Dinarian888
News • Business • Investing & Finance
Cross chain swaps on Matcha!
December 05, 2023
post photo preview

Seize any opportunity across 7 networks with cross chain swaps on Matcha! Trade tokens directly for a different asset on another blockchain in one go, with aggregated liquidity from 100s of DEXs.

If you have ever tried to move assets to another blockchain, you’ve probably been stuck wondering which bridge is safe to use, or which tokens are compatible with the other chain. Maybe you want to keep assets on one chain while still having access to tokens on another, but there's no way of knowing how long the process will take - or if it will work at all.

Now, there’s a better way! Rather than navigating shallow liquidity and unverified platforms, switch to Matcha for simple, cost-effective cross chain swaps which get the job done, first time round.

                     Cross chain is available as a new tab in the Matcha trade module.

We've made it easy to swap directly from one token to another so you can use web3 without limits, as it's meant to be. With smooth cross-chain capabilities, you can be ready for NFT mints in minutes and take your trading multichain for a seamless experience that crosses the EVM ecosystem.

How cross chain works on Matcha

Combining bridge aggregation with DEX aggregation.

You can find the new Cross Chain feature in your trade module, right next to the Limit tab, keeping the familiar look and feel you’re used to. To set up a new cross chain trade, you simply choose the chain and token you want to sell, and the chain and token you want to receive. Fill out the amount to receive an instant quote and hit Review order to see a summary of the trade. All good? Then select Place order and confirm the transaction in your wallet. 

Cross chain swaps step-by-step:

  1. Go to matcha.xyz and select Start Trading.
  2. Open the Cross Chain tab in the trade module.
  3. Select a token to Buy on any supported network using the menu.
  4. Click on Select token and use the pop-up module to choose a token to Sell.
  5. Enter an amount to Sell to receive a quote.
  6. Select Review order.
  7. Select Place order and confirm the transaction in your wallet.

Cross chain swaps have been integrated in Matcha using Socket API, allowing us to enhance the DEX aggregation you already know and love with industry-leading bridge aggregation. With over 3.5 million transactions processed to date, and an all-star list of integrators including Coinbase, MetaMask, Rainbow and Zerion, Socket was the obvious choice for security and ease of use. Read more about the integration in our blog what is a cross chain swap.

More than just a bridge

Most bridges are clunky and slow, leaving you with a forest of browser tabs and the hope that your crypto will come through eventually. Why can’t you just bridge from A to B without jumping through multiple hoops to get there? Well, now you can! 

Cross chain swaps are better than regular bridges because you can swap one token for another directly, across networks, without multiple steps in-between. Matcha aggregates available bridges to find the best route for you. Instead of searching for the right bridge, moving your WETH across, and then swapping for the token you wanted, you can do it all in a single trade. Matcha will first swap to a compatible token and then bridge to the chain you want to get to. 

Get confident about cross chain with simple, fast swaps and transparent routing, so you always know how many tokens will land in your wallet. Just choose the token you have, the token you want from those available, and the network to bridge to - Matcha will choose an optimal route that gives you the best value for your crypto, settled in minutes on your chain of choice.

Cross chain liquidity

The beauty of a DEX aggregator like Matcha is that you aren’t limited to one liquidity source. From blue-chip to long-tail tokens, you’ll tap into deep liquidity whatever you’re trading - and prevent unwanted price impact from eating your profits! 

Finding healthy liquidity on low market cap tokens can be a challenge. Even relatively small trades can quickly drain the supply, leaving you overpaying or receiving fewer tokens than you expect. Matcha overcomes these limitations by drawing together all available liquidity, so you can execute your trades across multiple sources and networks with minimal impact on any individual source, keeping prices low.  

Supercharge your trading with cross chain swaps

Whether you're trading large volumes or just speculating with spare crypto, you need an efficient path across blockchains. Cross chain on Matcha is for traders at any level, with everything you need in one place. From fund managers to small time investors, you can use cross chain to supercharge your trading strategy. 

A growing number of DeFi traders have crypto on multiple networks, with over 3.7 million wallets active on multiple chains each month. You’ll want to use cross chain if you:

  • Manage a web3 portfolio
  • Diversify your risk
  • Need flexibility of low-cost chains
  • Want to find the perfect NFT
  • Look for low-cap tokens
  • Chase large yields
  • Like to be first on new dApps

Every trader benefits from direct cross chain swaps.

As the bull market excitement ramps up, the number of users bridging their assets has risen as much as four times from where it was just weeks ago. This coming bull cycle will likely see all-time highs in cross chain volume, which has been around 5% of total DEX volume in 2023, with $1.3B in volume over the last 7 days, compared to $28B on DEXs.  

Diversify your portfolio across chains 

In today’s multichain landscape, it’s hard to tell where the real opportunity is. With cross chain swaps you can spread your investments across established coins as well as up-and-coming moonshots on layer 2 chains without wasting gas. And if an investment turns out to be a dud, you can rely on Matcha to help salvage the remainder quickly and hassle-free!

As bear turns to bull, it becomes even more important to stay agile. Avoid network congestion on the mainnet by moving your holdings to a layer 2, or redistribute your profits into assets that generate passive income. Whatever your strategy is, cross chain gives it a whole new dimension! 

Hunting airdrops 

Ever since the early Bitcoin forks, airdrops have provided some of the highest returns in crypto, just for holding the right tokens or signing up to the right newsletter. Nowadays, airdrop farming has become a trading strategy in its own right, with new opportunities popping up every day. 

But it’s not enough to sit around and wait for tokens to show up in your wallet anymore. You need to be flexible and fast to position your funds in the right place at the right time for that all-important snapshot. 

While most bridges will leave you waiting up to an hour for your funds before you can swap to the token you really wanted, Matcha makes it easy to establish your position in one go, faster than most bridges will process your gas!

Token farming

Anyone who’s locked their tokens for rewards knows that all good things come to an end. Farms rarely sustain their rates for more than a few weeks. Cross chain lets you uproot your tokens when the season’s over and move directly to new opportunities, where the grass is greener.

Follow the tech

New apps and projects spring up all the time, from onchain games to tradeable social tokens. If you like to be seen as an early adopter, you need to be everywhere at once. Keep up with all the latest experiments and access to the tokens you need on the chains you need them. 

Save time and money

Swap across chains and seize trading opportunities in minutes.

Bridging between networks is also time-consuming and can lead to missed opportunities and wasted gas. Save time and money by switching to Matcha, where you know in advance the route your tokens will take to reach the destination, and exactly how much it will cost.

 

                               Quick cross chain swaps come with zero fees at launch!

Fast on-chain settlement means that you can deploy capital to a new network in minutes and be ideally positioned to take advantage of any opportunity before the market catches up. Don’t get sidelined waiting for your wrapped Ether to confirm when you can load your bags in a single trade.

Better than CEXs

Avoid the risk of giving up custody of your crypto.

Decentralized bridges can be off-putting to users looking for a simple and smooth way to move assets from one chain to another. That leaves many people turning to centralized exchanges (CEXs) where trading across networks is made easier due to the custodial nature of the platforms. 

Since these exchanges retain control of all deposited assets, no onchain transactions need to take place to complete the transfer, but you also risk that your assets will not be returned to you, as you do not control their keys. 

Cross chain bridging on Matcha ensures that your assets remain under your control at all times, while the efficiency of aggregated liquidity keeps costs low without compromising on decentralization. Now, you can swap your tokens for a different token on another chain without extra steps, while retaining full control of your crypto.  

Move seamlessly across chains  

Cross chain swaps let you position yourself wherever opportunity beckons, by swapping your tokens directly for another across networks without any extra steps. No more hopping between bridges and DEXs - get where you need to be in just one trade! That’s the Matcha way - simple, efficient, and great value for money. 

Link

community logo
Join the Dinarian888 Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
​🚨 BREAKING: The Final Clarity Act Bill Text is Official! 🇺🇸🔥

​After more than a year of back-and-forth, the final draft is here—incorporating 126 last-minute amendments requested by Democrats just 24 hours before the vote. 🤯

​Key updates in the final text:

​Strict Ethics Oversight: Expanded restrictions now cover federal officials, judges, and spouses, with Senator Lummis noting Trump opted in voluntarily.
​Banking Safeguards: Treasury gains authority to step in if high-yield stablecoins start draining liquidity from community banks.

​Builder Protections: Civil safe harbor provisions have been strengthened to explicitly cover crypto miners and network validators.

​Market Integrity: Added guardrails target conflicts of interest and affiliate trading while leaving state consumer protection laws intact.

​Does it have enough momentum to secure 60 votes tomorrow? 👀

00:00:09
September 13, 2026
RFK Jr: "The Pandemics are coming from labs. ALL OF THEM... Lyme, COVID, RSV, HIV & Spanish Flu came out of a vaccine lab." ☠️ 💉

"Gain-of-Function Vaccine research has created the worst plagues in our history."

"We can go down the whole list of diseases... It’s just a disaster. It’s given us no benefits. It’s given us everything from Lyme disease to Covid, and many many other diseases. RSV, which is now one of the biggest killers of children, came out of a vaccine lab."

"There’s strong evidence that even Spanish flu came from vaccine research."

"There’s plenty of evidence that HIV also came from a vaccine gain-of-function lab program. "

"The 'PANDEMICS' are coming from labs... ALL OF THEM."

00:04:00
September 13, 2026
🚀The industry has gotten incredible at teaching robots

🚀The industry has gotten incredible at teaching robots to move, sprint, and imitate body dynamics. But as Michael Parker (@bittensormax) points out in The UMI Thesis, there’s still a massive missing piece in Physical AI: Motion Understanding.

✨ Key Takeaways:

🔹Looking Human vs. Understanding Humans: Robots can execute impressive physical feats, but they still struggle to reliably read non-verbal human cues in context.

🔹Motion is Meaning: A gesture, hesitation, or glance changes completely depending on posture, timing, and surrounding context.

🔹Beyond Pixels: True intelligence requires mapping human intent and sequence across time—not just processing raw frames.

🔹The UMI Intelligence Layer: As robots enter hospitals, factories, homes, and stores, Bittensor’s SN78 @umi_sn78 UMI (Universal Motion Intelligence) aims to own the critical layer that translates human movement into real meaning.

The future of robotics isn't just about how machines move—it's about how ...

00:04:54
🚨 Chutes is being framed as a Hyperliquid-style breakout for decentralized AI inference, with live revenue, verified GPU infrastructure, and a direct challenge to centralized cloud AI 🚨

Chutes is gaining attention as a decentralized AI inference platform that claims to combine real usage, cryptographic verification, confidential computing, and open-source infrastructure into a working production system. The thesis is simple: instead of trusting Big Tech clouds with AI workloads, users get a distributed compute layer built around verification and privacy.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Chutes is live in production and reportedly scaled to more than 1,170 active GPU nodes, including large numbers of Nvidia H200s and Blackwell-class hardware.

🔹 The platform says it has processed nearly 38 trillion tokens since launch across 53 deployed applications and more than 700,000 registered users.

🔹 The team reportedly cut unprofitable usage programs, reduced total token volume, and still improved revenue efficiency, with revenue per GPU rising sharply after removing subsidized traffic.

🔹 Chutes is using post-quantum cryptography, trusted execution environments, and Nvidia confidential ...

🚨 Chutes is being framed as a Hyperliquid-style breakout for decentralized AI inference, with live revenue, verified GPU infrastructure, and a direct challenge to centralized cloud AI 🚨
🚨 JPMorgan’s criticism of the CLARITY Act is fueling a fresh power struggle over who gets to write America’s crypto rules 🚨

A new clash is emerging between legacy finance and crypto legislation after JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon reportedly warned that the CLARITY Act could let crypto firms offer bank-like products without bank-level oversight. The dispute is quickly turning into a larger fight over regulation, competitiveness, and who controls the future architecture of digital finance in the United States.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Jamie Dimon reportedly called the CLARITY Act a threat to the financial system, arguing it could allow crypto firms to offer yield-like products while avoiding the capital, reserve, and oversight burdens traditional banks face.

🔹 Senator Cynthia Lummis pushed back publicly, framing the issue as a global strategic race and warning that if the U.S. does not set digital asset standards, other powers will.

🔹 The core tension is whether the bill creates legitimate regulatory clarity or simply opens the door to regulatory arbitrage for crypto platforms operating outside the traditional banking...

🚨 JPMorgan’s criticism of the CLARITY Act is fueling a fresh power struggle over who gets to write America’s crypto rules 🚨
👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? 🔜

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

👉 Here’s what you need to know:

💠 'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
💠 Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
💠 Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
💠 Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
💠 Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

👉 What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto 👉txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚨 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

⚖️ CLARITY Act ethics fight centers on Trump-linked crypto concerns ahead of September 15 vote ⚖️

Senate Democrats have demanded major changes to the CLARITY Act’s crypto-ethics provisions before supporting Tuesday’s cloture vote. Republicans say the latest text includes 126 Democratic-requested changes, but seven Democratic votes are still needed.

🔑 Key points

🔹 State AG enforcement: Democrats want state attorneys general to prosecute violations alongside the DOJ if federal officials refuse to act.

🔹 Family coverage must expand: The current language covers officials and spouses. Democrats want it extended to children and other family members involved in crypto ventures.

🔹 Ethics rules should be permanent: The current provisions sunset on January 20, 2029. Democrats want the restrictions to continue beyond the current presidential term.

🔹 Existing holdings must be divested: Democrats oppose allowing officials to place significant crypto interests in a blind trust instead of selling ...

🛒 How to buy Bittensor subnet tokens using TaoStats 🛒

TaoStats provides a simplified way to acquire Bittensor subnet tokens by connecting a wallet, selecting a subnet, and swapping TAO for the corresponding alpha token.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Connect a compatible wallet: Users begin by linking a Bittensor-supported wallet containing TAO.

🔹 Choose a subnet: TaoStats displays available subnet information, including alpha prices, market capitalization, liquidity, and emissions.

🔹 Review the market first: Users should check liquidity, trading volume, price movement, circulating supply, and recent emissions before swapping.

🔹 Enter the TAO amount: The platform calculates the estimated amount of subnet alpha the user will receive.

🔹 Slippage matters: Thin liquidity can cause the final execution price to differ significantly from the quoted price.

🔹 Confirm the transaction: Users review the exchange rate, network fee, price impact, and receiving wallet before signing.

🔹 Alpha tokens remain ...

📐 Conjecture (SN66) reportedly breaks a 66-year-old Erdős geometry problem 📐

Conjecture (SN66) has reportedly produced a breakthrough on a long-standing geometry problem associated with Paul Erdős, using distributed mathematical search and verification.

🔑 Key points

🔹 Six decades of open work: The problem had remained unresolved for approximately 66 years.

🔹 AI-assisted discovery: Conjecture uses computational systems to explore mathematical structures, test cases, and search for potential solutions.

🔹 Distributed contributors: Miners can compete to generate candidate constructions, proofs, counterexamples, or reductions.

🔹 Verification is essential: A proposed result must be checked through formal reasoning or independently reproducible computation.

🔹 “Breaks” requires clarification: The claim could mean a complete proof, a counterexample to the original conjecture, or a major reduction of the problem.

🔹 Search is not proof: Finding a pattern or candidate solution is only the ...

September 13, 2026
post photo preview
Revolut Leak Shows the Cost of Constant ID Collection
Revolut’s mistake is the news, but the bigger problem is the growing number of companies being encouraged or required to keep copies of our most sensitive identity documents.

Online bank Revolut has revealed that it gave out sensitive personal and financial information of an undisclosed number of its customers in response to a fake government request.

The information that was handed over to an “unauthorized third party” reportedly includes names, dates of birth, occupations, addresses, phone numbers, account numbers, transaction histories (including Bitcoin), and even copies of government-issued IDs and onboarding verification selfies.

Revolut claims that derived biometric face data was not.

The company said that the data was handed over in response to an email that came from a real government agency’s domain, but was not actually sent or authorized by that agency.

The email passed several authentication checks (SPF, DKIM, and DMARC) that are designed to establish the authenticity of a message’s origin and integrity, but do not verify the legitimacy of the legal request itself.

Revolut said that it complied with the request “under the reasonable belief that it was an authentic government agency request” – and only later found out that it was not.

Revolut said it later realized its mistake, blocked the email address, and reported the incident to the relevant authorities.

Revolut said that only a “limited” number of its customers were affected by the data leak, and that the company’s systems were not hacked, nor was any money stolen.

The story broke on September 11 when Revolut customers started receiving an email notice about a data leak, and the news was picked up by media outlets the following day.

Revolut notice explaining customer identity and financial data was shared after an unauthorized government email request.

The reason this is a recurring problem is that companies are keeping highly sensitive information about their customers’ identities, and sometimes even financial transactions, for a long time, and this data is then available to be disclosed to third parties – either in response to valid legal requests, or, as in the case of Revolut, fake ones.

One reason for this is know your customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) rules. Revolut’s current UK customer privacy notice spells it out: the company generally keeps personal data of UK customers for no more than seven years after the relationship ends, and sometimes longer – for legal reasons.

This means that even if you close your account, your identity documents don’t disappear.

And while the incident with Revolut happened in the financial sector, it’s by no means the only one that requires customers to hand over sensitive identity information. Discord, a popular chat service, said in an October 9, 2025 security update that government ID photos of approximately 70,000 users may have been exposed after a third-party customer service provider got hacked.

This was not a financial service, nor the same type of attack. But the result was similar – because the underlying business process was the same: requiring and storing sensitive identity documents. In the case of Discord, these were used to review age-related appeals.

It’s hard to do anything about a copy of your old passport, or a photo of your face, or a record of your past transactions. These can be used to identify and profile you, and can be used to carry out targeted fraud. And this can happen even if the initial disclosure didn’t result in financial loss.

The more companies are forced to collect and store such information, and the more of it they have, the more opportunities there are for this data to be leaked, either by the company itself or a third party it works with. That's what makes governments' push for more ID checks just to access ordinary parts of life so reckless.

Source

🙏To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

👉 Cashapp: $thedinarian

👉 Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

👉 PayPal: Scan the QR code below 📲 or Click Here

👇 Crypto Donations 👇

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
This Is The Income A Family Needs To Live Comfortably In Every US State

Here’s the short version of what it takes for a family of four to live comfortably in 2026 by state:

In Massachusetts, you’d need nearly $330,000 a year - the highest figure in the entire country. Only three states clear the $300,000 mark: Massachusetts, Hawaii, and California. At the other end of the spectrum, Mississippi is the most affordable at about $188,000. That’s a full $142,000 less than what you’d need in Massachusetts.

So… how much does a family of four need in your state?

This map shows the pre-tax income a household with two working adults and two kids needs to live comfortably in every U.S. state.

The numbers come from SmartAsset (as of February 2026). They’re based on the familiar 50/30/20 budget: 50% for necessities, 30% for discretionary spending, and 20% for savings or other goals. These aren’t bare-minimum survival numbers—they’re what it takes to live pretty well while still putting money aside.

And as Visual Capitalist notesMassachusetts sits at the very top of that list. Massachusetts tops the ranking, with a family of four needing $329,555 per year to meet the 50/30/20 benchmark.

Hawaii follows at $313,165, while California ranks third at $302,682.

Rank State Income needed for family of four (2026)

  • 1 - Massachusetts - $329,555
  • 2 - Hawaii - $313,165
  • 3 - California - $302,682
  • 4 - Connecticut - $298,189
  • 5 - New Jersey - $295,110
  • 6 - New York - $291,533
  • 7 - Colorado - $283,213
  • 8 - Washington - $281,798
  • 9 - Oregon - $280,966
  • 10 - Vermont - $280,384
  • 11 - Alaska - $272,064
  • 12 - New Hampshire - $267,904
  • 13 - Rhode Island - $264,659
  • 14 - Minnesota - $263,078
  • 15 - Maryland - $257,837
  • 16 - Maine - $250,931
  • 17 - Montana - $249,434
  • 18 - Pennsylvania - $247,936
  • 19 - Illinois - $244,109
  • 20 - Virginia - $242,944
  • 21 - Nevada - $242,278
  • 22 - Indiana - $241,696
  • 23 - Wisconsin - $238,451
  • 24 - Arizona - $236,870
  • 25 - Utah - $235,789
  • 26 - Delaware - $228,134
  • 27 - Ohio - $226,221
  • 28 - Idaho - $226,054
  • 29 - Florida - $223,392
  • 30 - New Mexico - $223,142
  • 31 - Nebraska - $223,059
  • 32 - Missouri - $217,734
  • 33 - Georgia - $214,573
  • 34 - Michigan - $214,323
  • 35 - South Carolina - $212,909
  • 36 - North Carolina - $212,410
  • 37 - Wyoming - $212,410
  • 38 - Oklahoma - $211,910
  • 39 - North Dakota - $210,496
  • 40 - Kansas - $207,917
  • 41 - Iowa - $204,422
  • 42 - Texas - $203,424
  • 43 - West Virginia - $202,592
  • 44 - South Dakota - $201,760
  • 45 - Alabama - $198,931
  • 46 - Louisiana - $197,933
  • 47 - Tennessee - $197,267
  • 48 - Arkansas - $195,437
  • 49 - Kentucky - $194,854
  • 50 - Mississippi - $187,533

Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York aren't far behind, bringing the number of states with comfortable-income thresholds above $290,000 to six.

Colorado and Vermont Make the Top 10

As expected, many of the highest income thresholds are concentrated in the Northeast and along the West Coast.

However, Colorado has the seventh-highest threshold in the country at $283,213, ranking above Washington and Oregon.

Vermont rounds out the top 10 at $280,384, despite having the second-smallest population of any U.S. state. Meanwhile, nearby states like New Hampshire, Maine, and Rhode Island all fall outside the top 10.

Just Six States Come in Below $200,000

Despite the wide range in living costs across the country, only six states have a comfortable-income threshold below $200,000 for a family of four.

Mississippi ranks lowest at $187,533, followed by Kentucky. The states of Arkansas, Tennessee, Louisiana, and Alabama also fall below the $200,000 mark.

The gap between Massachusetts and Mississippi exceeds $142,000 per year, meaning the Massachusetts benchmark is about 76% higher.

Source

🙏To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

👉 Cashapp: $thedinarian

👉 Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

👉 PayPal: Scan the QR code below 📲 or Click Here

👇 Crypto Donations Always Welcome 👇

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
🤖Can Decentralized AI Stop Big Tech from Owning the Future of Robotics?🤖
The race to build the future of robotics is no longer just about robots. It's about who controls the intelligence behind them.
 
Over the last three years, a small group of companies has emerged as the backbone of the AI revolution. Microsoft provides cloud infrastructure. NVIDIA supplies the chips. Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and others develop the models. Together, they control much of the compute, data, and software stack powering modern AI.
 
Now that AI is moving into the physical world, many are asking a bigger question:
 
Will these same companies end up controlling robotics too?
 
It's a valid concern.
 
The latest generation of robots relies on enormous amounts of compute, simulation, training data, and foundation models. Many robotics startups today are built on infrastructure provided by large technology companies. NVIDIA's Omniverse is becoming a key simulation environment for robot training. Microsoft Azure is powering the training of robotics foundation models. Physical AI startups increasingly depend on hyperscale cloud infrastructure to train and deploy intelligent systems. Recent partnerships across the industry show just how central Big Tech has become to robotics development.
But while Big Tech is building the highways, another movement is trying to ensure it doesn't own every destination.
 
That movement is decentralized AI.
 
Why Decentralized AI Exists
 
The idea behind decentralized AI is simple. Instead of a handful of companies owning the models, compute infrastructure, data pipelines, and intelligence networks, these resources are distributed across thousands of participants.
 
This means anyone can contribute compute, contribute models, validate outputs and can participate.
The most visible example today is the decentralized AI network known as Bittensor (@bittensor). The network has evolved into a large ecosystem of specialized AI markets called subnets, where participants compete to provide useful machine intelligence and are rewarded based on performance. Rather than relying on a single company, intelligence is generated and validated by a distributed network of miners and validators.
 
Think of it as an attempt to build an open marketplace for AI instead of a world where intelligence is rented from a few centralized providers.
 
Why This Matters for Robotics
 
Robotics has a unique problem. Unlike chatbots, robots operate in the physical world. They need to perceive environments, make decisions, move safely and they need to learn continuously.
 
The challenge is that collecting and training on real-world robotic data is incredibly expensive. That's one reason large companies have such an advantage. They can afford the compute, simulation environments, and data infrastructure needed to train robotics models at scale.
 
This is where decentralized systems become interesting.
 
Instead of one company collecting all the data and training all the models, decentralized networks could allow thousands of contributors to participate in building robotic intelligence.
 
Imagine a future where:
  • Warehouse robots contribute operational data.
  • Delivery robots contribute navigation data.
  • Factory robots contribute manipulation data.
  • Developers contribute models.
  • Validators evaluate performance.
The resulting intelligence becomes a shared network rather than a proprietary asset.
 
That vision is beginning to emerge.
 
Bittensor's Move Toward Physical AI
 
While many people associate Bittensor (@bittensor) with language models and AI services, parts of the ecosystem are increasingly exploring embodied intelligence and robotics.
 
One example is Kinitro, a subnet focused on incentivizing the training and evaluation of embodied AI systems. The goal is to create competitive environments where developers build robotic intelligence and are rewarded based on performance.
 
The broader Bittensor ecosystem has also expanded into compute marketplaces, distributed inference systems, bandwidth infrastructure, and AI coordination layers that could eventually support robotics workloads. Several subnets now focus on decentralized compute, confidential inference, data transfer, and model training, critical components for future robotic systems.
 
In other words, the pieces are starting to appear.
 
Not a decentralized robot network yet.
 
But the infrastructure that could support one.
 
Beyond Bittensor: The Rise of Physical AI Networks
 
Bittensor isn't alone.
 
Across the industry, researchers and builders are experimenting with decentralized approaches to physical AI.
 
New research published in 2026 introduced the concept of DAO-enabled decentralized physical AI, or DePAI. The idea combines robotics, decentralized infrastructure, AI models, governance systems, and human oversight into a single framework. Instead of centralized control, robots and physical infrastructure could be coordinated through transparent rules and distributed ownership models.
 
At the same time, developers are exploring decentralized operating systems for robots that allow machines to communicate directly with each other and with distributed compute resources. These architectures are designed to make robotic systems more resilient and less dependent on a single cloud provider.
 
The goal is not simply decentralization for its own sake.
 
The goal is resilience.
 
If one server fails, the system continues.
 
If one company disappears, the network survives.
 
If one participant leaves, innovation continues.
 
But Here's the Reality
 
Decentralized AI faces the same challenge every decentralized technology faces.
 
Big Tech has resources. A lot of resources.
 
Training advanced robotics models requires enormous compute budgets, sophisticated simulation environments, access to specialized hardware, and vast amounts of real-world data.
 
That's why many robotics startups still partner with major cloud providers and AI companies. It's often the fastest path to deployment.
 
And there are legitimate concerns about whether decentralized networks can maintain quality, reliability, and security at the scale required for industrial robotics. Even researchers studying decentralized AI systems have highlighted risks around concentration, incentives, governance, and network security.
 
The challenge isn't just decentralizing intelligence.
 
It's decentralizing intelligence while maintaining performance.
 
That's much harder.
 
The Most Likely Outcome
 
The future probably won't be fully centralized. And it probably won't be fully decentralized either. Instead, we're likely heading toward a hybrid model.
 
Large technology companies will continue providing chips, cloud infrastructure, simulation platforms, and foundational research.
 
At the same time, decentralized AI networks will emerge as alternative coordination layers where intelligence, data, and economic value can be shared more openly.
 
The companies building robots may use NVIDIA hardware.
 
Train on Azure.
 
Run foundation models from OpenAI.
 
But they may also participate in decentralized data networks, decentralized compute markets, and decentralized intelligence protocols.
 
The future of robotics could end up looking less like a monopoly and more like an ecosystem.
 
The Bigger Question
 
The real question isn't whether decentralized AI can eliminate Big Tech.
 
It can't.
 
At least not anytime soon.
 
The real question is whether decentralized AI can prevent a future where a handful of companies control every robot, every model, every dataset, and every decision made by the machines operating around us.
 
As robots become workers, assistants, delivery drivers, factory operators, and even economic agents, that question becomes increasingly important.
 
Because the battle for the future of robotics is no longer about hardware.
 
It's about who owns the intelligence.
 
And that battle is just getting started.
 
 

🙏To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

👉 Cashapp: $thedinarian

👉 Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

👉 PayPal: Scan the QR code below 📲 or Click Here

👇 Crypto Donations 👇

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals