Dinarian888
News • Business • Investing & Finance
šŸ’„A sustainable future: Using blockchain for digital product passportsšŸ’„
December 30, 2022
post photo preview

The world is in crisis as the increasing global population has strained the limits of what our planet can sustainablyĀ offer and renew. Without thinking about sustainability, the ability to fulfil the needs of current generations without compromising the needs of future generations, we risk depleting valuable resources, irreparably damaging our environment, and endangering our very future. Other than the changing attitudes of consumers and forward-thinking businesses, here are also some of the relevant regulations coming into place:

  • Construction Products Regulation: proposed in 2022
  • EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles: implemented in 2022
  • EU Ecodesign for Sustainable Products: first adoption in 2024
  • Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD): to be implemented in 2024
  • New EU Battery Regulation: to be implemented in 2026
  • Critical Raw Material Act: first drafts due in the first quarter of 2023

There are also major updates to a host of existing Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and other directives whereby traceability is a key focus area such as:

  • Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive
  • End-of-life Vehicles Directive
  • Electrical and Electronic Equipment (EEE) & Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE)
  • Conflict Minerals Regulation: to be reviewed in 2023

We can no longer ignore the pressing issues at hand. Our ability to achieve sustainability depends significantly on our ability to work together to reduce waste and environmental impacts, maximise efficiency, and to also ensure ethical practices that do not infringe upon other humans, land rights or the natural ecosystems and biosphere.

Digital product passports and blockchainĀ could play major roles in creating a more sustainable future.Ā Together, they offer a compelling solution to add more visibility, trust and knowledge of complex material flows within global supply chains. But how would they work together?

Your passport is a state-issued document that allows you to travel and return to your home country. It contains a lot of personal information about you and your country of birth, the visas you need to travel, and keeps a record of all the countries you have visited.

Similarly, digital product passports also contain a range of information to track products throughout their entire lifecycle from production to end-of-life disposal. This information can be used to ensure proper sourcing of materials, monitor sustainable manufacturing practices and facilitate product lifetime extension. At the end of use, a digital product passport is invaluable for the disposal of products to increase the efficiency of material recovery and the reduction of waste. Digital product passports can also be used to engage with or reward stakeholders and customers for sustainable practices and behaviours.

Blockchain technology is already being utilised in many industries to improve transparency and traceability, showing immense potential in speeding up the transition towards a circular economy. Due to the decentralised nature of public blockchains, unauthorised access and manipulation of the data is impossible, making it highly trusted and reliable. But because all transactions are visible to everyone on the network this creates a lack of privacy that can be a major concern and barrier for businesses who want to keep certain information confidential and secure such as sensitive data relating to the composition of materials or products. Yet, this is sometimes the exact data that is needed to facilitate circular innovation and recovery strategies.

Fortunately, methods for protecting data privacy have been developed and are already in use in commercial applications. Data can be kept confidential with zero-knowledge proofs, or using smart contracts to securely reference off chain data. Other cryptographic strategies such as ring signatures, homomorphic encryption, and public-key cryptography can also be used to ensure that only the intended recipient can access the specific data set when required.

To summarise:

  1. Digital product passports offer a transparent way of tracking and managing product information, allowing governments, regulatory bodies, businesses, and consumers to identify and verify the quality and origin of products.
  2. Building digital product passports on public blockchain technology provide immutable records of ownership, origin and usage, increasing trust and transparency in complicated supply chains.
  3. Zero-knowledge proofs, smart contracts, and other cryptographic strategies can be used to protect data privacy, enabling transparency and trust without giving away any sensitive or confidential data.

Digital product passports will undoubtedly become the norm in the coming years, just as sustainability has become essential for long-term success. Companies that focus on sustainability can reduce operating costs, improve operations and reduce inefficiencies. At the same time, they can increase customer satisfaction and loyalty, boost brand reputation, and tap into the growing demand for sustainable products.

Creating a digital product passport requires dedication, planning, analysis, and collaboration to ensure that all the relevant information is accurately captured and stored. The work does not end with its implementation. It will also need to be continuously monitored, analysed, and audited to identify any issues that need to be addressed, such as outdated or inefficient processes.

Realising and implementing working digital product passport systems will be the first step on an innovation journey that will create new interconnected ways of working. The full benefits of digital product passports will only be realised once they are scaled and interoperable across multiple value chains. The data and insights contained within digital product passports can then be used to inform material selection challenges, product design briefs, and circular business models. In turn, these can facilitate customer interactions to promote sufficiency, product lifetime extension and take-back operations to facilitate end-of-life recovery.

