100% of my networth, because I was also held a spot position in the underlying asset. Leading up to the capitulation event, the plan was to sell $10k Bitcoin, then buyback ~$8k, and hold my generational entries throughout a full-fledged bull market. > enter Covid fears Within following days, I managed to find myself largely underwater, and because of my performance leading up into this, not only was I uncomfortable/unfamiliar with the concept of being heavily underwater, I was also overly-confident. I convinved myself that no action was necessary; the market would surely prove me right the same way it did every other time. I lulled myself into a state of complacency, and full-blown paralysis. I simply did not know what to do, so doing nothing felt easiest. Ofcourse, this complacency, fueled by my ego, is what led to my inevitable demise. I do not blame Covid. If my humbling did not occur in March 2020, it would’ve simply been prolonged to a later date; the end result was pre-ordained. I found myself down -80% my entire portfolio amount (which was my entire networth) within the span of a week. Some of my portfolio was liquidated; some was just drawdown, as I had spot sitting in hot/cold wallets in addition to what was on exchanges. Overall, -80% in a week, fully eradicating all the gains I had made the past 2 years. All the countless hours I had put into studying and trading markets gone to waste. I was right back where I started. I remember feeling hopeless and lost. I could not bring myself to eat—I had no appetite, I didn’t get out of bed, I stopped responding to calls/texts from friends or family. I was a corpse-like version of myself. After some days, my father came to check on me—he found me sulking in my bedroom: ā€œWhat’s going on with you?ā€. After some encouragement, I was finally able to talk to him about all that had happened. In order to fully appreciate his response, you need to understand more context—my dad’s background: He was an immigrant, serial-entrepreneur all his life. He started with absolutely nothing, and throughout the course of his ventures, had several businesses: some successful, most failures. Heading into the 2008 financial crisis, he and my mother managed to build up two massively successful businesses, valued at mid-7figures. Prior to this, my family and I were piss-poor; I have distinct memories of washing and reusing paper plates, and, at times, having cheese and crackers for dinner. With these two businesses, my parents had finally 'made it', except they made some terrible financial decisions just before the financial crisis. The ripple effects of 2008 weighed in over time, and about 5-6 years later, they lost everything. We were homeless for the next 2 weeks. Now the societal norm is that the man is the breadwinner of the house (not trying to be misogynistic here, but this is the mentality of most immigrant families, in my experience). My father had gone from piss-poor, to multi-millionaire, to homeless. I can only imagine what kind of mindset he was in, which is why his response meant so much... When he saw a lifeless embodiment of his son upset over his trading portfolio, he looked me in the eyes and said: ā€œYou’re crying over money?ā€, He followed up with an ultimatum: ā€œI’m going to give you 2 options: 1) Stop crying over money, or 2) Stop tradingā€ ā€œPick one.ā€ I remember the shock—the chills it sent down my spine hearing him say this. From a third-parties' standpoint, he understood the ā€˜back against the wall’ scenario I was in; furthermore, he had experienced it, several times, and to a degree that I could not even fathom at the time. If he was able to say this, looking straight into my eyes, surely there had to be some truth to it. I quickly realized he was right. I needed to make a decision; either stop trading or stop crying about money. Quitting trading felt like I was throwing away all the invaluable experience I had gained the past few years. Ironically, deciding to continue participating in the hardest sport in the world was the path that provided the least amount of friction for me, considering I had put all my eggs in this basket—didn't know what I wanted to do with my life; didn't go to college or have a backup plan. Trading was all I knew, and it was all I was good at. It was now a matter of reshaping my approach—I had to find a style of trading, a philosophy, concepts, principles, that would embody the inability to cry about money. I then had to make sure my execution reflected those principles, 100% of the time; I realized that no matter my performance, 99% discipline was not good enough—it only took 1 bad trade over the course of 2.5 years for me to essentially lose everything. I had experienced large gains. I knew what it was like to hold large positions in unrealized profit. I knew what it was like to lose it all. Pressing the buttons at this point felt natural to me—I just needed to rethink my strategy. It wasn’t easy, and I ran into new hurdles that had to be overcome shortly afterwards. Admittedly, in the weeks that followed the bottom, I found myself revenge-shorting. Thankfully, I was able to quickly snap out of this mindset. I had a good circle of people around me that helped me recognize what I was doing, and that aided in refining my new approach to markets. When you hear things like your uncle, who hates crypto, telling you that he bought Bitcoin at $4,000 ā€œjust becauseā€, and knowing that you couldn’t even weigh the option of buying the capitulation even if you wanted to, because you were the capitulation. Safe to say that crushes any ounce of self-esteem that you have. My main priority became ensuring that I could never feel that way again. Getting liquidated was no longer an option, nor was experiencing outrageous drawdown. I needed to be fluid. I needed to find balance, and peace in the market. I needed to understand and apply proper risk management. I needed to be consistent. I needed to have full control over the things that I have control over. And above all, I needed to never cry about money. I am happy to say that I’ve never felt that way since then. It is unfortunate that it often takes us being at rock-bottom, in order to find a way upwards; because at that point, that’s the only direction to go. "You only learn from your failures" Ironically, the thing that I deemed ā€œthe worst thing to ever happen to meā€ at the time, ended up being the best thing that ever happened to me. I’ve recently been able to retire my parents, thanks to trading...to markets. The hard work, countless hours, anxiety, getting wicked out of trades at the lows, slippage on illiquid moves, drawdown, missed opportunities, criticism along the way… it was all worth it. I've since realized that the only thing that truly matters is execution. The market is synonymous with variance, and therefore, there is no tried-and-true system or strategy that can be repeated to infinity to guarantee success—atleast not for a discretionary trader. There is only how you execute based on your discretion. My philosophy now is: there is no market movement that is 'unforeseeable'; there is no way for the market to 'catch us off-guard'. There is only word-vomit, and deflection, to find reasons as to why we did not execute the way we think we should in our heads. Every market movement is inherently 'normal'—because it's the market, and the market is never wrong. The periods where variance is largely pronounced are merely considered 'White Swans'. I hope that you've found this article enlightening, and if you have a retweet/share is appreciated. More than anything, I hope that you lose the ability to "cry about money". Much love, and Goodluck. Original post: https://x.com/TraderMercury/status/1886591383844126918">
Dinarian888
News • Business • Investing & Finance
?The Dinarian exists because the truth deserves a platform. Covering cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, global agendas, emerging science, and consciousness — because everything is connected and people deserve to know it. Knowledge is power. ?
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
🦢 White Swans 🦢

This was one of the best reads I have come upon in a long-long time. I hope you not only enjoy this, you learn from this. I myself have had a similar situation, not the same, but similar. NamastĆ© šŸ™~The Dinarian

Some of you are already aware, but I got absolutely destroyed during the Covid drop in March 2020.

I’m going to be incredibly transparent, and hopefully that helps someone here today. But first, you need to understand context:

I started trading crypto in November of 2017. Due to the bullmarket-mania, I immediately managed to 5x my account in the span of a few weeks, but I did not take any profit at all, so I ended up being down -90% of my initial within the following months. 2018 was brutal for me, but I got hooked by crypto, and markets in general—I saw the potential, so I kept at it, stared at the screens for 12-16hrs a day on average. Crypto trading was no longer just a hobby, or a passion—it was my life. I dedicated everything to trading. The 15minute chart was my best friend, and there were times where I took over 100 trades in a day.

Most importantly, my dedication paid off. I was massively profitable. I managed to grind my account up 6x my initial investment heading into March 2020 and as a result, my ego was inflated beyond belief. Even if I had someone in my ear telling me that the way I was trading would lead to my inevitable demise, I wouldn’t have heard it—money talks louder than game-theory or market philosophy. I was also ~19 years old at the peak of my success, so I was trading with 99% of my networth because the generic advice that every adult role model had given me was "you're young, take lots of risks", and I took that to heart.

Remember this is pre-USDT perpetual popularization, so everything I traded was inverse perpetual—meaning everytime I was long, I was long >100% of my networth, because I was also held a spot position in the underlying asset.

Leading up to the capitulation event, the plan was to sell $10k Bitcoin, then buyback ~$8k, and hold my generational entries throughout a full-fledged bull market.

> enter Covid fears

Within following days, I managed to find myself largely underwater, and because of my performance leading up into this, not only was I uncomfortable/unfamiliar with the concept of being heavily underwater, I was also overly-confident. I convinved myself that no action was necessary; the market would surely prove me right the same way it did every other time. I lulled myself into a state of complacency, and full-blown paralysis. I simply did not know what to do, so doing nothing felt easiest. Ofcourse, this complacency, fueled by my ego, is what led to my inevitable demise. I do not blame Covid.

If my humbling did not occur in March 2020, it would’ve simply been prolonged to a later date; the end result was pre-ordained. I found myself down -80% my entire portfolio amount (which was my entire networth) within the span of a week.

Some of my portfolio was liquidated; some was just drawdown, as I had spot sitting in hot/cold wallets in addition to what was on exchanges. Overall, -80% in a week, fully eradicating all the gains I had made the past 2 years. All the countless hours I had put into studying and trading markets gone to waste. I was right back where I started.

I remember feeling hopeless and lost. I could not bring myself to eat—I had no appetite, I didn’t get out of bed, I stopped responding to calls/texts from friends or family. I was a corpse-like version of myself. After some days, my father came to check on me—he found me sulking in my bedroom: ā€œWhat’s going on with you?ā€. After some encouragement, I was finally able to talk to him about all that had happened.
In order to fully appreciate his response, you need to understand more context—my dad’s background:

He was an immigrant, serial-entrepreneur all his life. He started with absolutely nothing, and throughout the course of his ventures, had several businesses: some successful, most failures. Heading into the 2008 financial crisis, he and my mother managed to build up two massively successful businesses, valued at mid-7figures.

Prior to this, my family and I were piss-poor; I have distinct memories of washing and reusing paper plates, and, at times, having cheese and crackers for dinner.

With these two businesses, my parents had finally 'made it', except they made some terrible financial decisions just before the financial crisis. The ripple effects of 2008 weighed in over time, and about 5-6 years later, they lost everything.

We were homeless for the next 2 weeks.

Now the societal norm is that the man is the breadwinner of the house (not trying to be misogynistic here, but this is the mentality of most immigrant families, in my experience). My father had gone from piss-poor, to multi-millionaire, to homeless. I can only imagine what kind of mindset he was in, which is why his response meant so much...

When he saw a lifeless embodiment of his son upset over his trading portfolio, he looked me in the eyes and said:

ā€œYou’re crying over money?ā€,

He followed up with an ultimatum:

ā€œI’m going to give you 2 options:

1) Stop crying over money, or
2) Stop tradingā€
ā€œPick one.ā€

I remember the shock—the chills it sent down my spine hearing him say this. From a third-parties' standpoint, he understood the ā€˜back against the wall’ scenario I was in; furthermore, he had experienced it, several times, and to a degree that I could not even fathom at the time.

If he was able to say this, looking straight into my eyes, surely there had to be some truth to it. I quickly realized he was right. I needed to make a decision; either stop trading or stop crying about money. Quitting trading felt like I was throwing away all the invaluable experience I had gained the past few years. Ironically, deciding to continue participating in the hardest sport in the world was the path that provided the least amount of friction for me, considering I had put all my eggs in this basket—didn't know what I wanted to do with my life; didn't go to college or have a backup plan.

Trading was all I knew, and it was all I was good at.

It was now a matter of reshaping my approach—I had to find a style of trading, a philosophy, concepts, principles, that would embody the inability to cry about money. I then had to make sure my execution reflected those principles, 100% of the time; I realized that no matter my performance, 99% discipline was not good enough—it only took 1 bad trade over the course of 2.5 years for me to essentially lose everything. I had experienced large gains. I knew what it was like to hold large positions in unrealized profit. I knew what it was like to lose it all. Pressing the buttons at this point felt natural to me—I just needed to rethink my strategy.

It wasn’t easy, and I ran into new hurdles that had to be overcome shortly afterwards. Admittedly, in the weeks that followed the bottom, I found myself revenge-shorting. Thankfully, I was able to quickly snap out of this mindset. I had a good circle of people around me that helped me recognize what I was doing, and that aided in refining my new approach to markets.

When you hear things like your uncle, who hates crypto, telling you that he bought Bitcoin at $4,000 ā€œjust becauseā€, and knowing that you couldn’t even weigh the option of buying the capitulation even if you wanted to, because you were the capitulation. Safe to say that crushes any ounce of self-esteem that you have. My main priority became ensuring that I could never feel that way again.

Getting liquidated was no longer an option, nor was experiencing outrageous drawdown. I needed to be fluid. I needed to find balance, and peace in the market. I needed to understand and apply proper risk management. I needed to be consistent. I needed to have full control over the things that I have control over. And above all, I needed to never cry about money.

I am happy to say that I’ve never felt that way since then.

It is unfortunate that it often takes us being at rock-bottom, in order to find a way upwards; because at that point, that’s the only direction to go.

"You only learn from your failures"

Ironically, the thing that I deemed ā€œthe worst thing to ever happen to meā€ at the time, ended up being the best thing that ever happened to me. I’ve recently been able to retire my parents, thanks to trading...to markets. The hard work, countless hours, anxiety, getting wicked out of trades at the lows, slippage on illiquid moves, drawdown, missed opportunities, criticism along the way… it was all worth it.

I've since realized that the only thing that truly matters is execution. The market is synonymous with variance, and therefore, there is no tried-and-true system or strategy that can be repeated to infinity to guarantee success—atleast not for a discretionary trader. There is only how you execute based on your discretion.

