TheDinarian
News • Business • Investing & Finance
Is Trump’s Bitcoin Reserve a Global Threat? EU Warns of ‘American Brutality
4 hours ago
post photo preview

The idea of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve under President Donald Trump has sparked intense debate, with European leaders warning that aggressive US crypto policies could lead to financial chaos. While Trump’s executive order on March 6 outlined plans to use seized BTC from criminal and civil cases, the skepticism is strong.

According to Polymarket, there’s only a 29% chance the reserve will be implemented within Trump’s first 100 days. Meanwhile Bitcoin (BTC) price; which had previously hit $100,000; have struggled to sustain momentum and is currently at $82,693.09 as at the time of this publication.

As the US pushes into Bitcoin-backed financial strategies, European regulators are sounding the alarm over economic risks.

With skepticism growing, experts are debating whether the US government’s Bitcoin accumulation will be a financial breakthrough or a new wave of uncertainty in global markets.

European Leaders Warn US Crypto Policies

European Central Bank (ECB) policymaker François Villeroy de Galhau has been vocal about his concerns over Trump’s Bitcoin strategy. Speaking to La Tribune Dimanche, he said:

“We are seeing great brutality on the American side. Donald Trump seems to harbor this false vision that the global economy is a zero-sum game. He sees it like a Monopoly board, with a fixation on trade deficits: what some gain is necessarily what others lose.”

Villeroy added that global trade should be about collaboration, not competition. He told European nations to strengthen their economic policies in response:

“No! Trade is about exchanging ideas, talents and products to create wealth together. We must not respond to this brutality with passivity or inevitability, but with will.”

Despite the concerns, the ECB official said Europe’s financial system is well regulated, so there’s less chance of a banking crisis. He also called for a stronger global role for the euro and better investment frameworks to attract international capital.

US Political Opposition

As European leaders warn, opposition in the US is growing. Based on reports, Representative Gerald Connolly is urging Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to stop Trump’s Bitcoin Reserve plan, citing conflicts of interest tied to Trump’s friends and donors.

This backlash only shows how divisive the Bitcoin reserve issue is in government reserves. Critics say BTC is too volatile for national reserves, others see it as an inflation hedge.

Experts Discuss Bitcoin’s Role in Financial Stability

The Strategic Bitcoin Reserve has sparked debate among financial experts, with different views on its economic impact.

Naysayers Warn of Market Chaos

Critics say Bitcoin’s price swings will destabilize national reserves. The current dip, where BTC has fallen from over $100,000, has only strengthened their case. If Bitcoin were to lose big, the US Treasury would lose.

Economist Paul Krugman said:

“Bitcoin is a speculative asset. While it has gotten institutional interest, it doesn’t have the stability of a national reserve.”

Supporters Point to Liquidity and Resilience

Crypto analyst Christopher Perkins says digital assets can enhance financial stability. He cites Bitcoin’s liquidity and ability to do real-time transactions, reducing settlement risks; something traditional finance has struggled with for ages.

From his experience during the Lehman Brothers collapse, Perkins says liquidity is key to market resilience. He compares Bitcoin to gold in economic downturns, saying it can be a store of value in times of crisis.

“Bitcoin’s decentralized nature makes it an alternative to traditional banking systems, reduces systemic risk.”

Despite regulatory concerns, institutional interest in Bitcoin is growing. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong says governments are getting more involved in blockchain adoption, which means a shift in sentiment.

Even Deutsche Bank has acknowledged Bitcoin’s potential role in setting global financial standards, so the debate over digital assets in national reserves is far from over.

The Future: Will the Bitcoin Reserve Become Reality?

The Bitcoin Reserve is a controversial idea, with no clear path forward.

If it happens; it will be a major shift in how nations incorporate digital assets into their financial systems.

If not, it will show the regulatory and political hurdles Bitcoin faces at the national level.

With domestic and international opposition building, the next few months will be crucial in determining if Trump’s Bitcoin vision becomes reality or just speculation.

Conclusion: An Inflection Point for Bitcoin and Global Finance

As Trump’s Bitcoin Reserve plan is being challenged by both US lawmakers and European officials; the debate over government-held BTC is far from over. While concerns over market manipulation and regulatory risks persist, institutional interest in digital assets is growing.

The next few weeks will decide if the US will move ahead with their Bitcoin plan or face growing opposition from lawmakers and international partners. Either way, the outcome will set a precedent for national crypto reserves and the role of digital assets in global finance.

 
Source

🙏 Support My Work 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support:

💳 PayPal – Just scan the QR code 📲
🔗 Crypto – Send contributions via Coinbase Wallet to: Dinarian.cb.id

Your generosity keeps this mission alive! Namasté 🙏✨ #SupportIndependentMedia #Crypto

 
community logo
Join the TheDinarian Community
To read more articles like this, sign up and join my community today
0
What else you may like…
Videos
Podcasts
Posts
Articles
🚨FBI Director Kash Patel revealed he has read the entire JFK file🚨

FBI Director Kash Patel revealed he has read the entire JFK file, including all classified secrets.

He insists that the answers everyone is looking for are already out there.

"The things we can't release have nothing to do with the questions you're asking."

"The 7 pages of 9-11 report, yes, overnight, that needs to go, and there are going to be some people that are PISSED off!"

00:01:27
5 - False Allegation Regarding Agreements
  • The SEC alleged Reggie was merely negotiating deals with the Jamaican Stock Exchange (Memorandum of Understanding) and Nigerian Stock Exchange (Joint Venture Agreement), when signed agreements were already in place.

The SEC's aggressive and actions caused the cancellations of these agreements.

FOIA request have been submitted seeking communications between the SEC and the JSE

2017 Video: Veritaseum Updates: Rental Facilities, Jamaican Stock Exchange & Top 10 Global Exchange Deals

Got $VERI?

00:00:59
👉The American people will be truly shocked by what they see

The White House Deputy Press Secretary hints at a major revelation with the release of the JFK files today.

He warns that the American people will be truly shocked by what they see.

The documents are set to be released this afternoon.

00:00:10
👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading

Custom AI assistants that print money in your sleep? 🔜

The future of Crypto x AI is about to go crazy.

👉 Here’s what you need to know:

💠 'Based Agent' enables creation of custom AI agents
💠 Users set up personalized agents in < 3 minutes
💠 Equipped w/ crypto wallet and on-chain functions
💠 Capable of completing trades, swaps, and staking
💠 Integrates with Coinbase’s SDK, OpenAI, & Replit

👉 What this means for the future of Crypto:

1. Open Access: Democratized access to advanced trading
2. Automated Txns: Complex trades + streamlined on-chain activity
3. AI Dominance: Est ~80% of crypto 👉txns done by AI agents by 2025

🚨 I personally wouldn't bet against Brian Armstrong and Jesse Pollak.

👉 Coinbase just launched an AI agent for Crypto Trading
The EPA’s Dirty Secret—How It’s Controlling Your Life & Raising Prices!

This ones for "The Truth Shall Set You Free" File ~Crypto Michael/The Dinarian

Did you know that the EPA regulates over half of ALL U.S. government regulations? That’s right—this small but powerful agency has the ability to control what cars you drive, how energy is produced, and even what appliances you use. But is it really protecting the environment, or is it pushing an agenda that’s costing YOU money?

In this episode of The Energy Show with REI Energy, we’re exposing how the EPA has overstepped its original purpose and what’s being done to reform these outdated policies. Our guest, Daren Bakst from the Competitive Enterprise Institute, reveals how these regulations increase energy costs, limit choices, and hurt industries like oil and gas.

Here’s what you’ll learn:

How the EPA became one of the most powerful agencies in government
Why outdated environmental laws are driving up costs for everyone
The real impact of the Green New Deal and EV mandates
How government-funded ...

👀 Ethereum's MVRV (Market Value To Realized Value) 👀

Really interesting to see $ETH's MVRV(Market Value To Realized Value) entering the under 1 range here. Which usually leads for the best accumulation ranges to look for Ethereum entries.

post photo preview
📉Bitcoin's Recent Price Action📉

Bitcoin's recent price action is facing increased selling pressure, particularly from short-term holders who bought above $83K. With 20% of the total supply at a loss, these holders might sell to cut losses, potentially pushing $BTC below $80K.

Glassnode data indicates that around 100,000 BTC have already been offloaded by short-term investors. Combined with weak demand and limited new supply, this has contributed to Bitcoin's 30% pullback from its all-time high of $108K. If BTC$BTC loses $80K as support, a deeper correction could follow.

post photo preview
post photo preview
Motion to Vacate Alleging Fraud Upon the Court in SEC v Reggie Middleton et al

Will the SEC Defend Its Alleged Fraud?

Motion to Vacate Puts Crypto Oversight on Trial

On March 13, 2025, Reginald Middleton, founder of Veritaseum, filed a Motion to Vacate the Consent Order and Judgment in SEC v. Reggie Middleton et al., alleging fraud upon the court by the SEC. A letter from his attorney, Franklin Jason Seibert, requested a delay in the SEC’s briefing schedule—originally set for opposition papers by March 14 and replies by March 21—until after the motion’s ruling, with new deadlines two weeks and one week post-disposition, respectively.
 
The modified schedule order (DOC-106) required filings as follows:
  • March 14, 2025: opposition papers, if any, are served on the SEC
  • March 21, 2025: reply papers, if any, must be served by the SEC
The revised scheduling order, as stipulated, would be as follows:
  • Two weeks after disposition of Defendants’ FRCP 60(d)3 motion to vacate Consent Order and Judgment (DOC-61) for Fraud Upon the Court: opposition papers, if any, are served on the SEC;
  • One week later: reply papers, if any, must be served by the SEC

The question now becomes, will the SEC defend "Fraud Upon the Court?"

Digital Asset Securities

The SEC “regrets any confusion” caused by its characterization of these tokens as “crypto asset securities” and “no longer uses the shorthand term,” according to the Sept. 12 filing. Yet, this term was used to claim jurisdiction over the crypto industry raising questions over past cases, including that of Reggie Middleton.

"...by using imprecise language we've been able to suggest the token itself is a security, apart from that investment contract, which has implications for Secondary Sales, it has implications for who can list it...We've fallen down on our duty as a regulator not to be precise. So, tucking into a footnote that yes we admit that now that the TOKEN ITSELF IS NOT A SECURITY..." ~ SEC Commissioner @HesterPeirce

Tom Emmer @GOPMajorityWhip would later introduce the "Security Clarity Act" further questioning the SEC's jurisdiction over some cases.
 
What's even more suspicious, is the VERI token was mentioned about 150 times in the SEC's original complaint but the VERI Token was not mentioned once in the Final Judgment, which begs the question. Is the SEC deliberately hiding any reference to the VERI Token, just as they hid "The SEC is not referring to the crypto asset itself as a security" in a footnote of the Binance case? This becomes a little more questionable when the SEC refused to issue a written reply to the No Action Letter submitted by Jeremy Hogan and the VeriDAO.
 

The SEC's Smoking Guns: Fraud on the Court Allegations

1 - Falsely Claimed Patents were "not novel", "stalled" and would never be granted, claiming Reggie "misled investors about the status of Veritaseum’s IP". A total of 7 patents have since been granted with 3 in the US (US11196566B2, US11895246B2, US12231579) and 4 in Japan (JP6813477B2, JP7204231B2, JP7533974B2, JP7533983B2). These patents titled "Devices, systems, and methods for facilitating low trust and zero trust value transfers" are foundational to DeFi, Tokenized Assets, NFT's, Stablecoins, Proof of Stake and Proof of Work.

Coinbase filed a IPR2023-00751 in an attempt in invalidate these patents. The USPTO upheld the patents denying the IPR challenge based on "lack of merit" further strengthening the validity of the patents
 
2 -VeADIR Platform Functionality - a live demonstration was performed in front of SEC staff and days later Reggie was told to shut it down, Tenreiro then claimed the platform was not functional. VeTest Channel on YouTube has videos that prove the functionality but as shown in his affidavit, the owner was threatened by Tenreiro "...the line of questioning quickly turned aggressive, abusive and threatening" and told to cease making videos "...through threats of multiple felony charges against me for supporting Mr. Middleton, testing his software and publicizing the results through my YouTube Channel".
 
3 - Misrepresented Ownership of Kraken Corporate Account as Personal - Jorge Tenreiro failed to correct the record after expert witness Patrick Doody corrected his statements "I understand now that the account is titled in the name of Veritaseum LLC", found on the last page of his 2nd declaration. Also detailed on page 20 of the SEC RICO Dossier
 
Reggie Middleton a NY resident points out that Kraken is not licensed to do business in NY making it impossible for him to have a personal Kraken account as found on Krakens Support page under Geographic Restrictions.
 
4 - Misrepresentation of Asset Flow - by falsely alleged vast sums of money were flowing into Middleton’s personal account, misleading the court about asset misappropriation of funds. This point becomes moot as the account is proven to be a Corporate account as evidenced in point #3 and also in a 423 page reply to the TRO.
 
5 - False Allegation Regarding Agreements - alleging the defendants were merely negotiating deals with the Jamaican Stock Exchange (Memorandum of Understanding) and Nigerian Stock Exchange(Joint Venture Agreement), when signed agreements were already in place. The SEC's aggressive and actions caused the cancellations of these agreements. FOIA request have been submitted seeking communications between the SEC and the JSE.
 
6 - Misrepresenting Trading Activity on Etherdelta - as manipulation when it was publicly announced prior as a liquidity test of the new platform also found on page 49 Veritaseum's reply to the TRO Testing EtherDelta as a method of distributing post-Offering Veritas tokens. Anyone interested in buy VERI please visit https://etherdelta.github.io and let me know”
 
7 - Misrepresentation of CEO Payments - falsely misrepresented that $1.7 million in periodic payments to Middleton over 27 months (about 2 and a half years), was dissipation of assets, misleading the court about CEO compensation. this is detailed on page 55 of the SEC RICO Dossier.
 
8 - Nature of International Payments -The SEC's TRO action misrepresented payments to overseas contractors as asset dissipation. Daneillo would later correct her findings to show they were in fact payments to overseas contractors. The SEC continued to imply that the payments were part of an effort to hide assets to thwart judgment relief, which is clearly a disingenuous characterization (SEC Memo of Law in Further Support of TRO).
 
9 - Unethical Conduct in No-Action Letter Request - Involved himself unethically in a No Action Letter (NAL) request meeting, breaching the SEC’s ethical separation as found in the Bar Complaint against Jorge Tenreiro.
 
10 - Harassment of VERI Token Holders - aggressively pursued VERI token holders to coerce them into giving evidence against Middleton, despite them stating they were not victims of Fraud. Victims of harassment have either come forth with notarized affidavits (Lloyd Cupp, John Doe) explicitly and verbosely describing the coercion, or have indicated fear of retaliation due to their treatment after interaction with Mr.Tenreiro.
 
11 - The sanctions against the SEC for lying to the Court to issue a Temporary Restraining Order in the Debtbox case further exemplifies the SEC's tactics in issuing TRO's. Quoted from a letter by Senator at the time JD Vance to Gary Gensler “It is difficult to maintain confidence that other cases are not predicated upon dubious evidence, obfuscations, or outright misrepresentations”. Parallels of the TRO issued in the Debtbox and that of Veritaseum.
 

Timeline of Events

Aug 19, 2019: All allegations against Reggie were addressed and rebutted in a strong
423 page reply to the SEC emergency TRO but days later the SEC would ignore the evidence provided and the TRO was granted regardless forcing a Consent Order and Final Judgment
 
March 10, 2021: Jorge Tenreiro argued the SEC's case against Ripple’s Christian Larsen for aiding and abetting unregistered securities sales was valid, highlighting Tenreiro's aggressive enforcement approach.
 
Oct 13, 2022: SEC v Middleton Case Information claiming he harmed investors yet no token holders came forth as witnesses for the SEC.
 
March 2024: “Gross Abuse of Power” US Court SEC for Misrepresenting Evidence to obtain a TRO against Debtbox. US Court Memorandum Decision and Order. An analysis comparing this to the SEC's TRO against Veritaseum can be found on page 42 of the SEC RICO Dossier.
 
Sept 2024 - SEC v Binance - Footnote states Token itself is not a security.
 
Oct 4, 2024: A Bar Complaint was filed against Jorge Tenreiro by the VERI Community.
 
Oct 31, 2024: A 96 page SEC RICO Dossier supported by over 1800 pages of evidence was also released by the VERI Community.
 
Dec 6, 2024: The Attorney Grievance Committee forwarded the Bar Complaint back to the SEC OGC. The VERI Community issues a letter to the AGC asking it to reconsider investigating the complaint.
 
Jan 2025: SEC admits in a footnote "that a token itself is not a security" revealing that "Digital Asset Securities" is a made up term used to claim jurisdiction over digital assets https://x.com/SovereignRiz/status/1881316167987388904
 
March 9, 2025 - Tom Emmer introduces the "Securities Clarity Act" stating Tokens are separate from an investment contract.
 
Feb 5, 2025: Tenreiro has since been reassigned to the IT Dept. WSJ Article "SEC Ousts Top Litigator Who Battled with Crypto Giants"
 
 
 

Other Articles exploring this topic in more detail

 
 
 

Source links:

Disclaimer: The content provided in this document is intended strictly for informational and educational purposes only. This document constitutes a research opinion and should be regarded as such. All claims, statements, allegations, and opinions contained within are based on publicly available information and are allegations unless and until proven in a court of law. The authors expressly disclaim any representation or warranty regarding the truthfulness, accuracy, completeness, fitness for a particular purpose, or durability of the information contained herein.
 
The authors of these documents are not licensed attorneys or legal professionals and do not claim to provide legal, financial, or professional advisory services. Nothing in this document should be construed as legal advice, legal opinion, or any form of licensed advisory counsel. If you require legal assistance or professional advice, you are strongly encouraged to consult a licensed attorney or qualified expert in the relevant field. The authors are laypersons presenting research-based opinions, and as such, this document should not be relied upon to make any decisions of legal, financial, or professional significance.
 
The authors make no guarantees, express or implied, regarding the completeness or reliability of the information presented. No warranties of any kind are offered regarding the accuracy, validity, timeliness, or completeness of any information within this document. The information may contain errors or inaccuracies, and any use of it is entirely at your own risk.
 
Furthermore, this document may contain statements of belief, criticism, or commentary, and all such statements are offered solely as opinions protected under the principles of free speech. The authors disclaim liability for any interpretation that may be construed as libel, slander, or defamation, as the document aims to present alleged facts and subjective opinions for educational research purposes only. All statements about individuals, organizations, or entities should be understood as unproven allegations, and readers are urged not to interpret them as established facts.
 
The authors will not be liable for any damages, losses, or legal consequences that arise from the use, misuse, or reliance on the information provided herein. No responsibility is assumed for any actions or decisions that any party may make based on this document. The reader assumes full responsibility for any and all consequences that may arise from using the information contained in this document.
 
By accessing and using this document, you agree that neither the authors nor any affiliated parties shall be held liable for any direct, indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or punitive damages resulting from your use of this information. The authors reserve the right to update or revise the information in this document at any time without notice, but they are under no obligation to do so.
 
Finally, any statements regarding individuals, entities, or organizations are not intended to malign, defame, or harm the reputation of those mentioned. Any resemblance to real individuals or incidents is purely coincidental, unless otherwise explicitly stated, and the authors urge readers to exercise caution and discernment when interpreting the information presented.
 
This document is a work-in-progress, part of an ongoing investigative process, and should not be treated as definitive or final. Readers are encouraged to independently verify the information and seek professional advice before acting on any information herein.
 

🙏 Support My Work 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support:

💳 PayPal – Just scan the QR code 📲
🔗 Crypto – Send contributions via Coinbase Wallet to: Dinarian.cb.id

Your generosity keeps this mission alive! Namasté 🙏✨ #SupportIndependentMedia #Crypto

 

 

 

.
.
 
 
Read full Article
post photo preview
Theta EdgeCloud adds Chung-Ang University as 25th customer, now utilized by 4 of Top 5 South Korea universities

Theta is proud to announce a new academic collaboration with Chung-Ang University’s Intelligent Information Processing Lab (IIPL), led by Professor Young Bin Kim. They join as Edgecloud’s 25th customer since platform launch in the summer of 2024, and EdgeCloud is now used by 4 of the Top 5 South Korea universities, top professional sports teams including NHL’s Las Vegas Knights and New Jersey Devils, and global esports teams FlyQuest and Evil Geniuses.

With Chung-Ang University joining the Theta EdgeCloud ecosystem, the platform continues to strengthen its role as a leading enabler of AI research and decentralized computing. IIPL(Intelligent Information Processing Lab) has built a global reputation in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and natural language processing (NLP), consistently contributing to top-tier AI conferences such as NAACL, EMNLP, ECCV, AAAI, and ICLR. This partnership underscores Theta’s commitment to powering academic institutions globally with scalable, high-performance computing, which includes Seoul National University, KAIST, Korea University, Yonsei University, the University of Oregon, Michigan State University, and Singapore’s NTU.

“We evaluated multiple cloud based services from all the top tier providers and we’re excited to collaborate with Theta Labs to integrate EdgeCloud into our research,” said Professor Young Bin Kim, Associate Professor at Chung-Ang UniversityWe had the easiest access to EdgeCloud’s GPU computing infrastructure and received the most responsive customer service compared to all other providers. Looking forward to accelerating our AI model training and pushing the boundaries of NLP and multimodal AI in low-resource environments.”

Empowering AI Research with Theta EdgeCloud

Chung-Ang University’s Intelligent Information Processing Lab (IIPL) specializes in low-resource AI, natural language processing (NLP), multimodal AI, and data-efficient machine learning. Through this collaboration, Theta EdgeCloud will provide scalable and cost-effective GPU compute power to support various AI researches in:

  • LLM-driven Data Generation and Augmentation: Enhancing the efficiency and scalability of dataset generation and augmentation by leveraging large language models and the high-performance computational resources of Theta EdgeCloud.
  • Domain Generalization for Low-resource and Multimodal Tasks: Strengthening AI resilience in diverse, resource-constrained environments while ensuring consistent and robust performance through Theta EdgeCloud’s optimized edge computing capabilities and infrastructure.
  • Bias Mitigation and Enhanced Model Robustness: Ensuring fairness and reliability in AI systems by employing advanced bias mitigation techniques and robust model training methods, powered by Theta EdgeCloud’s computational resources.

Theta EdgeCloud’s hybrid cloud-edge GPU computing platform enables Chung-Ang University’s researchers to scale deep learning models efficiently, overcoming the high costs and computational bottlenecks of traditional centralized cloud providers.

Source

🙏 Support My Work 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support:

💳 PayPal – Just scan the QR code 📲
🔗 Crypto – Send contributions via Coinbase Wallet to: Dinarian.cb.id

Your generosity keeps this mission alive! Namasté 🙏✨ #SupportIndependentMedia #Crypto

Read full Article
post photo preview
50 Million XRP Moves Between Unknown Wallets. What’s Happening Behind The Scene?
In a recent development, a significant transaction involving 50 million XRP, valued at approximately $117,576,852, was executed between two unknown wallets. This substantial movement has ignited discussions within the cryptocurrency community, with many pondering the motives behind such a large, discreet transfer.

This event is part of a series of notable XRP transactions observed recently. Five days prior, Ripple facilitated a transfer of 200 million XRP, equivalent to about $457.39 million, to an unidentified wallet.

in addition, two weeks earlier, a transfer of 50 million XRP, valued at approximately $147.49 million, was directed to the Bithumb exchange from an unknown wallet. These transactions, occurring within a short timeframe, indicate heightened activity within the XRP network, raising questions about their purpose and potential impact.

Potential Implications

Large-scale movements of XRP can have various implications. One possible explanation is liquidity management, as Ripple and other major holders might be redistributing assets to facilitate institutional transactions. 

The impact on the market is another critical consideration, as transfers to exchanges like Bithumb could signal potential sell-offs, which may influence XRP’s price action. Additionally, security measures could be a factor, with substantial wallet movements serving as a strategy to enhance security or reorganize holdings.

Community Speculations

The anonymity of the wallets involved has fueled widespread speculation among market participants. Some believe these transactions may indicate institutional involvement, suggesting that major financial entities or partners could be positioning themselves ahead of a significant announcement. Others suspect that Ripple is undergoing internal restructuring, potentially reallocating assets for upcoming projects or strategic business moves.

While the exact motives behind these substantial XRP transfers remain undisclosed, they highlight the dynamic nature of cryptocurrency markets and the importance of monitoring on-chain activities.

The sudden and frequent movement of large XRP holdings could signal preparation for significant developments within the ecosystem. Investors and enthusiasts are advised to stay informed and exercise caution, considering both the potential opportunities and risks associated with these transactions.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
 

🙏 Support My Work 🙏

If you find value in my content, consider showing your support:

💳 PayPal – Just scan the QR code 📲
🔗 Crypto – Send contributions via Coinbase Wallet to: Dinarian.cb.id

Your generosity keeps this mission alive! Namasté 🙏✨ #SupportIndependentMedia #Crypto

Read full Article
See More
Available on mobile and TV devices
google store google store app store app store
google store google store app tv store app tv store amazon store amazon store roku store roku store
Powered by Locals