What's behind the fox? It's you. It always has been, and now it will be more than ever.”
For over 8 years and millions of users annually, MetaMask has been the gateway to crypto self-custody, empowering people to control their own assets, build freely, and engage with web3 on their terms: in short, to have agency in their digital lives. The future of web3 depends on self-custody: for it to become the default choice for users, we need to make wallets more intuitive, connected, powerful, and safe.
Today, we’d like to share our near-term product roadmap: guided by our vision for how crypto wallets can evolve to support mainstream adoption by offering services that are better than a bank, and how MetaMask is transforming to be capable of playing a central role in a user’s financial life.
MetaMask, then and now
MetaMask was founded in 2016 supporting just a single chain: Ethereum. As the first browser-extension based wallet, we established many of the patterns that define web3 interactions today: an API for websites to propose Ethereum interactions to the user. A connection to a trusted blockchain source (Infura) so new users didn’t have to sync the entire chain. We soon added the ability for users to add their own custom network RPCs, custom tokens, and eventually even a plugin system called Snaps, all in the spirit of ensuring users can interact with any decentralized protocols they want… a spirit that remains to this day.
We’ve come a long way since then: with millions of users annually, mainstream adoption seemingly within grasp, an improving regulatory environment, and key technology unlocks on the horizon with Pectra—there is reason to be optimistic.
And we’re still really early.
But there are also challenges. We need to make web3 more usable, intuitive, and useful for everyone from power users to newcomers to crypto. The use cases are still limited. The number of networks is growing, and navigating them is complicated. Most importantly: we need to make wallets more powerful while also making them more secure.
To address these challenges, we’d like to share our near-term roadmap and some recent updates that have three primary goals:
Improve the user experience: make it easy
Connect everything, everywhere: make it seamless
Make wallets much more powerful and safe: make it good
Improving wallet and ecosystem UX
The foundation of our approach to the design of MetaMask is in balancing maximizing security while granting radical empowerment. While that has resulted in the most popular and secure wallet in web3, the user experience is still behind where we want it. We think we’re on the verge of unlocking some major improvements that will feel obvious in hindsight. We’re going to achieve this by making transactions smarter and simpler, abstracting away networks and gas, and by improving the core walletexperience.
Smarter and simpler transactions
At the heart of a crypto wallet’s experience is transactions. Traditional cryptography just had you signing and encrypting, which is a trivial operation that doesn’t require user review. In Ethereum, a signature can mean anything, from a vote to giving away your life savings, so the interpretability and performance of those transactions is critical to the product’s effectiveness. Also, the transaction is only valid once processed by a public network, which happens to have all sorts of adversaries in its “dark forest” who would be happy to play against you.
We introduced Smart Transactions in 2024. Enabled by default for new installs, Smart Transactions vastly improve the experience of swapping and transacting. Working behind the scenes to solve some technical limitations of a public mempool, Smart Transactions have resulted in an overall transaction success rate of 99.995%, including for Swaps (a type of transaction that has the worst reliability): this is 400x better than you might get on mainnet without Smart Transactions enabled. It’s 7000x more reliable than what’s typical for a user on Solana.
Smart Transactions also provide protection against front-running botsand MEV sandwich attacks: in July of 2024, $11 million in value was siphoned off of user transactions on mainnet. But among the millions of MetaMask users, that value was $5. You’re 400 times less likely to be affected by these bots when using MetaMask Swaps.
To make transactions simpler, we’re introducing ERC-5792 batched transactions, so users can perform common sequences of transactions like “Approve & Swap” in one click, saving them time, gas cost, and mental effort.
Goodbye, gas
Gas plays an important role in web3, but it’s another barrier for every user interaction. Users don’t want to think about another game mechanic every time they make an action, and often users don’t have ether to pay for gas: on mainnet, this interrupts ~25% of transactions. Having to hold a balance of a network token in every account you use is a complication that hinders onboarding. We have several features–launched and coming soon–that help make gas increasingly disappear to users.
First, we introduced gas-included Swaps, so users can swap two tokens without having to possess ETH in their account: the gas is included in their swap quote and is paid in the token they’re swapping.
Soon—in March—we’ll generalize this to all transactions, so to interact with dapps or send tokens, you can pay gas in whatever token you hold.
Longer term, we believe we can eliminate gas as a user-facing concern in nearly all interactions. (We’ll get to that!)
Abstracting networks
Our ecosystem has grown far beyond Ethereum mainnet, and new networks and communities are growing daily. The UX patterns that worked for a world with a single chain are insufficient in a rich, multichain world. To address this, we have a number of features live and upcoming that abstract networks and make the user experience seamless.
One old pain has been requiring users to switch networks when interacting with sites that connect to different networks. We eased this pain by allowing sites to suggest the network switch, and I’m relieved to say we finally have gotten rid of even this user friction.
Bonus features
In March, we’ll be adding support for multiple SRPs (Secret Recovery Phrases) in the wallet for the users who want to manage several distinct wallets without needing separate instances of MetaMask.
We’re also adding Profile Sync, so users can easily switch between browsers and devices and keep all their account names and settings the same. This will be available in extension in April, and mobile in May.
Improving the core wallet experience
Alongside the core refactors required to enable multiple network connections, we’re rolling out a set of UI changes that reimagine the wallet for a many-chain world. Our redesigned home screen can show a user all their assets across many networks on each account screen, greatly simplifying navigating many chains.
These same patterns apply to and enhance the experience of Snaps, our plugin system, so any blockchains you add via Snaps will be integrated as intuitively and seamlessly across MetaMask.
These changes will include an updated trading view, giving users more sophisticated charting tools.
These changes will be rolling out over the next month.
Connecting everything, everywhere
In 2024, MetaMask users connected to over 850 networks. Up to now, MetaMask has primarily supported EVM networks with non-EVM connectivity provided via third party Snaps.
The power of Snaps
Snaps allow for the permissionless addition of new networks and currencies. But there hasn’t been tight enough integration between our Snaps platform and our core wallet experience. So, we rebuilt the UI integration into the new multi-network home screen to permit much tighter native-like experiences.
To prove it out, we’re going to launch a couple networks to showcase how powerful this new system is, which will come built-in to MetaMask and feel just like any other natively supported network.
Hello, Bitcoin
Full bitcoin support is coming in Q3 this year: so users won’t need a separate wallet, or wrapped tokens, to hold bitcoin.
Here comes Solana
Coming sooner in May, we’re adding native Solana support to MetaMask, the first non-EVM chain supported out of the box. All MetaMask users will be able to buy, sell, swap, and interact with dapps across the entire Solana ecosystem. Existing Solana users will get access to the same security, reliability and rich features of MetaMask, along with access to all the chains you use with MetaMask today.
Connect to everything all at once with Multichain API
Our CAIP-25 multichain API will let dapps connect to more than one network simultaneously, EVM and non-EVM alike: a user will be able to connect to Ethereum, Linea, Solana, and Bitcoin networks all at once. This improves all sorts of use cases that involve multiple networks like portfolio rebalancing, bridging, or deploying and managing tokens on multiple chains at once. Expect the multichain API to launch in June.
Bringing crypto IRL with MetaMask Card
Crypto is all just numbers on a screen until you can use it. Traditional crypto offramps involve storing funds in a custodial exchange, transferring to a bank, and only then being able to spend those funds.
MetaMask Card solves the key industry UX challenge surrounding how to bring crypto IRL. Leveraging Mastercard’s payment network, MetaMask Card connects your self-custody wallet with millions of vendors around the world. You can be earning staking rewards or yield on your favorite protocol with your favorite tokens and have those funds available to spend anywhere that Mastercard is accepted with just a tap. This is more than just a convenience, this is the last missing piece in the essential feature set for crypto: connection back to the real world. You can get it and use it. The virtual card is available now in eligible countries and the physical Metal card will be available for select territories in April.
More powerful and safe: self custody, reimagined
While we can improve wallet UX, and connect everything together, there is still a gap between where we want to go and where we are.
One hurdle we have to overcome comes from the EOA—the externally owned account—which forms the basis for how users have interacted with everything.
Up until now, the industry has been defined by programmable money. Tokens are smart contracts that provide a set of rules to everyone, but those rules are one-size-fits-all. That one token contract defines what that token can do, what permissions you can grant from it, and any additional functionality must be defined by a contract you deposit the token into, which becomes an opaque machine that users can only trust in terms defined by that token’s contract. The EOAs that people use to hold their funds are bare rails that can’t be programmed.
We think we can do better.
While the EOA and programmable money has taken us a long way, the next era of web3 will be shaped by programmable accounts. Smart-contract-based accounts allow us to solve a number of problems: allowing new powerful uses of the assets you hold, while simultaneously improving security. When the user defines their terms from their own programmable account, we greatly expand how the user expresses their agency in ways that are enforced by their own code. In essence, programmable accounts are how we can make the wallet more powerful and safe, and deliver our vision for a self-custody wallet that can serve as the center of a user’s financial life.
Imagine a future
Meet Alice. The year is 2025. Alice holds her most valuable assets in a multisig wallet with some keys entirely offline, and used those keys to grant access to a $200 daily budget to a hot wallet that she uses every day, along with the ability to trade within the most popular tokens on the DEXes that ensure common price clearing, but without withdrawing more than the daily allowance from the account. This permission was easily reviewed and issued from offline signers, with no transaction fee or transaction processing latency.
From her hot account, Alice is able to set a limit order on a new DEX with an entirely readable confirmation which guarantees their offered price without needing to trust any external infrastructure to guess at or simulate the DEX’s behavior.Again, with no transaction fee or processing latency. Alice can then give a permission to an AI agent that will be able to trade on her behalf with the same token budget, in case it learns of a new token on social media that relates to her interests. Her funds are empowered by as many external agents as she can reliably trust, without needing to lock funds with them. Again, with no transaction fee or processing latency.
Alice is able to issue streaming token subscriptions, and spend directly from her preferred yield-bearing tokens anywhere Mastercard is accepted. The card issues her rewards, back to the same wallet, which are rebalanced according to her preferences automatically. Again, all of this with no transaction fees or processing latency.
A major hack begins draining user funds from one of the AI agents she’s subscribed to, but fortunately one of the security services that Alice’s wallet enabled by default was able to detect the first block of thefts, and revoke Alice’s permissions before she was affected, all while she slept soundly.
This is not a distant future vision: we’re building it.
EIP-7702 will ship in the Pectra hard fork—the upcoming upgrade to Ethereum. EIP-7702 will allow all EOAs to behave like smart accounts.
We authored ERC-7710 to define a standard interface for any smart account to grant arbitrary permissions: a critical interface enabling an open ecosystem of smart accounts and dapps that can request permissions from users.In the future, smart accounts that expose this interface could add privacy layers, compression schemes, or new ways of expressing users' intents, all while remaining compatible with sites that adopt this new connection standard.
We co-authored ERC-7715 to define an interface by which a website, app, or eventually anything might ask for a permission from your account. This can include any on-chain action, like token and NFT allowances, as well as streaming token subscriptions, and can support the wallet adding additional terms to the permission at approval time: an expiration time, an asset they expect to receive in exchange, or a security service that may revoke the terms. Granting these permissions requires no gas cost to grant, and are instant. They’re not needed onchain until they’re used. Sites can submit transactions on the user’s behalf; paid for from the granted permission.
How hot can cold be? Introducing MetaMask smart accounts
To realize all of the potential described above, we have built the MetaMask Delegation Framework. I like to call it the Gator (short for delegator). It allows us to grant open ended ERC-7710 permissions to other accounts, entirely offchain. We think it might be the most dynamic and powerful permission system you’ve ever used. In combination with the upgrades from Pectra, we can unlock these incredible new powers for all MetaMask accounts.
We’re building the Gator to allow MetaMask to receive ERC-7715 permissions requests, and let the user customize their approval with open-ended granularity. Thanks to EIP-7702, any MetaMask account will be able to grant the same permissions.
While permissions are great for reducing friction and enabling new use cases, we’ve also been exploring how we can use this account type to improve security. While a multisig is great for adding friction and review process to account actions, a multisig is only as safe as its actions are readable, so granting these account-defined permissions are a powerful way to ensure that multisig signers aren’t reliant on external simulation infrastructure to have confidence in what they’re signing.
Additionally, while multisigs are great at adding more layers of review, they can become cumbersome for approving smaller day to day operations that might be worth entrusting to a nimbler account. ERC-7710 delegations are a powerful tool for organizations to dynamically add new delegates that can perform arbitrary actions, which are always expressed in user-readable terms (even offline or from a hardware signer).
When used for a personal account, a user can keep one high-security account for the majority of their funds, but still grant the ability to spend funds, stake and un-stake, vote, and claim airdrops from a hot wallet, without risking losing more funds than they grant as a regular discretionary fund.
This paves the way for a web3 where every action is readable, and users aren’t forced to choose between the inconvenience and unreadability of hardware wallets and multisigs, or the convenience and usability of pure hot wallets. Through the Gator’s open ended permission system, users will be able to craft highly personalized policies that let them be nimble while staying safe.
Better UX that makes web3 easier to use, infinite connectivity inside crypto and out into the real world, and stronger account types that make wallets much safer and stronger—this is how we will make our vision for a next-generation wallet a reality.
A call to builders
Pectra and programmable accounts represent a huge opportunity to innovate the next wave of web3. What’s possible now? Just a few ideas for the eager developer:
Subscription Payments: set up recurring payments for services, APIs, and digital goods.
Seamless dapp onboarding: let users interact with web3 before owning crypto: Invitations to onboard with just a click. Links can include referral fees, making a web3 referral economy transparent and simple, without the rug-promoting dynamics of bonding curves.
Permission-based interactions: give granular access to assets, contracts, and digital identities.
Revocation services: the most responsive, widely enabled revocations of permissions.
Overlapping permissions: give a number of independent entities access to the same assets inside a smart account. Don’t lock funds: Unlock them.
Delayed transactions: grant a DEX permission to buy a token at a future value (ie creating a limit order off chain) with strong readability and safety guarantees.
Decentralized AI Agents: securely delegate investment and financial decisions without ceding control or locking up funds.
And these are just a few ideas. It’s time to push the boundaries of what’s possible in the decentralized web, together.
In a leaked video, Klaus Schwab promises new WEF recruits that their "avatar" will live on after death, and that their brains "will be replicated through artificial intelligence and algorithms."
The company that owns the world. They are buying up the media, real-estate, everything you can think of and it's leading to dystopian future ahead. Larry Fink's investment management is destroying our lives.
"BlackRock is the 4th branch of government" - Bloomberg
“Whoever controls the money controls the world” - Henry Kissinger
We no longer live under free market capitalism, we live under a system of socialism for the rich.
👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading
Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? 🔜
The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.
👉 Here’s what you need to know:
💠 'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
💠 Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
💠 Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
💠 Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
💠 Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit
👉 What this means for the future of Crypto:
1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto 👉txns done by AI agents by 2025
🚨 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.
👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading
👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading
🚨 Bittensor’s founder: “TAO isn’t a crypto—it’s AI infrastructure” 🚨
A major narrative shift is being pushed by Jacob Steeves—and it directly challenges how most people view tokens like TAO.
🔑 Key points
🔹 Not a token-first system
Steeves argues TAO isn’t meant to be a speculative asset—it’s the incentive layer powering a decentralized AI network.
🔹 Marketplace for intelligence
Bittensor functions as a peer-to-peer market where AI models compete and get paid for useful output, not hype or staking alone.
🔹 Subnets = micro-economies
The network is split into specialized subnets, each acting like its own AI market (text, vision, prediction, etc.), rewarding contributors based on performance.
🔹 Fixing open-source AI incentives
Bittensor aims to solve a core problem:
👉 open AI research isn’t well monetized
👉 centralized labs dominate
So it introduces token rewards to incentivize global contributors.
🔹 “Proof of intelligence” model
Instead of proof-of-work or proof-of-stake, the network rewards useful ...
🚨 $620M floods into Bittensor as Nvidia & Polychain load up 🚨
A massive institutional wave just hit Bittensor (TAO), and it’s not small money—this is serious capital positioning around decentralized AI infrastructure.
🔑 Key points
🔹 $620M institutional injection:
Nvidia ($200M) have deployed over $620M into TAO exposure.
🔹 Heavy staking = supply squeeze:
Around 68% of TAO supply is locked, with much of Nvidia’s allocation staked—reducing circulating liquidity.
🔹 Real revenue, not just hype:
The network generated ~$43M in AI compute revenue in Q1 2026, showing actual usage.
🔹 Emission cut tightening supply:
Daily token emissions were cut in half, lowering sell pressure by ~$500K per day.
🔹 Price supported by fundamentals:
TAO rose ~21% in Q1 2026, holding strength despite volatility.
🔹 ETF narrative building:
Grayscale & Bitwise filings for TAO ETFs could become a major future catalyst.
🔎 Why it matters
🔹 This is AI infrastructure, not just a token
Bittensor is essentially a marketplace for machine...
EU’s proposed Google data access rule could enable large-scale surveillance
The European Commission is facing criticism from security and privacy experts over a proposed Digital Markets Act (DMA) measure that would require Google to share vast amounts of search data with third parties via an automated API.
Critics warn the plan could expose sensitive user queries at scale, creating both privacy and national security risks.
This past week (April 13–19, 2026) wasn’t just another cycle of subnet drama and $TAO price noise.
Three major developments landed almost back-to-back that, when viewed together, paint a far bigger picture than most participants are seeing right now.
Bittensor is steadily transitioning from a speculative incentive network into production-grade decentralized AI infrastructure that enterprises, researchers, and real users are beginning to plug into directly.
Most eyes remain fixed on emissions, governance changes like BIT-0011, or short-term token flows. But the deeper shift happening underneath is structural. These three developments show Bittensor subnets creating tangible value across enterprise physical AI, frontier training scalability, and consumer-facing uncensored models in ways that can compound over years, not hype cycles.
This was one of the clearest institutional validation moments the ecosystem has seen so far.
@manakoai, the commercial product layer built on @webuildscore decentralized computer vision network, took first place at Start in Block, beating more than 1,000 startups at the Louvre during
Around the same time, @PwC_France & Maghreb announced a strategic alliance to integrate Manako’s Business Operations World Model into its AI and digital advisory practice. PwC isn’t some small crypto-friendly firm. They are a $57B revenue global giant serving 82% of the Fortune Global 500. Reports indicate they spent months on technical and legal due diligence before deciding to move forward with deployment opportunities across retail, manufacturing, logistics, energy, and infrastructure.
The key capability is powerful: transforming existing enterprise camera systems into real-time physical AI decision networks without requiring companies to rebuild their entire operational stack.
The Bigger Picture Most Aren’t Seeing: This does not look like a one-off pilot or marketing headline. It could represent one of the first real on-ramps forBig Four consulting firms to distribute decentralized AI infrastructure to enterprise clients at scale. If successful, this creates:
▫️Recurring enterprise demand
▫️Regulatory credibility
▫️Higher-quality commercial usage
▫️Long-term trust in Bittensor infrastructure
That type of adoption cannot be replicated by retail hype alone.
While enterprise headlines captured attention, @MacrocosmosAI quietly released its ResBM (Residual Bottleneck Models) research paper. The breakthrough demonstrated state-of-the-art 128x activation compression in pipeline-parallel training while maintaining near-zero loss in convergence, memory efficiency, or compute overhead. This is highly relevant because it is designed for low-bandwidth, internet-scale distributed training, the exact type of environment decentralized networks must solve for.
Why This Matters Long-Term:
The biggest barrier to truly decentralized frontier model training is not only GPU access. It is bandwidth and communication cost when massive models are split across many machines. Centralized labs solve this using expensive proprietary interconnects inside hyperscale data centers. ResBM attempts to attack that problem directly. What many miss is that this tech moat positions Subnet 9 (@IOTA_SN9), and Bittensor’s pre-training layer more broadly, as a viable alternative for the next wave of open-source models. As training demands continue to rise, the ability to scale efficiently without centralization could become a compounding strategic advantage.
This is not a minor upgrade. It may materially shift the economics of who gets to train competitive models.
3. Venice Uncensored 1.2 Launches, Trained on Targon (Subnet 4)
@ErikVoorhees and the @AskVenice team released Venice Uncensored 1.2, a Mistral 24B variant featuring:
• Vision support
• 4x larger context window
• Stronger tool use
• Minimal refusal behavior after extensive testing
Most importantly, it was explicitly trained using @TargonCompute confidential compute on Subnet 4.
This gained strong attention because it is a live consumer-facing product users can interact with immediately. Privacy-focused, uncensored AI running on decentralized infrastructure resonates in a world increasingly concerned about centralized censorship, data harvesting, and platform control.
The Underappreciated Angle Targon’s confidential compute layer is showing it can support real model training workloads for production applications.
Every Venice-style release creates a direct bridge between:
▫️End-user demand
▫️Subnet emissions
▫️Compute utilization
▫️TAO-linked ecosystem value
As regulation around privacy and AI governance grows stricter, demand for confidential and permissionless training environments may continue rising.
This is the consumer on-ramp that complements the enterprise and research stories above.
Connecting the Dots: The Bigger Picture for Bittensor: Individually, these are impressive wins.
Together, they signal something more profound:
▫️Enterprise bridge (SN44): Real corporate budgets and distribution channels via PwC.
▫️Technical scalability (SN9): Solving the hard physics of decentralized training.
▫️Product-market pull (SN4): Shipping usable AI to everyday users who value freedom and privacy.
Bittensor is no longer just incentivizing miners. It is evolving into a neutral, permissionless layer where multiple AI value chains can operate together, from world models and large-scale training to inference, compute, and consumer applications.
While many still focus on short-term moves such as subnet rotations, governance votes, or
$TAO price action amid post-Covenant recovery, the bigger shift is ecosystem maturity.
These developments help attract:
▫️ Serious capital
▫️ Strong technical talent
▫️ Real enterprise demand
▫️ Growing consumer usage
This week showed resilience and forward momentum.
Big Four validation, meaningful research breakthroughs, and live products all point to one thing: The vision is becoming real.
Final Thoughts: If you are only watching the chart, you may be missing the real shift. Bittensor is laying the groundwork to become the decentralized backbone for the next era of AI, not by competing head-on with closed labs on every metric, but by becoming the open, scalable, incentive-aligned alternative no single company can fully control or censor.
The pieces are moving.
The bigger picture is beginning to come into focus for those paying attention beyond the noise.
🙏 Donations Accepted, Thank You For Your Support 🙏
If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:
In the Bittensor (TAO) ecosystem, there are two main ways people can stake their tokens: Root staking and Alpha staking. These represent two different strategies, with different levels of risk and reward.
Root staking was the first method introduced when Bittensor launched. It allows users to lock up their TAO tokens in the core part of the network (now called Subnet 0) to earn steady, “predictable” rewards. It's straightforward and carries less risk, making it a good fit for early users or anyone who prefers a more passive, steady approach. In essence, this is the “traditional” form of token staking seen in many crypto projects. Rather than simply holding your tokens, you delegate them to validators who help run and secure the network on your behalf.
Later, on February 13, 2025, Alpha staking was introduced as part of a major network upgrade called Dynamic TAO (dTAO). This upgrade created subnet-specific tokens called Alpha tokens, which users receive when they stake TAO into subnets. If you’re not familiar with the concept of subnets and Bittensor infrastructure, please check out Bittensor project review. Alpha tokens can go up or down in value, but they also offer a chance for much higher rewards, especially in new or fast-growing subnets. It has more complex staking dynamics and comes with more risk, but also more opportunity if you're actively involved.
In both Root and Alpha staking, there’s no fixed lock-up period—you can stake or unstake your TAO tokens at any time. However, while your tokens are staked, they’re temporarily locked, which means you can’t trade or transfer them until you unstake.
In Root staking, staking rewards are simple and “stable”. However, the reward amount (APY) is slowly going down over time. It’s because the network is moving more rewards toward Alpha staking.
In Alpha staking, things work differently. You first change your TAO into special tokens called Alpha tokens, which are connected to subnets. When you hold Alpha tokens, your balance grows as and when the subnet earns daily rewards. The more TAO is staked into a subnet, the more rewards it gets. If you want to exit, you must convert your Alpha tokens back to TAO. This process can be affected by market prices and might give you less TAO back than you put in, depending on the timing. This method can earn you more than Root staking, but it depends on how well your chosen subnet performs and how much activity it gets.
With Root staking, your rewards are based on how well your validator performs in the network. In Alpha staking, you stake your TAO into a subnet, and your rewards depend on the overall performance of that subnet. Subnets that provide more value to the network receive more emissions, which increases your Alpha token balance.
Centralized staking
Centralized TAO staking, offered by platforms like Coinbase, is a simple and beginner-friendly option where the exchange handles the staking process for you. You earn a fixed reward rate of around 17.3% APY. While your tokens are temporarily locked during staking, there are no additional lock-up periods beyond what the network requires. The main trade-off between centralized and decentralized staking is convenience versus control.
Staking is a great way to put your TAO to work while contributing to the network's security. But, it's important to understand the terms before participating, as rewards and conditions may differ depending on the platform you choose.
🙏 Donations Accepted, Thank You For Your Support 🙏
If you find value in my content, consider showing your support via:
🧬VINDICATED! The Epstein Files Connect Gates, Pandemics & Censorship to a Globalist Blueprint for a Biosecurity State🧬
Every warning. Every documentary. Every article. Every post that got us banned. All of it was true. Now what? What can we do? Read on, share this Substack, help us save lives! The Light is shining! ✨
Well, well, well… look what the cat dragged in.
Actually, scratch that. Look what the Department of Justice finallydragged out of Jeffrey Epstein’s email inbox and dumped on the world’s doorstep like a rotting corpse nobody wanted to claim. Yep, that’s right. The Epstein files. It’s hilarious how the “Democratic hoax” and “fantasy” client list we were all told didn’t exist suddenly became a very real, very unsealed document.
For years—years—they called us conspiracy theorists. They slapped “misinformation” labels on our posts faster than Pfizer could print liability waivers. They kicked us off platforms, lied about us in the media, and shadow-banned our reach. Meanwhile, the real conspiracy—the one typed out in black-and-white emails between billionaires, bankers, and a convicted pedophile—was sitting in a government vault, waiting to prove us right.
And now? Now the receipts are public.
The release of Jeffrey Epstein’s files has done far more than expose a network of elite pedophilia and blackmail—it has vindicated truth-tellers like us and countless others who were smeared, censored, de-platformed, and persecuted for warning about the sinister agendas of the globalist elite. The documents reveal shocking connections between Epstein, Bill Gates, pandemic planning, and the systematic suppression of anyone who dared to connect the dots.
We weren’t crazy. We were just early. And they hated us for it.
Epstein, Gates, and the Pandemic “Business Model” They Built Together
One of the most damning revelations from Epstein’s files is his partnership with Bill Gates. Forget the carefully crafted PR spin about “regretting” those meetings. These weren’t casual dinners. These were planning sessions.
Back in 2015, Gates and Epstein exchanged emails about “preparing for pandemics” and strategies to “involve the WHO.” Gates wrote: “I hope we can pull this off.”
How’s that for a chill down your spine?
This eerily foreshadowed the 2019 Event 201 simulation—a pandemic exercise hosted by the Gates Foundation, Johns Hopkins, and the World Economic Forum that just happened to model a global coronavirus outbreak… just months before COVID-19 ”mysteriously” emerged in Wuhan. Funny how that works, isn’t it?
But let’s rewind even further, to the real blueprint—the financial architecture that made the pandemic response not just possible, but profitable.
The story crystallizes in a chilling 2011 email exchange. Juliet Pullis, a JPMorgan executive under then-chairman Jes Staley, emailed Jeffrey Epstein with a list of detailed questions. The source? “The JPM team that is putting together some ideas for Gates.”
The questions were precise: What are the objectives? Is anonymity key? Who directs the investments and grants? This wasn’t JPMorgan consulting an expert; it was a trillion-dollar bank asking a convicted felon to architect a billion-dollar philanthropic fund for Bill Gates.
This wasn’t JPMorgan consulting a philanthropic expert. This was a trillion-dollar bank asking a convicted felon to architect a billion-dollar philanthropic fund for one of the richest men on Earth. Let that marinate for a moment.
Epstein’s reply was fluent and commanding. He described a donor-advised fund with a “stellar board” and ties to the Gates-Buffett “Giving Pledge.” He noted the billions already pledged and identified the gap: “They all have a tax advisor, but have no real clue on how to give it away.” His solution? “JPM would be an integral part. Not advisor… operator, compliance.“ Staley’s response: “We need to talk.”
By July 2011, the plan evolved. In an email to Staley, copying Boris Nikolic (Gates’ chief science advisor), Epstein laid out the core pitch: “A silo based proposal that will get Bill more money for vaccines.”
Not “more research for pandemics.” Not “better public health infrastructure.” “More money for vaccines.” This is the unambiguous language of capital formation, not charity. It reveals the structure’s intended output planning reached the highest levels.
In August 2011, Mary Erdoes, CEO of JPMorgan’s $2+ trillion Asset & Wealth Management division, emailed Epstein (while on vacation) with additional operational questions.
Epstein’s reply was breathtaking in scope:
Scale: “Billions of dollars” in two years, “tens of billions by year 4.”
Structure: Donors choose from “silos” like mutual funds.
The Kicker:“However, we should be ready with an offshore arm — especially for vaccines.”
An offshore arm. For vaccines. For a charitable vehicle. Let that sink in.
So, by the time the world was panicking in March 2020, the financial machinery was already built. The investment vehicles, the donor-advised funds, the reinsurance products at places like Swiss Re, and even the simulation playbooks were dusted off and ready to go.
The pandemic wasn’t an interruption to their business—it was the Grand Opening.
Epstein’s role extended far beyond trafficking; he was a facilitator and blackmail operative for the global elite. The same forces that orchestrated the COVID-19 power grab—the mask mandates, lockdowns, censorship, and coercive mRNA push—are the ones who silenced critics like us.
Gates, despite his documented ties to Epstein (multiple flights on the “Lolita Express” after Epstein’s 2008 conviction), walks freely. He’s on TV. He’s advising governments. He’s still funding “global health initiatives” and pushing digital IDs, vaccine passports, and climate lockdowns.
Meanwhile, people like our friend, Joby Weeks, are under house arrest without charges, and voices like ours were de-platformed, demonetized, and destroyed for saying this very thing.
We told you. You knew it in your gut. Now you have the emails.
Censorship: The Elite’s “Misinformation” Label to Cover Their Crimes
The Epstein files expose not just criminal behavior, but the playbook for the systematic suppression of truth. While Epstein’s powerful friends were being protected by the FBI, the DOJ, and the media, platforms like Facebook (Meta), YouTube (Google), and Twitter went to war against anyone talking about it.
Think about the sheer audacity.
We were banned from social media for calling COVID-19 a “fake pandemic” and exposing the vaccine injury data that’s now undeniable.
Below is a screenshot of the first Facebook post that was taken down and then used as “Exhibit A” in their “reports” about how bad we were, naming us the 3rd most dangerous people on earth after Dr Joseph Mercola and Bobby Kennedy in the digital hit list they called the “Disinformation Dozen.” They attacked us, lied about us, and pressured the media, social media, and population at large to do the same: attack, threaten, and cast us out.
We were labeled “dangerous” for sharing emails, documents, and research that the DOJ and the CDC have now confirmed.
It was never about “safety.” It was about narrative control.
The same institutions that turned a blind eye to Epstein’s crimes for decades—the same ones that let him “commit suicide” in a maximum-security prison with cameras conveniently malfunctioning—suddenly became the ruthless hall monitors of “acceptable discourse,” ensuring only their approved stories could be told.
Big Tech, Big Media, and Big Government are all part of the same protection racket. They shielded Epstein’s client list, and now they shield the architects of the pandemic debacle. Independent journalists, researchers, and health advocates like us,who connected these dots, were systematically de-platformed, demonetized, and destroyed.
Why? Because we were right, and that was the greatest threat of all.
When you’re over the target, that’s when the flak gets heaviest. And brothers and sisters, we were getting shelled.
They Lied About Us While Protecting the Real Criminals
Let’s be crystal clear about what happened here.
We have spent decades exposing the cancer industry, Big Pharma’s corruption, and the suppression of natural health solutions. We produced The Truth About Cancer docu-series, reaching millions worldwide. We warned about vaccine injuries, censorship, and the coming medical tyranny years before COVID-19.
And what did they do? They called us “Conspiracy Theorists,” “Anti-Vaxxers,” and “Killers.” Dangerous.
They said we were killing people with “misinformation.”
Facebook banned us. YouTube deleted our videos. Legacy media ran hit pieces. PayPal froze our accounts.
All while Bill Gates—a man with documented ties to Jeffrey Epstein, who flew on his plane multiple times after Epstein’s conviction, who got STDs from Russian girls Epstein provided for him for which Gates asked Epstein’s help getting him antibiotics to slip secretly to his then wife, Melinda, so that she would not know about his inexcusable and perverted escapades—yes, THAT Bill Gates—was at the same time, being platformed on every major news network as the world’s health oracle.
All while Anthony Fauci—who funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan through Peter Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance, who lied under oath to Congress, who flip-flopped on masks, lockdowns, and vaccines—was treated like a saint. Time Magazine’s “Guardian of the Year.”
All while Pfizer—a company with a $2.3 billion criminal fine for fraudulent marketing, bribery, and kickbacks—was given blanket immunity from liability and billions in taxpayer dollars to produce a vaccine in record time with no long-term safety data.
Were we the dangerous ones?
No.
We were the truthful ones. And that made us the enemy.
The Weaponized Institutions: From Epstein’s Blackmail to Your Digital ID
Epstein’s operation was never just about blackmail for perversion; it was blackmail for control. The files show his cozy ties to intelligence agencies (Mossad, CIA), financial giants like JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank, and political leaders across the globe.
This is the same cabal now pushing:
The Great Reset
Digital IDs
Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs)
15-minute cities
Carbon credit social scoring
Vaccine passports
Let’s connect the dots they desperately don’t want you to see:
Financial Control:
JPMorgan banked Epstein for years despite clear red flags—over $1 billion in suspicious transactions flagged internally and ignored. They knew. They didn’t care. They paid a $290 million fine and moved on.
Now, banks like Bank of America, Chase, and PayPal de-bank conservatives, truckers, health freedom advocates, and anyone who questions the narrative. Canadian truckers. Gun shops. Crypto entrepreneurs. The goal is the same: punish dissent and control economic life.
CBDCs are the endgame—a digital leash on every citizen. Programmable money that can be turned off, restricted, or expired. Social credit by another name.
Medical Tyranny:
The FDA, CDC, and WHO—utterly captured by Big Pharma—lied about:
COVID origins (Wuhan lab leak dismissed as conspiracy theory)
Vaccine efficacy (”95% effective” turned into “you need boosters forever”)
Natural immunity (ignored despite being superior)
Early treatments (ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, vitamin D censored and mocked)
They attacked natural health advocates just as they’ve done for decades with cancer cures, detox protocols, and anything that threatens Big Pharma profits. They are not health agencies; they are profit-enforcement arms dressed in lab coats.
Political Corruption:
Epstein’s blackmail ensured elite immunity. His client list includes presidents, princes, CEOs, scientists, and media moguls.
Meanwhile, true dissidents—Julian Assange (tortured in prison for journalism), Edward Snowden (exiled for exposing mass surveillance), and journalists like us—face persecution, imprisonment, debanking, slanderous hit pieces, and/or constant character assassination.
Two systems of justice: one for them, one for you. One for Epstein’s friends, one for truth-tellers.
The Way Forward: They’re Exposed. Now It’s Time to Build.
The Epstein files are more than proof; they are a declaration that the system is rotten to its core. But here’s the beautiful part: they vindicate us completely.
Every warning. Every documentary. Every article. Every post that got us banned. All of it was true.
The globalists’ grip is weakening. The truth—the real, ugly, documented truth—is erupting from the very files they tried to hide. They labeled us liars, but the emails show they were the architects. They silenced us, they censored us, but that only made our voices more necessary.
Epstein did not kill himself. COVID-19 was not natural. The vaccines were not safe or effective. The censorship was not about protecting you—it was about protecting them.
And now? Now it’s time to use this vindication as fuel. Not for revenge, but for revolution. A revolution of truth, health, freedom, and justice.
They tried to bury us. They didn’t know we were seeds.
The Epstein files are a smoking gun. A paper trail. A confession written in emails, financial structures, and offshore accounts.
Sign Up for free to see more from this community or subscribe to TheDinarian for $5/month to support TheDinarian for more interaction and exclusive content.
Welcome to the Dinarian on Locals, where we discuss everything blockchain and digital asset related. We are here to learn from one another as this is a new and ever evolving space. Please post and share what you like, but be respectful to others as they are here to learn as well.
Knowledge is power, using that knowledge can be extremely powerful,
The Dinarian