This is how we realise the circular economy vision for materials and products to flow end-to-end and back again through multiple loops of use and reuse. Yet, technological solutions alone will not bring about these full potential benefits; there’s also a need to change mindsets around how, what, when, and with whom to share data. This is why we are working to consistently advance practical examples of what is possible when combining digital transition with circular innovation and supply chain operations.

CirculariseĀ supports companies in their transition towards circularity. Our cutting-edge solutions protect your data privacy and give your business a competitive advantage. Sustainability can be an attainable, yet profitable objective for your business as it scales.

Link

community logo
Join the Dinarian888 Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
September 28, 2026
🚨 JUST IN — CONST AT EXPLOIT SUMMIT— šŸ–•The Cabal

@Const of Bittensor ($TAO) just delivered an absolute mic-drop speech on decentralized intelligence and true freedom! šŸ”„

Key takeaways from the stage:

1ļøāƒ£ Mind Outside of the State: 🌐
"Bitcoin was money outside of the state. Bittensor said, let’s build artificial intelligence that’s not controllable by China and the United States."

2ļøāƒ£ Fighting Centralized Control: šŸ›”ļø
The goal is to build an independent, sovereign intelligence outside the cabal to safeguard against potential impending totalitarianism.

3ļøāƒ£ A Message to Regulators:
"And the fact that we exist is a massive middle finger to anybody trying to regulate AI and slow this down."

4ļøāƒ£ Harnessing the Swarm: šŸ¤–
Bittensor embraces hyper-intelligent bot swarms to optimize tech, creating open systems where anyone can contribute and have a say.

5ļøāƒ£ Empowering Everyone: šŸŒ
From a core team to 25 validators, to $dTAO holders, and ultimately—everyone on Earth!

šŸš€ Rule #1: Don't become the cabal. Decentralize ...

00:01:47
September 26, 2026
The true enemy of peace is NOT Russia, China, or Iran…

ā€œThe Rothschilds claim to be Jewish, but are actually Khazars from Mongolian Eastern Europeā€¦ā€

The true enemy of peace is the Rothschild-Khazarian Mafia!

Forbidden Knowledge šŸ“š

00:02:55
September 26, 2026
Just as Guns Don't Kill People...

🚨 BIG NEWS: Speaking to a packed room of over 1,000 attendees at ETH Zurich, Edward Snowden called for Sam Altman to face IMPRISONMENT to establish legal liability for harms caused by OpenAI's models—drawing massive, thunderous applause! šŸ‘šŸ’„

Time to cut through the corporate "safetyism" PR distraction šŸŽ­ and demand true accountability. Lock him up! šŸ”’šŸ›ļø

00:03:45
🚨 Chutes is being framed as a Hyperliquid-style breakout for decentralized AI inference, with live revenue, verified GPU infrastructure, and a direct challenge to centralized cloud AI 🚨

Chutes is gaining attention as a decentralized AI inference platform that claims to combine real usage, cryptographic verification, confidential computing, and open-source infrastructure into a working production system. The thesis is simple: instead of trusting Big Tech clouds with AI workloads, users get a distributed compute layer built around verification and privacy.

šŸ”‘ Key points

šŸ”¹ Chutes is live in production and reportedly scaled to more than 1,170 active GPU nodes, including large numbers of Nvidia H200s and Blackwell-class hardware.

šŸ”¹ The platform says it has processed nearly 38 trillion tokens since launch across 53 deployed applications and more than 700,000 registered users.

šŸ”¹ The team reportedly cut unprofitable usage programs, reduced total token volume, and still improved revenue efficiency, with revenue per GPU rising sharply after removing subsidized traffic.

šŸ”¹ Chutes is using post-quantum cryptography, trusted execution environments, and Nvidia confidential ...

🚨 Chutes is being framed as a Hyperliquid-style breakout for decentralized AI inference, with live revenue, verified GPU infrastructure, and a direct challenge to centralized cloud AI 🚨
🚨 JPMorgan’s criticism of the CLARITY Act is fueling a fresh power struggle over who gets to write America’s crypto rules 🚨

A new clash is emerging between legacy finance and crypto legislation after JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon reportedly warned that the CLARITY Act could let crypto firms offer bank-like products without bank-level oversight. The dispute is quickly turning into a larger fight over regulation, competitiveness, and who controls the future architecture of digital finance in the United States.

šŸ”‘ Key points

šŸ”¹ Jamie Dimon reportedly called the CLARITY Act a threat to the financial system, arguing it could allow crypto firms to offer yield-like products while avoiding the capital, reserve, and oversight burdens traditional banks face.

šŸ”¹ Senator Cynthia Lummis pushed back publicly, framing the issue as a global strategic race and warning that if the U.S. does not set digital asset standards, other powers will.

šŸ”¹ The core tension is whether the bill creates legitimate regulatory clarity or simply opens the door to regulatory arbitrage for crypto platforms operating outside the traditional banking...

🚨 JPMorgan’s criticism of the CLARITY Act is fueling a fresh power struggle over who gets to write America’s crypto rules 🚨
šŸ‘‰ Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? šŸ”œ

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

šŸ‘‰ Here’s what you need to know:

šŸ’  'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
šŸ’  Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
šŸ’  Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
šŸ’  Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
šŸ’  Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

šŸ‘‰ What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto šŸ‘‰txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚨 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

šŸ‘‰ Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

ā˜ļø Hippius positions S3-compatible storage as a way to eliminate cloud egress fees ā˜ļø

Hippius is promoting its S3-compatible storage as an alternative for teams that want to keep using AWS tools while avoiding recurring data-transfer charges.

šŸ”‘ Key points

šŸ”¹ S3 tools remain compatible: AWS CLI, rclone, boto3, AWS SDKs, MinIO clients, Cyberduck, Duplicati, and Nextcloud can connect through standard S3 settings.

šŸ”¹ Egress fees are the main target: Amazon S3 charges published internet-transfer rates, while Hippius says data downloads are included.

šŸ”¹ 10 TB of monthly egress can become expensive: At Amazon’s listed rate of $0.09 per GB after the free allowance, a 10 TB workload could add roughly $913 before storage and request charges.

šŸ”¹ Hippius advertises $0 egress: The platform says its plans include data transfer, requests, and retrieval without additional egress fees.

šŸ”¹ Pay-as-you-go pricing is available: Hippius lists pricing at approximately $6 per TB per month, billed hourly without a ...

šŸ–„ļø Targon launches Bare Metal and Sandboxes for dedicated and ephemeral compute šŸ–„ļø

Targon has expanded its decentralized cloud marketplace with Bare Metal servers and disposable Linux Sandboxes, giving users more options for AI, software development, agents, and testing.

šŸ”‘ Key points

šŸ”¹ Bare Metal provides full machines: Customers receive direct access to physical servers without a hypervisor, container runtime, or noisy neighbors.

šŸ”¹ Full hardware control: Users can manage kernels, drivers, firmware-level GPU settings, and specialized inference stacks.

šŸ”¹ Dedicated compute targets demanding workloads: Bare Metal is suited for training, inference, benchmarking, custom drivers, and workloads requiring predictable performance.

šŸ”¹ Operators are KYC-verified: Targon says Bare Metal providers are verified to support workload security without requiring a trusted virtual machine.

šŸ”¹ Sandboxes are short-lived environments: Users can create isolated Linux environments, run tasks, and discard them ...

post photo preview
šŸŒŽ Schumann Resonance Today 9/30 šŸŒŽ

Right now the Schumann resonance fundamental sits at 7.83 Hz, with geomagnetic activity quiet (Kp 2.0).

Minimal Solar Pressure, A Stable Electromagnetic Morning
Kp sits at 2.0 and solar wind is slow at 312 km/s, placing Earth's magnetic environment in deep quiet.

post photo preview
September 13, 2026
post photo preview
Revolut Leak Shows the Cost of Constant ID Collection
Revolut’s mistake is the news, but the bigger problem is the growing number of companies being encouraged or required to keep copies of our most sensitive identity documents.

Online bank Revolut has revealed that it gave out sensitive personal and financial information of an undisclosed number of its customers in response to a fake government request.

The information that was handed over to an ā€œunauthorized third partyā€ reportedly includes names, dates of birth, occupations, addresses, phone numbers, account numbers, transaction histories (including Bitcoin), and even copies of government-issued IDs and onboarding verification selfies.

Revolut claims that derived biometric face data was not.

The company said that the data was handed over in response to an email that came from a real government agency’s domain, but was not actually sent or authorized by that agency.

The email passed several authentication checks (SPF, DKIM, and DMARC) that are designed to establish the authenticity of a message’s origin and integrity, but do not verify the legitimacy of the legal request itself.

Revolut said that it complied with the request ā€œunder the reasonable belief that it was an authentic government agency requestā€ – and only later found out that it was not.

Revolut said it later realized its mistake, blocked the email address, and reported the incident to the relevant authorities.

Revolut said that only a ā€œlimitedā€ number of its customers were affected by the data leak, and that the company’s systems were not hacked, nor was any money stolen.

The story broke on September 11 when Revolut customers started receiving an email notice about a data leak, and the news was picked up by media outlets the following day.

Revolut notice explaining customer identity and financial data was shared after an unauthorized government email request.

The reason this is a recurring problem is that companies are keeping highly sensitive information about their customers’ identities, and sometimes even financial transactions, for a long time, and this data is then available to be disclosed to third parties – either in response to valid legal requests, or, as in the case of Revolut, fake ones.

One reason for this is know your customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) rules. Revolut’s current UK customer privacy notice spells it out: the company generally keeps personal data of UK customers for no more than seven years after the relationship ends, and sometimes longer – for legal reasons.

This means that even if you close your account, your identity documents don’t disappear.

And while the incident with Revolut happened in the financial sector, it’s by no means the only one that requires customers to hand over sensitive identity information. Discord, a popular chat service, said in an October 9, 2025 security update that government ID photos of approximately 70,000 users may have been exposed after a third-party customer service provider got hacked.

This was not a financial service, nor the same type of attack. But the result was similar – because the underlying business process was the same: requiring and storing sensitive identity documents. In the case of Discord, these were used to review age-related appeals.

It’s hard to do anything about a copy of your old passport, or a photo of your face, or a record of your past transactions. These can be used to identify and profile you, and can be used to carry out targeted fraud. And this can happen even if the initial disclosure didn’t result in financial loss.

The more companies are forced to collect and store such information, and the more of it they have, the more opportunities there are for this data to be leaked, either by the company itself or a third party it works with. That's what makes governments' push for more ID checks just to access ordinary parts of life so reckless.

Source

šŸ™To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

šŸ‘‰ Cashapp: $thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ PayPal: Scan the QR code below šŸ“² or Click Here:Ā 

šŸ‘‡ Crypto Donations šŸ‘‡

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
This Is The Income A Family Needs To Live Comfortably In Every US State

Here’s the short version of what it takes for a family of four to live comfortably in 2026 by state:

In Massachusetts, you’d need nearly $330,000 a year - the highest figure in the entire country. Only three states clear the $300,000 mark: Massachusetts, Hawaii, and California. At the other end of the spectrum, Mississippi is the most affordable at about $188,000. That’s a full $142,000 less than what you’d need in Massachusetts.

So… how much does a family of four need in your state?

This map shows the pre-tax income a household with two working adults and two kids needs to live comfortably in every U.S. state.

The numbers come fromĀ SmartAssetĀ (as of February 2026). They’re based on the familiar 50/30/20 budget: 50% for necessities, 30% for discretionary spending, and 20% for savings or other goals. These aren’t bare-minimum survival numbers—they’re what it takes to live pretty well while still putting money aside.

And asĀ Visual CapitalistĀ notes,Ā Massachusetts sits at the very top of that list.Ā Massachusetts tops the ranking, with a family of four needing $329,555 per year to meet the 50/30/20 benchmark.

Hawaii follows at $313,165, while California ranks third at $302,682.

Rank State Income needed for family of four (2026)

  • 1 - Massachusetts - $329,555
  • 2 - Hawaii - $313,165
  • 3 - California - $302,682
  • 4 - Connecticut - $298,189
  • 5 - New Jersey - $295,110
  • 6 - New York - $291,533
  • 7 - Colorado - $283,213
  • 8 - Washington - $281,798
  • 9 - Oregon - $280,966
  • 10 - Vermont - $280,384
  • 11 - Alaska - $272,064
  • 12 - New Hampshire - $267,904
  • 13 - Rhode Island - $264,659
  • 14 - Minnesota - $263,078
  • 15 - Maryland - $257,837
  • 16 - Maine - $250,931
  • 17 - Montana - $249,434
  • 18 - Pennsylvania - $247,936
  • 19 - Illinois - $244,109
  • 20 - Virginia - $242,944
  • 21 - Nevada - $242,278
  • 22 - Indiana - $241,696
  • 23 - Wisconsin - $238,451
  • 24 - Arizona - $236,870
  • 25 - Utah - $235,789
  • 26 - Delaware - $228,134
  • 27 - Ohio - $226,221
  • 28 - Idaho - $226,054
  • 29 - Florida - $223,392
  • 30 - New Mexico - $223,142
  • 31 - Nebraska - $223,059
  • 32 - Missouri - $217,734
  • 33 - Georgia - $214,573
  • 34 - Michigan - $214,323
  • 35 - South Carolina - $212,909
  • 36 - North Carolina - $212,410
  • 37 - Wyoming - $212,410
  • 38 - Oklahoma - $211,910
  • 39 - North Dakota - $210,496
  • 40 - Kansas - $207,917
  • 41 - Iowa - $204,422
  • 42 - Texas - $203,424
  • 43 - West Virginia - $202,592
  • 44 - South Dakota - $201,760
  • 45 - Alabama - $198,931
  • 46 - Louisiana - $197,933
  • 47 - Tennessee - $197,267
  • 48 - Arkansas - $195,437
  • 49 - Kentucky - $194,854
  • 50 - Mississippi - $187,533

Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York aren't far behind, bringing the number of states with comfortable-income thresholds above $290,000 to six.

Colorado and Vermont Make the Top 10

As expected, many of the highest income thresholds are concentrated in the Northeast and along the West Coast.

However, Colorado has the seventh-highest threshold in the country at $283,213, ranking above Washington and Oregon.

Vermont rounds out the top 10 at $280,384, despite having theĀ second-smallest populationĀ of any U.S. state. Meanwhile, nearby states like New Hampshire, Maine, and Rhode Island all fall outside the top 10.

Just Six States Come in Below $200,000

Despite theĀ wide range in living costsĀ across the country, only six states have a comfortable-income threshold below $200,000 for a family of four.

Mississippi ranks lowest at $187,533, followed by Kentucky.Ā The states of Arkansas, Tennessee, Louisiana, and Alabama also fall below the $200,000 mark.

The gap between Massachusetts and Mississippi exceeds $142,000 per year, meaning the Massachusetts benchmark is about 76% higher.

Source

šŸ™To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

šŸ‘‰ Cashapp: $thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ PayPal: Scan the QR code below šŸ“² or Click Here:Ā 

šŸ‘‡ Crypto Donations Always Welcome šŸ‘‡

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
šŸ¤–Can Decentralized AI Stop Big Tech from Owning the Future of Robotics?šŸ¤–
The race to build the future of robotics is no longer just about robots. It's about who controls the intelligence behind them.
Ā 
Over the last three years, a small group of companies has emerged as the backbone of the AI revolution. Microsoft provides cloud infrastructure. NVIDIA supplies the chips. Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and others develop the models. Together, they control much of the compute, data, and software stack powering modern AI.
Ā 
Now that AI is moving into the physical world, many are asking a bigger question:
Ā 
Will these same companies end up controlling robotics too?
Ā 
It's a valid concern.
Ā 
The latest generation of robots relies on enormous amounts of compute, simulation, training data, and foundation models. Many robotics startups today are built on infrastructure provided by large technology companies. NVIDIA's Omniverse is becoming a key simulation environment for robot training. Microsoft Azure is powering the training of robotics foundation models. Physical AI startups increasingly depend on hyperscale cloud infrastructure to train and deploy intelligent systems. Recent partnerships across the industry show just how central Big Tech has become to robotics development.
But while Big Tech is building the highways, another movement is trying to ensure it doesn't own every destination.
Ā 
That movement is decentralized AI.
Ā 
Why Decentralized AI Exists
Ā 
The idea behind decentralized AI is simple. Instead of a handful of companies owning the models, compute infrastructure, data pipelines, and intelligence networks, these resources are distributed across thousands of participants.
Ā 
This means anyone can contribute compute, contribute models, validate outputs and can participate.
The most visible example today is the decentralized AI network known as Bittensor (@bittensor). The network has evolved into a large ecosystem of specialized AI markets called subnets, where participants compete to provide useful machine intelligence and are rewarded based on performance. Rather than relying on a single company, intelligence is generated and validated by a distributed network of miners and validators.
Ā 
Think of it as an attempt to build an open marketplace for AI instead of a world where intelligence is rented from a few centralized providers.
Ā 
Why This Matters for Robotics
Ā 
Robotics has a unique problem. Unlike chatbots, robots operate in the physical world. They need to perceive environments, make decisions, move safely and they need to learn continuously.
Ā 
The challenge is that collecting and training on real-world robotic data is incredibly expensive. That's one reason large companies have such an advantage. They can afford the compute, simulation environments, and data infrastructure needed to train robotics models at scale.
Ā 
This is where decentralized systems become interesting.
Ā 
Instead of one company collecting all the data and training all the models, decentralized networks could allow thousands of contributors to participate in building robotic intelligence.
Ā 
Imagine a future where:
  • Warehouse robots contribute operational data.
  • Delivery robots contribute navigation data.
  • Factory robots contribute manipulation data.
  • Developers contribute models.
  • Validators evaluate performance.
The resulting intelligence becomes a shared network rather than a proprietary asset.
Ā 
That vision is beginning to emerge.
Ā 
Bittensor's Move Toward Physical AI
Ā 
While many people associate Bittensor (@bittensor) with language models and AI services, parts of the ecosystem are increasingly exploring embodied intelligence and robotics.
Ā 
One example is Kinitro, a subnet focused on incentivizing the training and evaluation of embodied AI systems. The goal is to create competitive environments where developers build robotic intelligence and are rewarded based on performance.
Ā 
The broader Bittensor ecosystem has also expanded into compute marketplaces, distributed inference systems, bandwidth infrastructure, and AI coordination layers that could eventually support robotics workloads. Several subnets now focus on decentralized compute, confidential inference, data transfer, and model training, critical components for future robotic systems.
Ā 
In other words, the pieces are starting to appear.
Ā 
Not a decentralized robot network yet.
Ā 
But the infrastructure that could support one.
Ā 
Beyond Bittensor: The Rise of Physical AI Networks
Ā 
Bittensor isn't alone.
Ā 
Across the industry, researchers and builders are experimenting with decentralized approaches to physical AI.
Ā 
New research published in 2026 introduced the concept of DAO-enabled decentralized physical AI, or DePAI. The idea combines robotics, decentralized infrastructure, AI models, governance systems, and human oversight into a single framework. Instead of centralized control, robots and physical infrastructure could be coordinated through transparent rules and distributed ownership models.
Ā 
At the same time, developers are exploring decentralized operating systems for robots that allow machines to communicate directly with each other and with distributed compute resources. These architectures are designed to make robotic systems more resilient and less dependent on a single cloud provider.
Ā 
The goal is not simply decentralization for its own sake.
Ā 
The goal is resilience.
Ā 
If one server fails, the system continues.
Ā 
If one company disappears, the network survives.
Ā 
If one participant leaves, innovation continues.
Ā 
But Here's the Reality
Ā 
Decentralized AI faces the same challenge every decentralized technology faces.
Ā 
Big Tech has resources. A lot of resources.
Ā 
Training advanced robotics models requires enormous compute budgets, sophisticated simulation environments, access to specialized hardware, and vast amounts of real-world data.
Ā 
That's why many robotics startups still partner with major cloud providers and AI companies. It's often the fastest path to deployment.
Ā 
And there are legitimate concerns about whether decentralized networks can maintain quality, reliability, and security at the scale required for industrial robotics. Even researchers studying decentralized AI systems have highlighted risks around concentration, incentives, governance, and network security.
Ā 
The challenge isn't just decentralizing intelligence.
Ā 
It's decentralizing intelligence while maintaining performance.
Ā 
That's much harder.
Ā 
The Most Likely Outcome
Ā 
The future probably won't be fully centralized. And it probably won't be fully decentralized either. Instead, we're likely heading toward a hybrid model.
Ā 
Large technology companies will continue providing chips, cloud infrastructure, simulation platforms, and foundational research.
Ā 
At the same time, decentralized AI networks will emerge as alternative coordination layers where intelligence, data, and economic value can be shared more openly.
Ā 
The companies building robots may use NVIDIA hardware.
Ā 
Train on Azure.
Ā 
Run foundation models from OpenAI.
Ā 
But they may also participate in decentralized data networks, decentralized compute markets, and decentralized intelligence protocols.
Ā 
The future of robotics could end up looking less like a monopoly and more like an ecosystem.
Ā 
The Bigger Question
Ā 
The real question isn't whether decentralized AI can eliminate Big Tech.
Ā 
It can't.
Ā 
At least not anytime soon.
Ā 
The real question is whether decentralized AI can prevent a future where a handful of companies control every robot, every model, every dataset, and every decision made by the machines operating around us.
Ā 
As robots become workers, assistants, delivery drivers, factory operators, and even economic agents, that question becomes increasingly important.
Ā 
Because the battle for the future of robotics is no longer about hardware.
Ā 
It's about who owns the intelligence.
Ā 
And that battle is just getting started.
Ā 
Ā 

šŸ™To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

šŸ‘‰ Cashapp: $thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ PayPal: Scan the QR code below šŸ“² or Click Here:Ā 

šŸ‘‡ Crypto Donations šŸ‘‡

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals