TheDinarian
News • Business • Investing & Finance
? The Dinarian on Locals brings you the latest in news, interviews, in-depth conversations, and stories from across the blockchain and global communities—within and beyond cryptocurrency ?. Experts delve into how blockchain technology is reshaping industries, enhancing business networks ?, transforming transaction workflows, and advancing distributed ledger systems ??. We also explore intriguing topics that may venture into the realm of conspiracies—and so much more!
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
-- PUBLIC NOTICE: BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST --

šŸ‘‰ (The Truth Shall Set You Free-Dinarian)

This reveals the specific section of the United States Municipal Code where the Birth Certificate Trust was established in 1995 and details the context of its creation.

A British Territorial corporation doing business as "the United States of America, Inc." went bankrupt in 1933. This has been publicly admitted in many places, including the Minutes of the Conference of Governors meeting on March 6, 1933.

All the British Territorial U.S. Citizens were bankrupted as franchises of this corporation.

So, as you can see, the Puerto Rican Bankruptcy Trustees set their individual estates aside in a sort of legal limbo.

They––members of the U.S. Military and Dependents–– could, if they wished, claim their "reversionary trust interest" as Americans.

As the U.S. Military had incorrectly misidentified all of us as their "dependents," we were all cast into this same limbo.

And all our estates were classified as belonging to "infant decedents".

What this means is either:
(1) the estate of a baby who literally died in infancy; or,
(2) the estate of a baby whose birthright estate was waived.

In our case, our birthright estates were waived by our unwitting Mothers when they signed the "birth registration" paperwork at the hospital.

That allowed us to be human trafficked on paper and deprived us of our birthright as Americans.

Instead, we were assigned the political status of Puerto Ricans, U.S. Citizenship, and, please note. Puerto Rico is a British Commonwealth nation.

None of this was lawful or legal, either one. It was not disclosed to our Mothers. It was not disclosed to us when we were older.

In order to "legalize" this mammoth crime and fraud, they allowed the victims (if they knew about it) to assert their reversionary trust interest––that is, reclaim their birthright estate, so long as they rolled it over into the United States (Trust)––and what is the United States Trust?

Remember that the Confederation and the Federal Republic were both rendered inoperable in 1861? And all their assets were rolled up into trusts?

State Trusts were created at the State level, and the United States Trust(s) were created at the Federal level.

From the foreign perspective of the Perpetrators of this giant con game, we are all assets of the United States Trust and that was where our birthright estate was cashiered.

We could choose to be bankrupt with them, or we could choose to return to our birthright status and roll all our assets into the United States Trust.

We had to assert our "reversionary trust interest"––that is, assert our natural political status and reject being classified as British Territorial U.S. Citizens.

If you think about it, you've seen these trusts all your life:
惻Northern Trust.
惻Southern Trust.
惻U.S. Trust.
惻United States Trust.
惻United States Trustees.

The person to be notified at that time, was the head of the Internal Revenue Service.

Since then, the person(s) to be notified are:
惻the United States Secretary of State
惻the United States Trustees
惻the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service

What I didn't go on to explain was the "out of the frying pan and into the fire" nature of this partial remedy.

Yes, you can assert your natural political birthright, but they will only allow you to claim to be a United States (Federal Republic) Trust chattel and still not recognize that you are an actual American and not obligatorily attached to the long-vanished American Federal Republic.

The purported "remedy" leaves you in a false political status either way.

Either you are mischaracterized as if you were a bankrupt Puerto Rican U.S. Citizen, or you are mischaracterized as a United States Trust chattel, and they control the United States Trust.

The Truth, of course, is that you were never a U.S. Citizen and never a United States Citizen of the Federal Republic, either.

You were naturally and factually an American born in one of the States of the Union and take your nationality from the State where you were born.

All this impersonation and mischaracterization going on in international and global jurisdictions claiming to own you, own your body, own your name and all other assets, etc., and them, claiming to be your Trustees and Representatives, is all fraud.

The claim that your American Government was in interregnum is also a form of fraud. The American Government was never called into Session because it was never informed of the circumstances. Our Federal Employees owed that Due Diligence to the American People, but instead, they acted in Breach of Trust.

So, I can, and I have, claimed my inherited "reversionary trust interest" in the Federal Republic and Confederation, but as the presumed Donor of all my assets held in the United States Trust(s), I have also asked my purported Trustees to dissolve the trust.

The Donor can require the dissolution of the United States Trust(s); the beneficiary can only request it.

There you have it.

They stole my identity and finagled to get my Mother to waive my birthright estate as an American. They trafficked my stolen identity into the international jurisdiction of the sea and pretended that I was a U.S. Citizen or Dependent thereof. As a remedy, they allowed me to adopt a different foreign political status, that of a United States Citizen (a denizen of the vanished Federal Republic), and having done that, they cashiered my assets in the United States Trust(s)––which they control, except for one thing.

Via this operation, I became a Donor, and a Donor can always dissolve the trust.

So there is a logic to everything, and now you know why they are so desperately trying to "disqualify" me and, at the same time, so frantic to "restore" the Federal Republic––a job they can't do because they lack the standing as Americans to do it.

Remember, they are all U.S. Citizens. They never asserted their reversionary trust interest. They were never recognizable as United States Citizens of the Federal Republic. And as I have continued my march home to Wisconsin in the character of a Federal Dual Citizen as originally intended, they've all been left stopgobbered.

All my actions have been recorded and all claims cured, everything given Due Process. So, even in their whacky fictional world, they have no cause to complain nor any recourse.

What goes around, comes around. They outsmarted themselves. They left themselves ineligible to "restore" anything American or claim anything American. They certainly don't have any superior claim to the Union States and States of the Union. Any old Great-Grandma from Wisconsin who stands as a Donor is first in line, first in time, and has a superior claim to all American assets.

So long as I was leaving their fraudulent con game behind, I made sure to take all my countrymen with me so that any American who doesn't actually work for the Federal Government Subcontractors and isn't knowingly and voluntarily adopting their foreign citizenship(s), is free to declare their American State National political status and come home to truth and sanity.

Even those Americans currently working for a Federal Subcontractor need not worry about this. When they quit or retire, they can come back home to their natural political status like anyone else.

To recap:

Undeclared Foreign Agents working for European interests took "me"––my Given Name––to sea as a baby only three weeks old, and registered me as a British Territorial U.S. Citizen under British Crown copyright. As a remedy for this (and to "legalize" their own actions), they "allowed" me to claim my reversionary trust interest as a Donor to the United States Trust(s)––which I did. Having arrived back in the American domain, I then exercised my position as a Donor to dissolve the Trust in favor of my Beneficiary, a little ole American Lawful Person born in Wisconsin on June 6th, 1956.

To symbolically record this in terms that must be understood, I initiated a name change from ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER (the Municipal Trust documented in the first paragraph of page 19) to Anna Maria Riezinger (the name of the "lost" British Territorial Person, which is the same as the name of my Lawful State Person).

I then changed the venue to land jurisdiction by recording the Name Change and posted my Notice with a Certified Copy of the recording to the Court that granted the name change––thus returning full circle back to the (Territorial) State of Wisconsin––where I had been snatched as a baby––and then into the State Trust, as a State Trust Asset Donor. As Donor, I ordered my "presumed" Trustees to dissolve the Alaska State Trust and the Wisconsin State Trust, too, and set me and my assets free, returning all my purloined assets to me and to my control, as I am a living, breathing woman, a Wisconsinite, in no need of their services.

These foreign "federal" corporations here on our shores to provide "essential government services" created State-of-State franchises for themselves and had them act as Public Usufructs under color of law. One of these foreign State-of-State franchise corporations, doing business as the State of Wisconsin, latched onto my Given Name and used it to create a franchise named after me for their own benefit: Anna Maria Riezinger (Inc.) defined as a British Territorial Person and U.S. Citizen. They owe me the Usufructuary Duty to hold me harmless from any charges or harm resulting from the existence of this franchise entity.

Similarly, the Municipal Government did the same thing, only their action resulted in the creation of a Municipal franchise corporation named after me: ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER and numerous derivative corporations, such as: ANNA M RIEZINGER (a public transmitting utility) and RIEZINGER, ANNA M (the estate of a "lost" sailor in the British Merchant Marines) and so on. All these are considered "citizens of the United States". Again, those who created these franchises and named them after me owe me the Usufructuary Duty to hold me harmless from any charges or harms resulting from the existence of these corporate franchises named after me.

Instead, both of these dishonest "service providers" reorganized as commercial and municipal corporations, respectively, have used these fictional franchises to impersonate me, to subject me under foreign law, and they have enforced laws and fines and fees and performances and mortgages and taxes that I never owed using these devices.

These are all deliberate crimes of personage and barratry against their actual American employers. This has been done in Gross Breach of Trust and Violation of their Service Contracts––that is, The Constitution of the United States of America and The Constitution of the United States.

The more interesting thing about all this, aside from the convoluted and endless impersonations and the misuse and abuse of trusts to purloin and control assets that never belonged to the perpetrators, is that all that is truly required of me to bust this fraud scheme into a million little pieces, is my clearly stated intention on the record, so here it is in this Court of Record: Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents:

It is my intent and act to dissolve all foreign public and private trusts containing assets belonging to me and I direct all my assets to be returned to me, to my possession, and my control.

It is my intent to live my life as a freeborn American, a Wisconsinite in full possession of my land and soil, my water and air, together with my Good Name under my copyright, and with all my assets in all jurisdictions, both public and private––meaning all my physical and intellectual and energetic assets––in my direct control and possession, intact and immune from any foreign legal presumptions or attacks of any kind.

My intent is to dissolve all foreign-generated trusts and bonds that have been foisted off on me and used to cashier my assets for the benefit of foreign interests, both public and private. My intent is to clear the air and vacate the seas so that there is no longer any question about my identity, my political status, my standing, nor any cause to think that I have abandoned my Natural and Unalienable Rights as an American in favor of any foreign government.

It is my will and intent that all Americans who have been mistreated, impersonated, commandeered, deceived, defrauded, and subjected under unconscionable contracts obtained under color of law and enforced under False Pretense of War receive back their assets and that their unincorporated American Government is recognized as the true and lawful Government of this country. So said, so signed, and so sealed.

Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
August 5th 2024

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
šŸš€ Bitcoin Hits New All-Time High – What’s Next?

Bitcoin reached a new peak of $118,254 on July 11, 2025, driven by institutional demand, favorable macro conditions, and supportive crypto regulations. With a 100%+ year-over-year surge, what's next for BTC?

šŸ”® Bitcoin Outlook

šŸ“† Short Term (6–12 Months)

  • Expect volatility post-ATH
  • Spot BTC ETFs attract significant capital
  • Potential range: $95K–$135K

šŸ•° Medium Term (1–3 Years)

  • 2024 halving impact continues
  • More institutions may adopt BTC as reserve/collateral
  • Global regulatory clarity boosts confidence
  • Potential range: $120K–$200K+

🌐 Long Term (5–10+ Years)

  • BTC may solidify as digital gold
  • Used in cross-border settlements and emerging markets
  • Scarcity (21M cap) drives value
  • Bullish case: $250K–$1M+
  • Bearish case: $20K–$50K (if tech/regulatory risks rise)

šŸ“Œ Key Drivers

  • Institutional adoption
  • Spot ETF flows
  • Crypto regulations
  • Fed interest rate policy
  • Lightning Network & Layer 2 scaling
  • Geopolitical uncertainty

šŸ’¬ TL;DR:
Bitcoin’s $118K breakout ...

00:00:07
Ripple CEO on partnership with BNY to serve as custodian of stablecoin
00:01:12
Brad Garlinghouse In Washington šŸš€

It’s time for a fair and open level playing field.

Under Gary Gensler it was quite the opposite.

  • Brad Garlinghouse
    July 9, 2025
00:01:56
šŸ‘‰ Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? šŸ”œ

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

šŸ‘‰ Here’s what you need to know:

šŸ’  'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
šŸ’  Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
šŸ’  Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
šŸ’  Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
šŸ’  Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

šŸ‘‰ What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto šŸ‘‰txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚨 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

šŸ‘‰ Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading
🚨 BREAKING NEWS: Ripple National Trust Bank! šŸ¦ šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡ø

Ripple has officially filed an application to become a national trust bank, aiming to launch what would be called Ripple National Trust Bank.

This move is designed to bring Ripple’s crypto and stablecoin operations under direct federal regulation and marks a major step toward mainstream integration with the U.S. financial system.

šŸ¤” What This Means:

šŸ”¹ If approved by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Ripple would be able to operate nationwide under federal oversight, expanding its crypto services and allowing it to settle payments faster and more efficiently—without relying on intermediary banks.

šŸ”¹ Ripple’s RLUSD stablecoin would be regulated at both the state and federal level, setting a new benchmark for transparency and compliance in the stablecoin market.

šŸ”¹ Ripple has also applied for a Federal Reserve master account, which would let it hold reserves directly at the Fed and issue or redeem stablecoins outside normal banking hours, further strengthening ...

post photo preview
PERSISTENCE Q2 SUMMARY & WHATS TO COME IN Q3 šŸ‘€

Q2’25 was a significant one as we laid the groundwork for multiple initiatives on our orange-themed road to BTCFi šŸ›£ļøšŸ§”

From being one of the first DEXs to deploy on Babylon, to going live with the beta-mainnet & onboarding new Persisters.

Read more šŸ‘‰ https://blog.persistence.one/2025/07/10/persistence-one-a-look-back-on-q2-2025-and-an-overview-of-whats-to-come-in-q3/

BTC Interop beta mainnet is back 🧔
post photo preview
Musk Turns On Starlink to Save Iranians from Regime’s Internet Crackdown

Elon Musk, the world’s richest man and a visionary behind SpaceX, has flipped the switch on Starlink, delivering internet to Iranians amid a brutal regime crackdown.

This move comes on the heels of Israeli strikes targeting Iran’s nuclear facilities, as the Islamic Republic cuts off online access.

The former Department of Government Efficiency chief activated Starlink satellite internet service for Iranians on Saturday following the Islamic Republic's decision to impose nationwide internet restrictions.

As the Jerusalem PostĀ reports, that the Islamic Republic’s Communications Ministry announced the move, stating, "In view of the special conditions of the country, temporary restrictions have been imposed on the country’s internet."

This action followed a series of Israeli attacks on Iranian targets.

Starlink, a SpaceX-developed satellite constellation, provides high-speed internet to regions with limited connectivity, such as remote areas or conflict zones.

Elizabeth MacDonald, a Fox News contributor, highlighted its impact, noting, "Elon Musk turning on Starlink for Iran in 2022 was a game changer. Starlink connects directly to SpaceX satellites, bypassing Iran’s ground infrastructure. That means even during government-imposed shutdowns or censorship, users can still get online, and reportedly more than 100,000 inside Iran are doing that."

During the 2022 "Woman, Life, Freedom" protests, Starlink enabled Iranians to communicate and share footage globally despite network blackouts," she added.

MacDonald also mentioned ongoing tests of "direct-to-cell" capabilities, which could allow smartphone connections without a dish, potentially expanding access and supporting free expression and protest coordination.

Musk confirmed the activation, noting on Saturday, "The beams are on."

This follows the regime’s internet shutdowns, which were triggered by Israeli military actions.

Adding to the tension, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the Iranian people on Friday, urging resistance against the regime.

"Israel's fight is not against the Iranian people. Our fight is against the murderous Islamic regime that oppresses and impoverishes you,ā€ he said.

Meanwhile, Reza Pahlavi, the exiled son of Iran’s last monarch,Ā called onĀ military and security forces to abandon the regime, accusing Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in a Persian-language social mediaĀ postĀ of forcing Iranians into an unwanted war.

Starlink has been a beacon in other crises. Beyond Iran, Musk has leveraged Starlink to assist people during natural disasters and conflicts.

In the wake of hurricanes and earthquakes, Starlink has provided critical internet access to affected communities, enabling emergency communications and coordination.

Similarly, during the Ukraine-Russia conflict, Musk activated Starlink to support Ukrainian forces and civilians, ensuring they could maintain contact and access vital information under dire circumstances.

The genius entrepreneur, is throwing a lifeline to the oppressed in Iran, and the libs can’t stand it.

Conservative talk show host Mark Levin praised Musk’s action,Ā repostingĀ a message stating that Starlink would "reconnect the Iranian people with the internet and put the final nail in the coffin of the Iranian regime."

"God bless you, Elon. The Starlink beams are on in Iran!" LevinĀ wrote.

Musk, who recently stepped down from leading the DOGE in the Trump administration, has apologized to President Trump for past criticisms, including his stance on the One Big Beautiful Bill.

Source

šŸ™ Donations Accepted šŸ™

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

šŸ’³ PayPal:Ā 
1) Simply scan the QR code below šŸ“²
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian

šŸ”— Crypto – Support via Coinbase Wallet to: [email protected]

Or Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

Your generosity keeps this mission alive, for all! NamastĆ© šŸ™ Crypto Michael ⚔ Ā The Dinarian

Read full Article
post photo preview
GENIUS Act lets State banks conduct some business nationwide. Regulators object

The Senate passed the GENIUS Act for stablecoins last week, but significant work remains before it becomes law. The House has a different bill, the STABLE Act, with notable differences that must be reconciled. State banking regulators have raised strong objections to a provision in the GENIUS Act that would allow state banks to operate nationwide without authorization from host states or a federal regulator.

The controversial clause permits a state bank with a regulated stablecoin subsidiary to provide money transmitter and custodial services in any other state. While host states can impose consumer protection laws, they cannot require the usual authorization and oversight typically needed for out-of-state banking operations.

The Conference of State Bank Supervisors welcomed some changes in the GENIUS Act but remains adamantly opposed to this particular provision. In a statement, CSBS said:

ā€œCritical changes must be made during House consideration of the legislation to prevent unintended consequences and further mitigate financial stability risks. CSBS remains concerned with the dramatic and unsupported expansion of the authority of uninsured banks to conduct money transmission or custody activities nationwide without the approval or oversight of host state supervisors (Sec. 16(d)).ā€

The National Conference of State Legislatures expressed similar concerns in early June, stating:

ā€œWe urge you to oppose Section 16(d) and support state authority to regulate financial services in a manner that reflects local conditions, priorities and risk tolerances. Preserving the dual banking system and respecting state autonomy is essential to the safety, soundness and diversity of our nation’s financial sector.ā€

Evolution of nationwide authorization

Section 16 addresses several issues beyond stablecoins, including preventing a recurrence of the SEC’s SAB 121, which forced crypto assets held in custody onto balance sheets. However, the nationwide authorization subsection was added after the legislation cleared the Senate Banking Committee, with two significant modifications since then.

Originally, the provision applied only to special bank charters like Wyoming’s Special Purpose Depository Institutions or Connecticut’s Innovation Banks. Examples include crypto-focused Custodia Bank and crypto exchange Kraken in Wyoming, plus traditional finance player Fnality US in Connecticut. Recently the scope was expanded to cover most state chartered banks with stablecoin subsidiaries, possibly due to concerns about competitive advantages.

Simultaneously, the clause was substantially tightened. The initial version allowed state chartered banks to provide money transmission and custody services nationwide for any type of asset, which would include cryptocurrencies. Now these activities can only be conducted by the stablecoin subsidiary, and while Section 16(d) doesn’t explicitly limit services to stablecoins, the GENIUS Act currently restricts issuers to stablecoin related activities.

However, the House STABLE Act takes a more permissive approach, allowing regulators to decide which non-stablecoin activities are permitted. If the House version prevails in reconciliation, it could result in a significant expansion of allowed nationwide banking activities beyond stablecoins.

Is it that bad?

As originally drafted, the clause seemed overly permissive.

The amended clause makes sense for stablecoin issuers. They want to have a single regulator and be able to provide the stablecoin services throughout the United States. But it also leans into the perception outside of crypto that this is just another form of regulatory arbitrage.

The controversy over Section 16(d) reflects concerns about creating a regulatory gap that allows banks to operate interstate without the oversight typically required from either federal or state authorities. As the two Congressional chambers work toward reconciliation, lawmakers must decide whether stablecoin legislation should include provisions that effectively reduce traditional banking oversight requirements.

Source

šŸ™ Donations Accepted šŸ™

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

šŸ’³ PayPal:Ā 
1) Simply scan the QR code below šŸ“²
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian

šŸ”— Crypto – Support via Coinbase Wallet to: [email protected]

Or Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

Your generosity keeps this mission alive, for all! NamastĆ© šŸ™ Crypto Michael ⚔ Ā The Dinarian

Read full Article
post photo preview
Dubai regulator VARA classifies RWA issuance as licensed activity
Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority (VARA) leads global regulatory framework - makes RWA issuance licensed activity in Dubai.

Real-world assets (RWAs) issuance is now licensed activity in Dubai.

~ Actual law.
~ Not a legal gray zone.
~ Not a whitepaper fantasy.

RWA issuance and listing on secondary markets is defined under binding crypto regulation.

It’s execution by Dubai.

Irina HeaverĀ explained:

ā€œRWA issuance is no longer theoretical. It’s now a regulatory reality.ā€

VARA defined:

- RWAs are classified as Asset-Referenced Virtual Assets (ARVAs)

- Secondary market trading is permitted under VARA license

- Issuers need capital, audits, and legal disclosures

- Regulated broker-dealers and exchanges can now onboard and trade them

This closes the gap that killed STOs in 2018.

No more tokenization without venues.
No more assets without liquidity.

UAE is doing what Switzerland, Singapore, and Europe still haven’t:

Creating enforceable frameworks for RWA tokenization that actually work.

Matthew White, CEO of VARA, said it perfectly:

ā€œTokenization will redefine global finance in 2025.ā€

He’s not exaggerating.

$500B+ market predicted next year.

And the UAE just gave it legal rails.

~Real estate.
~Private credit.
~Shariah-compliant products.

Everything is in play.

This is how you turn hype into infrastructure.

What Dubai is doing now is 3 years ahead of everyone else.

Founders, investors, ecosystem builders:

You want to build real-world assets onchain.

Don’t waste another year waiting for clarity.

Come to Dubai.

It’s already here.

Ā 

Source

šŸ™ Donations Accepted šŸ™

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:

šŸ’³ PayPal:Ā 
1) Simply scan the QR code below šŸ“²
2) or visit https://www.paypal.me/thedinarian

šŸ”— Crypto – Support via Coinbase Wallet to: [email protected]

Or Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

Your generosity keeps this mission alive, for all! NamastĆ© šŸ™ Crypto Michael ⚔ Ā The Dinarian

Ā 

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals