Dinarian888
News • Business • Investing & Finance
Chainlink’s Leading Position in Capital Markets, Tokenized Assets, and DeFi | 2024 Highlights
December 30, 2024
post photo preview

2024 marks a turning point for the adoption of onchain finance in traditional markets, with Chainlink solidifying its position as the standard for verifiable data, cross-chain interoperability, and connectivity between blockchains and legacy infrastructure. This year featured several groundbreaking Chainlink product launches, solutions with some of the largest financial institutions and market infrastructures in the world, continued dominance across DeFi, substantial growth in key Chainlink programs such as Build and Scale, and much more.

For a list of Chainlink’s biggest banking and capital markets announcements, check out the blog: Chainlink’s Work With Swift, Euroclear, and Major Banking and Capital Markets Institutions.

Dominance in Banking and Capital Markets

Chainlink, Euroclear, Swift, and 6 Financial Institutions Launch AI Initiative

The industry initiative brought together Chainlink, leading financial and market infrastructures Euroclear and Swift, and some of the world’s largest financial institutions, including UBS, Franklin Templeton, Wellington Management, CACEIS, Vontobel, and Sygnum Bank to “solve a 3.1 trillion dollar unstructured data problem”.

The initiative successfully demonstrated how LLMs can be used in combination with Chainlink for near real-time data distribution of corporate actions events across three blockchain networks. Financial institutions could then use that onchain corporate actions data to build automated and programmatic workflows for increased efficiency and new product opportunities. For more information, read the full report.

DTCC Announces Launch of Smart NAV To Accelerate Fund Tokenization With Chainlink, JP Morgan, Franklin Templeton, And More

Processing $2+ quadrillion annually, The Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (DTCC) is the premier post-trade market infrastructure that provides clearing, settlement, asset servicing, data management, and trade reporting around millions of security transactions each day. 

The DTCC, Chainlink, and 10 of the world’s largest financial institutions, including American Trust Custody, American Century Investments, BNY Mellon, Edward Jones, Franklin Templeton, Invesco, JP Morgan, MFS, State Street, and U.S. Bank collaborated on Smart NAV to deliver key mutual fund data onchain. Smart NAV demonstrated how DTCC and Chainlink can make net asset value (NAV) data available across virtually any private/public blockchain, enabling automated data dissemination and historical data access, which unlocks a multitude of use cases around fund tokenization.

One of the key findings from the report showed how Chainlink CCIP serves as an open blockchain interoperability standard to prevent future fragmentation by providing a secure abstraction layer between DTCC and blockchains.

SBI Digital Markets, UBS Asset Management, and Chainlink Unlock Automated Fund Administration and Transfer Agency

SBI Digital Markets, UBS Asset Management, and Chainlink successfully completed their implementation of a tokenized fund, showcasing how tokenization, smart contracts, and Chainlink infrastructure can automate the fund management process for traditional fund administrators and transfer agents. This unlocks a fundamental shift in how the industry’s $132T global assets under management can begin to operate using blockchains. 

The adoption of tokenized funds by the world’s largest asset managers has created a need for the fund administration industry to evolve into an onchain format. The UBS, SBIDM, and Chainlink solution shows how existing fund administration processes can apply to tokenized funds across multiple chains. The key insight is that existing systems already widely in use for fund administration processes can become compatible with tokenized funds once they’re made compatible with blockchains and smart contracts via Chainlink.

Swift, UBS Asset Management, and Chainlink Bridge Tokenized Assets With Existing Payment Systems

Swift, UBS Asset Management, and Chainlink successfully settled tokenized fund subscriptions and redemptions using the Swift network. This initiative enables digital asset transactions to settle offchain in fiat using an established payment system that’s already widely adopted by more than 11,500 financial institutions, across over 200 countries and territories.

“Our work with UBS Asset Management and Chainlink in MAS’ Project Guardian leverages the global Swift network to bridge digital assets with established systems.”—Jonathan Ehrenfeld, Head of Strategy at Swift

Swift, UBS, and Chainlink’s work proves how financial institutions can leverage blockchain technology, the Chainlink Platform, and the Swift network to settle subscriptions and redemptions for tokenized investment fund vehicles, thereby allowing the straight-through-processing of the payment leg without the need for global adoption of an onchain form of payment. This helps in the automation of the entire lifecycle of the fund redemption and subscription process.

Central Bank of Brazil Selects Chainlink Alongside Banco Inter, Microsoft Brazil, and 7COMm To Build CBDC Solution for Trade Finance

The Central Bank of Brazil (BCB) selected Banco Inter alongside Microsoft Brazil, 7COMm, and Chainlink to build a trade finance solution as part of the second phase of Brazil’s DREX—Brazil’s digital currency pilot. The solution leverages blockchain technology and the Chainlink standard to automate supply chain management and improve trade finance processes. The goal of the solution is to demonstrate the automated settlement of agricultural commodity transactions across borders, across platforms, and via different currencies.

Chainlink CCIP enables interoperability between the Central Bank of Brazil and another country’s central bank. This unlocks real-world use cases, including international agricultural commodity trade, infrastructure development, and more.

Fidelity International and Sygnum Partner With Chainlink To Bring NAV Data Onchain for Fidelity International’s $6.9 Billion Institutional Liquidity Fund

Fidelity International and Sygnum partnered with Chainlink to bring NAV data onchain for Fidelity International’s $6.9 billion Institutional Liquidity Fund. The solution provides unparalleled transparency and accessibility around key asset data for Fidelity International’s Institutional Liquidity Fund issued onchain by Sygnum. 

Sygnum, a global digital asset banking group, tokenized $50 million of Matter Labs’ company treasury reserves (held in Fidelity’s International money market fund) and issued it as a token on the ZKsync blockchain (a Chainlink Scale partner).

“This is an important milestone, and it’s exciting to see the great work that’s been done with Fidelity International, Chainlink, and Matter Labs come to fruition, and we look forward to keep building an onchain ecosystem in a regulated and compliant way.”—Fatmire Bekiri, Head of Tokenization at Sygnum

ANZ Is Among the First Financial Institutions To Leverage CCIP Private Transactions for Cross-Chain Settlement of Tokenized RWAs

Chainlink CCIP Private Transactions enable confidential cross-chain transfers between private blockchain networks using the public CCIP network. CCIP Private Transactions feature a novel onchain encryption and decryption protocol, which empowers institutional cross-chain transactions across multiple private chains while keeping the transaction details including data, token amounts, and counterparties entirely private. 

ANZ—an Australian bank with over A$1 trillion in AUM—is among the first financial institutions leveraging this capability for cross-chain settlement of tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) under the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) Project Guardian initiative.

“Chainlink’s new cross-chain privacy capabilities have the potential to further accelerate institutional blockchain adoption by enabling end-to-end privacy between blockchain networks.”—Nigel Dobson, Banking Services Lead at ANZ

ADDX, ANZ, and Chainlink Introduce Privacy-Enabled Cross-Chain, Cross-Border Connectivity for Tokenized Commercial Paper 

ADDX, in collaboration with ANZ and Chainlink, presented a solution focused on the entire asset lifecycle of tokenized commercial paper for cross-border transactions. The solution leverages ADDX’s investment platform, ANZ’s Digital Asset Services, and Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP), including its recently announced Private Transactions capability. 

“By leveraging Chainlink CCIP for secure and compliant blockchain interoperability, this use case showcases the utility of tokenized financial assets within a regulated environment.”—Inmoo Hwang, Co-Founder and Group CFO at ADDX

For this solution, the participants selected commercial paper as the candidate asset class. The short duration of the commercial paper makes it possible to showcase the entire asset lifecycle, from issuance and subscription to settlement and redemption. This transaction shows that regulated financial entities can securely tokenize and execute digital asset transactions using their existing systems while staying within the regulatory frameworks that ensure the integrity of financial markets.

Bancolombia Group’s Wenia Taps Chainlink To Increase Transparency of Its Stablecoin Backed 1:1 By The Colombian Peso

Wenia—the new digital asset company from the Bancolombia Group, one of the largest financial conglomerates in Latin America—is live and in production using Chainlink Proof of Reserve (PoR) to bring end-to-end transparency to the Colombian Peso reserves backing its COPW stablecoin.

Through this collaboration, COPW users on the Wenia platform gain access to Chainlink’s secure and reliable onchain PoR data, enhancing visibility into the reserves backing the stablecoin. In addition, Chainlink PoR is integrated directly into the stablecoin’s minting function, helping to protect users against the risk of infinite mint attacks where additional COPW is issued without sufficient available reserves. 

Growing Momentum in the Tokenized Asset Industry

$3T+ AUM Fund Administrator Apex Group Is Leveraging Chainlink Infrastructure for Tokenized Assets

$3T+ AUM fund administrator Apex Group is leveraging Chainlink’s infrastructure for tokenized assets. Apex Group and Chainlink are collaborating to help fund managers use CCIP, Data Feeds, and Proof of Reserve to enhance asset liquidity, utility, and transparency.

21Shares Leverages the Chainlink Standard to Increase Transparency for Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs and 21BTC

Throughout 2024, 21Shares, an affiliate of 21.co, one of the world’s largest issuers of crypto exchange-traded products (ETPs), announced multiple integrations of the Chainlink standard. 

  • 21Shares integrated Chainlink Proof of Reserve to increase the transparency of the ARKB Bitcoin ETF, issued in collaboration with ARK Invest.
  • 21Shares integrated Chainlink PoR to increase the transparency of the 21Shares Core Ethereum ETF (CETH).
  • 21.co integrated Chainlink PoR to help verify reserves and secure minting for its wrapped Bitcoin product, 21BTC.

21X, Europe’s First Tokenized Securities Trading and Settlement System, Is Adopting the Chainlink Standard

Europe’s first tokenized securities trading and settlement system, 21X, is adopting the Chainlink standard. Chainlink Price Feeds will underpin 21X’s trading engine and CCIP will connect it to assets across the onchain economy.

21X, soon to launch the first EU-regulated financial market infrastructure (FMI) for order matching, trading, settlement, and registry services for tokenized money and securities, announced that it has signed a strategic partnership with Chainlink. Through this collaboration, 21X’s onchain trading, matching, and settlement system will leverage the Chainlink standard to enrich tokenized assets with high-quality data and facilitate cross-chain interoperability.  

“We will launch 21X in Q1 2025 on a public permissionless blockchain and look forward to making a variety of tokenized assets accessible to our clients and prospects through CCIP. In addition, Chainlink will provide secure and accurate price data feeds for listed products on 21X.”—Max Heinzle, Founder and CEO of 21X

Coinbase’s Project Diamond Strategically Integrates the Chainlink Standard To Scale Institutional Adoption of Digital Assets

Coinbase’s Project Diamond—a compliant digital asset platform for global institutions—is adopting the Chainlink standard as infrastructure for powering the full lifecycle management of tokenized assets. With Chainlink natively integrated into the Project Diamond platform, asset issuers and fund managers have a secure and compliant solution to quickly scale their tokenized assets across public and private blockchains through verifiable data connectivity.

Chainlink CCIP is enabling new assets on Coinbase’s Project Diamond platform to become interoperable with public or private blockchains. Chainlink Functions enriches these assets with high-quality, real-world data, no matter which chain they move across via CCIP. The integration of the Chainlink standard will also enhance the existing Coinbase Project Diamond implementation for Abu Dhabi Global Market’s (ADGM) RegLab.

Emirates NBD welcomes Chainlink to Digital Asset Lab

Emirates NBD, a ~$260B AUM banking group in the Middle East, North Africa, and Türkiye (MENAT) region, announced Chainlink as the fifth member of its Digital Asset Lab. Chainlink will join other founding members, including PwC, Fireblocks, R3, and Chainalysis.

Chainlink’s membership will play a key role in advancing the Digital Asset Lab’s mission to create innovative solutions in digital finance. The Chainlink standard will help support the adoption of digital assets in the region via verifiable data and cross-chain interoperability.

“With Chainlink Labs’ expertise in onchain finance, we are confident this partnership will drive new advancements in tokenisation and digital asset management, reinforcing Emirates NBD’s position as a regional leader in financial innovation.”—Miguel Rio Tinto, Group Chief Digital and Information Officer at Emirates NBD

Chainlink Labs Establishes Presence in Abu Dhabi Global Market

Chainlink Labs announced that it is expanding its presence in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, including setting up an office and establishing an entity in Abu Dhabi under the Registration Authority of ADGM.

Chainlink Labs plans to utilize its local presence to expand its network of strategic partnerships with financial market infrastructures and financial institutions, better serve its global ecosystem, and continue to build key relationships in the region as demand for tokenized assets surges.

Backed, Sonic, and Chainlink Partner with Fortlake Asset Management for Landmark Fund Tokenization Solution

Fortlake Asset Management—a fund manager backed by JP Morgan—is launching a tokenized fund on Sonic, which is facilitated by Backed and powered by the Chainlink standard. Chainlink CCIP and SmartData will be key drivers of the fund’s utility and adoption.

The fund is being tokenized by Backed, creating permissionless tokens that are collateralized 1 to 1 by fund units, with the price tied to the real-time net asset value (NAV). Chainlink SmartData will deliver NAV data of the underlying fund shares onchain, Chainlink Proof of Reserve will help verify collateralization and AUM, and Chainlink CCIP will enable seamless cross-chain liquidity and operations.

Fireblocks and Chainlink Labs Announce Strategic Collaboration To Accelerate Regulated Stablecoin Issuance

Fireblocks and Chainlink Labs have entered into a strategic collaboration to accelerate regulated stablecoin issuance. Fireblocks and Chainlink will provide a secure and compliant technology solution for banks and financial institutions to issue and transact with stablecoins across global financial markets.

The technology solution plans to support end-to-end tokenization capabilities for stablecoin issuers, including issuance, data synchronization, data connectivity and enrichment, compliance, custody, interoperability, and distribution. This integrated offering will give issuing agents a single, comprehensive, real-time view of stablecoins, reserves, market value, and total supply, including across different blockchains.

SOOHO.IO and Chainlink Announce Strategic Partnership To Explore Tokenized Asset and CBDC Use Cases in South Korea, Japan, Thailand, and Other Asian Markets

Blockchain financial technology company SOOHO.IO announced a strategic partnership with Chainlink to accelerate the development of tokenized assets and CBDC use cases in emerging digital markets across Asia, particularly in Korea, Japan, and Thailand. 

The partnership will focus on utilizing Chainlink to support the adoption of blockchain technology by financial institutions, with a specific emphasis on leveraging Chainlink CCIP for cross-chain asset transfers, Chainlink Proof of Reserve for verification of prepaid settlement reserves, and Chainlink oracles for provisioning NAV data onchain.

“Chainlink has become the industry standard for tokenization use cases. This partnership will allow us to work extensively with Chainlink in the Asia region, addressing the needs of financial institutions and creating fundamental solutions for the digital asset industry.”—Jisoo Park, CEO of SOOHO.IO

Superstate Integrates Chainlink Infrastructure To Enhance the Transparency and Utility of the USTB Tokenized Fund

Superstate, an asset management firm modernizing investing through tokenized financial products, integrated Chainlink Data Feeds into its tokenized treasury fund—the Superstate Short Duration US Government Securities Fund (USTB). Specifically, Superstate integrated Chainlink for onchain NAV data to enhance the transparency and utility of USTB. Additionally, Superstate plans to integrate Chainlink Proof of Reserve to further enhance onchain verification of its AUM data. 

The integration of Chainlink brings numerous benefits to USTB, including real-time transparency of its reserves, democratized access, and opportunities for the fund to be composable and programmable within collateralized lending, asset management, and market making.

Arta TechFin and Chainlink Labs Expand Digital Asset Collaboration in Hong Kong

Arta TechFin, a Hong Kong-based financial services platform, expanded its partnership with Chainlink Labs around fund tokenization. The ARTA-Chainlink solution aims to bring a wide variety of key asset data onchain and across different blockchains, helping meet the needs of asset owners and financial institutions in Hong Kong and abroad that are seeking greater levels of accessibility to the digital asset space for their clients. The partnership brings a much-needed market standard for originating, distributing, trading, and keeping custody of tokenized assets.

Extensive Adoption in DeFi

Scaling Lido and Other (Re)Staking Protocols Expand Cross-Chain via Chainlink CCIP

Lido, a leading liquid staking protocol, integrated CCIP to power the new Lido Direct Staking rails, enabling users to stake their ETH directly from other blockchain networks and receive wstETH, starting with support for Arbitrum, Base, and Optimism. The new Lido Direct Staking rails are being adopted by various DeFi frontends, including XSwap, OpenOcean, and Interport.

In addition to Lido, a growing number of protocols are also integrating Chainlink CCIP to go cross-chain and enable the staking/restaking of ETH from layer-2 networks: 

For more information on how CCIP is helping (re)staking protocols scale, read the full announcement blog: Scaling (Re)Staking Protocols Cross-Chain With CCIP.

Donald Trump-Inspired World Liberty Financial Adopts the Chainlink Standard To Accelerate the Mass Adoption of DeFi

Trump-supported World Liberty Financial (WLFI) selected the Chainlink standard to support its planned launch of the World Liberty Financial Aave v3 instance. Chainlink Price Feeds will provide the WLFI Protocol with a secure and reliable source of financial market data, crucial to enabling lending/borrowing markets as part of WLFI’s Aave v3 instance. 

Chainlink’s track record of successfully keeping Aave’s markets secure for over 5 years without losing user value was a main factor in WLFI choosing Chainlink. WFLI plans to leverage additional capabilities of Chainlink in the future, such as CCIP for cross-chain interoperability, Proof of Reserve for RWAs, and more.

Aave’s GHO Stablecoin Goes Live on Arbitrum Powered by Chainlink CCIP

The Aave DAO launched its stablecoin GHO, the multi-collateralized stablecoin native to the Aave Protocol, on the Arbitrum network—marking the DAO’s first new market in its phased GHO cross-chain expansion strategy powered by CCIP. 

For secure cross-chain transfers between Ethereum and non-Ethereum chains like Arbitrum, GHO uses a lock-and-mint model enabled by CCIP, in which tokens are locked on Ethereum while an equivalent amount is minted on the other network, keeping the total supply constant. Transfers between non-Ethereum chains will use a burn-and-mint model enabled by CCIP for maximum capital efficiency and fungibility while still being backed by reserves on Ethereum. This ensures security and flexibility for GHO’s future expansion across multiple blockchains.

Telefónica Integrates Chainlink Functions To Help Smart Contracts Detect Unauthorized SIM Card Changes

Telefónica, a Spanish multinational telecommunications company, leveraged Chainlink Functions to enable developers to connect any API on the GSMA Open Gateway to the Polygon blockchain. GSMA Open Gateway is a global telecoms industry initiative led by the GSMA, which introduced a suite of standardized Telco APIs that bring pioneering Telco capabilities to the Web3 ecosystem. 

The first GSMA Open Gateway API, SIM SWAP—introduced in Brazil by the carrier Vivo (Telefónica Brazil)—is leveraging Chainlink Functions to enable the verification of data from various sources. This integration not only enhances transaction security but also introduces an extra layer of security to blockchain transactions by enabling smart contracts to make information requests to the API to ensure that a device’s SIM card has not undergone any unauthorized changes. Using the GSMA Open Gateway API via Chainlink can also help mitigate risk beyond transaction security, addressing two-factor authentication (2FA) and fraud detection in Web3 apps and DeFi services.

BTCFi Ecosystem Increasingly Adopting the Chainlink Standard

Solv Protocol, one of the largest Bitcoin staking platforms, is adopting the Chainlink standard for data and cross-chain solutions. Solv integrated Chainlink CCIP across the Arbitrum, Avalanche, BNB Chain, and Ethereum mainnets to facilitate cross-chain transfers of SolvBTC, SolvBTC.BBN, and SolvBTC.ENA. Solv is also integrating Chainlink Price Feeds and Proof of Reserve to enhance the liquidity, utility, and transparency of its tokenized assets.

“A secure BTCFi ecosystem needs robust and battle-tested infrastructure, which is why integrating Chainlink was an obvious choice.”–Ryan Chow, Solv Protocol Founder

Solv is one of many BTCFi projects adopting the Chainlink standard. Others include: 21BTC, B2 Network, Babypie, Bedrock, Bitlayer, Botanix Labs, dlcBTC, FBTC, Lombard, Lorenzo, and PumpBTC.

GMX-Solana Adopts Chainlink Data Streams As Official Data Oracle Solution on Solana

As part of the launch of Chainlink Data Streams on Solana, GMX-Solana—a community-driven sister project bringing the GMX V2 protocol to Solana—adopted Chainlink Data Streams as its official data oracle solution. Chainlink Data Streams help secure execution prices, funding rate calculations, liquidations, and other features on GMX-Solana that require secure, low-latency market data. As part of the integration, 1.2% of total protocol fees generated by GMX-Solana will be paid to Chainlink service providers in exchange for using Chainlink Data Streams. 

“Since the initial launch of GMX V2 powered by Chainlink Data Streams, the low-latency oracle solution has enabled $64.84 billion in transaction volume for GMX. The success of this collaboration between the GMX and Chainlink communities made choosing Chainlink Data Streams as the oracle solution powering GMX-Solana an obvious choice.” —GMX-Solana

Key Chainlink Product Announcements in 2024

To get an in-depth look at all the product innovations in 2024, check the Chainlink Q1 Product Update, Q2 Product Update, and SmartCon Recap blogs. Below are the key highlights.

Chainlink Runtime Environment (CRE)

The Chainlink Runtime Environment (CRE) is a major upgrade to the Chainlink Platform, designed to scale Chainlink across thousands of blockchains, meet the growing demand from financial institutions, and empower developers to build with Chainlink faster, more easily, and with more reach and flexibility than ever before.

Underpinning this initiative is a deep re-architecture of the Chainlink Platform. Drawing inspiration from microservices architecture, the Chainlink node software utilized by decentralized oracle networks (DONs) is being broken down into distinct, modular capabilities (e.g., read chain, perform consensus, etc.) that are each secured by independent DONs. Developers can seamlessly combine these capabilities in any number of ways into executable workflows that run via the newly developed Chainlink Runtime Environment (CRE)—the system of DON-based capabilities, DON-to-DON communications, capability orchestration, and code execution on which workflows run with the appropriate consensus model.

Read the full announcement blog post to learn more about how CRE will enable more purpose-built financial apps for capital markets.

Sign up for CRE Early Access
 

Chainlink CCIP Enters General Availability, Launched Cross-Chain Token (CCT) Standard, and Supported Numerous New Features

Chainlink CCIP entered general availability (GA), meaning any developer can permissionlessly use CCIP to securely transfer onboarded tokens cross-chain, send arbitrary messages to smart contracts on another integrated blockchain, or simultaneously send data and value together through CCIP’s unique support for Programmable Token Transfers. 

CCIP also introduced the Cross-Chain Token (CCT) standard, which are cross-chain native tokens secured by CCIP. CCTs support self-serve deployments, full control and ownership for developers, enhanced programmability, and zero-slippage transfers—all backed by CCIP’s industry-standard defense-in-depth security. Notably, CCTs do not require token developers to inherit any CCIP-specific code within their token’s smart contract. 

CCIP also introduced a variety of new features such as:

  • Lock and Unlock Support—A new token transfer mechanism, which complements the existing “burn and mint” and “lock and mint” methods of transfer. 
  • Updated pricing model—CCIP is now one of the most cost-efficient options for securely and reliably transferring a wide range of tokens and messages cross-chain.
  • CCIP Local Simulator—The CCIP Local Simulator enables developers to quickly build and iterate on their cross-chain dApps, reducing CCIP message and token transfer times during the building phase from 10+ minutes to less than a second. You can install and start building using the CCIP Local Simulator today by visiting the Chainlink GitHub.
  • Transporter—A hyper-secure and intuitive bridging app built in association with the Chainlink Foundation, with support from Chainlink Labs. Transporter enables anyone to easily and securely transfer their token cross-chain via CCIP. Start using Transporter today.
  • Token Developer Attestation—Token developers will be able to add additional external verifiers to their CCTs, enabling them to participate in the cross-chain verification process of their tokens. 
  • CCIP Token Manager—A new intuitive front-end web interface for token developers to seamlessly register, configure, and manage CCTs and token pools across multiple blockchain networks, including no-code, guided token deployments. 
  • CCIP SDK—A new software development kit that streamlines the process of integrating CCIP by allowing developers to use JavaScript to create a token transfer frontend dApp.
  • Refreshed CCIP Explorer—A new, unified design and improved navigation of the CCIP Explorer makes for a more seamless and intuitive developer experience.

Chainlink Platform Privacy Suite: Blockchain Privacy Manager, CCIP Private Transactions, and DECO Sandbox

Chainlink further innovated on a suite of privacy solutions that solve different privacy concerns for institutions and Web3 developers.

  • The Blockchain Privacy Manager for privacy of data entering and leaving blockchains: The Blockchain Privacy Manager enables institutions to integrate the public Chainlink Platform and their existing systems with private blockchain networks while limiting onchain data exposure.  
  • CCIP Private Transactions for privacy of cross-chain transactions: CCIP Private Transactions leverages the Blockchain Privacy Manager and a novel onchain encryption/decryption protocol to enable institutions to transact across multiple private blockchains using the public CCIP network, while keeping the transaction details fully confidential. 
  • DECO for privacy for onchain data: DECO enables statements about offchain data to be shared onchain without revealing the underlying data. The Chainlink DECO Sandbox has been opened to the public, providing developers with access to DECO, the foundational zkTLS-oracle technology for authenticating and verifying web data in a privacy-preserving manner.

If your organization is interested in adopting the Blockchain Privacy Manager and/or CCIP Private Transactions, reach out to an expert below.

Talk with an expert
 

Chainlink Digital Assets Sandbox

The Chainlink Digital Assets Sandbox (DAS) was launched to accelerate digital asset innovation within financial institutions. With the DAS alongside expert support and consultancy services provided by Chainlink Labs, financial institutions can now go from the start of their digital asset journey to having completed a successful PoC in days, not months, saving them not only time and resources but also realizing business impact much faster. 

The Chainlink DAS provides institutions with access to ready-to-use business workflows for digital assets. For example, institutions can use the Chainlink DAS across multiple blockchain testnets to digitize a traditional bond by converting it into digital tokens and enabling these tokens to be traded and settled on a Delivery versus Payment (DvP) basis, along with many other real-world examples involving a variety of financial instruments across their entire life cycles.

Start building digital asset use cases
 

Smart Value Recapture (SVR): A Chainlink-Powered MEV Recapture Solution For DeFi

Chainlink introduced Smart Value Recapture (SVR) —a novel oracle solution designed to enable DeFi applications to recapture the non-toxic Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) derived from their use of Chainlink Price Feeds. The initial version of Chainlink SVR was built in collaboration with BGD Labs, Flashbots, and other contributors to the Aave DAO and will initially focus on enabling DeFi lending protocols to recapture oracle-related MEV from liquidations. 

Built on top of Chainlink infrastructure, SVR systematically reduces unnecessary third-party dependencies and eliminates the need to integrate intermediary smart contracts, making it a very minimal lift for existing Chainlink Price Feed users to adopt SVR. The value recaptured by SVR not only provides DeFi protocols with a new revenue stream, but can be used to promote the long-term economic sustainability of Chainlink oracles, ultimately ensuring DeFi protocols maintain access to highly secure and reliable oracles. The integration of Chainlink SVR by the Aave community is currently undergoing governance approval and can be read on the Aave forum.

Chainlink Automation 2.0

Chainlink Automation 2.0 launched in production, enabling developers to offload any smart contract computation offchain in a verifiable and ultra-reliable manner. Chainlink Automation 2.0 allowed development teams to automate even the most intricate Web3 use cases, saving up to 90% in gas costs in the process. 

Chainlink Automation is powered by decentralized and verifiable offchain computing with the highest standard of cryptographic guarantees. Automation 2.0 also features an expanded set of triggers, unlocking new ways to connect multiple dApps. For example, Automation now enables smart contracts to react to log events emitted onchain, acting as a powerful messaging bus that’s similar to the pub/sub messaging bus used to connect microservices in Web2.

Chainlink Ecosystem Moments in 2024

The Chainlink ecosystem has continued to gain dominance, with notable growth across several key metrics, including:

  • $18.2T+ in transaction value enabled
  • 15.7B+ total verified messages
  • 7 new Chainlink Scale members (15+ total)
  • 42 new Chainlink Build members (100+ total)
  • 15 new canonical CCIP integrations
  • 140 new Data Streams markets
  • 150 community events
  • 18K+ hackathon signups and 378 submitted projects
  • 30+ workshops

Link

community logo
Join the Dinarian888 Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
🐝 Computer Vision Meets Real-World Hive Health Analytics! 📊

🐝 Computer Vision Meets Real-World Hive Health Analytics! 📊

​Monitoring hive entrance activity using computer vision and lightweight AI labelers is a brilliant real-world application of edge analytics! 🧠

​Why This Test Matters:

​Non-Invasive Monitoring: Tracking steady vs. frantic flight activity without disturbing the brood box gives beekeepers real-time early warnings for hive stress, swarming, or robbing. 📦

Rapid Iteration: Filtering out visual noise (like misidentifying a screw!) in early runs proves how quickly targeted single-class detection models can be tuned for precision. 🎯

🔍​Grassroots Computer Vision: Leveraging building blocks like @webuildscore demonstrates how accessible custom AI monitoring tools are becoming for everyday operational problems. 🛠️

✨​Building practical, low-latency vision systems that solve real problems is where true AI utility shines. Continuous improvement at its finest! 🚀👏

​#Score #SN44 #Bittensor #Tao #MachineLearning

00:00:40
Problem Reaction Solution 🤔

A superintelligence would have stopped this before it even started.

Wait, thats their point... Problem Reaction Solution. In the future, expect Superintelligence Police Online.

I can’t stop thinking about this… before hackers stole $6.4 billion from Binance, they spent days rehearsing the attack in public. The test transactions on Ethereum were worth only a few dollars. Nobody stopped them.

Bloomberg reconstructed what happened. Once the code worked, the hackers launched the real attack across multiple blockchains.

Then I reached the detail that doesn’t feel real. Some of the compromised wallets kept receiving fresh funds from Binance while the hackers were draining them. The attackers emptied a wallet, Binance refilled it, and they emptied it again. For a period of time, the exchange was effectively feeding new money into its own robbery.

Binance co-founder Yi He was at home in Abu Dhabi. She reportedly discovered the breach while scrolling X before bed. Imagine opening Twitter and learning...

00:00:16
🤫 WE CAN'T TALK ABOUT IT 🤫

🌧️ From rain-soaked diners ☕ to ancient coin forging in 589 BC 🪙, secret Non-Disclosure Agreements surround the financial world 💼.

💥 Suits marching with NDA signs 📄, high-octane skydiving onto private jets 🛩️, and BlackRock’s Larry Fink refusing to answer about an XRP ETF 🤐.

Is $XRP the hidden bridge for global finance? 🌐
⚡ Read between the lines! 📜

⚠️ Not Financial Advice ⚠️

🎥 Created by @BUNGAMEDINGOS

#XRP #Crypto #Bitcoin #BlackRock #XRPLedger #CryptoNews

00:07:06
🚨 Chutes is being framed as a Hyperliquid-style breakout for decentralized AI inference, with live revenue, verified GPU infrastructure, and a direct challenge to centralized cloud AI 🚨

Chutes is gaining attention as a decentralized AI inference platform that claims to combine real usage, cryptographic verification, confidential computing, and open-source infrastructure into a working production system. The thesis is simple: instead of trusting Big Tech clouds with AI workloads, users get a distributed compute layer built around verification and privacy.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Chutes is live in production and reportedly scaled to more than 1,170 active GPU nodes, including large numbers of Nvidia H200s and Blackwell-class hardware.

🔹 The platform says it has processed nearly 38 trillion tokens since launch across 53 deployed applications and more than 700,000 registered users.

🔹 The team reportedly cut unprofitable usage programs, reduced total token volume, and still improved revenue efficiency, with revenue per GPU rising sharply after removing subsidized traffic.

🔹 Chutes is using post-quantum cryptography, trusted execution environments, and Nvidia confidential ...

🚨 Chutes is being framed as a Hyperliquid-style breakout for decentralized AI inference, with live revenue, verified GPU infrastructure, and a direct challenge to centralized cloud AI 🚨
🚨 JPMorgan’s criticism of the CLARITY Act is fueling a fresh power struggle over who gets to write America’s crypto rules 🚨

A new clash is emerging between legacy finance and crypto legislation after JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon reportedly warned that the CLARITY Act could let crypto firms offer bank-like products without bank-level oversight. The dispute is quickly turning into a larger fight over regulation, competitiveness, and who controls the future architecture of digital finance in the United States.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Jamie Dimon reportedly called the CLARITY Act a threat to the financial system, arguing it could allow crypto firms to offer yield-like products while avoiding the capital, reserve, and oversight burdens traditional banks face.

🔹 Senator Cynthia Lummis pushed back publicly, framing the issue as a global strategic race and warning that if the U.S. does not set digital asset standards, other powers will.

🔹 The core tension is whether the bill creates legitimate regulatory clarity or simply opens the door to regulatory arbitrage for crypto platforms operating outside the traditional banking...

🚨 JPMorgan’s criticism of the CLARITY Act is fueling a fresh power struggle over who gets to write America’s crypto rules 🚨
👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? 🔜

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

👉 Here’s what you need to know:

💠 'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
💠 Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
💠 Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
💠 Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
💠 Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

👉 What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto 👉txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚨 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading
CZ warns banks may be more vulnerable to cyberattacks than crypto exchanges. 👀
post photo preview
Jim Cramer says "crypto put us on." 😉 🚀

SUPER BULLISH 👌

post photo preview
💾 Mine Hippius SN75 by providing storage

Hippius storage miners earn rewards for storing and serving encrypted file fragments and proving the data remains available. No GPU is required, but earnings depend on assigned storage, bandwidth served, uptime, reliability, and operating costs.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Hardware requirements are substantial: The guide recommends Ubuntu 22.04 or similar, at least four dedicated CPU cores, 16 GB RAM, 2 TB usable storage, 100 GB or more of SSD space for the blockchain, and a 1 Gbps connection with a static public IP.

🔹 Storage alone isn’t enough: Miners must receive assignments, serve requested data, stay online, and pass network checks; adding disk space does not guarantee higher rewards.

🔹 Two software components are needed: Operators run a Hippius blockchain node to sync network data and the Arion miner to store fragments and respond to checks.

🔹 Setup involves three steps: Prepare accounts and sync a node, install and configure Arion, then register the storage node through the Provider Dashboard.

...

post photo preview
🎯What’s In Your Vault? — 2026 Edition🎯

Sixteen years ago, I posed a question that appeared to be about money but was never really about money at all. What's In Your Wallet? was written at a moment when the world remained intoxicated by the illusion that a representation of value and value itself were interchangeable. The distinction seemed trivial because the machinery of modern finance operated smoothly enough to conceal it. A bank balance purchased goods. A brokerage statement could be exchanged for assets. A warehouse receipt represented commodities. A title represented property. A promise represented delivery. The system functioned, and because it functioned, few bothered to examine the assumptions upon which it rested.

Yet beneath the smooth functioning of the machine lurked a subtle substitution. Somewhere along the way we ceased valuing the thing and began valuing the description of the thing. We stopped demanding possession and settled for evidence of possession. We became comfortable owning records instead of realities, claims instead of assets, promises instead of substance. The map became more important than the territory because most people never wandered far enough from the roads to discover that the two were not the same.

Reading those observations in 2026 feels less like revisiting an old essay and more like observing a fault line that has slowly widened beneath the surface of the global financial order. What has changed is not the distinction itself. What has changed is that the institutions most responsible for maintaining the abstraction appear increasingly unwilling to trust it.

Around the world, central banks have begun bringing gold home. Not merely purchasing gold, though that is certainly occurring, but repatriating it. Bullion that once rested comfortably in the vaults of London and New York is being moved into domestic custody. Public explanations invoke geopolitical uncertainty, sanctions exposure, strategic resilience, and sovereign security. None of those explanations are incorrect. They are simply incomplete. They describe the circumstances without illuminating the realization that appears to be driving the behavior.

A gold bar in your vault is not the same thing as a claim upon a gold bar in someone else's vault. Since the Templars in Jerusalem communicating with the courts of Europe, promises are not the thing that's promised. They never were.

For decades that distinction could be ignored because confidence in the system remained sufficiently high that possession appeared unnecessary. The custodians were trusted. The networks functioned. The legal frameworks appeared durable. The infrastructure seemed permanent. Under those conditions, claims and assets could masquerade as equivalents because the distance between them was rarely tested. Yet every system eventually encounters moments when assumptions become visible. The freezing of sovereign reserves reveals that ownership and access are not identical. Financial crises reveal that liquidity and solvency are not identical. Infrastructure failures reveal that existence and availability are not identical. Again and again reality intrudes upon abstraction and reminds us that the world beneath the ledger still matters.

This is why the movement of gold deserves more attention than the declarations of economists, politicians, central bankers, or global forums. The repatriation of gold is not fundamentally a commodity story, an inflation story, or even a monetary story. It is a custody story. It is a sovereignty story. It is an acknowledgment that possession remains the final court of appeal whenever confidence begins to wobble.

The irony is difficult to miss. At precisely the moment civilization celebrates digital currencies, tokenized assets, algorithmic settlement systems, cloud-based records, and increasingly abstract forms of ownership, many of the institutions responsible for preserving national wealth appear to be moving in the opposite direction. Public narratives race toward virtuality while institutional behavior quietly migrates toward physical custody. The speeches point toward digitization while the bullion trucks point toward reality.

Perhaps nowhere does this contradiction become more visible than when contemplating the fragility of the infrastructure upon which modern finance rests. We speak confidently of balances, portfolios, reserves, pensions, derivatives, and increasingly digital assets as though they possess an existence independent of the systems that record them. Yet the entire architecture rests upon a remarkably delicate foundation of electricity, communications, computation, synchronization, and trust. We have become so accustomed to continuity that we mistake continuity for permanence.

Consider not catastrophe but interruption. Consider a Carrington-scale solar event, a successful cyberattack, a cascading grid failure, or an electromagnetic pulse. The specific mechanism matters less than the principle. The lights go out. The servers stop responding. The networks cease synchronizing. The endless choreography of verification pauses. Legal claims may survive. Contracts may survive. Accounting entries may survive. Yet the practical ability to verify, transfer, access, or exercise those claims becomes uncertain. The abstractions remain theoretically intact while becoming functionally irrelevant.

Gold occupies a peculiar place within this thought experiment because it exists outside the thought experiment. It requires no password, no network connection, no authentication server, no intermediary, and no continuous electrical infrastructure to affirm its existence. The ledger may disappear. The gold remains. Whether one views gold as a monetary asset, a strategic reserve, or simply a historical curiosity, its persistence reveals something deeper about the nature of value itself. Assets that derive their existence from the systems that record them are fundamentally different from assets that exist independently of those systems.

What fascinates me, however, is not the rhetoric surrounding the so-called Great Reset, because the phrase itself has become one of the most effective distractions of the modern era. During the COVID years, populations were conditioned into increasingly reflexive forms of polarization in which every issue was immediately translated into opposing camps, every observation became a declaration of allegiance, and every question became a test of ideological loyalty. One side treated the Great Reset as evidence of a coordinated conspiracy while the other dismissed it as evidence of irrational paranoia. Both reactions produced the same outcome. Attention became fixed upon the slogan while remaining safely distant from the structure beneath it.

History has never required a committee to produce a reset. Resets emerge whenever claims become sufficiently detached from assets, whenever promises become sufficiently detached from productive capacity, whenever leverage becomes sufficiently detached from resilience, and whenever abstractions become sufficiently detached from reality. Long before a reset acquires a name, it exists as a tension embedded within the architecture itself.

This is why the most revealing actions in history are rarely the ones announced from podiums. They are the quiet movements that occur beneath the rhetoric. While populations argue over narratives, central banks move bullion. While commentators debate ideology, nations secure custody. While attention remains fixed upon political theater, the custodians of monetary power appear to be asking an older and more fundamental question concerning what survives when confidence falters, when access becomes uncertain, and when the systems responsible for recording ownership can no longer be assumed to function exactly as they did yesterday.

History repeatedly demonstrates that major transitions rarely emerge from the causes later assigned to them. Wars, sovereign defaults, financial crises, technological disruptions, infrastructure failures, and natural disasters frequently function as explanatory narratives that make visible contradictions that had already been accumulating for decades. The triggering event receives the blame because it is easier to understand than the architecture that rendered the event consequential. Yet the architecture is always where the real story resides. The event merely exposes what was already true.

Seen from this perspective, the most important question is not whether a particular organization intends to implement a Great Reset. The more important question concerns the conditions under which resets become inevitable. Whenever claims multiply faster than assets, whenever obligations expand faster than productive capacity, whenever financial abstractions drift sufficiently far from physical realities, tensions accumulate that eventually demand reconciliation. That reconciliation may arrive through inflation, restructuring, default, crisis, technological disruption, or events conveniently attributed to forces beyond human control, but the mechanism remains secondary to the principle. Reality eventually reasserts itself because reality is the only foundation upon which any abstraction can ultimately stand.

Viewed through that lens, the repatriation of gold appears less like a financial decision than an institutional acknowledgment that the distinction between claims and assets still matters. It represents a quiet recognition that resilience and possession acquire increasing importance precisely when complexity and uncertainty begin to rise. It suggests that beneath the public narratives, beneath the political theater, and beneath the endless distractions that dominate contemporary discourse, some of the world's most consequential actors may be asking the same question that inspired an essay sixteen years ago. What do you actually possess when the systems recording possession become uncertain?

The question is not fundamentally about gold. It is not fundamentally about vaults. It is not fundamentally about central banks. It is a question about the difference between a thing and a description of a thing, between ownership and access, between claims and assets, between abstractions and realities. It is the question that emerges whenever a civilization becomes sufficiently dependent upon representations that it forgets to examine the realities those representations are intended to describe.

Sixteen years ago I asked what was in your wallet. Watching nations quietly move bullion across oceans and into sovereign custody, the question feels sharper today than it did then. Not because the answer has changed, but because the institutions themselves appear increasingly unwilling to pretend that a claim and an asset are the same thing. The distinction sounded eccentric in 2010. It sounds increasingly obvious in 2026. The most interesting question is whether the rest of us will recognize the significance of that realization before history once again forces the issue on its own terms.

Source

🙏To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

👉 Cashapp: $thedinarian

👉 Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

👉 PayPal: Scan the QR code below 📲 or Click Here: 

👇 Crypto Donations 👇

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
⚠️90 DAYS WITHOUT THE GRID⚠️
Why Governments Are Preparing for Critical Systems to Fail

MIND BEND THEORY | DOCUMENTED INVESTIGATION

The United States is preparing major military installations to continue operating if civilian infrastructure goes down. Britain is telling households to prepare for days without essential services. India is warning that an attack on the financial system can weaken a nation. And the Bank of England is asking what happens when cyber defenses fail—not if they can prevent every attack.

Individually, each development has an explanation.

Put them beside one another, however, and a larger pattern becomes visible.

Over the span of only a few weeks, governments and financial authorities in the United States, United Kingdom and India have publicly discussed preparations for disruptions involving some of the systems modern society depends upon most:

Power.

Water.

Fuel.

Communications.

Banking.

Supply chains.

This does not establish that these governments are preparing for one secret event.

There is no public evidence of a coordinated countdown, predetermined blackout date or single intelligence warning connecting them.

But there is something here that can be documented.

Governments are increasingly planning around a question that sounds very different from traditional emergency preparedness:

What happens when the systems we normally assume will be available are no longer available?

And in the United States, that question has now reached the Pentagon.

DOCUMENT 01

UNITED STATES — FORTRESS AMERICA

On September 30, 2026, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth established a program called FORTRESS America.

The acronym stands for:

Federal Operations for Resilience, Troop Resources, Energy, Supply and Survivability.

The program addresses a vulnerability that rarely receives much public attention:

The world's most powerful military still depends extensively on civilian infrastructure.

Electric grids.

Commercial supply chains.

Communications infrastructure.

Fuel.

Foreign sources of critical materials.

FORTRESS America is intended to reduce those dependencies.

The Pentagon's own public description says the initiative is designed to ensure that major U.S. military installations generate independent power so that bases remain operational even if the civilian grid is taken down by cyberattack or sabotage.

It goes beyond electricity.

The program includes five major areas:

Energy independence

Installation hardening and cyber resilience

Supply-chain and defense-industrial-base resilience

Strategic defense reserves

Space and spectrum resilience

The Pentagon also wants deeper reserves of critical supplies so military operations can continue when ordinary supply lines are disrupted.

The underlying idea is simple:

The military should be capable of functioning even when the infrastructure surrounding it cannot.

An October 7 implementation memorandum obtained by DefenseScoop shows that the Pentagon had already begun establishing the FORTRESS America Program Office and assigning officials to implement those objectives.

Then another piece of the story emerged.

DOCUMENT 02

THE 90-DAY REQUIREMENT

On October 25, Fox News published details from additional FORTRESS America documents its reporters reviewed.

According to that reporting, major continental U.S. military installations are being prepared to sustain essential operations for at least 90 days without outside support.

The essential systems reportedly include:

Power.

Water.

Fuel.

Communications.

Think about the distinction carefully.

The Pentagon isn't telling Americans that the United States will lose electricity for 90 days.

It isn't predicting a 90-day blackout.

Military contingency planning deliberately prepares for scenarios officials hope never occur.

But preparing installations for this possibility tells us something about the scenario being considered.

The Pentagon is building resilience around the possibility that a sufficiently serious conflict or attack could interfere with the civilian systems on which military installations normally depend.

The publicly released FORTRESS material specifically discusses:

Cyberattack.

Sabotage.

Grid disruption.

Foreign supply-chain disruption.

Attacks against installations.

And prolonged military contingencies.

That makes the 90-day requirement significant—but it must be described accurately.

Mind Bend Theory verification note:

The September 30 FORTRESS America program itself is documented publicly.

The October 7 implementation memorandum has been reported and described by DefenseScoop.

The 90-day requirement, however, currently comes from documents reviewed by Fox News, rather than a primary 90-day document independently published for the public.

That distinction matters.

We follow the documents as far as they take us—and no farther.

DOCUMENT 03

UNITED KINGDOM — BE READY FOR THREE DAYS

Now cross the Atlantic.

On October 22, the British government launched its new Be Ready campaign.

This time the audience wasn't the military.

It was ordinary households.

The UK government is asking households that are able to do so to prepare to remain self-sufficient for approximately three days during an emergency.

The government specifically discusses disruptions affecting:

Power.

Water.

Phones.

Internet access.

A Parliamentary Written Statement issued the same day explicitly states:

“The updated advice calls on households to be self-sufficient for three days in the case of an emergency.”

The government recommends maintaining three days of bottled water and non-perishable food.

Its expanded preparedness guidance includes:

Approximately three litres of drinking water per person per day

Three days of non-perishable food

Battery-powered or wind-up radio

Torch and spare batteries

Charged power bank

Essential medications

First-aid supplies

Blankets and warm clothing

Important telephone numbers written down

Basic hygiene supplies

Cash

Why cash?

Because during some disruptions, electronic payment systems and ATMs may not function normally.

That creates an important connection between infrastructure and finance.

Electricity isn't isolated from banking.

Communications aren't isolated from payments.

Modern infrastructure is interconnected.

And failure can move through those connections.

DOCUMENT 04

INDIA — “WARS ARE NOT FOUGHT WITH WEAPONS ALONE”

Three days later, on October 25, another statement appeared.

This one came from Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Modi was inaugurating the Reserve Bank of India's newly established Data Centre and Cybersecurity Training Institute in Bhubaneswar.

The facilities are designed to strengthen the technological foundations and cybersecurity resilience of India's financial system.

Four data centres will host mission-critical payment and settlement systems.

But Modi's explanation of why this matters went beyond ordinary cybersecurity.

His official statement says:

“Nowadays, wars are not fought with weapons alone; a nation can also be weakened by attacking its economy.”

He continued by saying India's growing economy requires its banking system to be protected against cyber looters and cyber terrorists.

That puts another critical system into the picture:

Money.

A modern economy depends on digital banking infrastructure almost as heavily as it depends on electricity and telecommunications.

Payment systems move commerce.

Banks hold liquidity.

Settlement systems move money between financial institutions.

Data centres keep those networks functioning.

Disrupt the financial infrastructure badly enough and the consequences don't remain inside banks.

They reach businesses.

Supply chains.

Payroll.

Purchasing.

Markets.

And households.

DOCUMENT 05

BANK OF ENGLAND — WHAT IF CYBER DEFENSE FAILS?

There is another document worth reading.

On June 30, Bank of England Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden delivered a speech titled:

“Agents of Change.”

The subject was artificial intelligence and financial stability.

One section deserves particular attention.

Breeden warned that advanced AI systems are becoming increasingly capable of identifying and chaining together cyber vulnerabilities.

That changes the nature of cyber risk.

AI can help defenders.

But the same capabilities can potentially increase the speed and effectiveness of attackers.

The important change in thinking comes afterward.

Preventing attacks is no longer enough.

Financial institutions must also prepare to recover after a successful attack.

Breeden raised the possibility of simultaneous disruption across multiple financial firms.

She then asked whether critical financial institutions may eventually require completely separate failover capabilities—or even the ability to rebuild compromised core systems from “bare metal.”

In October, Reuters reported that the Bank of England was pushing financial institutions further toward this type of recovery planning.

That represents a subtle but significant change in the question.

It isn't simply:

How do we stop the attack?

It's becoming:

What happens if we don't?

And:

How do we keep the system functioning afterward?

CONNECT THE DOCUMENTS

Now put the documents beside one another.

UNITED STATES

Military installations are being hardened so essential operations can continue when civilian infrastructure is disrupted.

UNITED KINGDOM

Households are being told to prepare for three days without services they normally assume will remain available.

INDIA

The prime minister publicly warns that modern conflict can weaken a country by attacking its economy and calls for stronger protection of banking infrastructure.

BANK OF ENGLAND

Financial authorities are examining recovery scenarios in which cyber defenses have already failed and multiple institutions could potentially be disrupted simultaneously.

These aren't identical programs.

They aren't even aimed at the same people.

And there is currently no public evidence demonstrating that they were coordinated.

But they share one important assumption:

CRITICAL SYSTEMS CAN FAIL.

And resilience therefore cannot begin after the failure occurs.

It has to exist beforehand.

THE SYSTEM BEHIND THE SYSTEM

This is where the story becomes bigger than individual announcements.

Modern infrastructure isn't a collection of isolated systems.

It's a network.

Consider what happens when electricity fails.

Without power, telecommunications eventually become difficult to maintain.

Without communications, electronic payments can be affected.

Fuel pumps require electricity.

Water systems depend on pumping and treatment infrastructure.

Businesses depend on payment processing.

Supply chains depend on communications, transportation and fuel.

Hospitals require electricity, communications, water, medicine and logistics simultaneously.

A serious disruption doesn't necessarily remain inside the system where it started.

It can propagate.

POWER → COMMUNICATIONS → BANKING → COMMERCE → SUPPLY CHAINS

And the dependency runs in multiple directions.

That interconnectedness is precisely why governments plan for resilience.

WHAT THIS DOES NOT PROVE

Mind Bend Theory exists to examine unusual patterns.

But a pattern isn't automatically proof of a conspiracy.

There is currently no public evidence showing that Washington, London and New Delhi are secretly preparing for the same scheduled event.

There is no verified date for a coming global blackout.

There is no public document establishing an imminent 90-day collapse of the American electrical grid.

And the Pentagon's 90-day military resilience requirement should not be interpreted as a prediction that Americans will lose electricity for 90 days.

That would go beyond the evidence.

What the evidence actually establishes is interesting enough.

Governments increasingly consider disruption of power, communications, supply chains and financial infrastructure plausible enough to justify concrete preparation.

The UK is preparing households.

The United States is hardening military infrastructure.

India is strengthening the technological backbone of its financial system.

The Bank of England is thinking about how banks recover after cyber defenses fail.

That isn't speculation.

It's in the documents.

THE QUESTION

Perhaps the most important change isn't what governments believe will happen.

It's what they're preparing to survive.

For decades, infrastructure security focused heavily on preventing failure.

The emerging model looks different:

Assume something eventually gets through.

Assume something eventually goes down.

Build the ability to continue operating anyway.

The Pentagon calls that resilience.

The UK calls it being ready.

Central banks call it operational resilience.

Different terminology.

Same fundamental question:

WHAT STILL WORKS WHEN THE SYSTEM DOESN'T?

DOCUMENT TRAIL

Read the Evidence Yourself

Mind Bend Theory strongly encourages readers to examine the original material rather than relying solely on our interpretation.

🇺🇸 DOCUMENT 01 — FORTRESS America Establishment

September 30, 2026

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's memorandum establishes FORTRESS America as a Department of Defense resilience program.

The publicly reported memorandum establishes the program around installation resilience, independent energy, strategic reserves, supply chains and related national-defense infrastructure.

Source type: Pentagon memorandum / official announcement.

🇺🇸 DOCUMENT 02 — FORTRESS America Implementation Memorandum

October 7, 2026

DefenseScoop obtained the memorandum from Under Secretary for Acquisition and Sustainment Michael Duffey directing officials to begin operationalizing the FORTRESS America Program Office.

It identifies five foundational pillars, including energy independence, installation hardening and cyber resilience, strategic reserves and supply-chain resilience.

Source type: Pentagon memorandum obtained by DefenseScoop.

🇺🇸 DOCUMENT 03 — 90-Day FORTRESS Requirement

October 25, 2026

Fox News reports that documents it reviewed require major continental U.S. installations to sustain essential operations for at least 90 days without outside support.

Source type: Journalistic reporting based on documents reviewed by reporters.

Important: This is not currently being presented by Mind Bend Theory as a publicly released primary 90-day Pentagon document.

🇬🇧 DOCUMENT 04 — UK Cabinet Office Be Ready Announcement

October 22, 2026

The Cabinet Office announces the three-year Be Ready campaign and describes preparation for disruption affecting power, water, phones and internet.

Source type: Official UK government publication.

🇬🇧 DOCUMENT 05 — Parliamentary Written Statement HCWS409

October 22, 2026

The UK Parliament records the government's explicit recommendation that households prepare to remain self-sufficient for three days.

Source type: Official Parliamentary record.

🇬🇧 DOCUMENT 06 — Be Ready Household Emergency Checklist

The government's practical household guidance provides recommendations for water, food, radio, lighting, medication, power banks, emergency cash and other supplies.

Source type: Official UK government preparedness guidance.

🇮🇳 DOCUMENT 07 — Prime Minister of India / RBI Cybersecurity Facilities

October 25, 2026

Official statement documenting the opening of the Reserve Bank of India's Data Centre and Cybersecurity Training Institute and Modi's warning that countries can be weakened through attacks against their economies.

Source type: Official Government of India statement.

🇬🇧 DOCUMENT 08 — “Agents of Change” — Sarah Breeden

June 30, 2026

The Bank of England deputy governor discusses rapidly advancing AI cyber capabilities, simultaneous disruption across financial institutions, separate failover infrastructure and potentially rebuilding compromised systems from bare metal.

Source type: Official Bank of England speech.

DOCUMENT 09 — Bank of England Cyber-Recovery Reporting

October 15, 2026

Reuters reports on the Bank of England's push for stronger recovery capabilities against AI-enabled cyberattacks, including bare-metal recovery.

Source type: Independent reporting.

MIND BEND THEORY

Follow the documents. Separate what they prove from what they don't.

Then ask why the preparation is happening now.

Documents attached to the investigation

FORTRESS America — Sept. 30 memorandum record
Pentagon FORTRESS America implementation memorandum — DefenseScoop
FORTRESS America 90-day documents — Fox News investigation
UK Cabinet Office — Be Ready announcement
UK Parliament — Written Statement HCWS409
India PM's Office — RBI Data Centre & Cybersecurity Training Institute
Bank of England — Sarah Breeden, “Agents of Change”
Reuters — Bank of England cyber-recovery warning

Source

🙏To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

👉 Cashapp: $thedinarian

👉 Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

👉 PayPal: Scan the QR code below 📲 or Click Here: 

👇 Crypto Donations 👇

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
September 13, 2026
post photo preview
Revolut Leak Shows the Cost of Constant ID Collection
Revolut’s mistake is the news, but the bigger problem is the growing number of companies being encouraged or required to keep copies of our most sensitive identity documents.

Online bank Revolut has revealed that it gave out sensitive personal and financial information of an undisclosed number of its customers in response to a fake government request.

The information that was handed over to an “unauthorized third party” reportedly includes names, dates of birth, occupations, addresses, phone numbers, account numbers, transaction histories (including Bitcoin), and even copies of government-issued IDs and onboarding verification selfies.

Revolut claims that derived biometric face data was not.

The company said that the data was handed over in response to an email that came from a real government agency’s domain, but was not actually sent or authorized by that agency.

The email passed several authentication checks (SPF, DKIM, and DMARC) that are designed to establish the authenticity of a message’s origin and integrity, but do not verify the legitimacy of the legal request itself.

Revolut said that it complied with the request “under the reasonable belief that it was an authentic government agency request” – and only later found out that it was not.

Revolut said it later realized its mistake, blocked the email address, and reported the incident to the relevant authorities.

Revolut said that only a “limited” number of its customers were affected by the data leak, and that the company’s systems were not hacked, nor was any money stolen.

The story broke on September 11 when Revolut customers started receiving an email notice about a data leak, and the news was picked up by media outlets the following day.

Revolut notice explaining customer identity and financial data was shared after an unauthorized government email request.

The reason this is a recurring problem is that companies are keeping highly sensitive information about their customers’ identities, and sometimes even financial transactions, for a long time, and this data is then available to be disclosed to third parties – either in response to valid legal requests, or, as in the case of Revolut, fake ones.

One reason for this is know your customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) rules. Revolut’s current UK customer privacy notice spells it out: the company generally keeps personal data of UK customers for no more than seven years after the relationship ends, and sometimes longer – for legal reasons.

This means that even if you close your account, your identity documents don’t disappear.

And while the incident with Revolut happened in the financial sector, it’s by no means the only one that requires customers to hand over sensitive identity information. Discord, a popular chat service, said in an October 9, 2025 security update that government ID photos of approximately 70,000 users may have been exposed after a third-party customer service provider got hacked.

This was not a financial service, nor the same type of attack. But the result was similar – because the underlying business process was the same: requiring and storing sensitive identity documents. In the case of Discord, these were used to review age-related appeals.

It’s hard to do anything about a copy of your old passport, or a photo of your face, or a record of your past transactions. These can be used to identify and profile you, and can be used to carry out targeted fraud. And this can happen even if the initial disclosure didn’t result in financial loss.

The more companies are forced to collect and store such information, and the more of it they have, the more opportunities there are for this data to be leaked, either by the company itself or a third party it works with. That's what makes governments' push for more ID checks just to access ordinary parts of life so reckless.

Source

🙏To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

👉 Cashapp: $thedinarian

👉 Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

👉 PayPal: Scan the QR code below 📲 or Click Here: 

👇 Crypto Donations 👇

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals