The SEC’s so-called "protection" of retail investors has done more harm than good, forcing speculation rather than allowing utility tokens to function as intended. But with the SEC’s tactics now under scrutiny and long-awaited regulatory clarity emerging, the game is changing.

That’s why I just made a video diving deep into the great-grandfather of all utility tokens: the VERI Token—and speculating the hell out of it. Let’s run some numbers.

Market Cap Comparisons: Where Could VERI Go?

If we apply the market caps of major cryptos to VERI’s ultra-low 2.16 million token supply, we get some jaw-dropping figures:

• XRP Market Cap / VERI Supply
  $150,685,407,710 ÷ 2,160,000 = $55,695.40 per VERI
• ETH Market Cap / VERI Supply
  $265,678,224,163 ÷ 2,160,000 = $104,732.50 per VERI
• BTC Market Cap / VERI Supply
  $1,764,865,971,748 ÷ 2,160,000 = $752,952.91 per VERI

What Could Send VERI Parabolic?

If the SEC case is vacated, VERI—backed by 2.16 million tokens and Veritaseum’s patents—could become a prepaid fee token for:

✅ VeADIR (Decentralized AI-driven investment research)
✅ VeRent (Tokenized asset rental and lending)
✅ VeTokenization (Asset tokenization across multiple sectors)
✅ VeResearch (On-chain research monetization)

But it gets better.

The PTAB’s rejection of Coinbase’s IPR, combined with ETH/SOL infringement claims and the PPE White Paper, could force BTC, ETH, XRP, and ADA into licensing agreements—potentially pushing VERI into the $6,000–$150,000 range.

And if VeriDAO’s massive $1.6 quadrillion asset tokenization vision takes off? We could be looking at $740,000–$740 million per VERI.

Now, these are just speculative price points, but the numbers highlight one thing: VERI’s upside potential is insane if adoption and legal clarity align.

If the SEC case is vacated, VERI—tied to 2.16 million tokens and Veritaseum’s patents—could soar as a prepaid fee token for VeADIR, VeRent, VeTokenization, and VeResearch.

The Bottom Line

The setup is primed. Success hinges on three key factors:

1️⃣ Legal victories over regulatory hurdles
2️⃣ Adoption of Veritaseum’s technology and patents
3️⃣ Traction of the prepaid fee model in the tokenization space

If these pieces fall into place, VERI could be one of the biggest sleepers in the crypto market.

Are you watching this play unfold? 🚀

Success hinges on legal victories, adoption, and the prepaid model’s traction, but the setup is primed for a breakout.

Original Post by @SovereignRiz

Crypto market capitalization has tanked to its lowest point since early November with $240 billion getting wiped out over the past day.

This has resulted in a 6% fall to $2.6 trillion as all post-US election gains have now been wiped out.

Ethereum has taken the brunt of the fall, losing a whopping 16% over 12 hours as it fell from around $2,140 to just below $1,800. Moreover, ETH is struggling to recover and was trading at $1,860 at the time of writing.

ETH Death?

The last time Ethereum traded below $1,800 was in October 2023, when it was slowly emerging from the two-year-long bear market.

There is solid support at current levels, which must be held to prevent the asset from tanking back to bear market lows following the formation of what appears to be a double-top chart pattern.

Analysts have warned that if support here is lost, ETH could fall as low as $1,200.

Ethereum is currently down a painful 62% from its all-time high in 2021, and the ETH/BTC ratio – which is a measure of the price of ETH in terms of Satoshis – is at its lowest level since December 2020, having fallen to 0.023 today, according to Tradingview.

Only Dogecoin (DOGE) had heavier losses than Ethereum in the crypto top twenty today, with the memecoin melting by 11%.

It does beg the question of who would be selling ETH at $2,000 and the answer appears to be whales that are trying to avoid being liquidated, according to Lookonchain.

Needless to say, the Ethereum derision and FUD had escalated to new heights on Crypto Twitter as traders and investors licked their wounds.

Ethereum Testnet Attacked

The ETH angst has been exacerbated by problems with Pectra testing and an unknown attacker sending zero-token transfers, causing empty blocks.

On March 9, Ethereum developer Marius van der Wijden said the issue had been fixed:

“We suspected that the attacker was reading some of our chats, so we decided not to publicize the fix, but only update a few nodes that we controlled in order to get more full blocks on the network,”

Source

🙏 Support My Work

If you find my content valuable, please consider supporting me:

💳 Via PayPal – Simply scan the QR code below or
🔗 Via Crypto – Send contributions through Coinbase to: Dinarian.cb.id

Your support is greatly appreciated! ✨

Last week Japan’s Financial Services Agency disclosed that a new Bill has been submitted to the National Diet to update the Payment Services Act, the legislation that governs stablecoins and cryptocurrencies.

The key changes relating to stablecoins and crypto include:

• More diversity in stablecoin reserves for trust-style stablecoins
• The ability to order exchanges to provide onshore custody of all spot crypto and stablecoins for the purposes of bankruptcy protections
• Creating a new kind of intermediary that acts as a broker, introducing clients to crypto exchanges.

Stablecoin reserves can include government bonds

The existing version of the Payment Services Act supports the issuance of stablecoins by three types of institutions: banks, money transfer businesses and trust companies. While stablecoins are still extremely nascent in Japan, it’s expected that trust companies are likely to be the most prolific as they support issuance on behalf of third parties and are similar to structures used elsewhere. For example, Mitsubishi UFJ Trust had discussions about working with Binance for stablecoin issuance.

Current legislation requires trust company stablecoins to keep all reserves in demand deposits at banks. The Bill allows up to 50% of reserves to be held in term deposits and/or government bonds, provided the one-to-one backing is maintained.

Crypto custody in Japan

Japan was the host of the first big cryptocurrency exchange collapse – Mount Gox in 2024. Hence, when FTX went bankrupt in 2022, users of FTX Japan were not impacted by the foreign bankruptcy proceedings. However, the reason was because FTX provided derivatives trading and regulators had issued an order requiring it to hold all client assets in Japan. If a cryptocurrency exchange only deals in spot transactions, the regulator could not make such an order. Hence, regulators want the law changed, so domestic custody orders can be made for spot (only) crypto exchanges.

New type of crypto broker intermediary

Currently in Japan, if a broker introduces clients to a cryptocurrency exchange, the broker is expected to register as an exchange themselves. The Bill aims to create a new class of intermediary for introducers that do not operate an exchange. Like exchanges, they will be responsible for asset and risk disclosures to clients. Crypto advertising restrictions will also apply.

However, they will not hold client funds, so will not be subject to capital requirements. Given the exchanges have to conduct anti money laundering compliance on all clients, the intermediary won’t need to. This new intermediary role also applies if some is an introducer for stablecoins.

As a sign of how nascent stablecoins are in Japan, crypto exchange SBI VC Trade recently landed the first license in Japan as an “Electronic Payment Instruments Exchange Service Provider”. This is required to deal with foreign stablecoins, allowing SBI VC Trade to support USDC.

Source

🙏 Support My Work

If you find my content valuable, please consider supporting me:

💳 Via PayPal – Simply scan the QR code below or
🔗 Via Crypto – Send contributions through Coinbase to: Dinarian.cb.id

Your support is greatly appreciated! ✨