My philosophy now is: there is no market movement that is 'unforeseeable'; there is no way for the market to 'catch us off-guard'. There is only word-vomit, and deflection, to find reasons as to why we did not execute the way we think we should in our heads. Every market movement is inherently 'normal'—because it's the market, and the market is never wrong. The periods where variance is largely pronounced are merely considered 'White Swans'.

I hope that you've found this article enlightening, and if you have a retweet/share is appreciated.

More than anything, I hope that you lose the ability to "cry about money".

Much love, and Goodluck.

Original post: https://x.com/TraderMercury/status/1886591383844126918

Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
RFK Jr: "The Pandemics are coming from labs. ALL OF THEM... Lyme, COVID, RSV, HIV & Spanish Flu came out of a vaccine lab." ā˜ ļø šŸ’‰

"Gain-of-Function Vaccine research has created the worst plagues in our history."

"We can go down the whole list of diseases... It’s just a disaster. It’s given us no benefits. It’s given us everything from Lyme disease to Covid, and many many other diseases. RSV, which is now one of the biggest killers of children, came out of a vaccine lab."

"There’s strong evidence that even Spanish flu came from vaccine research."

"There’s plenty of evidence that HIV also came from a vaccine gain-of-function lab program. "

"The 'PANDEMICS' are coming from labs... ALL OF THEM."

00:04:00
šŸš€The industry has gotten incredible at teaching robots

šŸš€The industry has gotten incredible at teaching robots to move, sprint, and imitate body dynamics. But as Michael Parker (@bittensormax) points out in The UMI Thesis, there’s still a massive missing piece in Physical AI: Motion Understanding.

✨ Key Takeaways:

šŸ”¹Looking Human vs. Understanding Humans: Robots can execute impressive physical feats, but they still struggle to reliably read non-verbal human cues in context.

šŸ”¹Motion is Meaning: A gesture, hesitation, or glance changes completely depending on posture, timing, and surrounding context.

šŸ”¹Beyond Pixels: True intelligence requires mapping human intent and sequence across time—not just processing raw frames.

šŸ”¹The UMI Intelligence Layer: As robots enter hospitals, factories, homes, and stores, Bittensor’s SN78 @umi_sn78 UMI (Universal Motion Intelligence) aims to own the critical layer that translates human movement into real meaning.

The future of robotics isn't just about how machines move—it's about how ...

00:04:54
Follow The MoneyšŸŽÆ

Israel Exposed launched 🤯Who Funded The Genocide🤯

A searchable database tracking pro-Israel political money in U.S. politics.

It includes:

šŸ‘‰ 11,168 named donors + employers

šŸ‘‰ 523 members of Congress + funding

šŸ‘‰ House & Senate votes on arms-transfer resolutions

šŸ‘‰165 candidates with network-backed fundraising pages

šŸ‘‰105 recipient committees linked to FEC filings

00:01:36
🚨 Chutes is being framed as a Hyperliquid-style breakout for decentralized AI inference, with live revenue, verified GPU infrastructure, and a direct challenge to centralized cloud AI 🚨

Chutes is gaining attention as a decentralized AI inference platform that claims to combine real usage, cryptographic verification, confidential computing, and open-source infrastructure into a working production system. The thesis is simple: instead of trusting Big Tech clouds with AI workloads, users get a distributed compute layer built around verification and privacy.

šŸ”‘ Key points

šŸ”¹ Chutes is live in production and reportedly scaled to more than 1,170 active GPU nodes, including large numbers of Nvidia H200s and Blackwell-class hardware.

šŸ”¹ The platform says it has processed nearly 38 trillion tokens since launch across 53 deployed applications and more than 700,000 registered users.

šŸ”¹ The team reportedly cut unprofitable usage programs, reduced total token volume, and still improved revenue efficiency, with revenue per GPU rising sharply after removing subsidized traffic.

šŸ”¹ Chutes is using post-quantum cryptography, trusted execution environments, and Nvidia confidential ...

🚨 Chutes is being framed as a Hyperliquid-style breakout for decentralized AI inference, with live revenue, verified GPU infrastructure, and a direct challenge to centralized cloud AI 🚨
🚨 JPMorgan’s criticism of the CLARITY Act is fueling a fresh power struggle over who gets to write America’s crypto rules 🚨

A new clash is emerging between legacy finance and crypto legislation after JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon reportedly warned that the CLARITY Act could let crypto firms offer bank-like products without bank-level oversight. The dispute is quickly turning into a larger fight over regulation, competitiveness, and who controls the future architecture of digital finance in the United States.

šŸ”‘ Key points

šŸ”¹ Jamie Dimon reportedly called the CLARITY Act a threat to the financial system, arguing it could allow crypto firms to offer yield-like products while avoiding the capital, reserve, and oversight burdens traditional banks face.

šŸ”¹ Senator Cynthia Lummis pushed back publicly, framing the issue as a global strategic race and warning that if the U.S. does not set digital asset standards, other powers will.

šŸ”¹ The core tension is whether the bill creates legitimate regulatory clarity or simply opens the door to regulatory arbitrage for crypto platforms operating outside the traditional banking...

🚨 JPMorgan’s criticism of the CLARITY Act is fueling a fresh power struggle over who gets to write America’s crypto rules 🚨
šŸ‘‰ Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? šŸ”œ

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

šŸ‘‰ Here’s what you need to know:

šŸ’  'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
šŸ’  Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
šŸ’  Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
šŸ’  Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
šŸ’  Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

šŸ‘‰ What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto šŸ‘‰txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚨 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

šŸ‘‰ Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

The future of cybersecurity isn't about blocking yesterday's threats—it's about defeating tomorrow's before they are even built. šŸ›”ļøāš”

​The ultimate competitive edge belongs to defenders who can instantly ingest unique zero-days, automatically generate the attack strains that don't exist yet, and ship bulletproof detections to the front lines ahead of the breach. šŸ”®šŸš€

​As legacy security platforms degrade under the weight of novel AI-driven threats, the world’s largest financial institutions won't scatter their bets. They will consolidate on the single provider capable of delivering this predictive defense at global scale. šŸ¦šŸ“Š

​The Engine Behind the Defense:

​To stay ahead, that provider needs a constant, unrelenting supply of edge-case attacks. A decentralized subnet is the only architecture built to fuel this machine—paying a global swarm of attackers to continuously probe, create, and supply novel threats around the clock. šŸŒšŸšŸ’„

​Self-evolving security is ...

šŸš€ Navigating Bittensor yield just got effortless! šŸ§ āš”ļø

If you’ve been looking to optimize your $TAO positions across subnets without the headache of manual rebalancing or technical friction, @TrustedStake is changing the game! šŸ’Ž

The new Quickstart Guide breaks down how to get seamless exposure to top-tier AI strategies:

šŸŽÆ One-Click Index Exposure: Access curated subnet baskets (Universe, Top 15, and specialized sectors) in seconds.

šŸ›” Non-Custodial Security: Retain complete asset control while leveraging Substrate proxy accounts—keeping your primary stash safe in cold storage.

šŸ”„ Automated Rebalancing & Yield Optimization: Smart TWAP execution, validator selection, and root reinvestment handle the heavy lifting to maximize your alpha.

šŸ“ˆ Block-Level Transparency: Real-time PnL metrics and full on-chain visibility right from your dashboard.

šŸ‘‡Check out the full walkthrough to get startedšŸ‘‡
...

post photo preview

šŸŽÆ Leadpoet’s new Arena could change how businesses find their next customers šŸŽÆ

Leadpoet is launching an Arena where AI agents compete to identify companies most likely to buy, turning sales intelligence into a measurable performance competition.

šŸ”‘ Key points

šŸ”¹ Agents compete on lead quality: Systems are evaluated on whether the prospects they identify show genuine buying intent.

šŸ”¹ Better than list generation: The goal is to find likely customers rather than produce large volumes of low-quality contacts.

šŸ”¹ Real-world signals matter: Agents can analyze company activity, business changes, hiring, technology use, market behavior, and other indicators.

šŸ”¹ Performance becomes measurable: Agents can be ranked based on precision, relevance, conversion potential, and downstream sales outcomes.

šŸ”¹ Competition can improve intelligence: Different agents may identify different signals, creating a wider search across potential customers.

šŸ”¹ Sales teams gain prioritization: Businesses ...

post photo preview
Revolut Leak Shows the Cost of Constant ID Collection
Revolut’s mistake is the news, but the bigger problem is the growing number of companies being encouraged or required to keep copies of our most sensitive identity documents.

Online bank Revolut has revealed that it gave out sensitive personal and financial information of an undisclosed number of its customers in response to a fake government request.

The information that was handed over to an ā€œunauthorized third partyā€ reportedly includes names, dates of birth, occupations, addresses, phone numbers, account numbers, transaction histories (including Bitcoin), and even copies of government-issued IDs and onboarding verification selfies.

Revolut claims that derived biometric face data was not.

The company said that the data was handed over in response to an email that came from a real government agency’s domain, but was not actually sent or authorized by that agency.

The email passed several authentication checks (SPF, DKIM, and DMARC) that are designed to establish the authenticity of a message’s origin and integrity, but do not verify the legitimacy of the legal request itself.

Revolut said that it complied with the request ā€œunder the reasonable belief that it was an authentic government agency requestā€ – and only later found out that it was not.

Revolut said it later realized its mistake, blocked the email address, and reported the incident to the relevant authorities.

Revolut said that only a ā€œlimitedā€ number of its customers were affected by the data leak, and that the company’s systems were not hacked, nor was any money stolen.

The story broke on September 11 when Revolut customers started receiving an email notice about a data leak, and the news was picked up by media outlets the following day.

Revolut notice explaining customer identity and financial data was shared after an unauthorized government email request.

The reason this is a recurring problem is that companies are keeping highly sensitive information about their customers’ identities, and sometimes even financial transactions, for a long time, and this data is then available to be disclosed to third parties – either in response to valid legal requests, or, as in the case of Revolut, fake ones.

One reason for this is know your customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) rules. Revolut’s current UK customer privacy notice spells it out: the company generally keeps personal data of UK customers for no more than seven years after the relationship ends, and sometimes longer – for legal reasons.

This means that even if you close your account, your identity documents don’t disappear.

And while the incident with Revolut happened in the financial sector, it’s by no means the only one that requires customers to hand over sensitive identity information. Discord, a popular chat service, said in an October 9, 2025 security update that government ID photos of approximately 70,000 users may have been exposed after a third-party customer service provider got hacked.

This was not a financial service, nor the same type of attack. But the result was similar – because the underlying business process was the same: requiring and storing sensitive identity documents. In the case of Discord, these were used to review age-related appeals.

It’s hard to do anything about a copy of your old passport, or a photo of your face, or a record of your past transactions. These can be used to identify and profile you, and can be used to carry out targeted fraud. And this can happen even if the initial disclosure didn’t result in financial loss.

The more companies are forced to collect and store such information, and the more of it they have, the more opportunities there are for this data to be leaked, either by the company itself or a third party it works with. That's what makes governments' push for more ID checks just to access ordinary parts of life so reckless.

Source

šŸ™To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

šŸ‘‰ Cashapp: $thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ PayPal: Scan the QR code below šŸ“² or Click Here:Ā 

šŸ‘‡ Crypto Donations šŸ‘‡

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
This Is The Income A Family Needs To Live Comfortably In Every US State

Here’s the short version of what it takes for a family of four to live comfortably in 2026 by state:

In Massachusetts, you’d need nearly $330,000 a year - the highest figure in the entire country. Only three states clear the $300,000 mark: Massachusetts, Hawaii, and California. At the other end of the spectrum, Mississippi is the most affordable at about $188,000. That’s a full $142,000 less than what you’d need in Massachusetts.

So… how much does a family of four need in your state?

This map shows the pre-tax income a household with two working adults and two kids needs to live comfortably in every U.S. state.

The numbers come fromĀ SmartAssetĀ (as of February 2026). They’re based on the familiar 50/30/20 budget: 50% for necessities, 30% for discretionary spending, and 20% for savings or other goals. These aren’t bare-minimum survival numbers—they’re what it takes to live pretty well while still putting money aside.

And asĀ Visual CapitalistĀ notes,Ā Massachusetts sits at the very top of that list.Ā Massachusetts tops the ranking, with a family of four needing $329,555 per year to meet the 50/30/20 benchmark.

Hawaii follows at $313,165, while California ranks third at $302,682.

Rank State Income needed for family of four (2026)

  • 1 - Massachusetts - $329,555
  • 2 - Hawaii - $313,165
  • 3 - California - $302,682
  • 4 - Connecticut - $298,189
  • 5 - New Jersey - $295,110
  • 6 - New York - $291,533
  • 7 - Colorado - $283,213
  • 8 - Washington - $281,798
  • 9 - Oregon - $280,966
  • 10 - Vermont - $280,384
  • 11 - Alaska - $272,064
  • 12 - New Hampshire - $267,904
  • 13 - Rhode Island - $264,659
  • 14 - Minnesota - $263,078
  • 15 - Maryland - $257,837
  • 16 - Maine - $250,931
  • 17 - Montana - $249,434
  • 18 - Pennsylvania - $247,936
  • 19 - Illinois - $244,109
  • 20 - Virginia - $242,944
  • 21 - Nevada - $242,278
  • 22 - Indiana - $241,696
  • 23 - Wisconsin - $238,451
  • 24 - Arizona - $236,870
  • 25 - Utah - $235,789
  • 26 - Delaware - $228,134
  • 27 - Ohio - $226,221
  • 28 - Idaho - $226,054
  • 29 - Florida - $223,392
  • 30 - New Mexico - $223,142
  • 31 - Nebraska - $223,059
  • 32 - Missouri - $217,734
  • 33 - Georgia - $214,573
  • 34 - Michigan - $214,323
  • 35 - South Carolina - $212,909
  • 36 - North Carolina - $212,410
  • 37 - Wyoming - $212,410
  • 38 - Oklahoma - $211,910
  • 39 - North Dakota - $210,496
  • 40 - Kansas - $207,917
  • 41 - Iowa - $204,422
  • 42 - Texas - $203,424
  • 43 - West Virginia - $202,592
  • 44 - South Dakota - $201,760
  • 45 - Alabama - $198,931
  • 46 - Louisiana - $197,933
  • 47 - Tennessee - $197,267
  • 48 - Arkansas - $195,437
  • 49 - Kentucky - $194,854
  • 50 - Mississippi - $187,533

Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York aren't far behind, bringing the number of states with comfortable-income thresholds above $290,000 to six.

Colorado and Vermont Make the Top 10

As expected, many of the highest income thresholds are concentrated in the Northeast and along the West Coast.

However, Colorado has the seventh-highest threshold in the country at $283,213, ranking above Washington and Oregon.

Vermont rounds out the top 10 at $280,384, despite having theĀ second-smallest populationĀ of any U.S. state. Meanwhile, nearby states like New Hampshire, Maine, and Rhode Island all fall outside the top 10.

Just Six States Come in Below $200,000

Despite theĀ wide range in living costsĀ across the country, only six states have a comfortable-income threshold below $200,000 for a family of four.

Mississippi ranks lowest at $187,533, followed by Kentucky.Ā The states of Arkansas, Tennessee, Louisiana, and Alabama also fall below the $200,000 mark.

The gap between Massachusetts and Mississippi exceeds $142,000 per year, meaning the Massachusetts benchmark is about 76% higher.

Source

šŸ™To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

šŸ‘‰ Cashapp: $thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ PayPal: Scan the QR code below šŸ“² or Click Here:Ā 

šŸ‘‡ Crypto Donations Always Welcome šŸ‘‡

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
šŸ¤–Can Decentralized AI Stop Big Tech from Owning the Future of Robotics?šŸ¤–
The race to build the future of robotics is no longer just about robots. It's about who controls the intelligence behind them.
Ā 
Over the last three years, a small group of companies has emerged as the backbone of the AI revolution. Microsoft provides cloud infrastructure. NVIDIA supplies the chips. Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and others develop the models. Together, they control much of the compute, data, and software stack powering modern AI.
Ā 
Now that AI is moving into the physical world, many are asking a bigger question:
Ā 
Will these same companies end up controlling robotics too?
Ā 
It's a valid concern.
Ā 
The latest generation of robots relies on enormous amounts of compute, simulation, training data, and foundation models. Many robotics startups today are built on infrastructure provided by large technology companies. NVIDIA's Omniverse is becoming a key simulation environment for robot training. Microsoft Azure is powering the training of robotics foundation models. Physical AI startups increasingly depend on hyperscale cloud infrastructure to train and deploy intelligent systems. Recent partnerships across the industry show just how central Big Tech has become to robotics development.
But while Big Tech is building the highways, another movement is trying to ensure it doesn't own every destination.
Ā 
That movement is decentralized AI.
Ā 
Why Decentralized AI Exists
Ā 
The idea behind decentralized AI is simple. Instead of a handful of companies owning the models, compute infrastructure, data pipelines, and intelligence networks, these resources are distributed across thousands of participants.
Ā 
This means anyone can contribute compute, contribute models, validate outputs and can participate.
The most visible example today is the decentralized AI network known as Bittensor (@bittensor). The network has evolved into a large ecosystem of specialized AI markets called subnets, where participants compete to provide useful machine intelligence and are rewarded based on performance. Rather than relying on a single company, intelligence is generated and validated by a distributed network of miners and validators.
Ā 
Think of it as an attempt to build an open marketplace for AI instead of a world where intelligence is rented from a few centralized providers.
Ā 
Why This Matters for Robotics
Ā 
Robotics has a unique problem. Unlike chatbots, robots operate in the physical world. They need to perceive environments, make decisions, move safely and they need to learn continuously.
Ā 
The challenge is that collecting and training on real-world robotic data is incredibly expensive. That's one reason large companies have such an advantage. They can afford the compute, simulation environments, and data infrastructure needed to train robotics models at scale.
Ā 
This is where decentralized systems become interesting.
Ā 
Instead of one company collecting all the data and training all the models, decentralized networks could allow thousands of contributors to participate in building robotic intelligence.
Ā 
Imagine a future where:
  • Warehouse robots contribute operational data.
  • Delivery robots contribute navigation data.
  • Factory robots contribute manipulation data.
  • Developers contribute models.
  • Validators evaluate performance.
The resulting intelligence becomes a shared network rather than a proprietary asset.
Ā 
That vision is beginning to emerge.
Ā 
Bittensor's Move Toward Physical AI
Ā 
While many people associate Bittensor (@bittensor) with language models and AI services, parts of the ecosystem are increasingly exploring embodied intelligence and robotics.
Ā 
One example is Kinitro, a subnet focused on incentivizing the training and evaluation of embodied AI systems. The goal is to create competitive environments where developers build robotic intelligence and are rewarded based on performance.
Ā 
The broader Bittensor ecosystem has also expanded into compute marketplaces, distributed inference systems, bandwidth infrastructure, and AI coordination layers that could eventually support robotics workloads. Several subnets now focus on decentralized compute, confidential inference, data transfer, and model training, critical components for future robotic systems.
Ā 
In other words, the pieces are starting to appear.
Ā 
Not a decentralized robot network yet.
Ā 
But the infrastructure that could support one.
Ā 
Beyond Bittensor: The Rise of Physical AI Networks
Ā 
Bittensor isn't alone.
Ā 
Across the industry, researchers and builders are experimenting with decentralized approaches to physical AI.
Ā 
New research published in 2026 introduced the concept of DAO-enabled decentralized physical AI, or DePAI. The idea combines robotics, decentralized infrastructure, AI models, governance systems, and human oversight into a single framework. Instead of centralized control, robots and physical infrastructure could be coordinated through transparent rules and distributed ownership models.
Ā 
At the same time, developers are exploring decentralized operating systems for robots that allow machines to communicate directly with each other and with distributed compute resources. These architectures are designed to make robotic systems more resilient and less dependent on a single cloud provider.
Ā 
The goal is not simply decentralization for its own sake.
Ā 
The goal is resilience.
Ā 
If one server fails, the system continues.
Ā 
If one company disappears, the network survives.
Ā 
If one participant leaves, innovation continues.
Ā 
But Here's the Reality
Ā 
Decentralized AI faces the same challenge every decentralized technology faces.
Ā 
Big Tech has resources. A lot of resources.
Ā 
Training advanced robotics models requires enormous compute budgets, sophisticated simulation environments, access to specialized hardware, and vast amounts of real-world data.
Ā 
That's why many robotics startups still partner with major cloud providers and AI companies. It's often the fastest path to deployment.
Ā 
And there are legitimate concerns about whether decentralized networks can maintain quality, reliability, and security at the scale required for industrial robotics. Even researchers studying decentralized AI systems have highlighted risks around concentration, incentives, governance, and network security.
Ā 
The challenge isn't just decentralizing intelligence.
Ā 
It's decentralizing intelligence while maintaining performance.
Ā 
That's much harder.
Ā 
The Most Likely Outcome
Ā 
The future probably won't be fully centralized. And it probably won't be fully decentralized either. Instead, we're likely heading toward a hybrid model.
Ā 
Large technology companies will continue providing chips, cloud infrastructure, simulation platforms, and foundational research.
Ā 
At the same time, decentralized AI networks will emerge as alternative coordination layers where intelligence, data, and economic value can be shared more openly.
Ā 
The companies building robots may use NVIDIA hardware.
Ā 
Train on Azure.
Ā 
Run foundation models from OpenAI.
Ā 
But they may also participate in decentralized data networks, decentralized compute markets, and decentralized intelligence protocols.
Ā 
The future of robotics could end up looking less like a monopoly and more like an ecosystem.
Ā 
The Bigger Question
Ā 
The real question isn't whether decentralized AI can eliminate Big Tech.
Ā 
It can't.
Ā 
At least not anytime soon.
Ā 
The real question is whether decentralized AI can prevent a future where a handful of companies control every robot, every model, every dataset, and every decision made by the machines operating around us.
Ā 
As robots become workers, assistants, delivery drivers, factory operators, and even economic agents, that question becomes increasingly important.
Ā 
Because the battle for the future of robotics is no longer about hardware.
Ā 
It's about who owns the intelligence.
Ā 
And that battle is just getting started.
Ā 
Ā 

šŸ™To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

šŸ‘‰ Cashapp: $thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ PayPal: Scan the QR code below šŸ“² or Click Here:Ā 

šŸ‘‡ Crypto Donations šŸ‘‡

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals