the shopper. “Intermediate and advanced is going to get really exciting.”

Instacart is working on more proactive AI features such as anticipating when customers are likely to run out of certain products and making intelligent suggestions based on past purchases and preferences.

Instacart’s vision for the future of grocery shopping involves what Danker calls a “personal planogram.” This concept aims to break free from the traditional store layout, the foundational plank around which stores are designed and products displayed, creating a uniquely tailored shopping experience for each customer.

“Online, that store really can physically reshape itself around needs,” Danker explains. This personalization extends to understanding dietary preferences, household composition, and even specific recipe needs.  “If my wife adds pancake mix to her cart and she inadvertently adds one that has wheat in it, [a message] will pop up and say, ‘this same brand has a gluten-free version’.”

The personal planogram will also anticipate shoppers’ needs based on their regular cooking habits. “We’re going to start to understand automatically the dishes that you have on rotation in your household, Danker says, explaining how the app could suggest all necessary ingredients for a dish with just a few taps. Their recent partnership with the NY Times Cooking section makes recipes shoppable, something that Danker says is among the most complicated logistical feats in delivery.

“It’s about knowing what’s in the store, and specifically knowing what’s on the shelf,” Danker said. “It’s extremely important. We do that better than anyone. If you’re placing an order right now for tomorrow, and those items are going to get replenished overnight, not letting you buy a certain product because it’s out of stock tonight might be foolish because it’ll be on the shelf by tomorrow morning. That requires so much history, right to every store in every location that we can predict when these items are going to show up on the shelf.”

Making Grocery Shopping More Affordable

With inflation comes a need for affordability — that’s a key focus for Instacart, especially given the rising costs of buying and putting food on the table.  To address this, Instacart is developing features to help customers make more cost-effective choices. One such feature is the personalized digital flyer, which Danker describes as “almost the equivalent of the circular that lands on people’s counters. The difference is we’ve personalized it. And it doesn’t get misplaced or mistakenly thrown away. The digital flyer informs customers about sales on products they regularly purchase across different stores, providing comparison shopping without the need to get in a car and visit multiple stores to save a couple of dollars here and there.

This comes over and above the store loyalty programs integrations Instacart provides its shoppers. “Linking even just the loyalty programs, which we’re also obsessed with making available to customers, is saving customers $8-10 per order,” Danker said.

From Groceries to Eat:  The Uber Eats Partnership

Instacart’s recent collaboration with Uber Eats marks a significant shift in the company’s approach to food delivery. “We are actually no longer a grocery delivery service. We’re a food delivery service, Danker states, emphasizing the company’s evolution to encompass both grocery and restaurant delivery. Danker told Webster that this partnership aligns with Instacart’s goal of meeting customers’ broader food needs. “If you want to serve customers better, you need to understand customer’s motivations. And the customer’s motivation in our case is convenient, healthy food, he said.

Early results from this collaboration are promising. Danker notes that the partnership has been “completely incremental for grocery orders, allaying concerns about potential cannibalization. Moreover, it’s performing particularly well among Instacart Plus members, indicating increased value for subscribers. It’s part of what he sees as the more connected future for the grocery and restaurant category.

Danker says that AI and all the many elements of the current Instacart platform will deliver more affordability, regardless of the channels consumers shop. Instacart’s acquisition of Caper gives shoppers a digital grocery shopping experience using their Instacart credentials in the store, including personalized ads based on what’s already in the shopping cart or items that might complement them. Instacart gives grocery stores an omnichannel experience they don’t have to build themselves, without losing touch with the consumer.

“Instacart’s going to deliver so much access, not just convenience, but access to stores you might not have gone to yourself that actually you’ll be able to get,” Danker said, “and we’re going to satisfy those needs best through Instacart, because we’re so much more connected to the world around you.”

Link

community logo
Join the TheDinarian Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
Dr. Steven Greer just alleged that the new Age of Disclosure movie is a “psychological warfare” operation.

“This film is an attempt to hijack UFO disclosure into a false narrative that presents it as a threat.”

“It’s [made] by operatives for the cabal that have been keeping this secret for 80 years.”

👉 “The best disinformation is a combination of fact, and they fold into those facts false narratives and false spin.”

“In the film, it mentions that yes, there’s been a reverse-engineering program for 80 years dealing with the retrieved non-human craft, but that nothing in the skies we’re looking at are the result of that … it’s all alien.”

“Including the Tic Tac, which we have established was a Lockheed Skunk Works device.”

“We have two whistleblowers, separate, who don’t know each other, who saw that object being utilized.”

“One in a top secret operation in Syria not that many years ago, and another one in the early 90s being offloaded from a C-130 transport for use in the First Gulf War.”

“UFOs are real … but some 80% of the ones people see zipping ...

00:03:33
🚨FOX NEWS: Bret Baier Reports🚨

Bret Baier reports on secret Government UAP program allegations — interviews Karl Nell, Tim Gallaudet, Peter Skafish & Senator Mark Kelly

🧬“This is going to change the arc of human history. We’re not alone in the universe and higher order non-human intelligences are visiting us.” ~ Former Rear Admiral Tim Gallaudet

00:08:21
Listen To This Lt General Closely 😉

Retired U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. Steven L. Kwast: "We have the technology today that can take any human being from any place on planet Earth to any other place in less than an hour."

😉Our reality is about to shift folks, to an entirely new paradigm. It won't be long before we will all have our own holodecks. ✨

00:01:55
👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? 🔜

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

👉 Here’s what you need to know:

💠 'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
💠 Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
💠 Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
💠 Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
💠 Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

👉 What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto 👉txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚨 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading
🚨This Is Life-Altering Information!🚨

Time To Geek Out... Grab A Coffee..☕

🚨 STEFAN MARINOV’S “MAGVID” PAPER: CLAIMS OF MAGNETIC-GRAVITATIONAL ANOMALIES & OVER-UNITY ROTATION 🚨

Analyzed nicely by @JustXAshton, a 1996 PDF by Bulgarian physicist Stefan Marinov—hosted on ScalarPhysics.com—describes a tabletop “Magvid” (Magnetic-Vortex) device that he claimed rotated without external power, produced anomalous gravitational gradients, and generated over-unity energy. The document is often cited as experimental evidence for magneto-gravitic coupling and zero-point energy extraction.

🔑 Key Claims

🔹 Contactless Rotation: A ring of permanent magnets arranged in a specific toroidal pattern allegedly spun a ferrite disk at up to 1,200 rpm when shielded from air currents—Marinov reported no electrical input and no Lenz-law braking.

🔹 Gravitational Anomaly: Sensitive torsion-balance tests inside the Magvid’s bore purported to show a 1–2 % reduction in gravitational acceleration along the rotation axis—an ...

magvid.pdf
I Concur With This Summation 👌

🚨People keep asking my opinion on what the phenomenon is and where “they” come from. I’ve held back; until today. Here’s my answer…

My Informed Opinion on UAP/NHI: Why I Think the Phenomenon Is Interdimensional, Ancient, and Connected to Multiple Aspects of High Strangeness

This isn’t a definitive claim; just my informed, reasoned opinion after looking at the UAP phenomenon from multiple angles: historical, scientific, religious, and personal accounts.

If you made me choose, I’d say the least likely explanation is that UAP/NHI are simply extraterrestrials traveling across space in physical craft. That interpretation leaves far too much unexplained.

A better fit; for the data, the patterns, and the high strangeness, is this:

UAP, NHI, ghosts, cryptids, and even certain religious encounters all stem from the same underlying phenomenon, one that is interdimensional or tied to another layer of timespace that intersects with our own.

And when you examine it carefully, the missing people cases that appear to happen “between one second and the next” fit into this model as well.

1. Why I Don’t Think They’re Simply From Another Planet

The behavior of UAP consistently violates what we’d ...

🚨 CHINA BEGINS POLICY TALKS TO CRACK DOWN ON STABLECOIN AND CRYPTO PAYMENTS 🚨

Beijing has quietly launched high-level inter-agency discussions on a comprehensive ban on stablecoin and crypto-based payments, according to sources cited by CryptoNews.net.

The proposed framework—still in draft form—would criminalize the use of any “non-yuan digital token” for goods, services, wages, or cross-border settlements, with penalties reaching seven years imprisonment and fines of up to five million yuan (US700 k).

🔑 Key Points

🔹️ Criminalization Scope: Draft language covers all stablecoins (USDT, USDC, DAI, etc.) and crypto assets; even foreign businesses accepting crypto from Chinese customers would be liable.

🔹️ Cross-Border Focus: Special provisions target offshore platforms that facilitate yuan-to-stablecoin swaps; banks and fintechs must block transactions “reasonably suspected” of settling in digital tokens.

🔹️ CBDC Shield: Policy talks explicitly frame the crackdown as ...

post photo preview
post photo preview
Epstein-Linked Emails Expose Funding Ties to Bitcoin Core Development — Here Is What the Documents Reveal
  • Newly released emails show Jeffrey Epstein helped fund MIT’s Digital Currency Initiative, which supported Bitcoin Core development.
  • The documents also confirm that Leon Black donated to MIT’s Media Lab through Epstein-directed channels.
  • The revelations reshape part of Bitcoin’s early institutional funding history and highlight long-hidden influence from controversial donors.

Newly unsealed emails from the House Oversight Committee have shed fresh light on Jeffrey Epstein’s hidden financial influence inside MIT’s Media Lab — and more importantly, how some of that money flowed into Bitcoin Core development. The correspondence reveals that Joichi Ito, then-director of the MIT Media Lab, relied on Epstein-connected “gift funds” to rapidly launch the Digital Currency Initiative (DCI) in 2015, the research hub that became one of the primary sources of funding for Bitcoin’s core developers.

Emails Show Epstein-Connected Money Helped Launch MIT’s Digital Currency Initiative

In the newly surfaced emails, Ito directly thanked Epstein for the financial help that allowed MIT to “move quickly and win this round,” referring to the formation of DCI — a program explicitly designed to provide long-term support for Bitcoin Core contributors after the collapse of the Bitcoin Foundation. Ito’s forwarded message to Epstein described how the foundation’s implosion left core developers without stable funding, creating an opening for MIT to bring them under its umbrella.

He explained that three major developers — including Wladimir van der Laan and Cory Fields — agreed to join MIT, calling it “a big win for us.” The email also highlighted early support from prominent academics, including cryptographer Ron Rivest and IMF economist Simon Johnson. Epstein simply replied: “gavin is clever.”

Funding Numbers Reveal a Much Larger Financial Trail

MIT publicly claimed that Epstein donated $850,000 to the institution, with $525,000 flowing to the Media Lab. But journalist Ronan Farrow later reported the true figure was closer to $7.5 million — including a $5 million anonymous donation connected to Epstein associate Leon Black. The new emails appear to confirm that Black not only donated, but did so through Epstein’s direction.

One email from Ito to Epstein reads: “We were able to keep the Leon Black money, but the $25K from your foundation is getting bounced by MIT back to ASU.”

 

Epstein responded: “No problem — trying to get more black for you.”

The documents reveal Epstein’s influence reached deeper into Bitcoin circles than previously acknowledged, even including early conversations with Brock Pierce — another figure with documented ties to both Epstein and controversy surrounding early crypto foundations.

MIT’s Internal Concerns and the Fallout

The emails also expose MIT’s internal unease around anonymous or reputationally risky donations. After the scandal broke, Ito resigned in 2019. MIT later tightened donation policies, warning that “everything becomes public” eventually — a statement that now seems prophetic given this week’s disclosures.

Developers like Wladimir van der Laan say they were unaware of the extent of Epstein’s involvement and noted that DCI’s funding transparency “was not great back in the day.” The Media Lab and DCI declined to comment.

Source

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 Stripe:
1) or visit http://thedinarian.locals.com/donate

💳 PayPal
2) Simply scan the QR code below 📲 or visit HERE

🔗 Crypto Donations👇
XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
Science of the People and 3I/ATLAS

To paraphrase the Declaration of Independence in the context of science:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all humans are created equal, that they are endowed with certain unalienable rights, that among these are the search for extraterrestrial knowledge, the liberty to deviate from the arrogance of dogmatists, and the pursuit of scientific truth.”

The human spirit is superior to artificial intelligence (AI) in its willingness to take risks and explore new territories of knowledge that are not restricted to past training data sets.

In a recent interview with a high-school girl, I was asked the question: “what is your advice to young adults?” to which I replied: “maintain your childhood curiosity, take risks to improve the world, but most importantly: give priority to human companionship over AI companions and follow primary sources of information rather than processed intellectual junk-food that is fed to you from your environment. The reason is simple: only critical thinking will make you smarter. The brain is like a muscle: you must use it in order to get better.” After the interview, I was informed that the student is the daughter of an AI technology mogul with a net worth exceeding 10 billion dollars. When asked if she can share the interview’s video with her father, I replied: “by all means.”

In a 3.5-hour podcast interview the following day, I was asked why is academia alienating the public? I explained that the communication port enabled in academia is often one-way, taking the form of scientists telling the public what they think it needs to know. This is no different than Marie Antoinette, the Queen of France before the fall of the monarchy during the French Revolution, stating: “There is nothing new except what has been forgotten.

I do not see myself as different from any member of the public. I was born on a farm and fell in love with nature. When you are in love, you wish to learn everything you can about the subject of your love. Your ego, your recognition by peers, or your sense of self-importance, are secondary to the subject of your love. I entered academia under the illusion that tenure secures this path. But instead, I found myself surrounded by self-declared kings and queens who rule over communities of students and postdocs in echo-chambers that they built out of taxpayer’s funds. They are in love with themselves rather than with nature.

The scientific declaration of independence asks instead that we attend to the public’s curiosity because the public funds science. The 2020 Decadal Survey on Astronomy and Astrophysics identified the search for the molecular fingerprints of microbial life as the highest research priority, worthy of the investment of at least 10 billion years in the next two decades. The search for technological signatures of extraterrestrial intelligence was sidelined with no recommended funding. This stands in contrast to the public’s passion to search for aliens and not just microbes. The mainstream report recommended searching for microbes in distant houses, Earth-Sun analogs, on our cosmic street. But if any of these houses happens to host intelligent residents, these might send a package to our backyard in the form of interstellar objects like 3I/ATLAS or have a construction project in their backyard that is easier to detect than microbes. The scientific declaration of independence argues for hedging the bets and investing in both types of searches. But the gatekeepers of academia avoid the public’s passion for aliens.

Academia communicates science from a pedestal. After 3I/ATLAS was discovered, I chose the alternative way of communicating the scientific process as the opportunity to explore an exciting possibility that 3I/ATLAS might be a technological object based on its 13 anomalies, listed here. Even if this explanation turns out to be wrong, we must take it seriously because of its huge implications to society. Admitting that there are mysterious facts about 3I/ATLAS endows us with the curiosity to learn something new. Excluding the anomalies from the vocabulary of NASA officials alienates the public, because it violates the scientific declaration of independence. The proper way to address alternative interpretations of 3I/ATLAS is by explaining anomalies away, not by ignoring them.

The public’s passion must be respected, not sidelined. Once science is perceived as a learning experience of the people, not an occupation of the intellectual elite, it would receive increased federal funding and would address exciting problems that the public really cares about. Just as with AI systems, there is “an alignment problem” in ensuring that scientists act in accordance with taxpayers’ intentions, values, and goals. Just as with AI systems: the problem stems from faulty training data sets. Comet experts should add spacecraft to the icy rocks that they have in their training data set, because humanity produced such objects and most of the 100 billion stars in the Milky-Way galaxies formed billions of years before the Sun. In a billion years, the Voyager spacecraft will visit the opposite side of the Milky-Way relative to the Sun.

And then there are science popularizers, who are simply worried about being liked without practicing scientific research on the topics they speak about. I would not worry about them, because they will drift in the right direction once the mainstream of science practitioners will attend to the scientific priorities of the public.

Even if the interstellar gift of 3I/ATLAS ends up being a natural iceberg, its revolutionary significance was in exposing major problems with the way science is pursued and communicated to the public. Here’s hoping that the passage of interstellar objects through the inner solar system will lead to a better future in which science is regarded as work of the people, rather than the work of the intellectual elite.

Source

🙏 Donations Accepted 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

💳 Stripe:
1) or visit http://thedinarian.locals.com/donate

💳 PayPal: 
2) Simply scan the QR code below 📲 or go HERE

🔗 Crypto Donations👇
XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

 

Read full Article
post photo preview
Sugar, The Silent Killer!

Have you ever heard that scientists at Princeton University discovered rats given intermittent access to sugar showed identical brain changes to rats addicted to cocaine?

Yep, the same:

  • Dopamine receptors
  • Withdrawal symptoms
  • Relapse patterns

Yet you probably think the reason you can't quit sugar is because you're weak.

Every time you reach for that chocolate bar, you blame yourself for not having enough discipline or strength.

That couldn't be further from the solution you are looking for.

Trying to quit sugar with willpower is like trying to put out a gasoline fire with more gasoline.

The harder you resist, the bigger the explosion when you break.

A chocolate bar contains:

  • High fructose corn syrup
  • Refined white sugar
  • Hydrogenated oils

All of which causes these:

  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Heart disease
  • Chronic inflammation

When you eat that chocolate bar, your blood sugar rockets up, the pancreas floods your system with insulin, and your blood sugar crashes harder than it spiked.

Then, your brain screams for more sugar to escape the crash you just created.

My friend, none of this can be fixed with willpower.

You need a proper transition to let that poison out of your system on a CHEMICAL level.

Today, I want to share my complete 3-Part Natural Sugar Reset System (and why willpower isn't enough to cure sugar cravings).

1: Understand your chemistry to catch your patterns.

Before we start, I need to tell you one fundamental truth:

Not all sugars are created equal.

When you eat a fresh, ripe apple or grapes, you get;

  • Fructose wrapped in fiber
  • Water
  • Enzymes

You can forget about crashes and desperate cravings.

email

So, the question here isn't:

"How do you get more willpower to crave less?"

But more like:

“Why does fruit stop your cravings while processed sugar creates more?”

Fruit helps you finish the job processed sugar bars never could: achieve balance.

Long before nutrition labels and lab-made sugar existed, every culture treated fruit as a complete medicine, not a snack.

Ancient systems understood something we often forget today:

Sweetness only nourishes when it comes from a living source.

email

Processed sugar carries sweetness without life: dried, bleached and heated.

Fruit arrives with a natural intelligence memory intact.

  • Sunlight stored in the flesh
  • Minerals drawn from the soil
  • Water content from the tree

Those qualities work together like a small internal ceremony.

  • Digestion slows.
  • Nerves settle.
  • Cells receive energy without confusion.

Cravings fade when the body recognizes the food as something it was designed to finish, not chase.

And most people blame their taste buds or their discipline when sugar cravings hit.

2: Calm your liver, kill the craving

Cravings don't live in your head. They live in your liver.

Have you noticed every healing tradition protects the liver?

  • Chinese physicians called it the “General” of the body
  • Ayurvedic healers viewed it as the fire that keeps everything moving
  • Traditional herbalists protect it the way a community protects itself

Processed sugar enters the liver without the balance that natural foods carry.

The organ works harder, heats up and tightens the body.

You feel this as:

  • Sudden hunger
  • Irritability
  • Sharp pull toward fast sweetness

Fruit’s water calms the internal fire and has a cooling, settling effect.

Its fiber regulates the pace.

email

When the liver softens, your mind softens.

The craving loses its urgency because the internal “noise” is gone.

3: Rewire the ancient reward pattern

Your brain built its sugar blueprint over thousands of years, eating whole fruit.

Processed sugar hijacked that blueprint 100 years ago.

You can rebuild it in 2-3 weeks.

Step 1: Eat fruit before you eat anything processed

Next time you want something sweet, eat 3-4 dates or a handful of grapes first.

Wait 10 minutes.

The craving either disappears or you eat less of the processed stuff.

Your brain starts remembering: "Oh, this is what sweetness is supposed to feel like."

Step 2: Create a daily fruit anchor

Your brain loves patterns.

If you always reach for chocolate at 3 pm, eat an apple at 2:45 pm instead.

Do this for 10 days straight.

Your body will start expecting fruit at that time, not the candy bar.

Step 3: Slow down when you eat fruit

Processed sugar trains you to eat fast - grab, chew, swallow, done.

Fruit requires a different pace.

Take one bite of a fruit. Chew it.

This teaches your nervous system that satisfaction can come slowly.

Step 4: Remove processed sugar from your space

You can crave what's not in your house. But you can't eat what's not available.

Make it difficult to reach out for processed sugar: ban them from your house.

If fruit is the only sweet thing available, your brain will adjust within a week.

Step 5: Make fruit your first food of the day

Whatever you eat first sets your body's expectation for the rest of the day.

Have at least 1 option from these:

email

Fruit restores your original reward pattern.

Your brain receives a complete “reward message,” not a shock.

So, my friend, does fruit still sound like something you need to avoid?

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals