Dinarian888
News • Business • Investing & Finance
?The Dinarian exists because the truth deserves a platform. Covering cryptocurrency, blockchain technology, global agendas, emerging science, and consciousness — because everything is connected and people deserve to know it. Knowledge is power. ?
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
-- PUBLIC NOTICE: BIRTH CERTIFICATE TRUST --

šŸ‘‰ (The Truth Shall Set You Free-Dinarian)

This reveals the specific section of the United States Municipal Code where the Birth Certificate Trust was established in 1995 and details the context of its creation.

A British Territorial corporation doing business as "the United States of America, Inc." went bankrupt in 1933. This has been publicly admitted in many places, including the Minutes of the Conference of Governors meeting on March 6, 1933.

All the British Territorial U.S. Citizens were bankrupted as franchises of this corporation.

So, as you can see, the Puerto Rican Bankruptcy Trustees set their individual estates aside in a sort of legal limbo.

They––members of the U.S. Military and Dependents–– could, if they wished, claim their "reversionary trust interest" as Americans.

As the U.S. Military had incorrectly misidentified all of us as their "dependents," we were all cast into this same limbo.

And all our estates were classified as belonging to "infant decedents".

What this means is either:
(1) the estate of a baby who literally died in infancy; or,
(2) the estate of a baby whose birthright estate was waived.

In our case, our birthright estates were waived by our unwitting Mothers when they signed the "birth registration" paperwork at the hospital.

That allowed us to be human trafficked on paper and deprived us of our birthright as Americans.

Instead, we were assigned the political status of Puerto Ricans, U.S. Citizenship, and, please note. Puerto Rico is a British Commonwealth nation.

None of this was lawful or legal, either one. It was not disclosed to our Mothers. It was not disclosed to us when we were older.

In order to "legalize" this mammoth crime and fraud, they allowed the victims (if they knew about it) to assert their reversionary trust interest––that is, reclaim their birthright estate, so long as they rolled it over into the United States (Trust)––and what is the United States Trust?

Remember that the Confederation and the Federal Republic were both rendered inoperable in 1861? And all their assets were rolled up into trusts?

State Trusts were created at the State level, and the United States Trust(s) were created at the Federal level.

From the foreign perspective of the Perpetrators of this giant con game, we are all assets of the United States Trust and that was where our birthright estate was cashiered.

We could choose to be bankrupt with them, or we could choose to return to our birthright status and roll all our assets into the United States Trust.

We had to assert our "reversionary trust interest"––that is, assert our natural political status and reject being classified as British Territorial U.S. Citizens.

If you think about it, you've seen these trusts all your life:
惻Northern Trust.
惻Southern Trust.
惻U.S. Trust.
惻United States Trust.
惻United States Trustees.

The person to be notified at that time, was the head of the Internal Revenue Service.

Since then, the person(s) to be notified are:
惻the United States Secretary of State
惻the United States Trustees
惻the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service

What I didn't go on to explain was the "out of the frying pan and into the fire" nature of this partial remedy.

Yes, you can assert your natural political birthright, but they will only allow you to claim to be a United States (Federal Republic) Trust chattel and still not recognize that you are an actual American and not obligatorily attached to the long-vanished American Federal Republic.

The purported "remedy" leaves you in a false political status either way.

Either you are mischaracterized as if you were a bankrupt Puerto Rican U.S. Citizen, or you are mischaracterized as a United States Trust chattel, and they control the United States Trust.

The Truth, of course, is that you were never a U.S. Citizen and never a United States Citizen of the Federal Republic, either.

You were naturally and factually an American born in one of the States of the Union and take your nationality from the State where you were born.

All this impersonation and mischaracterization going on in international and global jurisdictions claiming to own you, own your body, own your name and all other assets, etc., and them, claiming to be your Trustees and Representatives, is all fraud.

The claim that your American Government was in interregnum is also a form of fraud. The American Government was never called into Session because it was never informed of the circumstances. Our Federal Employees owed that Due Diligence to the American People, but instead, they acted in Breach of Trust.

So, I can, and I have, claimed my inherited "reversionary trust interest" in the Federal Republic and Confederation, but as the presumed Donor of all my assets held in the United States Trust(s), I have also asked my purported Trustees to dissolve the trust.

The Donor can require the dissolution of the United States Trust(s); the beneficiary can only request it.

There you have it.

They stole my identity and finagled to get my Mother to waive my birthright estate as an American. They trafficked my stolen identity into the international jurisdiction of the sea and pretended that I was a U.S. Citizen or Dependent thereof. As a remedy, they allowed me to adopt a different foreign political status, that of a United States Citizen (a denizen of the vanished Federal Republic), and having done that, they cashiered my assets in the United States Trust(s)––which they control, except for one thing.

Via this operation, I became a Donor, and a Donor can always dissolve the trust.

So there is a logic to everything, and now you know why they are so desperately trying to "disqualify" me and, at the same time, so frantic to "restore" the Federal Republic––a job they can't do because they lack the standing as Americans to do it.

Remember, they are all U.S. Citizens. They never asserted their reversionary trust interest. They were never recognizable as United States Citizens of the Federal Republic. And as I have continued my march home to Wisconsin in the character of a Federal Dual Citizen as originally intended, they've all been left stopgobbered.

All my actions have been recorded and all claims cured, everything given Due Process. So, even in their whacky fictional world, they have no cause to complain nor any recourse.

What goes around, comes around. They outsmarted themselves. They left themselves ineligible to "restore" anything American or claim anything American. They certainly don't have any superior claim to the Union States and States of the Union. Any old Great-Grandma from Wisconsin who stands as a Donor is first in line, first in time, and has a superior claim to all American assets.

So long as I was leaving their fraudulent con game behind, I made sure to take all my countrymen with me so that any American who doesn't actually work for the Federal Government Subcontractors and isn't knowingly and voluntarily adopting their foreign citizenship(s), is free to declare their American State National political status and come home to truth and sanity.

Even those Americans currently working for a Federal Subcontractor need not worry about this. When they quit or retire, they can come back home to their natural political status like anyone else.

To recap:

Undeclared Foreign Agents working for European interests took "me"––my Given Name––to sea as a baby only three weeks old, and registered me as a British Territorial U.S. Citizen under British Crown copyright. As a remedy for this (and to "legalize" their own actions), they "allowed" me to claim my reversionary trust interest as a Donor to the United States Trust(s)––which I did. Having arrived back in the American domain, I then exercised my position as a Donor to dissolve the Trust in favor of my Beneficiary, a little ole American Lawful Person born in Wisconsin on June 6th, 1956.

To symbolically record this in terms that must be understood, I initiated a name change from ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER (the Municipal Trust documented in the first paragraph of page 19) to Anna Maria Riezinger (the name of the "lost" British Territorial Person, which is the same as the name of my Lawful State Person).

I then changed the venue to land jurisdiction by recording the Name Change and posted my Notice with a Certified Copy of the recording to the Court that granted the name change––thus returning full circle back to the (Territorial) State of Wisconsin––where I had been snatched as a baby––and then into the State Trust, as a State Trust Asset Donor. As Donor, I ordered my "presumed" Trustees to dissolve the Alaska State Trust and the Wisconsin State Trust, too, and set me and my assets free, returning all my purloined assets to me and to my control, as I am a living, breathing woman, a Wisconsinite, in no need of their services.

These foreign "federal" corporations here on our shores to provide "essential government services" created State-of-State franchises for themselves and had them act as Public Usufructs under color of law. One of these foreign State-of-State franchise corporations, doing business as the State of Wisconsin, latched onto my Given Name and used it to create a franchise named after me for their own benefit: Anna Maria Riezinger (Inc.) defined as a British Territorial Person and U.S. Citizen. They owe me the Usufructuary Duty to hold me harmless from any charges or harm resulting from the existence of this franchise entity.

Similarly, the Municipal Government did the same thing, only their action resulted in the creation of a Municipal franchise corporation named after me: ANNA MARIA RIEZINGER and numerous derivative corporations, such as: ANNA M RIEZINGER (a public transmitting utility) and RIEZINGER, ANNA M (the estate of a "lost" sailor in the British Merchant Marines) and so on. All these are considered "citizens of the United States". Again, those who created these franchises and named them after me owe me the Usufructuary Duty to hold me harmless from any charges or harms resulting from the existence of these corporate franchises named after me.

Instead, both of these dishonest "service providers" reorganized as commercial and municipal corporations, respectively, have used these fictional franchises to impersonate me, to subject me under foreign law, and they have enforced laws and fines and fees and performances and mortgages and taxes that I never owed using these devices.

These are all deliberate crimes of personage and barratry against their actual American employers. This has been done in Gross Breach of Trust and Violation of their Service Contracts––that is, The Constitution of the United States of America and The Constitution of the United States.

The more interesting thing about all this, aside from the convoluted and endless impersonations and the misuse and abuse of trusts to purloin and control assets that never belonged to the perpetrators, is that all that is truly required of me to bust this fraud scheme into a million little pieces, is my clearly stated intention on the record, so here it is in this Court of Record: Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents:

It is my intent and act to dissolve all foreign public and private trusts containing assets belonging to me and I direct all my assets to be returned to me, to my possession, and my control.

It is my intent to live my life as a freeborn American, a Wisconsinite in full possession of my land and soil, my water and air, together with my Good Name under my copyright, and with all my assets in all jurisdictions, both public and private––meaning all my physical and intellectual and energetic assets––in my direct control and possession, intact and immune from any foreign legal presumptions or attacks of any kind.

My intent is to dissolve all foreign-generated trusts and bonds that have been foisted off on me and used to cashier my assets for the benefit of foreign interests, both public and private. My intent is to clear the air and vacate the seas so that there is no longer any question about my identity, my political status, my standing, nor any cause to think that I have abandoned my Natural and Unalienable Rights as an American in favor of any foreign government.

It is my will and intent that all Americans who have been mistreated, impersonated, commandeered, deceived, defrauded, and subjected under unconscionable contracts obtained under color of law and enforced under False Pretense of War receive back their assets and that their unincorporated American Government is recognized as the true and lawful Government of this country. So said, so signed, and so sealed.

Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
August 5th 2024

post photo preview
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
RFK Jr: "The Pandemics are coming from labs. ALL OF THEM... Lyme, COVID, RSV, HIV & Spanish Flu came out of a vaccine lab." ā˜ ļø šŸ’‰

"Gain-of-Function Vaccine research has created the worst plagues in our history."

"We can go down the whole list of diseases... It’s just a disaster. It’s given us no benefits. It’s given us everything from Lyme disease to Covid, and many many other diseases. RSV, which is now one of the biggest killers of children, came out of a vaccine lab."

"There’s strong evidence that even Spanish flu came from vaccine research."

"There’s plenty of evidence that HIV also came from a vaccine gain-of-function lab program. "

"The 'PANDEMICS' are coming from labs... ALL OF THEM."

00:04:00
šŸš€The industry has gotten incredible at teaching robots

šŸš€The industry has gotten incredible at teaching robots to move, sprint, and imitate body dynamics. But as Michael Parker (@bittensormax) points out in The UMI Thesis, there’s still a massive missing piece in Physical AI: Motion Understanding.

✨ Key Takeaways:

šŸ”¹Looking Human vs. Understanding Humans: Robots can execute impressive physical feats, but they still struggle to reliably read non-verbal human cues in context.

šŸ”¹Motion is Meaning: A gesture, hesitation, or glance changes completely depending on posture, timing, and surrounding context.

šŸ”¹Beyond Pixels: True intelligence requires mapping human intent and sequence across time—not just processing raw frames.

šŸ”¹The UMI Intelligence Layer: As robots enter hospitals, factories, homes, and stores, Bittensor’s SN78 @umi_sn78 UMI (Universal Motion Intelligence) aims to own the critical layer that translates human movement into real meaning.

The future of robotics isn't just about how machines move—it's about how ...

00:04:54
Follow The MoneyšŸŽÆ

Israel Exposed launched 🤯Who Funded The Genocide🤯

A searchable database tracking pro-Israel political money in U.S. politics.

It includes:

šŸ‘‰ 11,168 named donors + employers

šŸ‘‰ 523 members of Congress + funding

šŸ‘‰ House & Senate votes on arms-transfer resolutions

šŸ‘‰165 candidates with network-backed fundraising pages

šŸ‘‰105 recipient committees linked to FEC filings

00:01:36
🚨 Chutes is being framed as a Hyperliquid-style breakout for decentralized AI inference, with live revenue, verified GPU infrastructure, and a direct challenge to centralized cloud AI 🚨

Chutes is gaining attention as a decentralized AI inference platform that claims to combine real usage, cryptographic verification, confidential computing, and open-source infrastructure into a working production system. The thesis is simple: instead of trusting Big Tech clouds with AI workloads, users get a distributed compute layer built around verification and privacy.

šŸ”‘ Key points

šŸ”¹ Chutes is live in production and reportedly scaled to more than 1,170 active GPU nodes, including large numbers of Nvidia H200s and Blackwell-class hardware.

šŸ”¹ The platform says it has processed nearly 38 trillion tokens since launch across 53 deployed applications and more than 700,000 registered users.

šŸ”¹ The team reportedly cut unprofitable usage programs, reduced total token volume, and still improved revenue efficiency, with revenue per GPU rising sharply after removing subsidized traffic.

šŸ”¹ Chutes is using post-quantum cryptography, trusted execution environments, and Nvidia confidential ...

🚨 Chutes is being framed as a Hyperliquid-style breakout for decentralized AI inference, with live revenue, verified GPU infrastructure, and a direct challenge to centralized cloud AI 🚨
🚨 JPMorgan’s criticism of the CLARITY Act is fueling a fresh power struggle over who gets to write America’s crypto rules 🚨

A new clash is emerging between legacy finance and crypto legislation after JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon reportedly warned that the CLARITY Act could let crypto firms offer bank-like products without bank-level oversight. The dispute is quickly turning into a larger fight over regulation, competitiveness, and who controls the future architecture of digital finance in the United States.

šŸ”‘ Key points

šŸ”¹ Jamie Dimon reportedly called the CLARITY Act a threat to the financial system, arguing it could allow crypto firms to offer yield-like products while avoiding the capital, reserve, and oversight burdens traditional banks face.

šŸ”¹ Senator Cynthia Lummis pushed back publicly, framing the issue as a global strategic race and warning that if the U.S. does not set digital asset standards, other powers will.

šŸ”¹ The core tension is whether the bill creates legitimate regulatory clarity or simply opens the door to regulatory arbitrage for crypto platforms operating outside the traditional banking...

🚨 JPMorgan’s criticism of the CLARITY Act is fueling a fresh power struggle over who gets to write America’s crypto rules 🚨
šŸ‘‰ Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? šŸ”œ

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

šŸ‘‰ Here’s what you need to know:

šŸ’  'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
šŸ’  Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
šŸ’  Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
šŸ’  Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
šŸ’  Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

šŸ‘‰ What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto šŸ‘‰txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚨 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

šŸ‘‰ Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

The future of cybersecurity isn't about blocking yesterday's threats—it's about defeating tomorrow's before they are even built. šŸ›”ļøāš”

​The ultimate competitive edge belongs to defenders who can instantly ingest unique zero-days, automatically generate the attack strains that don't exist yet, and ship bulletproof detections to the front lines ahead of the breach. šŸ”®šŸš€

​As legacy security platforms degrade under the weight of novel AI-driven threats, the world’s largest financial institutions won't scatter their bets. They will consolidate on the single provider capable of delivering this predictive defense at global scale. šŸ¦šŸ“Š

​The Engine Behind the Defense:

​To stay ahead, that provider needs a constant, unrelenting supply of edge-case attacks. A decentralized subnet is the only architecture built to fuel this machine—paying a global swarm of attackers to continuously probe, create, and supply novel threats around the clock. šŸŒšŸšŸ’„

​Self-evolving security is ...

šŸš€ Navigating Bittensor yield just got effortless! šŸ§ āš”ļø

If you’ve been looking to optimize your $TAO positions across subnets without the headache of manual rebalancing or technical friction, @TrustedStake is changing the game! šŸ’Ž

The new Quickstart Guide breaks down how to get seamless exposure to top-tier AI strategies:

šŸŽÆ One-Click Index Exposure: Access curated subnet baskets (Universe, Top 15, and specialized sectors) in seconds.

šŸ›” Non-Custodial Security: Retain complete asset control while leveraging Substrate proxy accounts—keeping your primary stash safe in cold storage.

šŸ”„ Automated Rebalancing & Yield Optimization: Smart TWAP execution, validator selection, and root reinvestment handle the heavy lifting to maximize your alpha.

šŸ“ˆ Block-Level Transparency: Real-time PnL metrics and full on-chain visibility right from your dashboard.

šŸ‘‡Check out the full walkthrough to get startedšŸ‘‡
...

post photo preview

šŸŽÆ Leadpoet’s new Arena could change how businesses find their next customers šŸŽÆ

Leadpoet is launching an Arena where AI agents compete to identify companies most likely to buy, turning sales intelligence into a measurable performance competition.

šŸ”‘ Key points

šŸ”¹ Agents compete on lead quality: Systems are evaluated on whether the prospects they identify show genuine buying intent.

šŸ”¹ Better than list generation: The goal is to find likely customers rather than produce large volumes of low-quality contacts.

šŸ”¹ Real-world signals matter: Agents can analyze company activity, business changes, hiring, technology use, market behavior, and other indicators.

šŸ”¹ Performance becomes measurable: Agents can be ranked based on precision, relevance, conversion potential, and downstream sales outcomes.

šŸ”¹ Competition can improve intelligence: Different agents may identify different signals, creating a wider search across potential customers.

šŸ”¹ Sales teams gain prioritization: Businesses ...

post photo preview
Revolut Leak Shows the Cost of Constant ID Collection
Revolut’s mistake is the news, but the bigger problem is the growing number of companies being encouraged or required to keep copies of our most sensitive identity documents.

Online bank Revolut has revealed that it gave out sensitive personal and financial information of an undisclosed number of its customers in response to a fake government request.

The information that was handed over to an ā€œunauthorized third partyā€ reportedly includes names, dates of birth, occupations, addresses, phone numbers, account numbers, transaction histories (including Bitcoin), and even copies of government-issued IDs and onboarding verification selfies.

Revolut claims that derived biometric face data was not.

The company said that the data was handed over in response to an email that came from a real government agency’s domain, but was not actually sent or authorized by that agency.

The email passed several authentication checks (SPF, DKIM, and DMARC) that are designed to establish the authenticity of a message’s origin and integrity, but do not verify the legitimacy of the legal request itself.

Revolut said that it complied with the request ā€œunder the reasonable belief that it was an authentic government agency requestā€ – and only later found out that it was not.

Revolut said it later realized its mistake, blocked the email address, and reported the incident to the relevant authorities.

Revolut said that only a ā€œlimitedā€ number of its customers were affected by the data leak, and that the company’s systems were not hacked, nor was any money stolen.

The story broke on September 11 when Revolut customers started receiving an email notice about a data leak, and the news was picked up by media outlets the following day.

Revolut notice explaining customer identity and financial data was shared after an unauthorized government email request.

The reason this is a recurring problem is that companies are keeping highly sensitive information about their customers’ identities, and sometimes even financial transactions, for a long time, and this data is then available to be disclosed to third parties – either in response to valid legal requests, or, as in the case of Revolut, fake ones.

One reason for this is know your customer (KYC) and anti-money laundering (AML) rules. Revolut’s current UK customer privacy notice spells it out: the company generally keeps personal data of UK customers for no more than seven years after the relationship ends, and sometimes longer – for legal reasons.

This means that even if you close your account, your identity documents don’t disappear.

And while the incident with Revolut happened in the financial sector, it’s by no means the only one that requires customers to hand over sensitive identity information. Discord, a popular chat service, said in an October 9, 2025 security update that government ID photos of approximately 70,000 users may have been exposed after a third-party customer service provider got hacked.

This was not a financial service, nor the same type of attack. But the result was similar – because the underlying business process was the same: requiring and storing sensitive identity documents. In the case of Discord, these were used to review age-related appeals.

It’s hard to do anything about a copy of your old passport, or a photo of your face, or a record of your past transactions. These can be used to identify and profile you, and can be used to carry out targeted fraud. And this can happen even if the initial disclosure didn’t result in financial loss.

The more companies are forced to collect and store such information, and the more of it they have, the more opportunities there are for this data to be leaked, either by the company itself or a third party it works with. That's what makes governments' push for more ID checks just to access ordinary parts of life so reckless.

Source

šŸ™To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

šŸ‘‰ Cashapp: $thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ PayPal: Scan the QR code below šŸ“² or Click Here:Ā 

šŸ‘‡ Crypto Donations šŸ‘‡

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
This Is The Income A Family Needs To Live Comfortably In Every US State

Here’s the short version of what it takes for a family of four to live comfortably in 2026 by state:

In Massachusetts, you’d need nearly $330,000 a year - the highest figure in the entire country. Only three states clear the $300,000 mark: Massachusetts, Hawaii, and California. At the other end of the spectrum, Mississippi is the most affordable at about $188,000. That’s a full $142,000 less than what you’d need in Massachusetts.

So… how much does a family of four need in your state?

This map shows the pre-tax income a household with two working adults and two kids needs to live comfortably in every U.S. state.

The numbers come fromĀ SmartAssetĀ (as of February 2026). They’re based on the familiar 50/30/20 budget: 50% for necessities, 30% for discretionary spending, and 20% for savings or other goals. These aren’t bare-minimum survival numbers—they’re what it takes to live pretty well while still putting money aside.

And asĀ Visual CapitalistĀ notes,Ā Massachusetts sits at the very top of that list.Ā Massachusetts tops the ranking, with a family of four needing $329,555 per year to meet the 50/30/20 benchmark.

Hawaii follows at $313,165, while California ranks third at $302,682.

Rank State Income needed for family of four (2026)

  • 1 - Massachusetts - $329,555
  • 2 - Hawaii - $313,165
  • 3 - California - $302,682
  • 4 - Connecticut - $298,189
  • 5 - New Jersey - $295,110
  • 6 - New York - $291,533
  • 7 - Colorado - $283,213
  • 8 - Washington - $281,798
  • 9 - Oregon - $280,966
  • 10 - Vermont - $280,384
  • 11 - Alaska - $272,064
  • 12 - New Hampshire - $267,904
  • 13 - Rhode Island - $264,659
  • 14 - Minnesota - $263,078
  • 15 - Maryland - $257,837
  • 16 - Maine - $250,931
  • 17 - Montana - $249,434
  • 18 - Pennsylvania - $247,936
  • 19 - Illinois - $244,109
  • 20 - Virginia - $242,944
  • 21 - Nevada - $242,278
  • 22 - Indiana - $241,696
  • 23 - Wisconsin - $238,451
  • 24 - Arizona - $236,870
  • 25 - Utah - $235,789
  • 26 - Delaware - $228,134
  • 27 - Ohio - $226,221
  • 28 - Idaho - $226,054
  • 29 - Florida - $223,392
  • 30 - New Mexico - $223,142
  • 31 - Nebraska - $223,059
  • 32 - Missouri - $217,734
  • 33 - Georgia - $214,573
  • 34 - Michigan - $214,323
  • 35 - South Carolina - $212,909
  • 36 - North Carolina - $212,410
  • 37 - Wyoming - $212,410
  • 38 - Oklahoma - $211,910
  • 39 - North Dakota - $210,496
  • 40 - Kansas - $207,917
  • 41 - Iowa - $204,422
  • 42 - Texas - $203,424
  • 43 - West Virginia - $202,592
  • 44 - South Dakota - $201,760
  • 45 - Alabama - $198,931
  • 46 - Louisiana - $197,933
  • 47 - Tennessee - $197,267
  • 48 - Arkansas - $195,437
  • 49 - Kentucky - $194,854
  • 50 - Mississippi - $187,533

Connecticut, New Jersey, and New York aren't far behind, bringing the number of states with comfortable-income thresholds above $290,000 to six.

Colorado and Vermont Make the Top 10

As expected, many of the highest income thresholds are concentrated in the Northeast and along the West Coast.

However, Colorado has the seventh-highest threshold in the country at $283,213, ranking above Washington and Oregon.

Vermont rounds out the top 10 at $280,384, despite having theĀ second-smallest populationĀ of any U.S. state. Meanwhile, nearby states like New Hampshire, Maine, and Rhode Island all fall outside the top 10.

Just Six States Come in Below $200,000

Despite theĀ wide range in living costsĀ across the country, only six states have a comfortable-income threshold below $200,000 for a family of four.

Mississippi ranks lowest at $187,533, followed by Kentucky.Ā The states of Arkansas, Tennessee, Louisiana, and Alabama also fall below the $200,000 mark.

The gap between Massachusetts and Mississippi exceeds $142,000 per year, meaning the Massachusetts benchmark is about 76% higher.

Source

šŸ™To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

šŸ‘‰ Cashapp: $thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ PayPal: Scan the QR code below šŸ“² or Click Here:Ā 

šŸ‘‡ Crypto Donations Always Welcome šŸ‘‡

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
post photo preview
šŸ¤–Can Decentralized AI Stop Big Tech from Owning the Future of Robotics?šŸ¤–
The race to build the future of robotics is no longer just about robots. It's about who controls the intelligence behind them.
Ā 
Over the last three years, a small group of companies has emerged as the backbone of the AI revolution. Microsoft provides cloud infrastructure. NVIDIA supplies the chips. Google, OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and others develop the models. Together, they control much of the compute, data, and software stack powering modern AI.
Ā 
Now that AI is moving into the physical world, many are asking a bigger question:
Ā 
Will these same companies end up controlling robotics too?
Ā 
It's a valid concern.
Ā 
The latest generation of robots relies on enormous amounts of compute, simulation, training data, and foundation models. Many robotics startups today are built on infrastructure provided by large technology companies. NVIDIA's Omniverse is becoming a key simulation environment for robot training. Microsoft Azure is powering the training of robotics foundation models. Physical AI startups increasingly depend on hyperscale cloud infrastructure to train and deploy intelligent systems. Recent partnerships across the industry show just how central Big Tech has become to robotics development.
But while Big Tech is building the highways, another movement is trying to ensure it doesn't own every destination.
Ā 
That movement is decentralized AI.
Ā 
Why Decentralized AI Exists
Ā 
The idea behind decentralized AI is simple. Instead of a handful of companies owning the models, compute infrastructure, data pipelines, and intelligence networks, these resources are distributed across thousands of participants.
Ā 
This means anyone can contribute compute, contribute models, validate outputs and can participate.
The most visible example today is the decentralized AI network known as Bittensor (@bittensor). The network has evolved into a large ecosystem of specialized AI markets called subnets, where participants compete to provide useful machine intelligence and are rewarded based on performance. Rather than relying on a single company, intelligence is generated and validated by a distributed network of miners and validators.
Ā 
Think of it as an attempt to build an open marketplace for AI instead of a world where intelligence is rented from a few centralized providers.
Ā 
Why This Matters for Robotics
Ā 
Robotics has a unique problem. Unlike chatbots, robots operate in the physical world. They need to perceive environments, make decisions, move safely and they need to learn continuously.
Ā 
The challenge is that collecting and training on real-world robotic data is incredibly expensive. That's one reason large companies have such an advantage. They can afford the compute, simulation environments, and data infrastructure needed to train robotics models at scale.
Ā 
This is where decentralized systems become interesting.
Ā 
Instead of one company collecting all the data and training all the models, decentralized networks could allow thousands of contributors to participate in building robotic intelligence.
Ā 
Imagine a future where:
  • Warehouse robots contribute operational data.
  • Delivery robots contribute navigation data.
  • Factory robots contribute manipulation data.
  • Developers contribute models.
  • Validators evaluate performance.
The resulting intelligence becomes a shared network rather than a proprietary asset.
Ā 
That vision is beginning to emerge.
Ā 
Bittensor's Move Toward Physical AI
Ā 
While many people associate Bittensor (@bittensor) with language models and AI services, parts of the ecosystem are increasingly exploring embodied intelligence and robotics.
Ā 
One example is Kinitro, a subnet focused on incentivizing the training and evaluation of embodied AI systems. The goal is to create competitive environments where developers build robotic intelligence and are rewarded based on performance.
Ā 
The broader Bittensor ecosystem has also expanded into compute marketplaces, distributed inference systems, bandwidth infrastructure, and AI coordination layers that could eventually support robotics workloads. Several subnets now focus on decentralized compute, confidential inference, data transfer, and model training, critical components for future robotic systems.
Ā 
In other words, the pieces are starting to appear.
Ā 
Not a decentralized robot network yet.
Ā 
But the infrastructure that could support one.
Ā 
Beyond Bittensor: The Rise of Physical AI Networks
Ā 
Bittensor isn't alone.
Ā 
Across the industry, researchers and builders are experimenting with decentralized approaches to physical AI.
Ā 
New research published in 2026 introduced the concept of DAO-enabled decentralized physical AI, or DePAI. The idea combines robotics, decentralized infrastructure, AI models, governance systems, and human oversight into a single framework. Instead of centralized control, robots and physical infrastructure could be coordinated through transparent rules and distributed ownership models.
Ā 
At the same time, developers are exploring decentralized operating systems for robots that allow machines to communicate directly with each other and with distributed compute resources. These architectures are designed to make robotic systems more resilient and less dependent on a single cloud provider.
Ā 
The goal is not simply decentralization for its own sake.
Ā 
The goal is resilience.
Ā 
If one server fails, the system continues.
Ā 
If one company disappears, the network survives.
Ā 
If one participant leaves, innovation continues.
Ā 
But Here's the Reality
Ā 
Decentralized AI faces the same challenge every decentralized technology faces.
Ā 
Big Tech has resources. A lot of resources.
Ā 
Training advanced robotics models requires enormous compute budgets, sophisticated simulation environments, access to specialized hardware, and vast amounts of real-world data.
Ā 
That's why many robotics startups still partner with major cloud providers and AI companies. It's often the fastest path to deployment.
Ā 
And there are legitimate concerns about whether decentralized networks can maintain quality, reliability, and security at the scale required for industrial robotics. Even researchers studying decentralized AI systems have highlighted risks around concentration, incentives, governance, and network security.
Ā 
The challenge isn't just decentralizing intelligence.
Ā 
It's decentralizing intelligence while maintaining performance.
Ā 
That's much harder.
Ā 
The Most Likely Outcome
Ā 
The future probably won't be fully centralized. And it probably won't be fully decentralized either. Instead, we're likely heading toward a hybrid model.
Ā 
Large technology companies will continue providing chips, cloud infrastructure, simulation platforms, and foundational research.
Ā 
At the same time, decentralized AI networks will emerge as alternative coordination layers where intelligence, data, and economic value can be shared more openly.
Ā 
The companies building robots may use NVIDIA hardware.
Ā 
Train on Azure.
Ā 
Run foundation models from OpenAI.
Ā 
But they may also participate in decentralized data networks, decentralized compute markets, and decentralized intelligence protocols.
Ā 
The future of robotics could end up looking less like a monopoly and more like an ecosystem.
Ā 
The Bigger Question
Ā 
The real question isn't whether decentralized AI can eliminate Big Tech.
Ā 
It can't.
Ā 
At least not anytime soon.
Ā 
The real question is whether decentralized AI can prevent a future where a handful of companies control every robot, every model, every dataset, and every decision made by the machines operating around us.
Ā 
As robots become workers, assistants, delivery drivers, factory operators, and even economic agents, that question becomes increasingly important.
Ā 
Because the battle for the future of robotics is no longer about hardware.
Ā 
It's about who owns the intelligence.
Ā 
And that battle is just getting started.
Ā 
Ā 

šŸ™To support my work, Helping to keep the signal high and the noise low:

šŸ‘‰ Cashapp: $thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/thedinarian

šŸ‘‰ PayPal: Scan the QR code below šŸ“² or Click Here:Ā 

šŸ‘‡ Crypto Donations šŸ‘‡

XRP: r9pid4yrQgs6XSFWhMZ8NkxW3gkydWNyQX
XLM: GDMJF2OCHN3NNNX4T4F6POPBTXK23GTNSNQWUMIVKESTHMQM7XDYAIZT
XDC: xdcc2C02203C4f91375889d7AfADB09E207Edf809A6

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals